Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Numerical radius inequalities for 2×2 operator matrices

2012, Studia Mathematica

https://doi.org/10.4064/SM210-2-1

Abstract

We derive several numerical radius inequalities for 2×2 operator matrices. Numerical radius inequalities for sums and products of operators are given. Applications of our inequalities are also provided.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What new inequalities are presented for 2×2 operator matrices?add

The paper introduces sharper numerical radius inequalities than previously established, particularly for 2×2 operator matrices, demonstrating significant advancements in theoretical operator analysis.

How does the numerical radius for operator products compare?add

The findings indicate that the numerical radius inequalities for operator products are context-dependent, with none showing consistent supremacy across different matrix configurations.

What implications do these results have for numerical radius applications?add

The results provide foundational tools for enhancing various numerical range applications, particularly in quantum mechanics and signal processing, where operator matrices frequently arise.

When did newer numerical radius inequalities emerge in research?add

Recent literature, particularly since 2022, has highlighted advancements in numerical radius inequalities for commutators and operator matrices, informing the methodologies discussed in this paper.

What defines the equivalence of the numerical radius and the operator norm?add

The numerical radius, w(A), is shown to be equivalent to the operator norm, with established constants that confirm this relationship across bounded linear operators.

References (14)

  1. W. Bani-Domi and F. Kittaneh, Norm equalities and inequalities for operator ma- trices, Linear Algebra Appl. 429 (2008), 57-67.
  2. M. Barraa and M. Boumazgour, Inner derivations and norm equality, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130 (2001), 471-467.
  3. R. Bhatia, Matrix Analysis, Springer, New York, 1997.
  4. R. Bhatia, Positive Definite Matrices, Princeton Univ. Press, 2007.
  5. R. Bhatia and F. Kittaneh, On the singular values of a product of operators, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 11 (1990), 272-277.
  6. S. S. Dragomir, Inequalities for the norm and numerical radius of composite opera- tors in Hilbert spaces, RGMIA Res. Rep. Coll. 8 (suppl.) (2005), art. 11.
  7. K. E. Gustafson and D. K. M. Rao, Numerical Range, Springer, New York, 1997.
  8. P. R. Halmos, A Hilbert Space Problem Book, 2nd ed., Springer, New York, 1982.
  9. O. Hirzallah, F. Kittaneh, and K. Shebrawi, Numerical radius inequalities for com- mutators of Hilbert space operators, Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 32 (2011), 739-749.
  10. O. Hirzallah, F. Kittaneh, and K. Shebrawi, Numerical radius inequalities for certain 2 × 2 operator matrices, Integral Equations Operator Theory 71 (2011), 129-147.
  11. J. C. Hou and H. K. Du, Norm inequalities of positive operator matrices, Integral Equations Operator Theory 22 (1995), 281-294.
  12. F. Kittaneh, A numerical radius inequality and an estimate for the numerical radius of the Frobenius companion matrix, Studia Math. 158 (2003), 11-17.
  13. F. Kittaneh, Numerical radius inequalities for Hilbert space operators, Studia Math. 168 (2005), 73-80.
  14. Omar Hirzallah Department of Mathematics Hashemite University Zarqa, Jordan E-mail: o.hirzal@hu.edu.jo Khalid Shebrawi Department of Applied Sciences Al-Balqa' Applied University Salt, Jordan E-mail: khalid@bau.edu.jo