Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Time-Consistent Stopping Under Decreasing Impatience

2000, SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Under non-exponential discounting, we develop a dynamic theory for stopping problems in continuous time. Our framework covers discount functions that induce decreasing impatience. Due to the inherent time inconsistency, we look for equilibrium stopping policies, formulated as fixed points of an operator. Under appropriate conditions, fixed-point iterations converge to equilibrium stopping policies. This iterative approach corresponds to the hierarchy of strategic reasoning in Game Theory, and provides "agent-specific" results: it assigns one specific equilibrium stopping policy to each agent according to her initial behavior. In particular, it leads to a precise mathematical connection between the naive behavior and the sophisticated one. Our theory is illustrated in a real options model.

References (35)

  1. N. Barberis, A model of casino gambling, Management Science, 58 (2012), pp. 35-51.
  2. R. F. Bass, The measurability of hitting times, Electron. Commun. Probab., 15 (2010), pp. 99-105.
  3. E. Bayraktar and Y.-J. Huang, On the multidimensional controller-and-stopper games, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 51 (2013), pp. 1263-1297.
  4. T. Björk, M. Khapko, and A. Murgoci, A theory of Markovian time- inconsistent stochastic control in continuous time, preprint, available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2727480, (2016).
  5. T. Björk and A. Murgoci, A theory of Markovian time-inconsistent stochastic control in discrete time, Finance Stoch., 18 (2014), pp. 545-592.
  6. T. Björk, A. Murgoci, and X. Y. Zhou, Mean-variance portfolio optimization with state-dependent risk aversion, Math. Finance, 24 (2014), pp. 1-24.
  7. A. N. Borodin and P. Salminen, Handbook of Brownian motion-facts and formulae, Probability and its Applications, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, second ed., 2002.
  8. B. Bouchard and N. Touzi, Weak dynamic programming principle for viscosity solu- tions, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 49 (2011), pp. 948-962.
  9. Y. Dong and R. Sircar, Time-inconsistent portfolio investment problems, in Stochastic analysis and applications 2014, vol. 100 of Springer Proc. Math. Stat., Springer, Cham, 2014, pp. 239-281.
  10. S. Ebert, P. Strack, et al., Until the bitter end: On prospect theory in a dynamic context, American Economic Review, 105 (2015), pp. 1618-1633.
  11. I. Ekeland and A. Lazrak, Being serious about non-commitment: subgame perfect equilibrium in continuous time, tech. rep., University of British Columbia, 2006. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0604264.
  12. I. Ekeland, O. Mbodji, and T. A. Pirvu, Time-consistent portfolio management, SIAM J. Financial Math., 3 (2012), pp. 1-32.
  13. I. Ekeland and T. A. Pirvu, Investment and consumption without commitment, Math. Financ. Econ., 2 (2008), pp. 57-86.
  14. S. R. Grenadier and N. Wang, Investment under uncertainty and time-inconsistent preferences, Journal of Financial Economics, 84 (2007), pp. 2-39.
  15. Y. Hu, H. Jin, and X. Y. Zhou, Time-inconsistent stochastic linear-quadratic control, SIAM J. Control Optim., 50 (2012), pp. 1548-1572.
  16. I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Methods of mathematical finance, vol. 39 of Applications of Mathematics (New York), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998.
  17. J. Kent, Some probabilistic properties of Bessel functions, Ann. Probab., 6 (1978), pp. 760- 770.
  18. G. Loewenstein and D. Prelec, Anomalies in intertemporal choice: evidence and an interpretation, Q. J. Econ., 57 (1992), pp. 573-598.
  19. G. Loewenstein and R. Thaler, Anomalies: Intertemporal choice, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3 (1989), pp. 181-193.
  20. J. Noor, Decreasing impatience and the magnitude effect jointly contradict exponential discounting, Journal of Economics Theory, 144 (2009), pp. 869-875.
  21. Hyperbolic discounting and the standard model: Eliciting discount functions, Journal of Economics Theory, 144 (2009), pp. 2077-2083.
  22. M. Nutz, Random G-expectations, Ann. Appl. Probab., 23 (2013), pp. 1755-1777.
  23. B. Øksendal and A. Sulem, Applied stochastic control of jump diffusions, Universitext, Springer, Berlin, second ed., 2007.
  24. J. L. Pedersen and G. Peskir, Solving non-linear optimal stopping problems by the method of time-change, Stochastic analysis and applications, 18 (2000), pp. 811-835.
  25. Optimal mean-variance selling strategies, Mathematics and Financial Economics, 10 (2016), pp. 203-220.
  26. G. Peskir and A. Shiryaev, Optimal stopping and free-boundary problems, Lectures in Mathematics ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 2006.
  27. R. A. Pollak, Consistent planning, The Review of Economic Studies, (1968), pp. 201- 208.
  28. D. Prelec, Decreasing impatience: A criterion for non-stationary time preference and "hyperbolic" discounting, Scand. J. of Econ., 106 (2004), pp. 511-532.
  29. D. Stahl, Evolution of smart-n players, Games and Economic Behavior, 5 (1993), pp. 604- 617.
  30. D. Stahl and P. Wilson, Experimental evidence on players' models of other players, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25 (1994), pp. 309-327.
  31. R. H. Strotz, Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization, The Review of Economic Studies, 23 (1955), pp. 165-180.
  32. M. I. Taksar and C. Markussen, Optimal dynamic reinsurance policies for large in- surance portfolios, Finance Stoch., 7 (2003), pp. 97-121.
  33. R. Thaler, Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistency, Econ. Lett., 8 (1981), pp. 201-207.
  34. Z. Q. Xu and X. Y. Zhou, Optimal stopping under probability distortion, Ann. Appl. Probab., 23 (2013), pp. 251-282.
  35. J. Yong, Time-inconsistent optimal control problems and the equilibrium HJB equation, Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 3 (2012), pp. 271-329.