Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
FAQs
Suggestions for Further Study
References
All Topics
History
Social History

play and games

Profile image of Joshua SchwartzJoshua Schwartz

Abstract
sparkles

AI

The paper explores the significance of play and games within Jewish society, especially during Roman Palestine, emphasizing their cultural importance and sociological implications. It addresses various scholarly perspectives on the role of play, noting that despite its universal presence, rabbinic literature often viewed such pastimes as distractions from religious study. The text provides a comparative analysis with Graeco-Roman leisure activities, highlighting the limited discussion of play in Jewish texts compared to the abundance found in Roman writings.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What cultural roles do games and play serve in Jewish society?add

The study reveals that games in Jewish society function as microcosms of social systems, reflecting relationships within cultural contexts. Furthermore, participation in play is integral in establishing social ties and identity across various age groups and communities.

How do rabbinic views on games differ from those of Graeco-Roman sources?add

Rabbinic literature reflects a limited and often cautious approach to games, prioritizing Torah study over leisure. In contrast, Graeco-Roman sources enthusiastically discuss various games, including gambling, highlighting a stark divergence in cultural perspectives on play.

What are the methodological challenges in studying ancient Jewish games?add

The analysis of rabbinic literature presents difficulties in determining the exact dates and origins of game references, complicating contextual understanding. Additionally, archaeological identification of play objects often leads to ambiguity regarding their use as toys versus functional items.

When did scholarly interest in Jewish games and play begin to develop?add

Early studies on Jewish games emerged in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, mostly within broader examinations of daily life. Subsequent research highlighted significant methodological advancements and a move towards focused investigations of individual games.

How did political messages influence children's games in Jewish society?add

The paper notes that children's play can be sensitive to external political influences, shaping their themes and interactions. This connection informs broader understandings of how societal events manifest in leisure activities and cultural expression.

Related papers

Children’s play, learning and development
Peter Smith

2016

Play in humans, especially in human children, has been written about extensively by psychologists and anthropologists. Play forms are primarily exercise play, rough-and-tumble play, object play, pretend and sociodramatic play. Play behavior can take up an appreciable part of the time budget. There is a spectrum of views on the importance of play in human development, amongst theorists and amongst human societies generally. Different views can be found both historically and cross-culturally, from Spencer’s (1898) description of play as “superfluous and useless exercise”, through to Gaskins, Haight and Lancy (2007), who describe three types of societies with differing prevailing attitudes to play, which they call ‘culturally cultivated play’, ‘culturally accepted play’, and ‘culturally curtailed play’. The ‘play ethos’ (Smith, 1988), or “the realisation that play is essential for normal development has slowly but surely permeated our cultural heritage” (Department of Environment Repor...

View PDFchevron_right
Play & Culture Studies, Vol. 2: Play Contexts Revisited, edited by S. Reifel. Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing, 1999; 288 pp
Doris Bergen

Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 2000

One of the distinctive aspects of the study of play is that its researchers and theorists come from many disciplines and investigate a wide range of activities under the label "play." Moreover, these investigators study not only the play of children, but also that of adult humans and that of many other species of animal. For example, researchers may study what is playful about adult Renaissance tournaments, aggressive play in primates, or qualities of playfulness in young children. Theorists may speculate about the structural properties of play in various cultures or create broader models distinguishing play from other activity. The conferences of The Association for the Study of Play (TASP) always provide examples of this broad perspective, and the Play & Culture Studies series of volumes, edited by Stuart Reifel, generated under the auspices of this organization, reflect this perspective. This second volume continues the series' purpose of providing "a forum for new thinking" about play from a variety of perspectives. The content ranges widely, including articles on adult play, child play, and animal play, written by authors from the disciplines of education, psychology, anthropology, and sociology. The sections are entitled: Stories of Adult Play, Children's Play Contexts and Rules, Play in Other Cultures, Play in Other Species, and Other Conceptions of Play. A diversity of writing styles and perspectives are presented. For example, the first section (Stories) includes both a theoretical discussion comparing Erikson's and Einstein's views of playfulness, a narrative about the formative years of a noted play theorist (Sutton-Smith), and an analysis of the role of play in exotic dancing. The final section provides two discussions of theoretical issues related to play definitions and models. The other sections are more focused on empirical studies of play. Section 2 reports observations of children's play in various contexts (chase games, other types of games, drawing, pretend play at a museum) and interviews with kindergarten and college students about play/work distinctions. Cross-cultural studies (Section 3) focus on differences between playfulness and children's pretend play interactions with adults in Asian and American cultures, as well as an analysis of adult play at carnivals in Germany. Play in Other

View PDFchevron_right
Social and cognitive aspects of children’s play
Andrzej Mirski

EUROPEAN HUMANITIES STUDIES: State and Society, 2015

The article provides an overview and analysis of social and cognitive aspects of children’s games. The nature of the game with the positions of psychology and other social sciences. Predstaveno analysis of classical and modern sources and research on the nature of children’s play. A structural dynamic model of children’s games as part of social behavior, and - as an important tool of cognitive development.

View PDFchevron_right
The “Playing” Field: Attitudes, Activities, and the Conflation of Play and Games
Chad Carlson

Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 2011

View PDFchevron_right
The Cultural Ecology of Play: Methodological Considerations for Studying Play in Its Everyday Contexts
Jill Brown

Oxford Handbooks Online, 2010

The cultural ecology of play: Methodological considerations for studying play in its everyday contexts. In A. D. Pellegrini (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the development of play (pp. 119-137). New York: Oxford University Press.

View PDFchevron_right
Investigating Perspectives on Play
Ben Schouten

Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, 2015

DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

View PDFchevron_right
NonSocial Play as a Risk Factor in Social and Emotional Development
Kenneth H Rubin

2000

View PDFchevron_right
The importance of play
louies Lique

A report on the value of children's play with a series of policy recommendations W r i t t e n f o r T o y I n d u s t r i e s o f E u r o p e (T I E) A p r i l 2 0 1 2

View PDFchevron_right
Play and development : evolutionary, sociocultural, and functional perspectives
Suzanne Gaskins

2006

Contents: Preface. Part I: Introduction. A. Goncu, S. Gaskins, An Integrative Perspective on Play and Development. Part II: Biological/Ethological Perspectives of Play and Development. P.K. Smith, Evolutionary Foundations and Functions of Play: An Overview. R.W. Mitchell, Pretense in Animals: The Continuing Relevance of Children's Pretense. A.D. Pellegrini, The Development and Function of Rough-and-Tumble Play in Childhood and Adolescence: A Sexual Selection Theory Perspective. Part III: Social/Cultural Perspectives of Play and Development. M.H. Bornstein, On the Significance of Social Relationships in the Development of Children's Earliest Symbolic Play: An Ecological Perspective. A. Lillard, Guided Participation: How Mothers Structure and Children Understand Pretend Play. A. Goncu, J. Jain, U. Tuermer, Children's Play as Cultural Interpretation. S. Gaskins, W. Haight, D.F. Lancy, The Cultural Construction of Play. Part IV: Applied Perspectives of Play and Development. ...

View PDFchevron_right
PLAY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF DEVELOPING THE WHOLE CHILD
LIADI ADEBAYO

Introductions Play, as the name indicates is a situation whereby one engages in activities to amuse oneself or others or to recreate. It involves such behaviour as teaching, jesting, joking, walking, running, jumping, catching, etc. it is a direct opposite of work. To children, play is an adventure, free and spontaneous , it make them happy and willing to be in one another’s company. The history of play according to Frost, Wartham & Reifel (2005) dates back to antiquity and there is a rich heritage of children’s play. From ancient time, great education thinkers and philosopher like Plato, Dewey, Piaget, Froebel and a host of others including professional Organization like the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and Association of Child hood Education International (ACEI) have recognize the essential role of play in children lives. They promoted its role in education and the need for children of all ages to play in the course of their development. To them play has always been in the center of children’s live. Children of pre-school age engage in lots of physical activity. This process paves way for good health, understanding of their abilities and capabilities as well as their environment. Unfortunately, some parents do not encourage their children to take part in the play as they do not see children’s play as a sign of normal growth and development. In line with this observation, Ekarem (2013) remarked that in many African homes, children are expected to be quiet, to sit still and not to disturb the arrangement of things in the home. This restriction on children limits their exploration and experiences on their environment and consequently their learning process. Similarly, it can be concluded that where children are not properly a engaged in play activities, they can give way to unwholesome activity, boredom and poor response to class work.

View PDFchevron_right

References (75)

  1. Avedon, E. M./Sutton-Smith, B. (1971). The Study of Games. New York and London: John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Balsdon, J. P. V. D (1969). Life and Leisure in Ancient Rome. London, Sydney, and Toronto: The Bodley Head.
  3. Bamberger, M. L. (1917). 'Spielverbote in talmudischer und nachtalmudischer Zeit' . Jeschurun 4: 516-521.
  4. Bar-Ilan, M. (1994). 'Children's Games in Antiquity' [Hebr.]. Proceedings of the Eleventh World Congress of Jewish Studies (Division B), 1: 23-30.
  5. Baxter, J. E. (2005). The Archaeology of Childhood: Children, Gender, and Material Culture. Walnut Creek: Altmira Press.
  6. Bazak, Y. (1960). 'Dice Games in Jewish and in Local Law' [Hebr.]. Hapraklit 16: 47-60.
  7. --(1961). 'Dice Games as a Problem of Mental Health in Halakhah' [Hebr.]. Sinai 48: 111-122.
  8. Becker, I. (1846). Iulii Pollucis Onomasticon. Berlin: F. Nicolai.
  9. Becq de Fouquieres, L. (1869). Les Jeux des Anciens: leurs descriptions, leur origine, leurs rapports avec la religion, l'histoire, les arts et les moeurs. Paris: C. Reinwald.
  10. Bell, R. C. (1979). Board-Games from Many Civilizations. New York: Dover Publications.
  11. --(2007). 'Notes on Pavement Games of Greece and Rome' , in Ancient Board Games in Perspective, ed. I. L. Finkel. London: British Museum Press, 98-99.
  12. Caillois, R. (1962). Man, Play and Games. London: Thames and Hudson.
  13. Chanan, G./Francis, G. (1984). Toys and Games of Children of the World. Barcelona and Paris: Unesco.
  14. Crabtree, R. D. (1982). 'Leisure in Ancient Israel (before 70 a. d.)'. PhD. Thesis, Texas A&M University.
  15. Dawson, L. (1994). The Complete Hoyle's Games, revised and updated by L. H. Dawson. Ware, Hertfordshire: Wordsworth.
  16. Ellis, M. J. (1973). Why People Play. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  17. Falkener, E. (1892). Games Ancient and Oriental and How to Play Them. London: Long- mans, Green and Co.
  18. Finkel, I. L. (ed.) (2007). Ancient Board Games in Perspective. London: British Museum Press.
  19. Fitta, M (1998). Spiele und Spielzeug der Antike. Stuttgart: Theiss.
  20. Gardiner, E. N. (1930). Athletics of the Ancient World. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  21. Grossman, H. (1994). 'War as Child's Play: Patriotic Games in the British Mandate and Israel'. Israel Studies 9: 1-30.
  22. Habas, L. (2002). 'Games in the Ancient World', in Play: A View from Psychoanalysis and from another Place, ed. E. Perroni. Tel-Aviv: Yediot Ahronot, 23-48.
  23. Herzog, M. (2002). Fussball als Kulturphaenomomen: Kunst-Kult-Kommerz. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.
  24. Hu ¨bner, U. (1992). Spiele und Spielzug im antiken Pala ¨stina. Go ¨ttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.
  25. --(2000). 'Les Jeux d'Enfants et les Jouets dans la Palestine Antique'. Revue Biblique 107: 163-174.
  26. Huizinga, J. (1955). Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element of Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.
  27. Krauss, S. (1912). Talmudische Archa ¨ologie, vol. 3. Leipzig: Fock.
  28. Ku ¨hn, C. G. (ed.) (1821). Galenus, Claudius: De parvae pilae exercitio. Claudii Galeni opera Omnia, vol. 5: Medicorum graecorum opera quae exstant. Leipzig: Knobloch.
  29. Landman, L. (1966-1967; 1967-1968). 'Jewish Attitudes Toward Gambling'. Jewish Quarterly Review 57: 298-319 and 58: 34-62.
  30. Laser, S. (1987). Sport und Spiel. Go ¨ttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
  31. Lillehammer, G. (1989). 'A Child is Born: The Child's World in an Archaeological Perspective'. Norwegian Archaeological Review 22: 89-105.
  32. Lo ¨w, L. (1875). Die Lebensalter in der Ju ¨dischen Literatur. Szegedin: S. Burger.
  33. Marquardt, J./Mommsen, T. (1882). Handbuch der Ro ¨mischen Alterthu ¨mer, vol. 7.2: Das Privatleben der Ro ¨mer. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
  34. Mendner, S. (1956). Das Ballspiel im Leben der Vo ¨lker. Mu ¨nster: Aschendorff.
  35. Murray, H. J. R. (1952). A History of Board Games Other than Chess. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  36. Opie, I./Opie, P. (1969). Children's Games in Street and Playground. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  37. Orme, N. (2002). Medieval Children. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  38. Purcell, N. (1995). 'Literate Games: Roman Urban Society and the Game of Alea'. Past and Present 147: 3-37.
  39. --(2007). 'Inscribed Imperial Roman Gaming-Boards' , in Ancient Board Games in Perspective, ed. I. L. Finkel. London: British Museum Press, 90-97.
  40. Rawson, B. (2003). Children and Childhood in Roman Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  41. Richter, W. (1891). Jeux des Grecs et des Romains. Paris: Le Promeneur.
