E-HRM: A proposed model based on technology
2010
Abstract
E-HRM provides the HR function with the opportunity to create new avenues for contributing to organizational effectiveness. The topic of E-HRM is certainly not becoming obsolete, and its full potential is still anticipated and therefore academic involvement in the topic needs to grow. Besides, there has been a great deal of research on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Malaysia. Less attention is given to examine the relationship between HR roles (strategic partner, change agent, employee champion, and administrative expert) and E-HRM by adoption of TAM. This paper intended to contribute to the Malaysian literature pertaining to this subject. Based on a review of extant literature on E-HRM, HR roles, and TAM, a model is presented and propositions outlined for future empirical testing.
References (51)
- Alleyne C, Kakabadse A, Kakabadse N (2007). Using the HR intranet: an exploratory analysis of its impact on managerial satisfaction with the HR function. Pers. Rev., 36(2): 295 -310.
- Anderson N (2003). Applicant and recruiter reactions to new technology in selection: a critical review and agenda for future research. Int. J. Selec. Ass., 11(2/3): 121 -136.
- Andreescu F (2004). Innovating the HR function in a commercialising British public sector organization: towards a more strategic role for HR? Manage. Rev., 15(3): 344 -363.
- Azmi AAC, Kamarulzaman Y (2010). Adoption of tax e-filing: a conceptual paper. Afr. J. Buss. Manage., 4(5): 599 -603.
- Bhatnagar J, Sharma A (2005). The Indian perspective of strategic HR roles and organizational learning capability. Int. J. Hum. Res. Manage., 16(9): 1711 -1739.
- Bueno S, Salmeron JL (2008). TAM-based success modeling in ERP. Interact. Comp. 20(6): 515 -523.
- Caldwell R (2003). The changing roles of personnel managers: old ambiguities, new uncertainties. J. Manage. Stud., 40(4): 983 -1004.
- Conner J, Ulrich D (1996). Human resource roles: creating value, not rhetoric. Hum. Res. Plan., 19(3): 38 -49.
- Davis FD (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Doctoral Dissertation Thesis.
- Davis FD (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quar. 13(3): 319 -340.
- Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sc., 35(8): 982 -1003.
- Dorenbosch L, de Reuver R, Sanders K (2006). Getting the HR message across: the linkage between line? HR consensus and "commitment strength" among hospital employees. Manage. Rev., 17(3): 274 -291.
- Elliott RH, Tevavichulada S (1999). Computer literacy and human resource management: a public private sector comparison. Pub. Pers. Manage., 28(2): 259 -274.
- Gardner SD, Lepak DP, Bartol KM (2003). Virtual HR: the impact of information technology on the human resource professionals. J. Voc. Beh., 63: 159 -179.
- Gloet M, Berrell M (2003). The dual paradigm nature of knowledge management: implications for achieving quality outcomes in human resource management. J. Know. Manage., 7(1): 78 -89.
- Hamner M, Qazi R-u-R (2009). Expanding the technology acceptance model to examine personal computing technology utilization in government agencies in developing countries. Gov. Info. Quart., 26: 128 -136.
- Hanudin A, Mohd Rizal AH, Suddin L, Zuraidah A (2008). The adoption of mobile banking in Malaysia: the case of Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad (CIMB). Int. J. Bus. Soc., 9(2): 43 -53.
- Hanudin A (2009). An analysis of online banking usage intentions: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Bus. Soc., 10(1): 27 -40.
- Harris L (2007). The changing nature of the HR function in UK local government and its role as "employee champion". Emp. Rel., 30(1): 34 -47.
- Hope-Hailey V, Farndale E, Truss C (2005). The HR department's role in organizational performance. Hum. Res. Manage. J., 15(3): 49 -66.
- Ignatius J, Ramayah T (2005). An empirical investigation of the course website acceptance model (CWAM). Int. J. Bus. Soc., 6(2): 69 -83.
- Jamrog JJ, Overholt MH (2004). Measuring HR and organizational effectiveness. Emp. Rel. Tod., 31(2): 33 -45.
- Lawler EE, Mohrman SA (2000). Beyond the vision: what makes HR effective? Hum. Res. Plan., 23(4): 27 -35.
- Lawler EE, Mohrman SA (2003). HR as a strategic partner: what does it take to make it happen? Hum. Res. Plan., 26(3): 15 -29.
- Lean OK, Zailani S, Ramayah T, Fernando Y (2009). Factors influencing intention to use e-government services among citizens in Malaysia. Int. J. Info. Manage., 29(6): 458 -475.
- Lee MC (2010). Explaining and predicting users' continuance intention toward e-learning: an extension of the expectation-confirmation model. Comp. Edu., 54: 506 -516.
- Lengnick-Hall ML, Moritz S (2003). The impact of e-HR on the human resource management function. J. Lab. Res., 24(3): 365 -379.
- Lievens F, Harris MM (2003). Research on Internet recruiting and testing: current status and future directions. Int. Rev Indus. Org. Psy., 18: 131 -165.
- Long CS, Wan Khairuzzaman WI (2008). Understanding the relationship of HR competencies & roles of Malaysian human resource professionals. Eur. J. Soc. Sc., 7(1): 88 -103.
- Martinsons MG (1997). Human resource management applications of knowledge-based systems. Int. J. Info. Manage., 17(1): 35 -53.
- Norazah MS, Ramayah T, Norbayah MS (2008). Internet shopping acceptance: Examining the influence of intrinsic versus extrinsic motivations. Dir. Market: Int. J., 2(2): 97 -110.
- Olivas-Lujan MR, Raminez J, Zapata-Cantu L (2007). E-HRM in Mexico: Adapting innovations for global competitiveness. Inter. J. Manpower., 28(5): 418-434.
- Pietersen FL, Engelbrecht AS (2005). The strategic partnership role of senior human resource managers in South African organizations. Manage. Dec., 14(4): 47 -58.
- Ramayah T, Lo MC (2007). Impact of shared beliefs on "perceived usefulness" and "ease of use" in the implementation of enterprise resource planning system. Manage. Res. New., 30(6): 420 -431.
- Ramayah T, Noor Hazlina A, May-Chiun L (2010). The role of quality factors in intention to continue using an e-learning system in Malaysia. Proc. Soc. Beh., 2: 5422 -5426.
- Ramayah T, Chin LG, Noor Hazlina A (2008). Internet piracy among business students: an application of Triandis Model. Int. J. Bus. Manage. Sc., 1(1): 85 -95. Yusoff et al. 3045
- Ramayah T, Nornina D, Noorliza K, Normalini MK (2006). Perceived characteristics of Innovation (PCI): the case of the human resource information system (HRIS). Adv. Glob. Bus. Res., 3(1): 159 -165.
- Raub S, Alvarez L, Khanna R (2006). The different roles of corporate and unit level human resources managers in the hospitality industry. Int. J. Cont. Hosp. Manage., 18(2): 135 -144.
- Ruel H, Bondarouk T, Looise JK (2004). E-HRM: innovation or irritation: an explorative empirical study in five large companies on web- basedHRM. Manage. Rev., 15(3): 364 -380.
- Ruel HJM, Bondarouk TV, Van der Velde M (2007). The contribution of e-HRM to HRM effectiveness: results from a quantitative study in a Dutch Ministry. Emp. Rel., 29(3): 280 -291.
- Schaup LC, Carter L, McBride ME (2010). E-file adoption: a study of U.S. taxpayers's intention. Comp. Hum. Beh. 26(4): 636 -644.
- Sheehan C, Scafidi A (2005). The strategic role of HR managers in Australian organizations: cues from organizational recruitment sources. J. Aus. N. Zea Aca. Manage., 11(1): 41 -56.
- Stone DL, Stone-Romero EF, Lukaszewski K (2006). Factors affecting the acceptance and effectiveness of electronic human resource systems. Hum. Res. Manage. Rev., 16(2): 229 -244.
- Strohmeier S (2007). Research in e-HRM: review and implications. Hum. Res. Manage. Rev., 17: 19 -37.
- Teo T, Lee CB, Chai CS, Wong SL (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: a multigroup invariance analysis of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Comp. Edu., 53: 1000 -1009.
- Triandis CH (1980). Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press:pp. 159 -295.
- Ulrich D (1997). Human resource champions: the next agenda for adding value and delivering results. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Venkatesh V (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Info. Syst. Res., 11(4): 342-365.
- Voermans M, van Veldhoven M (2007). Attitude towards E-HRM: An empirical study at Philips. Personnel. Rev., 36(6): 887-902.
- Welsh ET, Wanberg CR, Brown KG, Simmering MJ (2003). E-learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. Int. J.Train. Dev., 7(4): 244 -245.
- Yusliza MY, Hasliza AH (2009). Examination of the Psychometric Characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of HR Roles. December, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Proc. 5 th Int. Conf. Glob. Aca. Bus. Econ. Res., pp. 28-30 .