Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

IS SUPERVENIENCE JUST DISGUISED REDUCTION

1985, Southern Journal of Philosophy

https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2041-6962.1985.TB00379.X

Abstract
sparkles

AI

This paper explores the philosophical concept of supervenience and its relationship to reductionism, particularly in the context of the mind-body problem. The argument revolves around whether supervenience can be seen as merely a disguise for reductionistic views, focusing on Kim's notion of "Strong Supervenience" and its implications for the relationship between mental and physical properties. The author contends that a nuanced interpretation of supervenience offers ways to understand the interaction between properties without necessarily resorting to reductionism, engaging with Post's critiques and suggestions for a clearer characterization of supervenience.

References (4)

  1. John F. ( 1984),"Comments on Teller", Southern Journalof Philosophy, Volume XXII Supplement -Spindel Conference 1983: Supervenience. pp. 163-7.
  2. Kim, Jaegwon (1984), "Supervenience and Supervenient Causation", Sourhern Journal of Philosophy. Volume XXII Supplement -Spindel Conference 1983: Supervenience. pp. 45-56.
  3. Kim. Jaegwon (To Appear), "Concepts of Supervenience", Philosophy and Phe- nomonological Research. Teller, Paul (1984a), "A Poor Man's Guide to Supervenience and Determination", Southern Journal of Philosophy, Volume X X I l Supplement -Spindel Conference 1983: Supervenienre. pp. 137-162.
  4. Teller, Paul (1984b). "Comments on Kim's Paper", Southern Journal of Philosophy, Volume XXII Supplement -Spindel Conference 1983: Supervenience. pp. 57-62.