Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

General Analysis of Cube Satellite Technology: An Overview

2019, International Journal of Computer Applications

Abstract

CubeSat technology has become a tool to encourage engineering collaboration, to train students providing them with a platform for real-world space exploration. This provides advancements in the aerospace industry as well. These satellites are made for a rather specific purpose than a conventional heavyweight satellite thereby reducing the cost. This paper discusses Cube Satellites, their design, salient features along with different applications and advancements made in the field of CubeSat technology thus providing an overview of a general analysis of CubeSat technology.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What explains the rapid development time of CubeSats compared to traditional satellites?add

The research finds that CubeSats can be prepared for launch within months, contrasting with years for conventional spacecraft due to their smaller size and lower complexity.

How does CubeSat technology support educational initiatives in engineering?add

The study reveals that CubeSats serve as a practical training tool, enabling students to gain real-world satellite experience while fostering collaboration in aerospace engineering.

What are the production cost differences between CubeSats and traditional satellites?add

CubeSats can be developed for approximately $100,000, significantly less than traditional satellites that can cost hundreds of millions of dollars.

How does the P-POD design facilitate CubeSat deployment?add

The P-POD design employs a non-explosive deployment mechanism, minimizing shock impact and ensuring consistent design across various CubeSat models.

What limitations do CubeSats face in payload capacity and lifespan?add

The research indicates that CubeSats typically have a lifespan of 2 to 3 years and limited payload capacities, restricting their use for heavy missions.

References (6)

  1. Nacer E. Chahat. (2018). New Antennas Will Take CubeSats to Mars and Beyond: By packing big antennas into tiny satellites, JPL engineers are making space science cheap [Online] Available at https://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/satellites/new- antennas-will-take-cubesats-to-mars-and-beyond.
  2. Grim, Braden & Kamstra, Mitch & Ewing, Aaron & Nogales, Connor & Griffin, Joshua & Parke, Stephen. (2016). MakerSat: A CubeSat Designed for In-Space Assembly.
  3. Adam Bin Mohd Fikri, Muhammad Fais Haikal Bin Mohd Isa and Abeeb Fajobi Olamilekan. Thermal Control System in CubeSat -Critiques on Multi-Layer Insulation and Louver as Alternative.
  4. Ryan Nugent, Riki Munakata, Alexander Chin, Roland Coelho, Dr. Jordi Puig-Suari. (2000). The CubeSat: The Picosatellite Standard for Research and Education.
  5. Mr. Hank Heidt, Prof. Jordi Puig-Suari, Prof. Augustus S. Moore, Prof. Shinichi Nakasuka, Prof. Robert J. Twiggs. (2000) CubeSat: A new Generation of Picosatellite for Education and Industry Low-Cost Space Experimentation.
  6. Prof.Dr. Alim Rustem Aslan, Dr. Bulent Yagci, Ertan Umit, Mustafa Erdem Bas, Mehmet Şevket Uludağ, Okan Emre Özen, Murat Süer, Ahmet Sofyalı, Assist. Prof. Dr. Cuma Yarim. (2013). Lessons Learned Developing a 3U Communication CubeSat.