Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Free Vibration Optimization of Two and Three Dimensional Trusses

Abstract

This paper deals with the structural optimization of trusses by maximizing the structural fundamental frequency while maintaining a constant total structure weight or minimizing the structure weight while keeping the structural fundamental frequency over a limited value. The fundamental concept is to find shape and dimensions of trusses in which system vibration characteristic is improved. Natural frequencies are determined using matrix-displacement method. The applicability, simplicity and effectiveness of the genetic algorithm based optimization are demonstrated. A carefully defined, unambiguous benchmark example is presented and studied with independent verification to highlight the various features of the truss optimization process

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. The study optimizes trusses by maximizing fundamental frequency or minimizing weight under constraints.
  2. Genetic algorithms (GA) efficiently handle discrete and continuous design variables for structural optimization.
  3. The 10-bar 2D truss optimization yielded a 99.32% increase in fundamental frequency and 64.12% weight reduction.
  4. The 25-bar 3D truss achieved a 79.6% frequency increase and a 68.40% weight reduction post-optimization.
  5. The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of GA in enhancing dynamic performance of trusses with computational tools.

References (7)

  1. Al-Khamis, M.T.A. (1996). Structural optimization for static and free vibration conditions using genetic and gradient-based algorithms. PhD Thesis, University of Wales Swansea.
  2. Arora, J.S. (1989). Introduction to optimum design, Singapore: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Langley, S. (2003). Genetic algorithm focused comparative optimization study for a broad scope of engineering applications. PhD Thesis, University of Wales Swansea.
  4. Rao, S.S. (1996). Engineering Optimization, Theory and Practice, Canada, John Wiley & Sons.
  5. Schittkowski, K., Zillober, C. and Zotemantel, R. (1994), "Numerical comparison of nonlinear programming algorithms for structural optimization", Structural Optimization, 7, pp. 1-19.
  6. Tayşi, N. (2005) Analysis and optimum design of structures under static and dynamic loads. PhD Thesis, University of Gaziantep.
  7. Vanderplaats, G.N., and Thanedar, P.B. (1991), "A survey of discrete variable optimization for structural design", Proceeding of the 10th ASCE Congress Conference on Electronic Computation, pp. 173-180, Indianapolis, Indiana.