  42. Rieche, A. (2007). 'Board Games and their Symbols from Roman Times to early Chris- tianity', in Ancient Board Games in Perspective, ed. I. L. Finkel. London: British Museum Press, 87-89.
  43. Rifkind, I. (1926). 'The Reproach of Gaming' [Hebr.] HaDoar 5: 101-102.
  44. --(1934). 'On the History of Gaming in Israel' [Hebr.]. Horev 1: 82-91.
  45. --(1935). 'The Games of Dicers' [Hebr.]. Horev 2: 60-66.
  46. --(1946). The Fight Against Gambling Among Jews: A Study of Five Centuries of Jewish Poetry and Cultural History [Yiddish]. New York: YIVO Institute for Jewish Research.
  47. Robinson, R. S. (1981). Sources for the History of Greek Athletics. Chicago: Ares.
  48. Schmidt, R. (1977). Die Darstellung von Kinderspielzeug und Kinderspiel in der griechischen Kunst. Vienna: Selbstverlag des O ¨sterreichischen Museums fu ¨r Volkskunde.
  49. Schwartz, J. (1993). 'A Child's Wagon' [Hebr.]. Tarbiz 63: 375-392.
  50. --(1994). 'Ball-Playing in Ancient Jewish Society'. Proceedings of the Eleventh World Congress of Jewish Studies (Divison B), 1: 17-24.
  51. --(1995a). 'Ishmael at Play: On Exegesis and Jewish Society'. Hebrew Union College Annual 66: 203-221.
  52. --(1995b). 'Ball Play in Jewish Society in the Second Temple and Mishnah Periods' [Hebr.]. Zion 60: 247-276.
  53. --(1997a). 'Pigeon Flyers in Ancient Jewish Society'. Journal of Jewish Studies 48: 105-119.
  54. --(1997b). 'Ball Playing in Ancient Jewish Society: The Hellenistic, Roman and Byzan- tine Periods'. Ludica, annali di storia e civilta del gioco 3: 139-61.
  55. --(1997c). 'On the Prohibition against Eating Nuts on the Eve of Rosh ha-Shanah' [Hebr]. Talilei Orot 7: 112-115.
  56. --(1998a). 'Gambling in Ancient Jewish Society', in Jews in the Graeco-Roman World, ed. M. Goodman. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 145-165.
  57. --(1998b). 'Aspects of Leisure-Time Activities in Roman Period Palestine' , in The Talmud Yerushalmi in Graeco-Roman Culture, vol. 1, ed. P. Scha ¨fer. Tu ¨bingen: Mohr-Siebeck, 313-325.
  58. --(1998c). 'A Child's Cart' . Ludica, annali di storia e civilta del gioco 4: 7-19.
  59. --(2000). 'Dogs and Cats in Jewish Society in the Second Temple, Mishnah and Talmud Periods'. Proceedings of the Twelfth World Jewish Congress, Division B, History of the Jewish People, 25*-34*.
  60. --(2001). 'Cats in Ancient Jewish Society'. Journal of Jewish Studies 52: 211-234.
  61. --(2003). 'The Relationship Between Jews and Non-Jews in the Mishnah and Talmud Period in Light of Their Attitudes to Play and Leisure Time Activities' [Hebr.], in Jews and Gentiles in the Holy Land in the Days of the Second Temple, the Mishnah and the Talmud: A Collection of Articles, ed. A. Oppenheimer et al. Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi Press, 132-141.
  62. --(2004a). 'Dogs in Jewish Society in the Second Temple Period and in the Time of the Mishnah and Talmud'. Journal of Jewish Studies 55: 246-277.
  63. --(2004b). 'Jew and Non-Jew in the Roman Period in Light of Their Play, Games, and Leisure-Time Activities,' in God's Word for Our World, Theological and Cultural Studies in Honor of Simon John De Vries, ed. J. Harold Ellens et al. London and New York: Clark International and Continuum, 128-140.
  64. --(2006). 'The Material Realities of Jewish Life in the Land of Israel, c. 235-638', in: The Cambridge History of Judaism, vol. 4: The Late Roman-Rabbinic Period, ed. S. T. Katz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 431-456.
  65. Schwartzman, H. B. (1976). 'The Anthropological Study of Children's Play'. Annual Review of Anthropology 5: 289-328.
  66. Simri, U. (1969). 'The Religious and Magical Function of Ball Games in Various Cultures', in Proceedings of the First International Seminar on the History of Physical Education and Sport, ed. U. Simri. Netanya: Wingate Institute, 2-17.
  67. Sorek, Y. (1976). Physical Culture in the Land of Israel in the Mishnah and Talmud Period [Hebr.]. Netanya: Wingate Institute.
  68. Toner, J. P. (1995). Leisure and Ancient Rome. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  69. Va ¨terlein, J. (1976). Roma Ludens: Kinder und Erwachsene beim Spiel im antiken Rom. Amsterdam: Gruner.
  70. Wahrhaftig, S. (1972). 'Hozeh, Lotteries and Gambling According to the Halakhah' [Hebr.]. Sinai 71: 229-240.
  71. Wentworth Thompson, D. (1933). 'Games and Playthings' . Greece and Rome 2: 71-79.
  72. White, G. (1971). Antique Toys and Their Background. New York: Arco.
  73. Wileman, J. (2005). Hide and Seek: The Archaeology of Childhood. Stroud, Gloucestershire: Tempus.
  74. Wilkie, L. (2000). 'Not Merely Child's Play: Creating a Historical Archaeology of Children and Childhood', in Children and Material Culture, ed. Joanna Sofaer Derevenski. London and New York: Routledge, 100-113.
  75. Ziegler, D. (2004). 'Spiele und Spielzug in der Antike' , at http://www.klassischearchaeologie. phil.uni-erlangen.de/realia/spiele/spiele.html

