Anthropocentrism, egocentrism and the notion of Animacy Hierarchy

References (72)

1. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2003). Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford UP.
2. Audring, J. (2009). Reinventing pronoun gender. Dissertation. Utrecht: LOT.
3. Auerbach, J. S., Levy, K. N. , & Schaffer, C. E. S. (2005). Relatedness, self-definition and mental representation. Essays in honor of Sidney J. Blatt. London: Routledge.
4. Auster, P. (2012). Winter's journal. London: Faber & Faber.
5. Auster, P. (2013). Report from the interior. London: Faber & Faber.
6. Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G. (2005). The syntax-morphology interface: A study of syncretism. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 109. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
7. Barnes, W. (1863). A grammar and glossary of the Dorset dialect, with the history, outspreading, and bearings of south-western English. Berlin: Asher & Co.
8. Becker, M. (2014). The acquisition of syntactic structure: Animacy and thematic alignment. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 141. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
9. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987) Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Chevalier, Y., de Chanay, H. C., & Gardelle, L. (2017). Bases linguistiques de l'émancipation : système anglais, système français. Mots, les langages du politique, 113, Ecrire le genre, 9-36.
11. Cockburn, P., & Cockburn, H. (2011). Living with schizophrenia: a father's and son's story. New York City: Simon & Schuster.
12. Comrie, B. (1989). Language nniversals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology. 2 nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Corbett, G. G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
14. Corbett, G. G. (2000). Number. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
15. Corbett, G. G. (2001). Number. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher & W. Raible (Eds.), Language typology and language universals / Sprachtypologie und sprachliche Universalien / La typologie des langues et les universaux linguistiques: An international handbook / Ein internationales Handbuch / Manuel international, Vol.1 (pp. 816-831). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
16. Corbett, G. G. (2012). Features. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
17. Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
18. Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals. 2 nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
19. Dahl, O., & Fraurud, K. (1996). Animacy in grammar and discourse. In T. Fretheim & J. K. Gundel (Eds.), Reference and referent accessibility (pp. 47-64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Davidson, D. (1971). Agency. In R. Binkley et al. (Eds.), Agent, action, and reason (pp. 3- 25). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
21. De Cock, B. (2016). Register, genre and referential ambiguity of personal pronouns: a cross-linguistic analysis. Pragmatics, 26(3), 361-378.
22. DeLancey, S. (1981). An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language, 57, 626-657.
23. Delconte, M. (2003). Why You can't speak: Second-person narration, voice, and a new model for understanding narrative. Style, 37(2), 204-219.
24. Demjén, Z., & Semino, E. (2015). Henry's voices: the representation of auditory verbal hallucinations in an autobiographical narrative. Medical Humanities, 41, 57-62.
25. Dixon, R.M.W. (1979). Ergativity. Language, 55, 59-138.
26. Dixon, R.M.W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 69. Cambridge: CUP.
27. Elworthy, F. T. (1877). An outline of the grammar of the dialect of West Somerset, illustrated by examples of the common phrases and modes of speech now in use among the people. London: Trübner & Co.
28. England, N. (1991). Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 57, 446-486.
29. Fowler, R. (1977). Linguistics and the novel. London: Arrowsmith.
30. Gardelle, L. (2013). Gender/sex discrepancies in pronominal references to animals: a statistical analysis. English Language and Linguistics, 17(1), 181-194.
31. Gardelle, L. (2015). Sex-indefinite references to human beings in American English: effective uses and pragmatic interferences. A case study of your child. In L. Gardelle & S. Sorlin (Eds.), The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns (pp. 69-92). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
32. Golding, W. (1961 [1955]). The inheritors. London: Faber and Faber.
33. Guéguen, N. (2014). Psychologie de la manipulation et de la soumission. Paris : Dunod.
34. Guéguen, N. (2016) Psychologie du consommateur. Third edition. Paris: Dunod.
35. Haddon, M. (2003). The curious incident of the dog in the night-time. London: Vintage.
36. Haspelmath, M. (2013). Occurrence of nominal plurality. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <http://wals.info/chapter/34>, accessed on 22/08/2017.
37. Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
38. James, T. (2015). The tusk that did the damage. London: Harvill Secker.
39. Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical stylistics. The power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Mamillan.
40. Johnson, B. (2010 [2008]). Persons and things. Cambridge, Mass and London: Harvard UP. Kuno, S. (1976). Subject, theme, and the speaker's empathy -a re-examination of relativization phenomena. In C. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 417-444). New York: Academic Press.
41. Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.
42. Matthews, P. H. (2007). The concise Oxford dictionary of linguistics. 2 nd edition. Oxford: OUP. McInerney, J. (1984). Bright lights, Big city. London, Berlin, New York, Sydney: Bloomsbury.
43. Ortmann, A. (2002). Economy-based splits, constraints and lexical representations. In I. Kaufmann & B. Stiebels (Eds.), More than Words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich. Studia Grammatica 53 (pp. 147-178). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
44. Oxford English Dictionary online. Oxford University Press, 2017.
45. Romaine, S. (2000). Language in society: An introduction to sociolinguistics. 2 nd edition. Oxford: Oxford UP.
46. Rospide, M., & Sandrine S. (Eds). (2015). The ethics and poetics of alterity. New perspectives on genre literature. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
47. Ryder, R. D. (2000 [1989]). Animal revolution. Oxford: Berg.
48. Ryder, R. D. (2009 [1998]). Speciesism. In M. Bekoff (Ed.), Encyclopedia of animal rights and animal welfare. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood.
49. Sasse, H-J. (1993). Syntactic categories and subcategories. In J. Jacobs et al. (Eds.), Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung (pp. 646-686). Berlin: de Gruyter.
50. Sealey, A., & Oakley, L. (2013). Anthropomorphic grammar? Some linguistic patterns in the wildlife documentary series Life. Text & Talk, 33(3), 399-420.
51. Sealey, A., & Oakley, L. (2014). Why did the Canada goose cross the sea? Accounting for the behaviour of wildlife in the documentary series Life. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 19-37.
52. Semino, E. (2014). Language and autism in Mark Haddon's The curious incident of the dog in the night-time. In M. Fludernik & D. Jacob (Eds), Linguistics and Literary Studies (pp. 279-303). Berlin: de Gruyter.
53. Sewell, A. (2011 [1877]. Black beauty. New York: Grosset & Dunlap.
54. Siemund, P. (2008). Pronominal gender in English. A study of English varieties from a cross-linguistic perspective. London: Routledge.
55. Siewierska, A. (2004). Person. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
56. Silverstein, M. (1976). Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In R.M.W. Dixon (Ed.), Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Linguistic Series 22 (pp. 112-171). Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
57. Smith, S. (2010). How to do everything, from the man who should know: Red green. Toronto: Doubleday Canada (Random House).
58. Smith-Stark, T. C. (1974). The plurality split. Chicago Linguistic Society, 10, 657-661.
59. Sorlin, S. (2010). La défamiliarisation linguistique dans le roman anglais contemporain. Montpellier: PULM.
60. Sorlin, S. (2014). La stylistique anglaise. Théorie et pratique. Rennes: PUR.
61. Sorlin, S. (2017). The second-person pronoun across genres. RANAM, 50, 135-148.
62. Sridhar, S.N. (1990). Kannada. Descriptive grammars series. London: Routledge.
63. Stockwell, P. (2009). Texture. A cognitive aesthetics of reading. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP.
64. Tillyard, E. M. W. (1959). The Elizabethan world picture: A study of the idea of order in the age of Shakespeare, Donne, Milton. New York: Vintage Books.
65. Trush, T. (2012). The 'You' effect. How to transform ego-based marketing into captivating messages that creates customers. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Van den Berg, R. (1989). A grammar of the Muna language. Ph. D. dissertation. Leiden.
66. Virtanen, T. (2015). Referring to oneself in the third person: A novel construction in text-based computer-mediated communication. In L. Gardelle & S. Sorlin (Eds), The pragmatics of personal pronouns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
67. Wagner, S. (2003). Gender in English pronouns -myth and reality. PhD dissertation, Freiburg University. 2003. <http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/1412>, accessed August 2017.
68. Wales, K. (2013). Alice in Ego-Land. Babel, 4, 35-37.
69. Wales, K. (2015). 'Loquor, ergo sum'; 'I' and animateness ee-considered. In L. Gardelle & S. Sorlin (Eds), The pragmatics of personal pronouns (pp. 95-104). Amsterdam, John Benjamins Publishing.
70. Woolf, V. (2009 [1933]). Flush: A Biography. Oxford: Oxford UP.
71. Yamamoto, M. (1999). Animacy and reference: A cognitive approach to corpus linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
72. Yamamoto, M. (2006). Agency and impersonality: Their linguistic and cultural manifestations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.