Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Changing faces: Direction is important

2009

https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280802536656

Abstract

Recent research has provided evidence for the role of norm-based coding in face recognition (e.g. Leopold et al., 2001). In such a model, any given face can be represented by a vector from the norm, with the difference between two faces being the difference between the two vectors. However, as has previously been suggested it is also possible to conceive of a model in which the angle between two vectors provides relevant information for differentiating faces. Two experiments investigated this possibility using a face matching paradigm. Discrimination was found to be better when two faces lay on different vectors than when they were the same physical distance apart but lying on the same vector. The results favour a specific type of norm-based model suggesting that vector angle is important in face perception.

References (22)

  1. Benson, P.J., & Perrett, D.I. (1994). Visual processing of facial distinctiveness. Perception. 23, 75-93.
  2. Carey, S. (1992). Becoming a face expert. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B. 335, 95-103.
  3. Craw, I.G. (1995). A manifold model of face and object recognition. In T.R. Valentine (ed.) Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Face Recognition, 183-203, London: Routledge.
  4. Leopold, D.A., O'Toole, A.J., Vetter, T., and Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature, 4, 89-91.
  5. Lewis, M.B., & Johnston, R.A. (1998). Understanding caricatures of faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 50, 321-346.
  6. Lewis, M.B., & Johnston, R.A. (1999). A unified account of the effect of caricaturing faces. Visual Cognition, 6, 1-42.
  7. McKone, E.M., Aitkin, A., & Edwards, M. (1995). Categorical and coordinate relations in faces, or Fechner's law and face space instead? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 31, 1181-1198.
  8. Osborne, C.D., Stevenage, S.V. (2008). Internal feature saliency as a marker of familiarity and configural processing. Visual Cognition. 16, 23-43.
  9. Rhodes, G. (1995). Face recognition and configural coding. In: T. Valentine (Ed.)
  10. Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Face Recognition: Explorations in Face Space. pp. 47-68, London: Routledge.
  11. Rhodes, G. (1996). Superportraits: Caricatures and Recognition. Hove: Psychology Press. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology. 19, 473-497.
  12. Rhodes, G., Carey, S., Byatt, G., & Proffitt, F. (1998). Coding spatial variations in faces and simple shapes: A test of two models. Vision Research. 38, 2307-2321.
  13. Rhodes, G., & Jeffery, L. (2006). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research. 46, 2977-2987.
  14. Rhodes, G. & McLean, I.G. (1990) Distinctiveness and expertise effects with homogeneous stimuli: Towards a model of configural coding. Perception. 19, 773-794.
  15. Robbins, R., McKone, E., & Edwards, M. (2007). Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: Adapter position effects and neural models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 33, 570-592.
  16. Stevenage, S.V. (1997). Face facts: Theories and findings. The Psychologist. 10, 163- 168. Tanaka, J.W., & Farah, M.J. (2003). The holistic representation of faces. In M.A. Peterson & G. Rhodes (Ed.), Perception of Faces Objects and Scenes (pp. 53 -74). Oxford University Press.
  17. Tanner, T.G., Hill, N.J., Rasmussen, C. E., Wichmann, F.A., Efficient adaptive sampling of the psychometric function by maximizing information gain, Proceedings of the 8th Tübinger Perception Conference, 106. (Eds.) Bülthoff, H. H., H. A. Mallot, R. Ulrich and F. A. Wichmann, Knirsch Verlag, Kirchentellisfurt (2005)
  18. Tiddeman, B., Burt, D.M., & Perrett, D. (2001). Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research, IEEE Computers Graphics and Applications. 21, 42-50
  19. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
  20. Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 44A, 671-703.
  21. Young, A.W., Hay, D.C., McWeeny, K.H., & Flude, BV.M. (1985). Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features. Perception. 14, 737-746.
  22. Young, A.W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D.C. (1987). Configurational information in facial perception. Perception, 16, 747-759.