Related papers

Social and Nonsocial Play
Kenneth H Rubin

2000

View PDFchevron_right
Play and recreation
aimee herlihy
View PDFchevron_right
On the Anthropology of Play
Christoph Wulf

Philosophy International Journal

Games are voluntary actions that have their own intrinsic goal and differ from actions in the normal everyday world. It is in play that people form their cultural abilities; it is here that they create themselves as individuals, express emotions, and creatively deal with the demands of the outside world. In play, people generate social relationships, develop their own personalities, and create community and culture. Games are different and diverse and they are unlimited in number. New games are constantly being invented; it is very hard to classify them all. Since many games and ludic arrangements are often physical enactments and performances, they often carry more social weight than mere discourse. With their physicality, the players contribute "more" than merely linguistic communication. This "more" is rooted in the materiality of their bodies and the physical existence of other people. With the staging and performance of games, differences are processed, and commonalities are created. People stage themselves and their relationships to others in play. By inviting people to "play along", games invite them to accept the structures that are revealed in the games as acceptable. Those who do not accept the invitation to "play along" in a community segregate themselves, are excluded, and can become scapegoats and thus the target of negativity and violence. Games require movements of the body, which result in closeness or distance between the participants of the game. Social attitudes and postures are often expressed in the participants' body movements. Competitive relationships require movements of the body that are different from those in friendly or even intimate relationships. By shaping ludic situations with the help of body movements, the body is also shaped. There is often a performative element in the staging of games; the participants want their play to be seen and appreciated in a fitting way. In the movements of their bodies, they wish to display and express themselves. The following twelve structural elements can be used for a structural and impact analysis of games: space and time, rules, imagination, the as-if, flow, mimesis, performativity, practical knowledge, community, functionlessness, gamesutensils, uncertainty of the game outcome.

View PDFchevron_right
Play and (Post)Modern Culture: An Essay on Changes in the Scientific Interest in the Phenomenon of Play
Lourens Minnema

Cultural Dynamics, 1998

This essay presupposes that the recent Western scientific interest in play as a phenomenon and as a metaphor is characteristic of the way in which contemporary (post)modern culture sees itself: as a game without an overall aim, as play without a transcendent destination but not without the practical necessity of rules agreed upon and of (inter)subjective imagination; as a complex of games each one having its own framework, its own rules, risks, chances, and charms. The essay tries to demonstrate from a socio-cultural point of view how this recent self-image of (post)modern culture can be interpreted as the outcome of a long development. It does so in order to reconstruct and clarify, against this background, the historically changing scientific interest in, and the gradual formation of, the concept of play as a phenomenon and as a metaphor.

View PDFchevron_right
Being able to play is a crucial developmental achievement. What impact does being able to play confer upon an individual's life and subsequent development, and why do some never really achieve the ability to play?
Sara Ines Genevini

Being able to play is a crucial developmental achievement. What impact does being able to play confer upon an individual's life and subsequent development, and why do some never really achieve the ability to play? 0 "You can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in an hour of conversation" (Cited in D'Angour, 2013, p.293)

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Jewish History
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved