Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Reconsidering outsourcing solutions

2012, European Management Journal

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EMJ.2011.11.002

Abstract

Outsourcing continues to be an important strategic tool for firms. While outsourcing can take place without major problems, some firms experience problems. Unfulfilled expectations or new opportunities can make alterations to existing sourcing solutions necessary. Such reconsiderations may be due to internal or external changes. This article focuses on the reasons for reconsidering outsourcing activities, in addition to suggesting possible solutions that could be adopted by firms. Based on four case studies of Danish companies, four generic solutions for reconsidering outsourced activities are identified and discussed, which are based on three rival theoretical perspectives. The four generic solutions comprise: (1) maintain the original outsourcing partner; (2) obtain a new outsourcing partner; (3) backsource to own business; or (4) establish a new organisation. Finally, this paper discusses the rationales that underscore the four generic solutions, and outlines central considerations in the outsourcing process.

References (53)

  1. Arnold, U. (2000). New dimensions of outsourcing: A combination of transaction cost economics and the core competence concept. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 6, 23-39.
  2. Barney, H. T., Low, G. C., & Aurum, A. (2009). The morning after: What happens when outsourcing relationships end? Information Systems Development, Spring, 637-644.
  3. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
  4. Barthe ´lemy, J. (2003). The seven deadly sins of outsourcing. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 87-98.
  5. Barthe ´lemy, J., & Que ´lin, B. V. (2006). Complexity of outsourcing contracts and ex post transaction costs: An empirical investiga- tion. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1775-1797.
  6. Barthe ´lemy, J., & Geyer, D. (2001). An empirical investigation of IT outsourcing versus quasi outsourcing in France and Germany. Information and Management, 42(4), 533-542.
  7. Bon, J. L., & Hughes, D. E. (2009). The dilemma of outsourced customer service and care: Research propositions from a transition cost perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4), 404-410.
  8. Brandes, H., Lilliecreutz, J., & Brege, S. (1997). Outsourcing - Success or failure? Findings from five case studies. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 3(2), 63-75.
  9. Bryce, D., & Useem, M. (1998). The impact of corporate outsourcing on company value. European Management Journal, 16(6), 635-643.
  10. Business Wire (2000).
  11. Canie ¨ls, M. C. J., & Roeleveld, A. (2009). Power and dependence perspective in outsourcing decisions. European Management Journal, 27(6), 402-417.
  12. Carson, A., Gilmore, D., Perry, C., & Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative marketing research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  13. Conway, T., & Swift, J. S. (2000). International relationship marketing: The importance of psychic distance. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11/12), 1391-1414.
  14. DiRomualdo, A., & Gurbaxani, V. (1998). Strategic intent for IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 67-80.
  15. Dubois, A., & Gadde, L.-E. (2002). Systematic combining: An abductive approach to case research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 553-560.
  16. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advan- tage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.
  17. Ellram, L., & Billington, C. (2001). Purchasing leverage consider- ations in the outsourcing decision. European Journal of Pur- chasing and Supply Management, 7(1), 15-28.
  18. Fill, C., & Visser, E. (2000). The outsourcing dilemma: A composite approach to the make or buy decision. Management Decision, 38(1), 43-50.
  19. Freytag, P. V. (1999). Why do companies in business markets resist the outsourcing of market communication. Advances in Business Marketing and Purchasing, 8, 81-93.
  20. Freytag, P. V., & Kirk, L. (2003). Continuous strategic sourcing. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(3), 135-150.
  21. Gadde, L.-E., & Ha ˚kansson, H. (2001). Supply networks strategies. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  22. Gadde, L.-E., & Jonsson, P. (2009). Outsourcing and supply network performance -Consequences of sourcing and producing in low- cost countries. IMP Conference, <http://impgroup.org/>.
  23. Ha ˚kansson, H., Harrison, D., & Waluszewski, A. (2004). Rethinking marketing: Developing a new understanding of markets. Chich- ester: John Wiley and Sons Ltd..
  24. Hoecht, A., & Trott, P. (2006). Innovation risks of strategic outsourcing. Technovation, 26, 672-681.
  25. Kakabadse, N., & Kakabadse, A. (2000). Critical review -Out- sourcing: A paradigm shift. Journal of Management Develop- ment, 19(8), 670-728.
  26. Kavcic, K., & Tavcar, M. I. (2008). Planning successful partnership in the process of outsourcing. Kybernetes, 37(2), 241-249.
  27. Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, September-October, 109-117.
  28. Lewis, M. W., & Grimes, A. J. (1999). Building theory from multiple paradigms. The Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 672-690.
  29. Lonsdale, C., & Cox, A. (2000). The historical development of outsourcing: The latest fad? Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(9), 444-450.
  30. Malhotra, N., & Birks, D. (2006). Marketing research an applied approach. Harlow: Prentice Hall Financial Times.
  31. McIvor, R. (2008). What is the right outsourcing strategy for your process? European Management Journal, 26(1), 24-34.
  32. McIvor, R., Humphreys, P., McKittrick, A., & Wall, T. (2009). Performance management and the outsourcing process: Lessons from a financial services organisation. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 29(10), 1025-1048.
  33. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publications.
  34. Momme, J., & Hvolby, H.-H. (2002). An outsourcing framework: Action research in the heavy industry sector. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 8, 185-196.
  35. Mucisko, D., & Lum, E. (2005). Outsourcing falling from favor with worldÕs largest organizations, Deloitte Consulting study reveals. Deloitte Consulting LLP Report, April.
  36. Narasimhan, R., Narayanan, S., & Srinivasan, R. (2010). Explicating the mediating role of integrative supply management practices in strategic outsourcing: A case study analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 48(2), 379-404.
  37. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
  38. Que ´lin, B., & Duhamel, F. (2003). Bringing together strategic outsourcing and corporate strategy: Outsourcing motives and risks. European Management Journal, 21(5), 647-661.
  39. Rapp, A. (2009). Outsourcing the sales process: Hiring a merce- nary sales force. Industrial Marketing Management, 38(4), 411-418.
  40. Sharma, A., & Loh, P. (2009). Emerging trends in sourcing of business services. Business Process Management Journal, 15(2), 149-165.
  41. Shi, Yuwei (2007). TodayÕs solution and tomorrowÕs problem: The business process outsourcing risk management puzzle. Califor- nia Management Review, 49(3), 27-44.
  42. Useem, M. (2000). Leading laterally in company outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 41(2), 25-36.
  43. van Weele, A. (2005). Purchasing and supply management. New York: Thomson.
  44. Veltri, N., Carol, F., Saunders, S., & Kavan, C. B. (2008). Information systems backsourcing: Correcting problems and responding to opportunities. California Management Review, 51(1), 50-76.
  45. Vining, A., & Globerman, S. (1999). A conceptual framework for understanding the outsourcing decision. European Management Journal, 17(6), 645-654.
  46. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
  47. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capital- ism: Firms, markets and contracting. New York: Free Press.
  48. Whitten, D., Chakrabarty, S., & Wakefield, R. (2010). The strategic choice to continue outsourcing, switch vendors, or backsource: Do switching costs matter? Information and Management, 47, 167-175.
  49. Whitten, D., & Leidner, D. (2006). Bringing IT back: An analysis of the decision to backsource or switch vendors. Decision Sciences, 37(4), 605-621.
  50. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  51. Per V. Freytag is a professor of marketing. His primary research interest is in business- to-business marketing and purchasing. He has published a number of articles and books within segmentation, portfolio manage- ment, sourcing, buying behavior, bench- marking, lean, cooperation and business models.
  52. Ann H. Clarke is an associate professor of marketing. She researches in the field of business-to-business marketing and innova- tion. She has published in the areas of seg- mentation, business models, outsourcing, innovation, open innovation, networking, spin-off companies and corporate venturing.
  53. Majbritt R. Evald is an associate professor of organisation. She researches in the field of entrepreneurship including networks, spin-offs and corporate venturing. She has published in the areas of spin-offs, entrepre- neurships, open innovation, entrepreneur- ship, corporate venturing and methodology.