Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
FAQs
Conclusion
References

Mind, Brain, and Education: The Birth of a New Science

Profile image of Michel FerrariMichel Ferrari

2011, LEARNing Landscapes

https://doi.org/10.36510/LEARNLAND.V5I1.533
visibility

…

description

16 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the history of the emerging discipline of Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE) and explore the benefits as well as the difficulties involved in integrating neuroscience into educational policy and practice. We examine the power of neuroscience to impact practice and document the rise of neuromyths. History is on the side of the new discipline of MBE, but there is still much important work to be done to make neuroscientific findings accessible, comprehensible, and relevant to educators.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What historical influences shaped the emergence of Mind, Brain, and Education as a discipline?add

The development of MBE was spurred by 20th-century findings in neuroscience, psychology, and education, particularly between 1973 and 1990, when cross-disciplinary collaborations became prominent.

How did Piaget's research impact the Mind, Brain, and Education field?add

Piaget's four stages of cognitive development provided foundational insights linking biology and education, influencing instructional design from 1921 onward.

What are prominent neuropsychological theories relevant to educational practices developed in the 20th century?add

The Baldwin Effect and Hebbian synapse theory are core concepts, with the latter detailing associative learning principles observed in neural connections.

How are teachers currently integrating neuroscientific findings into educational practice?add

Over 90% of teachers from a study indicated their neuroscience coursework significantly influenced their classroom strategies, particularly regarding adolescent brain development.

What challenges do educators face when applying neuroscience findings to teaching practices?add

Many educators struggle to translate complex neuroscientific research into actionable teaching methods, often resulting in the persistence of neuromyths in educational settings.

Related papers

The Future of Educational Neuroscience. Report. Summary Need for Infrastructure to Ground Learning and Teaching in Research Obstacles to Moving Forward Neuromyths, Ethics, and "Brain-Based Education" Reading Minds from Brain Imaging Constructive Bridging
Todd Rose

2020

Summary The primary goal of the emerging field of educational neuroscience and the broader movement called Mind, Brain, and Education is to join biology with cognitive science, development, and education so as to create a sound grounding of education in research on learning and teaching. To avoid misdirection the growing worldwide movement needs to avoid the many myths and distortions in popular conceptions of brain and genetics and focus on integrating research with practice to create useful evidence that illuminates the brain and genetic bases of learning and teaching as well as social and cultural influences. Scientists and educators need to collaborate to build a strong research foundation for analyzing the "black box" of biological and cognitive processes that underpin learning. Understanding the diversity of abilities and disabilities will help educators and parents to facilitate individual students' learning and development. Analyzing the mental models that per...

View PDFchevron_right
Building the connection between mind, brain and educational practice; roadblocks and some prospects
M. Semih SUMMAK

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010

The fields of education and leadership, in essence, are derivatives of social science research currents. As interdisciplinary fields, to provide practical knowledge about what makes effective schooling, learning and teaching, they are in need of drawing upon streams of research from outside of the social sciences. Developments in psychology and neuroscience seem to create a base for connecting mind and brain resesarch with educational practices. A small group of educators and mind/brain researchers exert efforts to develop a common language and a resesarch context for transdisciplinary collaboration. This blooming field (Mind, Brain and Education or Educational Neuroscience) may have the potential to impact the theory and practice in educational sciences in the near future. This presentation aims at presenting the ongoing scholarly debates and prospective impact of this newly emerging field on educational science, schooling and in-class practices.

View PDFchevron_right
Education and the Brain: A Bridge Too Far
John Bruer

Educational Researcher, 1997

View PDFchevron_right
Connecting Education and Cognitive Neuroscience: Where will the journey take us?
Daniel Ansari

Educational Philosophy and …, 2011

In recent years there have been growing calls for forging greater connections between education and cognitive neuroscience.As a consequence great hopes for the application of empirical research on the human brain to educational problems have been raised. In this article we contend that the expectation that results from cognitive neuroscience research will have a direct and immediate impact on educational practice are shortsighted and unrealistic. Instead, we argue that an infrastructure needs to be created, principally through interdisciplinary training, funding and research programs that allow for bidirectional collaborations between cognitive neuroscientists, educators and educational researchers to grow.We outline several pathways for scaffolding such a basis for the emerging field of 'Mind, Brain and Education' to flourish as well as the obstacles that are likely to be encountered along the path.

View PDFchevron_right
"The Brain: What Teachers Need to Know"
Allison Dansie

Each day thousands of educators enter the classroom to teach students from two years old to eighty years old. But what do these teachers know of the "machines" that they so diligently try to work with? I speak now of our students' brains, for the brain is the "machine" of knowledge. The brain is meant to learn. That is its job. Our job as teachers is to help it. Mechanics study to learn everything they can about the cars they work on. Computer technicians are expected to know the intricate workings of a computer. Investors need to know not only the mechanics of trading stocks, but also the trends and theories of a global economy. As educators, we need to know the brain, for it is in understanding how the brain works that we will best be able to help our students acquire the knowledge that they seek, whether that be learning a second language, as is the focus of this paper, or approaching any other topic in life.

View PDFchevron_right
Neuroscience and education: prime time to build the bridge
Marcela Pena

Nature Neuroscience, 2014

View PDFchevron_right
Critical Explanation of the Place of Neuroscience in the Field of Educational Knowledge and Practice
Mahmoud Mehrmohammadi

ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2010

8 : ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE SUMMER 2010; 12(2 (46)):83-100. CRITICAL EXPLANATION OF THE PLACE OF NEUROSCIENCE IN THE FIELD OF EDUCATIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE NOURI ALI*,MEHRMOHAMMADI ...

View PDFchevron_right
Neuroscience and education: myths and messages
Özge Karakuş Özdemirci

For several decades, myths about the brain — neuromyths — have persisted in schools and colleges, often being used to justify ineffective approaches to teaching. Many of these myths are biased distortions of scientific fact. Cultural conditions, such as differences in terminology and language, have contributed to a ‘gap’ between neuroscience and education that has shielded these distortions from scrutiny. In recent years, scientific communications across this gap have increased, although the messages are often distorted by the same conditions and biases as those responsible for neuromyths. In the future, the establishment of a new field of inquiry that is dedicated to bridging neuroscience and education may help to inform and to improve these communications.

View PDFchevron_right
Mind, Brain, and Education: The Birth of a New Science Part 1. A History of a New Field Education in the Ancient World and Europe
Hazel McBride

2011

In this paper, we examine the history of the emerging discipline of Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE) and explore the benefits as well as the difficulties involved in integrating neuroscience into educational policy and practice. We examine the power of neuroscience to impact practice and document the rise of neuromyths. History is on the side of the new discipline of MBE, but there is still much important work to be done to make neuroscientific findings accessible, comprehensible, and relevant to educators.

View PDFchevron_right
Neuroscience and What It Tells About Education
George M M Jacobs

Springer briefs in education, 2019

This chapter reviews findings from neuroscience and discusses how Student Centered Cooperative Learning can facilitate application of these findings on behalf of learning. Firstly, on a physical level, neuroscience tells us that human brains need water and nutrition. Secondly, on an affective level, students need the right level of challenge, support in the face of bullying and other threats, and motivation. Thirdly, insights from neuroscience confirm that cognitive learning benefits when new learning connects with students' background knowledge in order that students can construct networks of knowledge. Next, that chapter focuses on insights from social neuroscience, in particular why and how to promote mutual concern, encourage students to believe that collaboration can be beneficial, help students develop and deploy cooperative skills, and manifest altruism. Advances in science have greatly added to our knowledge of how the brain works. No longer do we see the brain as the behaviorists did, an impenetrable black box into which we cannot look, or as the early cognitivists did, as something that can only be described via metaphors, as in the computer metaphor of the mind (Crowther-Heyck, 1999; see Chap. 4). Instead, researchers in education and related fields use newly developed neuroscience tools to look at actual brains thinking in real time, as these researchers search for insights into what strategies promote learning. Indeed, brain-based education has become a popular term (Jensen, 2008; Kumar & Yap, 2010; Shaughnessy, 2016). This chapter presents findings from neuroscience and their implications for education, in particular how Student Centered Cooperative Learning (SCCL) provides many ways to apply this research. Perhaps surprisingly, or maybe comfortingly, findings in neuroscience support the overall thrust of SCCL. Education Applications from Neuroscience At an accelerating rate, neuroscience provides new information about how the human brain, all 1300-1400 g or three pounds of it, works (Jan, 2017). Actually, much of what has been learned about the brain fits well with what people in the overlapping

