Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Music-ripping: des pratiques qui provoquent la musicologie

2009, Computing Research Repository

Abstract

Out of the scope of the usual positions of computing in the field of music and musicology, one notices the emergence of human-computer systems that do exist by breaking off. Though these singular systems take effect in the usual fields of expansion of music, they do not make any systematic reference to known musicological categories. On the contrary, they make possible experiments that open uses where listening, composition and musical transmission get merged in a gesture sometimes named as ?music-ripping?. We will show in which way the music-ripping practices provoke traditional musicology, whose canonical categories happen to be ineffectual to explain here. To achieve that purpose, we shall need: - to make explicit a minimal set of categories that is sufficient to underlie the usual models of computer assisted music;- to do the same for human-computer systems (anti-musicological?) that disturb us; - to examine the possibility conditions of reduction of the second set to the first;...

References (16)

  1. Albèra, Ph. (1995). Entretien avec Claude Helffer. Lausanne: Contrechamps.
  2. Bonardi, A. (2000). Contribution à l'établissement d'un genre : l'opéra virtuel interactif. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris-IV.
  3. Bonardi, A., Rousseaux, F. (2002). Composing an Interactive Virtual Opera: The Virtualis Project. Revue Leonardo, Journal of the International Society for the Arts, Sciences and Technology, volume 35, numéro 3, pp. 315-318.
  4. Chion, M. (1983). Guide des objets sonores. Paris: Buchet/Chastel.
  5. Dufourt, H. (2002). About Musical creativity. Lecture of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music. Liège, 5-8 avril.
  6. Fingerhut, M. (1999). The IRCAM Multimedia Library: a Digital Music Library. IEEE Forum on Research and Technology Advances in Digital Libraries (IEEE ADL'99). Baltimore, MD (USA), 19-21 mai.
  7. Goody, J. (1987). The Interface between the Written and the Oral. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Grabocz, M. (1999). Méthodes d'analyse concernant la forme sonate. Méthodes nouvelles -Musiques nouvelles -Musicologie et création, pp. 109-135. Strasbourg: Presses Universitaires de Strasbourg.
  9. Jouvelot, P. (1998). Music Composer's WorkBench : vers un environnement intelligent de l'enseignement de la composition tonale. Journées d'Informatique Musicale, La Londe-les- Maures. Publications du Laboratoire de Mécanique et d'Acoustique du CNRS n°148, pp. A1 1-9.
  10. Lerdahl, F., Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  11. Pachet, F. (1994). The MusES System: an Environment for Experimenting with Knowledge Representation Techniques in Tonal Harmony. First Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music, SBCM'94, Caxambu, Minas Gerais, Brésil, pp. 195-201.
  12. Rastier, F. (1994). Sémantique pour l'analyse. Paris: Masson.
  13. Rousseaux, F., Bonardi, A. (2002). Vagabonds, pédants ou philistins : choisir en beauté. Art lyrique et art numérique. A propos d'une scénographie virtuelle interactive de Norma de Bellini, série " Conférences et Séminaires ", Observatoire Musical Français n°13, pp. 43-50. Paris: Université de Paris-Sorbonne.
  14. Rink, J. (2002). The Practice of Performance: Studies in Musical Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Schaeffer, P. (1966). Traité des objets musicaux. Paris: Seuil.
  16. Szendy, P. (2001). Ecoute, une histoire de nos oreilles. Paris: Editions de Minuit. Xenakis, I. (1981). Musiques formelles. Paris: Stock.