Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Affordance based design: a relational theory for design

2009, Research in Engineering Design

https://doi.org/10.1007/S00163-008-0060-3

Abstract

After reviewing current approaches to design theory, which are based on the transformative concept of function, we argue that this basis in function limits the scope of design problems and explanatory power of current design theories. As an alternative with greater potential for explanatory power and a framework for solving a wider array of design problems, we propose that a relational theory of design is needed. Such a relational theory should mirror those currently developed in mathematics, physics, computer science, and even philosophy. We develop a relational theory for design based on the concept of affordances from perceptual psychology. Affordances help to explain the entanglement between designers, users, and artifacts—relationships that are not currently handled by function based approaches to design. Affordance based design, as developed in this paper, does not offer a radical new approach to doing design, but rather a shift in design thinking. Our focus in this paper is therefore on the explanatory power and potential innovation fostered by this change in design thinking, as illustrated through several examples, and not on specific methods.

References (66)

  1. Akiyama K (1991) Function analysis: systematic improvement of quality and performance. Productivity Press, Cambridge Bertalanffy Lv (1969) General systems theory: foundations, devel- opments, applications, rev edn. George Braziller, New York Bingham GP (2000) Events (like objects) are things, can have affordance properties, and can be perceived. Ecol Psychol 12(1):29-36. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_2
  2. Bush DJ (1989) Body icons and product semantics. In: Vihma S (ed) Semantic visions in design: Proceedings from the Symposium on Design Research and Semiotics. 17-18 May, 1989, University of Industrial Arts, Helsinki
  3. Brown DC, Blessing L (2005) the relationship between function and affordance. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Longview, CA. Paper no. DETC2005- 85017
  4. Chandrasekaran B, Josephson JR (2000) Function in device represen- tation. Eng Comput 16:162-177. doi:10.1007/s003660070003
  5. Dennett DC, Haugeland J (1987) Intentionality. In: Gregory RL (ed) The Oxford companion to the mind. Oxford University Press, New York Dixon JR (1966) Engineering design: inventiveness, analysis, and decision making. McGraw-Hill, New York
  6. Flach JM, Hancock PA, Caird JK, Vicente K (eds) (1995) The ecology of human-machine systems. Lawrence Earlbaum, Hillsdale
  7. Forrester JW (1968) Principles of systems. Pegasus Communications Gaffney ES, Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2007) Roles of function and affordance in the evolution of artifacts. In: Proceedings of ICED'07, Paris, France. 27-30 August, 2007. Paper no. 592
  8. Galvao AB (2007) Design relationships: integrating user information into product development. VDM Verlag, New York
  9. Galvao AB, Sato K (2005) Affordances in product architecture: linking technical functions and user requirements. In: Proceed- ings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Long Beach, CA. Paper no. DETC2005-84525
  10. Galvao AB, Sato K (2006) Incorporating affordances into product architecture: methodology and case study. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Philadel- phia, PA. Paper no. DETC2006-99404
  11. Gaver WW (1991) Technology affordances. In: Proceedings of CHI'91. New Orleans, LA, 28 April-2 May, 1991. ACM, New York, pp 79-84
  12. Gell-Mann M (1994) Complex adaptive systems. In: Cowan GA, Pines D, Meltzer D (eds) Complexity: metaphors, models, and reality. Addison-Wesley, New York, pp 17-29
  13. Gibson JJ (1979) The theory of affordances. In: The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin, Hopewell, pp 127-143
  14. Gibson EJ (2000a) Perceptual learning in development: some basic concepts. Ecol Psychol 12(4):295-302. doi:10.1207/ S15326969ECO1204_04
  15. Gibson EJ (2000b) Where is the information for affordances? Ecol Psychol 12(1):53-56. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_5
  16. Go ¨del K (1931) Metamathematics. van Nostrand, New York Guralnik DB (ed) (1984) Webster's New World Dictionary. Warner Books, New York
  17. Hartson HR (2003) Cognitive, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behav Inf Technol 22(5):315-338. doi:10. 1080/01449290310001592587
  18. Hazelrigg GA (1996) Systems engineering: an approach to informa- tion-based design. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River Heft H (1989) Affordances and the body: an intentional analysis of Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception. J Theor Soc Behav 19:1-30. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1989.tb00133.x
  19. Hirtz JM, Stone RB, McAdams DA, Szykman S, Wood K (2001) Evolving a functional basis for engineering design. In: Proceed- ings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. Paper no. DETC2001/DTM-21688
  20. Hirtz JM, Stone RB, McAdams DA, Szykman S, Wood K (2002) A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Res Eng Des 13:65-82. doi:10.1007/s00163- 001-0008-3
  21. Jensen T (2000) Function integration explained by allocation and activation of wirk elements. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Baltimore, MD. Paper no. DETC2000/DTM-14551
  22. Kim YS, et al (2007) Affordances in interior design: a case study of affordances in interior design of conference room using enhanced function and task interaction. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Las Vegas, NV. Paper no. DETC2007-35864
  23. Koffka K (1935) Principles of Gestalt psychology. Harcourt Brace, New York
  24. Krampen M (1995) Semiotics in architecture and industrial/product design. In: Margolin V, Buchanan R (eds) The idea of design. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 89-103
  25. Krippendorff K (1989) Product semantics: a triangulation and four design theories. In: Vakeva S (ed) Product Semantics '89: Proceedings from the Product Semantics '89 Conference. 16-19 May, 1989, University of Industrial Arts, Helsinki, pp a1-a23
  26. Krippendorff K (1995) On the essential contexts of artifacts or on the proposition that 'Design is Making Sense (of Things)'. In: Margolin V, Buchanan R (eds) The idea of design. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 156-184
  27. Kuhn TS (1996) The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
  28. Lintern G (2000) An affordance-based perspective on human- machine interface design. Ecol Psychol 12(1):65-69. doi: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_7
  29. Maier JRA (2005) Foundations of affordance based design. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29634
  30. Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2001) Affordance: the fundamental concept in engineering design. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. Paper no. DETC2001/DTM-21700
  31. Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2002) Comparing function and affordance as bases for design. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Montreal, Canada. Paper no. DETC2002/DTM-34029
  32. Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2003) Affordance-based methods for design. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Chicago, IL. Paper no. DETC2003/DTM-48673
  33. Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2005) A case study contrasting german systematic engineering design with affordance based design. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Con- ference, Long Beach, CA. Paper no. DETC2005-84954
  34. Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2006) Understanding the complexity of design. In: Braha D, Minai A, Bar-Yam Y (eds) Complex engineered systems: science meets technology. Springer, Berlin
  35. Maier JRA, Fadel GM (2007) Identifying Affordances. Proceedings of ICED'07, Paris, France. August 27-30, 2007. Paper no. 591
  36. Maier JRA, Ezhilan T, Fadel GM (2007) The affordance structure matrix-a concept exploration and attention directing tool for affordance based design. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Las Vegas, NV. Paper no. DETC2007-34526
  37. Maier JRA, Fadel GM, Batisto D (2008) An affordance based approach to architectural theory, design, and practice. Des Stud (submitted)
  38. Mark LS, Baillet JA, Craver KD, Douglas SD, Fox T (1990) What an actor must do in order to perceive the affordance for sitting. Ecol Psychol 2:325-366. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0204_2
  39. McGrenere J, Ho W (2000) Affordances: clarifying and evolving a concept. In: Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2000. 13-17 May, 2000. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp 179-186
  40. Murphy RR (1999) Case studies of applying Gibson's ecological approach to Mobile robots. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 29(1):105-111. doi:10.1109/3468.736365
  41. Norman DA (1988) The design of everyday things. Currency Doubleday, New York
  42. Norman DA (1999) Affordances, conventions and design. Interaction 6(3):38-43. ACM Press. doi:10.1145/301153.301168
  43. Otto K, Wood K (2001) Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
  44. Oudejans RRD, Michaels CF, Bakker FC, Dolne M (1996) The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 22:879-891. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.879
  45. Pahl G, Beitz W, Feldhusen J, Grote KH (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach, vol 3. Springer, New York
  46. Pickering J (2000) On the proper treatment of affordance: formality or mutuality. Ecol Psychol 12(1):71-77. doi:10.1207/S15326969 ECO1201_8
  47. Pittenger JB (1995) Some assembly required: biased speculations on the future of human factors design. In: Solso RL, Massaro DW (eds) The science of the mind: 2001 and beyond. Oxford, New York Riccio GE, Stoffregen TA (1988) Affordances as constraints on the control of stance. Hum Mov Sci 7:265-300. doi:10.1016/0167- 9457(88)90014-0
  48. Rodenacker WG (1970) Methodisches Konstruieren. Springer, Berlin Roth K (1986) Modellbildung fur das methodische Konstruieren ohne und mit Rechnerunterstutzung. VDI-Z, Berlin, pp 21-25
  49. Sanders JT (1997) An ontology of affordances. Ecol Psychol 9:97-112. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0901_4
  50. Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday, New York
  51. Sheridan JG, Kortuem G (2006) Affordance-based design of physical interfaces for ubiquitous environments. In: Proceedings of Ubiquitous Computing Systems; Third International Sympo- sium, UCS 2006, Seoul, Korea. LNCS 4239, pp 183-199. Springer, Berlin
  52. Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the artificial, vol 3. MIT Press, Cambridge
  53. St. Amant R (1999) User interface affordances in a planning representation. Hum Comput Interact 14(3):317-354. doi:10. 1207/S15327051HCI1403_3
  54. Stoffregen TA (2000) Affordances and events. Ecol Psychol 12(1): 1-28. doi:10.1207/S15326969ECO1201_1
  55. Suh NP (1990) The principles of design. Oxford University Press, New York
  56. Suh NP (2001) Axiomatic design: advances and applications. Oxford University Press, New York Turing AM (1959) Can a machine think? Mind 59:236
  57. Turvey MT (1992) Affordances and prospective control: an outline of the ontology. Ecol Psychol 4:173-187. doi:10.1207/s15326969 eco0403_3
  58. Ullman DG (2002) The mechanical design process, vol 3. McGraw- Hill, New York
  59. Warell AV (1999) Introducing a use perspective in product design theory and methodology. In: Proceedings of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Las Vegas, NV. Paper no. DETC/DTM-8782
  60. Warren WH (1984) Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 10:683-703. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.10.5.683
  61. Warren WH (1995) Constructing an Econiche. In: Flach J, Hancock JP, Caird J, Vicente K (eds) Global perspectives on the ecology of human-machine systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale
  62. Wegner P (1997) Why interaction is more powerful than algorithms. Commun ACM 40(5):80-91. doi:10.1145/253769.253801
  63. Wegner P (1998) Interactive foundations of computing. Theor Comput Sci 192(2):315-351. doi:10.1016/S0304-3975(97)00154-0
  64. Vicente K, Rasmussen J (1990) Ecological interface design: theoret- ical foundations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 22(4):589-606. doi:10.1109/21.156574
  65. You H, Chen K (2007) Applications of affordance and semantics in product design. Des Stud 28(1):23-38. doi:10.1016/j.destud. 2006.07.002
  66. Zebrowitz LA, Collins MA (1997) Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: the affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 1:204-233. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0103_2