Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Move to be Moved

2016, Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2856470

Abstract

Movement-based design is reaching critical mass in HCI, and we can start to identify strategies, similarities and differences in how it is approached. Similarities may include, for example, a strong first person perspective on design, emphasising movement, somatics and aesthetic sensibilities of the designer, as well as starting from the premise that our bodily ways of being in the world are shaped by the ecologies of people, cultural practices and the artefacts we create and use. Different classes of systems are starting to emerge, such as spurring somaesthetic appreciation processes using biofeedback loops or carefully nudging us to interact with our own movements; engaging us in affective loops where the technology takes on a stronger agency, attempting to pull participants into particular experiences; extending on our senses and perception-even creating new senses through technology; social interactions, engaging us to jointly explore movement or touch; even endowing machines with their own 'somatics', exploring our relationship to technology; as well as engaging in larger political issues around the body, such as gender perspectives, or challenging the mind-body divide.

References (29)

  1. Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Gabriella Giannachi, Brendan Walker, Joe Marshall, and Tom Rodden. 2012. Uncomfortable interactions. In Proc of the SIGCHI Conf on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). ACM.
  2. Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. The MIT Press.
  3. Frank Feltham, Lian Loke, Elise van den Hoven, Jeffrey Hannam, and Bert Bongers. 2014. The slow floor: increasing creative agency while walking on an interactive surface. In Proc of the 8th Intern. Conf on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI '14).
  4. Jodi Forlizzi and Katja Battarbee. 2004. Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proc of the 5th conf on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '04). ACM.
  5. Marianne Graves Petersen, Ole Sejer Iversen, Peter Gall Krogh, and Martin Ludvigsen. 2004. Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. In Proc of the 5th conf on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS '04). ACM.
  6. Elizabeth Grosz. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism, Indiana University Press.
  7. Mads Hobye and Jonas Löwgren. 2011. Touching a stranger: Designing for engaging experience in embodied interaction. Int. J. Design 5(3):31-48.
  8. Caroline, Hummels, Kees Overbeeke, and Sietske Klooster. 2007. Move to get moved: a search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Pers. and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 677-690. Workshop Summary #chi4good, CHI 2016, San Jose, CA, USA
  9. Caroline Hummels and Jelle van Dijk. 2015. principles to design for embodied TEI Proceedings (pp. 21-28). New York: ACM.
  10. Hoffman, Guy, and Wendy Ju. Designing Robots With Movement in Mind. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3.1 (2014): 89-122.
  11. Kristina Höök. 2008. Affective Loop Experiences - What Are They?. In Proc of the 3rd international conf on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE '08), Oinas-Kukkonen et al. (Eds.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1-12.
  12. Kristina Höök. 2010. Transferring qualities from horseback riding to design. In Proc of the 6th Nordic Conf on HCI (NordiCHI'10). ACM.
  13. Kristina Höök, Anna Ståhl, Martin Jonsson, Johanna Mercurio, Anna Karlsson, and Eva-Carin Banka Johnson. 2015. COVER STORY: Somaesthetic design. interactions 22, 4 (June 2015), 26-33.
  14. Isbister, K. (2011). Emotion and Motion: Games as Inspiration for Shaping the Future of Interface. Interactions, September/October 2011
  15. Khut, G. (2006). Development and Evaluation of Participant-Centred Biofeedback Artworks. Unpublished doctoral exegesis, University of Western Sydney.
  16. Lee, W., Lim, Y. K., & Shusterman, R. (2014, June). Practicing somaesthetics: exploring its impact on interactive product design ideation. In Proc of the 2014 conf DIS. ACM.
  17. Loke, L., Khut, G., Muller, L., Slattery, M., Truman, C. and Duckworth, J. (2013) Re-sensitising the body: Interactive art and the Feldenkrais Method. International Journal of Arts and Technology.
  18. Loke, L. and Robertson, T. (2013) Moving and Making Strange: An Embodied Approach to Movement-based Interaction Design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 1, Article 7 (March 2013).
  19. Patrizia Marti. 2014. The Subtle Body. Eindhoven Technical University Library, ISBN: 978-90-386- 3714-3.
  20. Helena M. Mentis, Jarmo Laaksolahti, and Kristina Höök. 2014. My Self and You: Tension in Bodily Sharing of Experience. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 21, 4, Article 20.
  21. Maurice Merleau-Ponty. 1962. Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
  22. Thecla Schiphorst. 2009. Soft (n): Toward a somaesthetics of touch. In CHI'09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2427-2438). ACM.
  23. Maxine Sheets-Johnstone. 2011. The primacy of movement (Vol. 82). John Benjamins Publishing.
  24. Richard Shusterman. 2008. Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press.
  25. Richard Shusterman. 2013. Somaesthetics. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd
  26. Ed. Soegaard, Mads, and Rikke Friis Dam.
  27. Vygandas Šimbelis, Anders Lundström, Kristina Höök, Jordi Solsona, & Vincent Lewandowski. 2014. Metaphone: machine aesthetics meets interaction design. In Proc of the SIGCHI Conf on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-10). ACM.
  28. Dag Svanaes, 2013. Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of Merleau- Ponty's phenomenology. ACM Trans. on Computer- Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(1), 8.
  29. Jay Vidyarthi, Bernhard E. Riecke, and Diane Gromala. 2012. Sonic Cradle: designing for an immersive experience of meditation by connecting respiration to music. In Proc of the Designing Interactive Systems Conf (DIS '12). ACM. Workshop Summary #chi4good, CHI 2016, San Jose, CA, USA