Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Supporting Complex Robot Behaviors with Simple Interaction Tools

2007, Human Robot Interaction

https://doi.org/10.5772/5186

Abstract

Human-Robot Interaction 40 behavior, there is very little confusion. In actuality, the joystick has proved for many applications to be a valuable and effective interaction metaphor. The problem is that it is only appropriate for more direct levels of human-robot interaction. As the level of robot initiative and autonomy increases, the underlying metaphor for interaction must also change, resulting in a need for new and, at times, more sophisticated theories of robot behavior. The goal should not be to simplify the actual robot behaviors-complex environments and tasks require appropriately complex behaviors. Instead, the goal should be to simplify the user's mental model of robot behavior. This chapter advocates that alongside new autonomous capabilities, the user must also be given interaction tools that communicate a mental model of the robot and the task, enabling the user to predict and understand robot behavior and initiative. The necessary "theory of robot behavior" should not be communicated by providing users with a developer's perspective of the system. Behavioral sciences research indicates that passing on system complexity to the user will increase stress and failure rates while decreasing task efficiency (Gertman et al., 2005). Quite to the contrary, a great deal of craft may be required to filter and fuse the system data, abstracting away from the complexity to support a higher-level, functional understanding. The hard question is how exactly to accomplish this in a principled fashion. This chapter considers various components of interaction complexity common in humanrobot interfaces. With results from several previous HRI experiments, the paper examines means employed to reduce this complexity. These include a) perceptual abstraction and data fusion, b) the development of a common visualization and tasking substrate, and c) the introduction of interaction tools that simplify the theory of robot behavior necessary for the operator to understand, trust and exploit robot behavior. The elements of operator trust are considered in detail with emphasis on how intelligently facilitating information exchange and human and robot initiative can build appropriate trust. New approaches to facilitating human-robot initiative are discussed within the context of several real-world task domains including: robotic event photographer, ground-air teaming for mine detection, and an indoor search and detection task. Human-Robot Interaction 42 (short) human. The robot can rotate in place, and can also move forward and backward. The cameras can pan and tilt independently of the body.

References (26)

  1. Antonic, D., Ban, Z. & Zagar, M. (2001) Demining robots -requirements and constraints. Automatika, 42(3-4)
  2. Arkin, R. C. (1997) Behavior-Based Robotics. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA Brooks, R. ; Brazeal, C., Marjanovic, M., Scassellati, B., & Williamson, M. (1998) The Cog Project: Building a Humanoid Robot. In Computation for Metaphors, Analogy, and Agents, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1562, C. Nehaniv, Ed., Springer-Verlag, Berlin
  3. Bruemmer, D. J. ; Few, D. A., Walton, M. C., Boring, R. L., Marble, J. L., Nielsen, C. W., & Garner, J. (2005) . Turn off the television!: Real-world robotic exploration experiments with a virtual 3D display . In Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). Waikoloa Village, Hawaii. January 3-6
  4. Bruemmer, D.J. ; Few, D.A., Boring, R. L., Marble, J. L., Walton, M. C. & Nielsen C. W. (2005) Shared Understanding for Collaborative Control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans. Vol. 35, no.4, pp. 505-512. July
  5. Bruemmer, D J; Boring, R. L,. Few. D.A., & Walton M. C. (2004). I Call Shotgun: An Evaluation of a Mixed-Initiative Control for Novice Users of a Search and Rescue Robot In proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, The Hague, ND October 10-13
  6. Burke, J. L. ; Murphy, R. R., Coovert, M. D. & Riddle D. L. (2004) Moonlight in Miami: A field study of human-robot interaction in the context of an urban search and rescue disaster response training exercise, Human-Computer Interaction, 19:85-116
  7. Byers, Z. ; Dixon, M., Goodier, K., Grimm, C. M., & Smart, W. D. (2003) An Autonomous Robot Photographer, In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Robots and Systems (IROS 2003, Vol 3, pages 2636-2641, Las Vegas, Nevada.
  8. Byers, Z., Dixon, M., Goodier, K., Smart, W. D. & Grimm, C.M. (2003) Say Cheese!: Experiences with a Robot In Proceedings for the Fifteenth Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI 2003), John Riedl and Randy Hill (editors), pages 65-70, Acapulco, Mexico
  9. Conley, D. T., & Goldman, P. (1994) Facilitative Leadership: How Principals Lead Without Dominating. Eugene, Oregon: Oregon School Study Council, August Desai. M. & Yanco H. A. Blending Human and Robot Inputs for Sliding Scale Autonomy.(2005) Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-MAN). Nashville, TN, August
  10. Fischhoff, B. ; Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein S, (1977) Knowing with Certainty: The appropriateness of extreme confidence Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3:552-564
  11. Fong, T. ; Thorpe, C. & Baur, C. (2001 ) Collaboration, dialogue,and human robot interaction. In 10th International Symposium of Robotics Research, Lourne, Victoria, Australia, November
  12. Gertman, D. I., Blackman, H. S., Marble, J. L., Byers, J., & Smith, C. (2005) The SPAR-H Human Reliability Analysis Method, NUREG/CR-6883, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC
  13. Kidd, P.T. (1992) Design of human-centered robotic systems. In Mansour Rahimi and Waldemar Karwowski, editors, Human Robot Interaction, pages 225-241. Taylor and Francis, London, England
  14. Konolige, K. (2004) Large-scale map-making. In Proceedings of the National Conference on AI (AAAI), San Jose, CA
  15. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134
  16. Maxwell B. A. ; Smart W. D., Jacoff A., Casper, J., Weiss, B., Scholtz, J., Yanco, H., Micire, M., Stroupe, A., Stormont, D., Lauwers, T., (2004) The 2003 AAAI Robot Competition and Exhibition. AI Magazine. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 68-80
  17. Marble, J. L. ; Bruemmer, D. J., and Few, D. A. (2003) Lessons Learned from Usability Tests with a Collaborative Cognitive Workspace for Human-Robot Teams. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conférence on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Washington, D.C., October 5-8
  18. Marble, J. L. ; Bruemmer D. J., Few, D. A. and Dudenhoeffer D. D. (2004) Evaluation of supervisory vs. peer-peer interaction for human-robot teams In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Big island, Hawaii, January 4-8
  19. Nicoud, J. D. &. Habib, M. K (1955)The pemex-b autonomous demining robot: perception and navigation strategies. In Proceedings of intelligent robots and systems, pages 419- 424, Pittsburgh, PA
  20. Nielsen Curtis W. and Michael A. Goodrich. Testing the usefulness of a pan-tilt-zoom (PTZ) camera in humanrobot interactions. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 2006.
  21. Pacis, E.B., Everett, H. R., Farrington,N., . Bruemmer D. J, (2004) Enhancing Functionality and Autonomy in Man-Portable Robots, In Proceedings of the SPIE Defense and Security Symposium 2004. 13 -15 April Royal Canadian Mounted Police: Police Dog Services, K-9 Recruit Successfully Completes Training, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.rcmp-grc.gc.ca/html/dogs.htm
  22. Scholtz, J. & Bahrami, S. (2003) Human-robot interaction: development of an evaluation methodology for the bystander role of interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, volume 4, pages 3212-3217
  23. Sellner, B. ; Heger, F. W., Hiatt, L. M, Simmons, R. & Singh, S. (2006) Coordinated multiagent teams and sliding autonomy for large-scale assembly. Proceedings of the IEEE, 94(7):1425-1444
  24. Sheridan,T. B. (1992) Telerobotics, automation, and human supervisory control. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
  25. Smart, W. D. ; Grimm, C. M., Dixon, M. and Byers, Z. (2003) (Not) Interacting with a Robot Photographer,. In Human Interaction with Autonomous Systems in Complex Environments: Papers from the 2003 AAAI Spring Symposium, Stanford University, March 24-26,David Kortenkamp and Michael Freed (editors), pages 181-186, Stanford California
  26. Woods, D. D., Tittle, J., Feil, M., F.& Roesler, A. (2004) Envisioning human-robot coordination in future operations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C, 34(2):210-218, May.