Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

An LP-Based Approach for Goal Recognition as Planning

2021

Abstract

Goal recognition is the problem of inferring the correct goal towards which an agent executes a plan, given a set of goal hypotheses, a domain model, and a (possibly noisy) sample of the plan being executed. This is a key problem in both cooperative and competitive agent interactions and recent approaches have produced fast and accurate goal recognition algorithms. In this paper, we leverage advances in operator-counting heuristics computed using linear programs over constraints derived from classical planning problems to solve goal recognition problems. Our approach uses additional operator-counting constraints derived from the observations to efficiently infer the correct goal, and serves as basis for a number of further methods with additional constraints.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The study proposes an LP-based method for efficient goal recognition in planning tasks.
  2. It introduces operator-counting and observation-counting constraints to enhance goal inference accuracy.
  3. The method addresses noisy observations by adapting integer programming techniques.
  4. Empirical results show the proposed approach outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in agreement ratio.
  5. Uncertainty measurement improves decision-making in low observability scenarios, enhancing accuracy.

References (12)

  1. Bonet, B. 2013. An Admissible Heuristic for SAS + Plan- ning Obtained from the State Equation. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2268-2274.
  2. Bonet, B.; and van den Briel, M. 2014. Flow-based heuris- tics for optimal planning: Landmarks and merges. In Inter- national Conference on Automated Planning and Schedul- ing, 47-55.
  3. E-Martín, Y.; R.-Moreno, M. D.; and Smith, D. E. 2015. A Fast Goal Recognition Technique Based on Interaction Esti- mates. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intel- ligence.
  4. Harman, H.; and Simoens, P. 2020. Action Graphs for Goal Recognition Problems with Inaccurate Initial States. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  5. Helmert, M. 2006. The Fast Downward planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 26: 191-246.
  6. Pereira, R. F.; Oren, N.; and Meneguzzi, F. 2017. Landmark- based heuristics for goal recognition. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  7. Pohl, I. 1970. Heuristic search viewed as path finding in a graph. Artificial intelligence 1(3-4): 193-204.
  8. Pommerening, F.; Röger, G.; and Helmert, M. 2013. Get- ting the most out of pattern databases for classical planning. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2357-2364.
  9. Pommerening, F.; Röger, G.; Helmert, M.; and Bonet, B. 2014. LP-based heuristics for cost-optimal planning. In International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 226-234.
  10. Ramírez, M.; and Geffner, H. 2009. Plan recognition as planning. In International Joint Conference on Artifical in- telligence, 1778-1783.
  11. Ramírez, M.; and Geffner, H. 2010. Probabilistic plan recog- nition using off-the-shelf classical planners. In AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence, 1121-1126.
  12. Sohrabi, S.; Riabov, A. V.; and Udrea, O. 2016. Plan Recog- nition as Planning Revisited. In International Joint Confer- ence on Artificial intelligence, 3258-3264.