Hermeneutics and the 'classic' problem in the human sciences
2011, History of the Human Sciences
https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111405277Abstract
There has been a longstanding and acrimonious debate in the human sciences over the role played by classic texts. Advocates of the classic insist its value is timeless and rests on the intrinsic superiority of its cognitive insights and aesthetic virtues. Critics, by contrast, argue that the respect accorded the classic is spurious because it conceals the ideological assumptions, tensions and discontinuities of tradition. This paper seeks a solution through the account of "the classical" brought by Hans-Georg Gadamer in Truth and Method, which acknowledges a text"s "eminence" as well as its "historicity". Following the introduction, the paper divides into four sections. Section one, notes that the hermeneutic account of tradition describes it as being open to challenge rather than closed and unchangeable, and that the classic, as grounded in tradition, will conserve difficulty as readily as comfortable certainty. Section two focuses on the idea that in the classic we find matter "properly portrayed", while section three notes the importance of "application" for an understanding of classic texts. It is noted that both "proper portrayal" and "application" depend on recognising the role of the fusion of historical horizons in generating classic texts. The final section challenges the criticism that the classic is no more than a reflection of the institutional power wielded by the canon, arguing instead that the classic and the canon are different entities, and conflating them in favour of the latter, misleadingly reduces classic-ness to being no more than an effect of canonicity. Influential as they are, deconstruction and postmodernism are only symptoms, bright bubbles at the surface of a mutation. It is, as I have suggested, our elemental perceptions of death, our time-sense, of the related classical impulse in art and poetry to endure, to achieve timelessness, which are today in radical question.
References (40)
- Amann P (Ed.) (1963) The Eighteenth Century Revolution: French or Western? Lexington Massachusetts: D. C. Heath and Company
- Alexander, J. (1987) "The Centrality of the Classics", in Social Theory Today edited by Anthony Giddens, Cambridge: Polity Press
- Alexander, J. C. and Smith P. eds. (2005) The Cambridge Companion to Durkheim, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Archer, M. (1989) Culture and agency: The Place of Culture in Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Archer, M. (1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Archer, M (2000) Being Human: The Problem of Agency, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Baehr, P. (2002) Founders, Classics, Canons: Modern Disputes over the Origins and Appraisal of Sociology's Heritage, London: Transaction Publishers
- Bloom, H. (1994) The Western Canon: The Book and School of the Ages, New York: Riverhead Books
- Bourdieu, P. (1988) Homo Academicus, translated by Peter Collins, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Caputo, J. (1987) "Gadamer"s Closet Essentialism: a Derridean Critique", in Dialogue and Deconstruction: The Gadamer -Derrida Encounter edited by Diane P. Michelfelder and Richard E. Palmer, New York: State University of New York
- Collins, R. (1997) "A Sociological Guilt Trip: a reply to Connell", American Journal of Sociology, 102(6): 1558-64
- Connell, R. W. (1997) "Why is Classical Theory Classical", American Journal of Sociology, 102(6): 1151-57
- Davey, N. (2006) Unquiet Understanding: Gadamer's Philosophical Hermeneutics, Albany: State University of New York Press
- Deflem, M (2003) "The Sociology of the Sociology of Money: Simmel and the Contemporary battle of the Classics", Journal of Classical Sociology, 3(1): 67-96
- Douglas, J. Ed. (1971) Understanding Everyday Life: Toward the Reconstruction of Sociological Knowledge, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul
- Eagleton, T. (1983) Literary Theory: An Introduction, Oxford: Basil Blackwell Frisby, D. (1992) Simmel and Since: Essays on Georg Simmel's Social Theory, London Routledge
- Gadamer, H-G. (1976) Philosophical Hermeneutics, translated and edited by David E. Linge, Berkeley: University of California Press
- Gadamer, H-G (1989) Truth and Method, second revised edition translated by J Weinsheimer and D. G. Marshall, London: Sheed and Ward
- Gadamer, H-G (1990) "Reply to my critics" in The Hermeneutic Tradition: from Ast to Ricoeur, edited by Gayle L. Ormiston and Alan D. Schrift, New York: State University of New York Press
- Gadamer, H-G. (2001) "Aesthetics", in Gadamer in Conversation: Reflections and Commentary, edited and translated by Richard E. Palmer, interview with Carsten Dutt, New Haven: Yale University Press
- George, T. (2009) What is the Future of the Past? Gadamer and Hegel on Truth, Art and the Ruptures of Tradition", Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 40(1): 4-20
- Gorak, J (1991), The Making of the Modern Canon: Genesis and Crisis of a Literary Idea, London: Athlone Press, 1991.
- Guillory, J. (1993) Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation, London: University of Chicago Press
- Grondin, J. (2003) The Philosophy of Gadamer, translated by Kathryn Plant, Chesham Bucks Acuman Publishing Limited
- Habermas, J. (1988) On the Logic of the Social Sciences, translated by Shierry Weber Nicholson and Jerry A. Stark, Cambridge: Polity Press with Basil Blackwell Habermas, J. (2004) "Public Space and Political Public Sphere -the biographical of two motifs in my thought", commemorative lecture, Kyoto, 11 th November 2004, see Habermas Forum online
- Hallberg, Von, R. (1984) Canons, Chicago: University of Chicago Press How, Alan R. (1995) The Habermas-Gadamer Debate and the Nature of the Social, Aldershot: Avebury Ashgate
- Jauss, H. R. (1982) Towards and Aesthetic of Reception, translated by Timothy Bahti, Minneapolis: University of Minnnesota Press
- Kermode, F. (1967) The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction, Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Lovejoy, A. O. (1960) The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea, New York: Harper Torchbooks
- Lyotard, J-F, (1984) The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge, translated by G. Bennington, Manchester: Manchester University Press
- Marshall, B. and Witz, A. (Eds). (2004) Engendering the Social: Feminist Encounters with Sociological Theory, Maidenhead UK: Open University Press
- Mouzelis, N (1997) "In defence of the sociological canon: a reply to David Parker, The Sociological Review, 45(2): 244-53
- Outhwaite, W. (2009) "Canon Formation in late 20 th Century British Sociology, Sociology, 43(6): 1029-1045
- Parker, D. (1997) ""Viewpoint: Why Bother with Durkheim: teaching sociology in the 1990s", The Sociological Review, 45(1): 122-46
- Poggi, G. (1996) "Lego Quia Inutile: An Alternative Justification for the Classics", in Social Theory and Sociology, edited by Stephen P. Turner, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd
- Ricks, C. (1989) "What is at Stake in the "Battle of the Books"", New Criterion Schleiermacher, F. (1998) Hermeneutics and Criticism and Other Writings, edited by Andrew Bowie, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Scheibler, I. (2000) Gadamer: Between Heidegger and Habermas, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers
- Skinner, Q. (1969) "Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas", History and Theory, 8(1): 3-53
- Smith, Barbara H. (1988) Contingencies of Value: Alternative Perspectives for Critical Theory, Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press
- Steiner, G. (1997) Errata: An Examined Life, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson