City Indicators for Mobility Data Mining
2021
Abstract
Classifying cities and other geographical units is a classical task in urban geography, typically carried out through manual analysis of specific characteristics of the area. The primary objective of this paper is to contribute to this process through the definition of a wide set of city indicators that capture different aspects of the city, mainly based on human mobility and automatically computed from a set of data sources, including mobility traces and road networks. The secondary objective is to prove that such set of characteristics is indeed rich enough to support a simple task of geographical transfer learning, namely identifying which groups of geographical areas can share with each other a basic traffic prediction model. The experiments show that similarity in terms of our city indicators also means better transferability of predictive models, opening the way to the development of more sophisticated solutions that leverage city indicators.
References (39)
- W Alonso. 1976. A Theory of Movements: Introduction. Working Paper 266 (1976).
- Gennady Andrienko et al. 2020. (So) Big Data and the transformation of the city. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics (2020).
- Valerio Arnaboldi, Marco Conti, Andrea Passarella, and Robin IM Dunbar. 2017. Online social networks and information diffusion: The role of ego networks. Online Social Networks and Media 1 (2017), 44-55.
- Albert-László Barabási and Márton Pósfai. 2016. Network science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Michael Batty. [n.d.]. Spatial Entropy. Geographical Analysis 6, 1 ([n. d.]), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1974.tb01014.x
- Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume, Renaud Lambiotte, and Etienne Lefebvre. 2008. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008, 10 (2008), P10008.
- Harold Carter. 1995. The Study of Urban Geography. E. Arnold publications.
- Tianqi Chen et al. 2016. XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System.
- CITEAIR consortium. 2007. Air Quality in Europe web site. http://www. airqualitynow.eu/ [Online; accessed 21-December-2020].
- Michele Coscia, Giulio Rossetti, et al. 2012. Demon: a local-first discovery method for overlapping communities. In ACM SIGKDD. 615-623.
- H.G De Sherbinin, A.; Bittar. London, UK, 2003. The Role of Sustainability Indicators as a Tool for Assessing Territorial. Environmental Competitiveness; International Forum for Rural Development (London, UK, 2003).
- George E. P. Box et al. 2015. Time Series Analysis: Forecasting and Control. John Wiley and Sons.
- Liu F. et al. 2020. Citywide Traffic Analysis Based on the Combination of Visual and Analytic Approaches. J geovis spat anal 4, 15 (2020).
- W. A. Fuller. 1976. Introduction to Statistical Time Series. John Wiley and Sons.
- Fosca Giannotti, Mirco Nanni, Dino Pedreschi, et al. 2011. Unveiling the complexity of human mobility by querying and mining massive trajectory data. The VLDB Journal 20, 5 (Oct. 2011), 695-719.
- Fosca Giannotti, Mirco Nanni, Fabio Pinelli, and Dino Pedreschi. 2007. Tra- jectory pattern mining. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 330-339.
- D. Gillis, I. Semanjski, and D. Lauwers. 2015. How to Monitor Sustainable Mo- bility in Cities? Literature Review in the Frame of Creating a Set of Sustainable Mobility Indicators. Sustainability 8 (2015), 29.
- Marta C. Gonzalez, Cesar A. Hidalgo, et al. 2008. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453, 7196 (June 2008), 779-782.
- Riccardo Guidotti and Mirco Nanni. 2020. Crash Prediction and Risk As- sessment with Individual Mobility Networks. In 2020 21st IEEE International Conference on Mobile Data Management (MDM). IEEE, 89-98.
- Riccardo Guidotti, Mirco Nanni, Salvatore Rinzivillo, Dino Pedreschi, and Fosca Giannotti. 2017. Never drive alone: Boosting carpooling with network analysis. Information Systems 64 (2017), 237-257.
- Riccardo Guidotti, Roberto Trasarti, Mirco Nanni, Fosca Giannotti, and Dino Pedreschi. 2017. There's a path for everyone: A data-driven personal model reproducing mobility agendas. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE, 303-312.
- M. K. Jat, P. K. Garg, and D. Khare. 2008. Modelling of urban growth using spatial analysis techniques: a case study of Ajmer city (India). International Journal of Remote Sensing 29, 2 (2008), 543-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01431160701280983 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160701280983
- Gabriel Lang, Eric Marcon, and Florence Puech. 2016. Distance-based Measures of Spatial Concentration: Introducing a Relative Density Function. (Sept. 2016).
- Z. Liu, Z. Li, K. Wu, and M. Li. 2018. Urban Traffic Prediction from Mobility Data Using Deep Learning. IEEE Network 32, 4 (2018), 40-46. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/MNET.2018.1700411
- A Paolo Masucci, Joan Serras, Anders Johansson, and Michael Batty. 2013. Gravity versus radiation models: On the importance of scale and heterogeneity in commuting flows. Physical Review E 88, 2 (2013), 022812.
- P. A. P. Moran. 1950. Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena. Biometrika 37, 1/2 (1950), 17-23.
- Paul Newson and John Krumm. 2009. Hidden markov map matching through noise and sparseness. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems. ACM, 336-343.
- Luca Pappalardo, Salvatore Rinzivillo, Zehui Qu, Dino Pedreschi, and Fosca Giannotti. 2013. Understanding the patterns of car travel. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 215, 1 (01 Jan 2013), 61-73.
- Karl Pearson. 1895. Notes on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 58 (1895), 240-242.
- S. Porta, P. Crucitti, and V. Latora. 2006. Centrality measures in spatial net- works of urban streets. Physical Review E 73, 3, part 2 (24 3 2006), 036125-1.
- Salvatore Rinzivillo, Lorenzo Gabrielli, Mirco Nanni, Luca Pappalardo, Dino Pedreschi, and Fosca Giannotti. 2014. The purpose of motion: Learning activi- ties from individual mobility networks. In 2014 International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE, 312-318.
- Antônio Nélson Rodrigues da Silva et al. 2015. A comparative evaluation of mobility conditions in selected cities of the five Brazilian regions. Transport Policy 37 (2015), 147 -156.
- P.A. Rogerson. 2010. Statistical Methods for Geography: A Student's Guide. SAGE Publications. https://books.google.ch/books?id=Zz69Ab8i0QsC
- Meead Saberi, Hani S. Mahmassani, Dirk Brockmann, and Amir Hosseini. 2017. A complex network perspective for characterizing urban travel demand patterns: graph theoretical analysis of large-scale origin-destination demand networks. Transportation 44, 6 (November 2017), 1383-1402.
- Claude Elwood Shannon. 1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal 27, 3 (7 1948), 379-423.
- Sulochana Shekhar. 2004. Urban sprawl assessment Entropy approach. GIS Development 2004, Vol 8 issue 5, Page ., 6 Pages (05 2004), 43 -48.
- Filippo Simini, Marta C. Gonzalez, Amos Maritan, et al. 2012. A universal model for mobility and migration patterns. Nature 484, 7392 (2012), 96-100.
- Pavlos Tafidis et al. 2017. Sustainable urban mobility indicators: policy versus practice in the case of Greek cities. Transportation Research Procedia 24 (2017), 304 -312. 3rd Conference on Sustainable Urban Mobility.
- Roberto Trasarti, Riccardo Guidotti, Anna Monreale, and Fosca Giannotti. 2017. Myway: Location prediction via mobility profiling. Information Systems 64 (2017), 350-367.