View PDFchevron_right

References (73)

  1. Aldrich, R. (1994). John Locke. PROSPECTS: the quarterly review of education, 24, (1/2), 61-76.
  2. Ansari, D. (2008). Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 278-291.
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., Knickmeyer, R.C., & Belmonte, M.K. (2005). Sex differences in the brain: Implications for explaining autism. Sci- ence, 310, 819-823.
  4. Beebe, D.W., Fallone, G., Neha Godiwala, N., & Flanigan, M. (2008). Feasibility and behav- ioral effects of an at-home multi-night sleep restriction protocol for adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(9), 915-923.
  5. Blakemore, S., & Frith, U. (2005). The learning brain: Lessons for education. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  6. Bonnet, C. (1755). Essai de psychologie; ou con- sidérations sur les opérations de l'ame, sur l'habitude et sur l'éducation. Auxquelles on a ajouté des principes philosophiques sur la cause première et sur son effet. London.
  7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.), (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Re- search Council. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C.
  8. Broca, P.P. (1862). Mémoire sur le cranio- graphe et sur quelquesunes de ses ap- plications. In Mémoires de la Société d'anthropologie de Paris. Série 1. Georges Masson, Paris, 349-378.
  9. Brodmann, K. (1909/1994). Brodmann's 'Lo- calisation in the Cerebral Cortex'. Smith- Gordon, London, UK.
  10. Broughton, JM (1981). The genetic psychology of James Mark Baldwin. American Psychol- ogist, 36, 396-407.
  11. Bruer, J. (1997). Education and the brain: A bridge too far. Educational Researcher, 4-16. be applied in educational settings. Mind, Brain, and Education is a science that shows great promise. It can, and should, continue to be fruitfully pursued in the future as ever more evidence emerges about the brain that is of great relevance to education. Buncombe, A. (August, 2010). Oldest university on earth is reborn after 800 years. Indepen- dent (Asia). Retrieved June 30, 2001, from http://www.independent.co.uk /news/ world/asia/oldest-university-on-earth-is- reborn-after-800-years-2042518.html.
  12. Canadian Council of Learning (2011). 21 st cen tury learning initiative (Canada). Retrieved No- vember 4, 2011, from http://www.ccl-cca. ca/ccl/aboutccl/21stCentury.html
  13. Carnine, D. (2000). Why education experts resist effective practices (and what it would take to make education more like medicine).
  14. Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation. Re- trieved October 20, 2011, from http://www. sc-boces.org/english/IMC/Focus/DirectIn- struction-carnine_article.pdf
  15. Chall, J. S. & Mirsky, A. F. (Eds) (1978). Education and the brain. Chicago: University of Chi- cago Press.
  16. Claycomb, M. (1978). Brain research and learning: a position paper. Washington, D.C: National Education Association.
  17. Cooper, A. & Levin, B. (2010). Some Canadian contributions to understanding knowl- edge mobilization. Evidence & Policy, 6(3), 351-369.
  18. Cooper, A., Levin, B., & Campbell, C. (2009). The growing (but still limited) importance of evidence in education policy and practice. Journal of Educational Change, 10, 159-171.
  19. Curnow, T. (2010). Wisdom in the ancient world. London: Duckworth.
  20. Davies, H., Nutley, S., & Smith, P. (2000). What works? Evidence-based policy and practice in public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
  21. Davydov, V.V. (1995). The influence of L.S. Vygots- ki on education. Theory, research, and prac- tice. Educational Researcher, 24(3), 12-21.
  22. Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the brain. New York: Penguin Viking.
  23. Feigenson, N. (2006). Brain imaging and court- room evidence: On the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI. International Jour- nal of Law in Context, 2, 233-255.
  24. Ferrari, M., & Vuletic, L. (2010). The developmen- tal relations between mind, brain and educa- tion: Essays in honor of Robbie Case. Amster- dam, NL: Springer.
  25. Fischer, K. W., & Bidell, T. R. (2006). Dynamic development of action, thought, and emotion. In R. M. Lerner (Ed.)
  26. & W. Damon (Series Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human develop- ment (6 th ed.). New York: Wiley.
  27. Gazzaniga, M.S. (ed). (1979). Handbook of behav- ioral neurobiology, vol. 2: Neuropsychol- ogy. New York: Plenum Press.
  28. Geake, J. (2008). Neuromythologies in educa- tion. Educational Research, 50(2), 123-133
  29. Giedd, J., & Lenroot, R. K. (2006). Brain develop- ment in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience and Behavioral Re- views, 30, 718-729.
  30. Goswami, U. (2006). Neuroscience and education: from research to practice? Nature reviews neuroscience. Retrieved May 2008, from http://www.nature.com/reviews/neuro
  31. Gregorian, V. (2007). A sense of elsewhere. Amer- ican Libraries, 38(10), 46-48.
  32. Hebb, D.O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
  33. Hempenstall, K. (2006). What does evidence- based practice in education mean? Aus- tralian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(2), 29-38.
  34. Immordino-Yang, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to edu- cation. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1, 3-10.
  35. James, W. (1899). Talks to teachers on psychology and to students on some of life's ideals. New York: Henry Holt.
  36. Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Association for Supervision and Curricu- lum Development, Alexandria, VA (revised, 2005).
  37. Kemp, M. (1972). Dissection and divinity in Leonardo's late anatomies. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, XXXV, 200-225.
  38. Kemp, M. (2007) Leonardo da Vinci: Experience, experiment, and design. London: V&A Pub- lications.
  39. Kugel, J. (2007). How to read the Bible: A guide to Scripture, then and now. New York: Free Press.
  40. Mind, Brain, and Education: The Birth of a New Science Locke, J. (1690). An essay concerning human un- derstanding. London.
  41. Locke, J. (1693). Some thoughts concerning educa- tion. London: Printed for A. and J. Churchill.
  42. Maggs, A., & White, R. (1982). The educational psychologist: Facing a new era. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 129-134.
  43. Marshall, J. (1993). Why Johnny can't teach. Rea- son, 25(7), 102-106.
  44. McBride, H.E.A., & Pomeroy, M. (2009). Neurosci- ence: A powerful influence on educational practice. Paper presented at the Second Biennial International Mind, Brain and Ed- ucation Society Conference, Philadelphia.
  45. McBride, H.E.A., & Todd, R. (2008). From theory to practice: Introducing neuroscience into a teacher education program. Paper pre- sented at The Jean Piaget Society's 38 th Annual Meeting, Quebec City, Quebec.
  46. Narhi, V., Lehto-Salo, P., Ahonen, T., & Mart- tunen, M. (2010). Neuropsychological sub- groups of adolescents with conduct disor- der. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 278-284.
  47. Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Davies, H. (2007). Using evidence: How research can inform public services. Bristol: Policy Press.
  48. Piaget, J. (1970). Piaget's theory. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael's manual of child psy- chology (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 703-723). New York: Wiley.
  49. Piaget, J. (1980). Adaptation and intelligence: Organic selection and phenocopy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  50. Purdy, N. & Morrison, H. (2009). Cognitive neu- roscience and education: unravelling the confusion. Oxford Review of Education, 35(1), 99-109.
  51. Ramon y Cajal, S. (1911). Histologie du Systeme Nerveux de l'Homme et des Vertebres. Paris. English translation: Histology of the nervous system of man and vertebrates (trans. Swan- son, N. & Swanson, L. W.), Oxford Univer- sity Press, 1995.
  52. Sabitzer, B. (2011). Neurodidactics: Brain-based Ideas for ICT and Computer Science Educa- tion. The International Journal of Learning, 18(2), 167-178.
  53. Saurez-Orozco, M., & Sattin-Bajaj, C. (Eds.), (2010). Educating the whole child for the whole world. New York: New York Univer- sity Press.
  54. Shaw, P., Eckstrand, K., Sharp, W., Blumenthal, J., Lerch, J.P., Greenstein, D., et al. (2007). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder is characterized by a delay in cortical matu- ration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104(49), 19649-19654.
  55. Shaywitz, E., & Shaywitz, A. (2008). Paying atten- tion to reading. The neurobiology of read- ing and dyslexia. Development and Psycho- pathology, 20(4), 1329-1349.
  56. Smith, L. (2000). A brief biography of Piaget. Jean Piaget Society Website (http://www.piag et.org/aboutPiaget.html).
  57. Stein, Z., & Fischer, K.W. (2011). Directions for mind, brain, and education: Methods, models, and morality. Educational philos- ophy and theory. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43, 56-66.
  58. Steinberg, L. (2007). Risk taking in adolescence: New perspectives from brain and behav- ioral science. Current Directions in Psycho- logical Science, 16, 55-59.
  59. Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2010). The new science of teaching and learning: Using the best of mind, brain, and education science in the classroom. New York: Columbia University Teachers College Press.
  60. Tokuhama-Espinosa, T. (2011). A brief history of the science of learning: Part 1 (3500 B.C.E.-1970 C.E.) & Part 2 (1970-the pres- ent). New Horizons for Learning, 9(1). Pub- lished on line (http://education.jhu.edu/ newhorizons/Journals/Winter2011/).
  61. Van Leijenhorst, L., Moor, B.G., Zdeňa A., de Macks, O., Serge, A.R.B., Rombouts, P., et al. (2010). Adolescent risky decision- making: Neurocognitive development of reward and control regions. NeuroImage, 51, 345-355.
  62. Van Steenbergen, H., Band, G.P.H., & Hommel, B. (2009). Reward counteracts conflict ad- aptation. Evidence for a role of affect in executive control. Psychological Science, 20(12), 1473-1477.
  63. Michel Ferrari teaches psychology at the University of Toronto|OISE. He is leading an international investigation of wisdom involving Canada, USA, India, China, Ukraine, and Ser- bia. His publications include Developmental Relations among Mind, Brain, and Education: Essays in honor of Robbie Case with Ljiljana Vuletic, (2010), and with Roger Taylor, Epistemology and Science Education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelli- gent design controversy (2011);
  64. with Chandi Fernando, Hand- book on Resilience in Children of War (in press).
  65. Hazel McBride was a certified teacher prior to obtaining her PhD in cognitive psychology. She currently teaches at The University of Toronto|OISE. She has developed a course called "The Adolescent Brain" for Initial Teacher Education students as well as a graduate course called "Neuroscience and Educa- tion. " She has also conducted research in the area of neurosci- ence and education.
  66. Vesalius, A. (1543). De humani corporis fabrica. [On the fabric of the human body, trans- lated by W. F. Richardson and J. B. Carman. 5 vols. San Francisco and Novato: Norman Publishing, 1998-2009].
  67. Weisberg, D. S., Keil, C., Goodstein, J., Rawson, E., & Gray, J. R. (2008). The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. Journal of Cog- nitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 470-477.
  68. Wernicke, K. (1874/1977). The aphasia symptom complex: A psychological study on an anatomic basis. Translated by Eggert, G. H. (1977). Wernicke's works on aphasia: A sourcebook and review. Mouton Publishers: The Hague.
  69. Willis, T. (1664). Cerebri anatome. Translated by Samuel Pordage in 1681 as "The anatomy of the brain," the translation of which is re- printed in several editions. The McGill Uni- versity Press edition (1965) and the Classics of Medicine Library edition (1978), in addi- tion to being facsimile editions of Pord- age both also include his useful ''Table of all the hard words derived from the Greek and Latin, of all Terms of Art and other words not vulgarly received.''
  70. Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid: The story and science of the reading brain. New York: Harper.
  71. Woodward, J., & Gersten, R. (1992). Innovative technology for secondary learning dis- abled students: A multi-faceted study of implementation. Exceptional Children, 58(5), 407-421.
  72. Yasnitsky, A. (in press). Lev Vygotsky: Philolo- gist and defectologist: A socio-intellectual biography. In W. Pickren (Ed.). Portraits of pioneers in psychology (volume 7).
  73. LINK TO: http://hdap.oise.utoronto.ca

Related papers

Neuroscience, Education, and a Radical Embodiment Model of Mind and Cognition (PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION 2013, Cris Mayo, editor)
Clarence W. Joldersma

Philosophy of Education 2013, 2013

Recent research in neuroscience has a seductive appeal for quick applications to many everyday phenomena. 1 This research has also attracted educational entrepreneurs, who often create commercial programs that turn neuroscience into classroom practice. 2 Phrases such as "brain-based education" give them an air of respectability and authority, enticing educators to adopt them. However, basic brain research is often superficially understood, and thus translated too quickly into educational practices. 3 The large gap between neuroscience and practice is ignored too often by entrepreneurs selling their programs. They often end up making inflated claims about neuroscience's direct benefits in day-to-day teaching practices. Problematizing this is a good public service for philosophy of education.

View PDFchevron_right
Can the Differences Between Education and Neuroscience be Overcome by Mind, Brain, and Education
Boba Samuels

Mind, Brain, and Education, 2009

ABSTRACT— The new field of Mind, Brain, and Education (MBE)—sometimes called educational neuroscience—is posited as a mediator between neuroscience and education. Several foundational concerns, however, can be raised about this emerging field. The differences between neuroscience and education are many, including differences in their histories, philosophies, and epistemologies. Historically, science and education have demonstrated separate, but interwoven, influences on society; philosophically, the values by which they operate are often in opposition; and epistemologically, the fields have relied on different conceptualizations of knowledge. Discussion about these differences has been largely absent in attempts to promote MBE. Two steps are proposed to respond to this omission. First, encouraging discussion about disciplinary differences and assumptions may enable better understanding between disciplines and facilitate the establishment of a more collaborative research community. Second, a transdisciplinary framework that focuses on salient issues of interest across disciplines should be considered. Transdisciplinarity aims for the creation of an inclusive research environment that transcends traditional disciplinary approaches to complex problems. This article initiates an exploration of disciplinary differences and proposes commitment to transdisciplinarity as a guiding principle that may increase the viability of MBE as a mediating field between neuroscience and education.

View PDFchevron_right
Mind, Brain, and Education: A Systemic Perspective
Ibrahim Halloun

net & halloun@hinstitute.org; web: www.halloun.net & www.hinstitute.org Our mind and brain affect each other and determine the way we learn in any setting. Formal education is supposed to help students make the best of their mental and cerebral faculties and potentials, and empower them for lifelong learning and continuous success in life. To this end, teachers, students, and all other stakeholders need a coherent pedagogical framework to guide their thoughts and actions in all scholastic respects. The framework should emerge from what reliable, yet still disparate, research in pertinent fields tell us about our students, especially in neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and education. In particular, it should conform to reliable findings on how our students actually are and think at specific school ages, what they can accomplish at a given age, and how they can realistically evolve throughout the years. This article provides an educator's interpretation of research findings he knows about in the fields in question, and subsequently proposes an outline of a pedagogical framework that is meant to serve the above purposes. The interpretation comes through specific conceptual lenses and leads to a systemic perspective on mind, brain, and education that may contribute to bringing researchers and practitioners in these fields to some common grounds, at least in relation to the proposed framework.

View PDFchevron_right
Crossing Mind, Brain, and Education Boundaries
Ali Nouri

Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022

Mind, Brain, and Education science is a very young field, though it has roots in thousands of years of academic reflection. This book is a brief but critical look into the key turning points in the field’s evolution and the existing initiatives in order to project its future directions. It draws on information from all major branches of the learning sciences, including philosophy and history, and more modern constructs such as cognitive psychology and neuroscience. First and foremost, it is a textbook for early graduate training programs in Mind, Brain, and Education science and Educational Neuroscience and those who would like to have Learning Sciences as their main area of study, but the book will also serve as an introduction for those educational policymakers who would like to ground decision-making in evidence from the Learning Sciences, and neuroscientists who need to have knowledge about mind and education.

View PDFchevron_right
Neuroscience in Education: A Bridge Too Far or One That Has Yet to Be Built: Introduction to the “Brain Goes to School”
Gerry Leisman

Brain Sciences

There have been numerous detractors and supporters relating to attempts to merge the neurosciences and the knowledge base of related contributing disciplines with the field of education. Some have argued that this is a “bridge too far”. The predominant view is that the relationship between neuroscience and the classroom has been neither significantly examined, nor applied. What is needed is a specially trained class of professionals whose role it would be to guide the introduction of cognitive neuroscience into educational practice in a sensible and ethical manner. Neuroeducators would play a pivotal role in assessing the quality of evidence purporting to be relevant to education, assessing who is best placed to employ newly developed knowledge, as well as with what safeguards, in addition to investigating how to deal with unexpected consequences of implemented research findings. This special issue of the “The Brain Goes to School” aims to provide support for the development of trai...

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Curriculum and Pedagogy

    • Cited by

    Understanding How Learning Takes Place with Neuroscience and Applying the Results to Education
    Andreas Ioannides

    2017

    Human learning has been dramatically altered by the new situation that saw us climb down trees and out of the savanna to larger communities with great reliance on agriculture and more recently industry. Psychology appeared as a scientific discipline at a time that formal education for all was becoming accepted. From the very beginning psychology and education had a major influence on each other. Education is notoriously slow to change. As the ideas of developmental psychologists started influencing education policy, new paradigms for education emerge from a variety of disciplines including computer science, medicine and particularly neurosciences. Each of these disciplines has its own vocabulary and progress is often limited because there is no common framework to bring together specialists from different disciplines or to formulate common research. We provide such a framework through a generalization of key concepts of developmental psychology. In the new framework, these concepts ...

    View PDFchevron_right
    Exploring Multiple Intelligence Theory Prospects as a Vehicle for Discovering the Relationship of Neuroeducation with Imaginative/Waldorf Pedagogy: A Systematic Literature Review
    Thanasis Daradoumis

    Education Sciences

    Waldorf Education follows a holistic approach of children’s development, where the fundamental characteristics are creative/artistic activities, integrating imagination-based teaching methods to support and enhance the development of children’s and adolescents’ physical, social, emotional, and cognitive skills. Neuroeducation provides the most relevant level of analysis for resolving today’s core problems in education. Multiple Intelligence (MI) theory investigates ways of using the theory as a framework in school for improving work quality, collaborations, opportunities for choice, and a role for the arts. To that end, we provide a systematic literature review that critiques and synthesizes representative literature on these three topics in order to reveal new perspectives towards a novel transformative educational paradigm in a digitized society. A comprehensive analysis of theoretical and empirical articles between 2000 and 2019 is provided. The search included five main academic...

    View PDFchevron_right
    Gamifying the foreign language classroom for brain‐friendly learning
    Dan Rueckert

    Foreign Language Annals, 2020

    The Challenge There must be a better way! Gamified versus traditional instruction: Gamified instruction is supposed to be more motivating than traditional language learning. Is it friendlier for our brains learning as well? This study compares two sections of an EFL class to determine which model wins the brain-friendly title.

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved