Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Bharata Muni and Western Dramatic Theory

International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology

https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-2176

Abstract

This Paper highlights a few generalizations about the Western dramatic theory represented by Aristotle and Indian dramatic theory represented by Bharata Muni. The purpose of this paper is not to suggest that Indian theory of drama is superior to the western but is to point out their differences. Obviously there is a fundamental difference between the Western and the Indian modes of thinking. Aristotle’s Western dramatic theory is based on tragedy. On the other hand Bharata Muni’s dramatic theory is based on the Indian theory of Karma. In Bharata’s theory “Rasa” is the sole object of dramatic representation. But there is one interesting point. Whereas western dramatic theory cannot be applied to Sanskrit drama, Bharata’s theory of rasa, as S.C. Sen Gupta. has shown, can be employed with profit in appreciating the western drama. The Paper concluded by suggesting that both the Indian and the Western theories of drama as represented by Bharata and Aristotle respectively have broken down...

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Bharata Muni's theory centers on 'Rasa', contrasting with Aristotle's tragedy-focused framework.
  2. Indian drama emphasizes karma, viewing humans as architects of their fate, unlike Western fatalism.
  3. Bharata classifies plays based on styles, while Western theory distinctly categorizes by tragedy and comedy.
  4. Both dramatic theories have fragmented, reflecting modern individualization and experimentation in literature.
  5. Bharata's 'Rasa' can enhance appreciation of Western drama, despite Western theory's inapplicability to Sanskrit drama.

References (11)

  1. Cf. Allardyce Nicoll : The theory of Drama, 1931.
  2. Barret H. Clark : European Theories of the Drama (Newly revised edition, 1965).
  3. Bharata Muni : Natyashastra George Steiner : The death of Tragedy, 1963.
  4. P.V. Kane : History of Sanskrit Poetics, 1971. Francisque Sorcy : A theory of the Theatre, Papers on play Making, ed. Brander Mathews, 1957.
  5. Sanskrit Drama and Dramaturgy, Varanasi, 1974. Manomohan Ghos : Natyashastra (English translation), 1950.
  6. A.G. Sukla : The concept of Imitation in Greek and Indian Aesthetics, Calcutta, 1977.
  7. J.H. Lobban : Periodical Essays, Selections from the Spectator, Cambridge, 1952.
  8. Cf. K.C. Pandey : Comparative Aesthetic, vol. I second edition. Raniero Gnoli : The Aesthetic Experience according to Abhinavagupta (Rome, 1956).
  9. Comparative Aesthetics, Vol. I (Second edition)
  10. S.S. Barlingay : Indian Aesthetics and Art Activity : Proceedings of a seminar, 1968.
  11. D.D. Raphael : The paradox of Tragedy (London, 1960).