Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Student game development: Framing digital literacy for 21 (synopsis)

Abstract

This study offers insight into the learning and teaching implications of an open-ended, project--based, learning environment that involves digital literacy development. In a case study of game design technology classes, with grades 6--9 students, interviews, creative thinking items from a 21 st Century Skill survey offer evidence toward understanding emerging concepts of creative and computational thinking, and its connection to digital literacy curriculum. Findings suggest that creative and innovative thinking is a critical construct in game design and development learning approaches. Moreover, students creative thinking is significantly correlated with positive emotions of game design class. Digital literacy, with a direct link to computational thinking is suggested to require technology-based environment that students find engaging and relevant.

References (19)

  1. Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48-54. doi:10.1145/1929887.1929905
  2. Claro, M., Preiss, D. D., San Martín, E., Jara, I., Hinostroza, J. E., Valenzuela, S., … Nussbaum, M. (2012). Assessment of 21st century ICT skills in Chile: Test design and results from high school level students. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1042-1053. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.004
  3. El-Nasr, M. S., & Maygoli, T. (2011). Understanding the Underlying Patterns: Teaching Scientific Thinking through Building Games. International Journal of Science in Society, 2(1), 17-27.
  4. Gangadharbatla, H. (2010). Technology component: a modified systems approach to creative thought. Creativity Research Journal, 22(2), 219-227. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.481539
  5. Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (Rev. and updated ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Hesse-Biber, S. N. (2010). Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York: Guilford Press.
  7. Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2006). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation. SAGE.
  8. Mishra, P., & Henriksen, D. (2012). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century: On being in-disciplined. TechTrends, 56(6), 18-21. doi:10.1007/s11528- 012-0608-y
  9. Mishra, P., & Yadav, A. (2013). Rethinking technology & creativity in the 21st century. TechTrends, 57(3), 10-14. doi:10.1007/s11528-013-0655-z National Research Council (U.S.). (2010). Report of a workshop on the scope and nature of computational thinking. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press.
  10. Nelson Laird, T. F., & Garver, A. K. (2010). The effect of teaching general education courses on deep approaches to learning: How disciplinary context matters. Research in Higher Education, 51(3), 248-265. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9154-7
  11. Resnick, M., & Wilensky, U. (1998). Diving into complexity: Developing probabilistic decentralized thinking through role-playing activities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(2), 153-172.
  12. Robertson, J., & Nicholson, K. (2007). Adventure Author: a learning environment to support creative design. In M. Becker & J. Robertson (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. Albourg, Denmark.
  13. Sapsford, R. (1999). Survey research. London: Thousand Oaks Calif.: Sage Publications.
  14. Shaffer, D. (2006). How computer games help children learn (1st ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Squire, K. (2011). Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. New York: Teachers College Press.
  16. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park Calif.: Sage Publications.
  17. Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  18. Walsh, C. (2010). Systems-based literacy practices: Digital games research, gameplay and design. Australian Journal of Language & Literacy, 33(1), 24-40.
  19. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Commun. ACM, 49(3), 33-35. doi:10.1145/1118178.1118215