Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Product Sound Design: Intentional and Consequential Sounds

https://doi.org/10.5772/55274

Abstract

is in fact creating a small musical composition (i.e., musical motives). Therefore, these sounds can also be used to convey brand values of companies.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What role do intentional sounds play in product design?add

Intentional sounds are designed to enhance user interaction, serving functions like feedback or alerts. For example, intentional auditory cues from devices like microwaves confirm user actions, enhancing the overall user experience.

How do consequential sounds influence user perceptions of product quality?add

Consequential sounds, such as rattling from a poorly assembled product, significantly impact user perception of quality. Studies have indicated that such sounds can lead to a negative emotional response, thus altering user satisfaction.

What methods are used to analyze product sounds during the design process?add

Sound analysis incorporates acoustical measurements and psychoacoustic evaluations to pinpoint problematic sound phenomena. This involves disassembling products and conducting high-definition audio-visual recordings to observe sound production during use.

How does sound design impact energy efficiency in domestic appliances?add

The design of sound-producing components influences efficiency; for instance, friction from moving parts can lead to energy losses, as exemplified by the 25.6% efficiency of drives with mechanical transmissions. Efficient direct drives minimize parts, thereby reducing sound sources and energy waste.

What are the main classes of intentional sounds in product design?add

There are four main classes of intentional sounds: earcons, auditory icons, sonification, and continuous sonic interaction. Each class serves distinct purposes, from user feedback to system status monitoring, impacting how users interact with products.

References (30)

  1. Blauert, J, & Jekosch, U. (1997). Sound-quality evaluation-a multi-layered problem, Acus- tica/acta acustica 83 (1997) same issue.
  2. Cook, P. R. (2002). Real sound synthesis for interactive applications. Natick, MA: Peters.
  3. Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (third edi- tion). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  4. Edworthy, J, Hellier, E, & Hards, R. (1995). The semantic associations of acoustic pa- rameters commonly used in the design of auditory information and warning signals. Ergonomics 38(11), , 2341-2361.
  5. Farnell, A. (2010). Designing Sound, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, USA
  6. Freudenthal, A, Melles, M, Pijl, V, Bouwman, A, & Stappers, P. J. (2005). A Contextu- al Vision on Alarms in the Intensive Care Unit. Human Factors in Design Safety, and Management, Maastricht, The Netherlands, Shaker Publishing.
  7. Gaver, W. W. (1993). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to audi- tory source perception. Ecological Psychology, 5(1), , 1-29.
  8. Hearst, M. A, Albers, M. C, Barrass, S, Brewster, S, & Mynatt, E. D. (1997). Disso- nance on audio interfaces." IEEE Expert-Intelligent Systems & Their Applications 12(5), , 10-16.
  9. Hermes, D. J. (1998). Auditory material perception (Annual Progress Report IPO.(33)
  10. Heufler, G. (2004). Design basics, from Ideas to Products,Niggli Verlag AG, Sulgen, Zürich.
  11. Hoggan, E, Raisamo, R, & Brewster, S. A. (2009). Mapping information to audio and tactile icons. Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on Multimodal interfa- ces.
  12. Hubka, V, & Eder, W. E. (1988). Theory of technical systems: A total concept theory for engineering design. Berlin: Springer.
  13. Jansen, R. J, Özcan, E, & Van Egmond, R. (2010). PSST! Product Sound Sketching Tool. AES: Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, 59(6), 396-403. Product Sound Design: Intentional and Consequential Sounds http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55274
  14. Kendall, R. A, & Carterette, E. C. (1993). Verbal attributes of simultaneous wind in- strument timbres: I. von Bismarck's adjectives. Music Perception, 10(4), 445-468.
  15. Kubovy, M, & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80(1-2):97-126.
  16. Marcell, M. E, Borella, D, Greene, M, Kerr, E, & Rogers, S. (2000). Confrontation nam- ing of environmental sounds. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 22(6), 830-864.
  17. Özcan, E, & Van Egmond, R. (2008). Product Sound Design: An Inter-Disciplinary Approach?, Design Research Society Biennial Conference (DRS2008), Sheffield, UK.
  18. Özcan, E, & Van Egmond, R. (2012). Basic semantics of product sounds. The Internation- al Journal of Design, in press for August, 2012.
  19. Özcan, E, & Sonneveld, M. (2009). Embodied explorations of sound and touch in con- ceptual designing. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Design & Se- mantics of Form and Movement: Taiwan: DeSForm.
  20. Pedersini, F, Sarti, A, & Tubara, S. (2000). Object-based sound synthesis for virtual environments-Using musical acoustics. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 17(6), 37-51.
  21. Petrausch, S, Escolano, J, & Rabenstein, R. (2005). A General Approach to Block-based Physical Modelling with Mixed Modelling Strategies for Digital Sound Synthesis. Proceed- ings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Process- ing, Pennsylvania, USA.
  22. Rocchesso, D, Bresin, R, & Fernstrom, M. (2003). Sounding objects. IEEE Multimedia, 10(2), 42-52.
  23. Rocchesso, D, & Polotti, P. Delle Monache, S. ((2009). Designing Continuous Sonic In- teraction." International Journal of Design , 3(3), 13-25.
  24. Roozenburg, N. F. M, & Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design, Fundamentals and Methods, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
  25. Rothbart, H. A. (1964). Mechanical Design and Systems Handbook, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA
  26. Sanderson, P. M, Liu, D, & Jenkins, S. A. (2009). Auditory displays in anesthesiolo- gy." Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology 22(6): , 788-795.
  27. Verheij, J. W. (1992). Basics Soundless Engineering, (Lecture book), Faculty Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Netherlands.
  28. Von Bismarck, G. (1974). Timbre of steady sounds: A factorial investigation of its ver- bal attributes. Acustica, , 30, 146-159.
  29. Yost, W. A. (1991). Auditory Image Perception and Analysis-the Basis for Hearing. Hearing Research, 56(1-2), 8-18.
  30. Zwicker, E, & Fastl, H. (1990). Psychoacoustics: Facts and models. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. Product Sound Design: Intentional and Consequential Sounds http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55274