Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Advances in Cohesive Zone Modeling of Dynamic Fracture

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0446-1

Abstract

In this chapter, we review the state of the-art in computational methods for modeling dynamic fracture of brittle solids based on the popular cohesive element approach. The discussion includes a detailed review of the underlying theory, its implementation via interface elements in its two different flavors: the intrinsic and extrinsic approach, as well as the application of the method to different concrete problems in dynamic fracture. Limitations and numerical issues are discussed in detail. As a means to address some of these issues, we describe an alternative approach based on a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) reformulation of the continuum problem that exploits the virtues of the existing cohesive element methods. The scalability and accuracy of the DG method for fracture mechanics is demonstrated through wave propagation and spall tests in ceramics. Lastly, some unresolved open problems and numerical issues pertaining to cohesive zone modeling of fracture are briefly discussed.

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Cohesive Zone Modeling (CZM) effectively represents dynamic fracture processes through phenomenological traction-separation laws.
  2. The Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) method improves scalability and accuracy for fracture simulations compared to traditional cohesive methods.
  3. Numerical issues like mesh dependency and artificial compliance significantly impact the accuracy of fracture modeling.
  4. The chapter reviews state-of-the-art computational methods, assessing their theoretical foundations, applications, and limitations.
  5. CZM's limitations include constraints on crack propagation paths, necessitating innovative solutions like adaptive meshing and advanced formulations.

References (103)

  1. Anvari M, Liu J, Thaulow C (2007) Dynamic ductile fracture in aluminum round bars: experiments and simulations. Int J Fracture 143:317-332
  2. Anvari M, Scheider I, Thaulow C (2006) Simulation of dynamic ductile crack growth using strain- rate and triaxiality-dependent cohesive elements. Eng Fract Mech 73:2210-2228
  3. Areias PMA, Belytschko T (2005) Analysis of three-dimensional crack intitiation and propagation using the extended finite element method. Int J Numer Meth Eng 63:760-788
  4. Arias I, Knap J, Chalivendra VB, Hong S, Ortiz M, Rosakis AJ (2007) Modeling and experimental validation of dynamic fracture events along weak planes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:3833-3840
  5. Arnold DN (1982) An interior penalty finite element method with discontinuous elements. SIAM J Numer Anal 19:742-760
  6. Arnold DN, Brezzi F, Cockburn B, Marini LD (2002) Unified analysis of discontinuous galerkin methods for elliptic problems. SIAM J Numer Anal 39(5):1749-1779
  7. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55-129
  8. Bassi F, Rebay S (1997) A high-order accurate discontinuous finite element method for the numer- ical solution of the compressible navier-stokes equations. J Comput Phys 131:267-279
  9. Beltz G, Rice JR (1991) Dislocation nucleation versus cleavage decohesion at crack tips. In: Lowe TC, Rollett AD, Follansbee PS, Daehn (eds) Modeling and deformation of crystalline solids, TMS, Warrendale, PA, p 457
  10. Bozzolo G, Ferrante J, Smith JR (1991) Universal behavior in ideal slip. Scr Metal Mater 25:1927- 1931
  11. Brezzi F, Manzini M, Marini D, Pietra P, Russo A (2000) Discontinuous galerkin approximations for elliptic problems. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 16:47-58
  12. Camacho GT (1996) Computational modeling of impact damage and penetration of brittle and ductile solids. PhD thesis, Brown University
  13. Camacho GT, Ortiz M (1996) Computational modeling of impact damage in brittle materials. Int J Solids Struct 33(20-22):2899-2983
  14. Chiluveru S (2007) Computational modeling of crack initiation in cross-roll piercing. Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  15. Cirak F, Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (2005) A cohesive approach to thin-shell fracture and fragmentation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:2604-2618
  16. Cockburn B, Shu CW (1998) The local discontinuous galerkin method for time-dependent convec- tion diffusion problems. SIAM J Numer Anal 35:2440-2463
  17. Dolbow J, Moes N, Belytschko T (2001) An extended finite element method for modeling crack growth with frictional contact. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 190:6825-6846
  18. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing clits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100-104
  19. Dvorkin EN, Assanelli AP (1991) 2d Finite elements with displacement interpolated embedded localization lines: the analysis of fracture in frictional materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 90:829-844
  20. Dvorkin EN, Cuitino AM, Gioia G (1990) Finite elements with displacement interpolated embedded localization lines insensitive to mesh size and distortions. Int J Numer Methods Eng 30:541-564
  21. Espinosa HD, Dwivedi S, Lu H-C (2000) Modeling impact induced delamination of woven fiber reinforced composites with contact/cohesive laws. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 183:259- 290
  22. Espinosa HD, Zavattieri PD (2003) 1 A grain level model for the study of failure initiation and evo- lution in polycrystalline brittle materials, part i: theory and numerical implementation. Mech Mater 35: 333-364
  23. Espinosa HD, Zavattieri PD (2003) 2 A grain level model for the study of failure initiation and evolution in polycrystalline brittle materials, part ii: numer examples. Mech Mater, 35: 365-394
  24. Espinosa HD, Zavattieri PD, Dwivedi SK (1998) A finite deformation continuum discrete model for the description of fragmentation and damage in brittle materials. J Mech Phys Solids 46(10):1909-1942
  25. Falk ML, Needleman A, Rice JR (2001) A critical evaluation of cohesive zone models of dynamic fracture. J Phys IV 11:Pr5-43-51
  26. Ferrante J, Smith JR (1985) Theory of the bimetallic interface. Phys Rev B 31(6):3427-3434
  27. Field JE (1988) Investigation of the impact performance of various glass and ceramic systems. Technical report, Cambridge University, Cambridge
  28. Freund LB (1989) Dynamic fracture mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Geubelle PH, Baylor JS (1998) Impact-induced delamination of composites: a 2d simulation. Com- pos B 29B:589-602
  29. Grady DE, Benson DA (1983) Fragmentation of metal rings by electromagnetic loading. Exp Mech 12:393-400
  30. Griffith AA (1920) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. In: Royal society (GB) (ed) Philosophical transactions of the Royal society of London, vol A221: Mathematical and phys- ical sciences Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 163-198
  31. Gurson AL (1977) Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I-yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol 99:2-15
  32. Klein PA, Foulk JW, Chen EP, Wimmer SA, Gao HJ (2001) Physics-based modeling of brittle fracture, cohesive formulations and the applications of meshfree methods. Theor Appl Fracture Mech 37:99-166
  33. Kubair DV, Geubelle PH (2003) A comparative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic cohesive models of dynamic fracture. Int J Solids Struct 40:3853-3868
  34. Lew A, Neff P, Sulsky D, Ortiz M (2004) Optimal bv estimates for a discontinuous galerkin method for linear elasticity. Appl Math Res eXpress 3:73-106
  35. Lubliner J (1972) On the thermodynamic foundations of non-linear solid mechanics. Int J Non- Linear Mech 7:237-254
  36. Lubliner J (1973) On the structure of rate equations of materials with internal variables. Int J Non- Linear Mech, 17:109-119
  37. Maiti S, Geubelle PH (2004) Mesoscale modeling of dynamic fracture of ceramic materials. Com- put Methods Eng Sci 5(2):2618-2641
  38. Maiti S, Rangaswamy K, Geubelle PH (2005) Mesoscale analysis of dynamic fragmentation of ceramics under tension. Acta Mater 53:823-834
  39. Mergheim J, Kuhl E, Steinmann P (2004) A hybrid discontinuous Galerkin/interface method for the computational modelling of failure. Commun Numer Methods Eng 20:511-519
  40. Miller O, Freund LB, Needleman A (1999) 1 Energy dissipation in dynamic fracture of brittle ma- terials. Modeling Simul Mater Sci Eng 7:573-586
  41. Miller O, Freund LB, Needleman A (1999) 2 Modeling and simulation of dynamic fragmentation in brittle materials. Int J Fracture 96(2):101-125
  42. Moes N, Dolbow J, Belytschko T (1999). A finite element method for crack growth without re- memshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 46:131-150
  43. Molinari JF, Gazonas G, Raghupathy R, Zhou F (2007) The cohesive element approach to dynamic fragmentation: the question of energy convergence. Int J Numer Methods Eng 69:484-503
  44. Mota A, Klug WS, Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (2003) Finite-element simulation of firearm damage to the human cranium. Comput Mech 31:115-121
  45. Mota A, Knap J, Ortiz M (2008) Fracture and fragmentation of simplicial finite element meshes using graphs. Int J Numer Methods Eng 73:1547-1570
  46. Needleman A (1987) A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. J Appl Mech, 54:525-531
  47. Needleman A (1990) An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface. Int J Fract, 42:21-40
  48. Needleman A (1990) An analysis of tensile decohesion along an interface. J Mech Phys Solids 38(3):289-324
  49. Needleman A (1997) Numer modeling of crack growth under dynamic loading conditions. Comput Mech 19:463-469
  50. Nguyen O, Repetto EA, Ortiz M, Radovitzky R (2001) A cohesive model of fatigue crack growth. Int J Fract, 110:351-369
  51. Nittur PG, Maitit S, Geubelle PH (2008) Grain-level analysis of dynamic fragmentation of ceram- ics under multi-axial compression. J Mech Phys Solids, 56:993-1017
  52. Noels L, Radovitzky R (2006) A general discontinuous Galerkin method for finite hyperelasticity. formulation and numerical applications. Int J Numer Methods Eng 68:64-97
  53. Noels L, Radovitzky R (2008) An explicit discontinuous galerkin method for non-linear solid dy- namics: formulation, parallel implementation and scalability properties. Int J Numer Methods Eng 74:1393-1420
  54. Ortiz M, Leroy Y, Needleman, A (1987) A finite element method for localized failure analysis. Comput Meth Appl M 61(2):189-214
  55. Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (1999) Finite-deformation irreversible cohesive elements for three- dimensional crack-propagation analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44:1267-1282
  56. Ortiz M, Suresh S (1993) Statistical properties residual stresses and intergranular fracture in ce- ramic materials. J Appl Mech 60:77-84
  57. Pandolfi A, Guduru PR, Ortiz M, Rosakis AJ (2000) Three dimensional cohesive-element analysis and experiments of dynamic fracture in c300 steel. Int J Solids Struct 37:3733-3760
  58. Pandolfi A, Krysl P, Ortiz M (1999) Finite element simulation ring expansion experiments and fragmentation: The capturing of length and time scales through cohesive models of fracture. Int J Fract 95:279-297
  59. Pandolfi A, Ortiz M (2002) An efficient adaptive procedure for three-dimensional fragmentation simulations. Eng Comput 18:148-159
  60. Panfolfi A, Ortiz M (1998) Solid modeling aspects of three-dimensional fragmentation. Eng Com- put 14:287-308
  61. Papoulia KD, Sam C-H, Vavasis SA (2003) Time continuity in cohesive finite element modeling. Int J Numer Methods Eng 58:679-701
  62. Papoulia KD, Vavasis SA, Ganguly P (2006) Spatial convergence of crack nucleation using a co- hesive finite-element model on a pinwheel-based mesh. Int J Numer Methods Eng 67:1-16
  63. Paulino GH, Celes W, Espinha R, Zhang Z (2008) A general topology-based framework for adap- tive insertion of cohesive elements in finite element meshes. Eng Comput 24:59-78
  64. Remmers JJC, de Borst R, Needleman A (2003) A cohesive segments method for the simulation of crack growth. Comput Mech 31:69-77
  65. Remmers JJC, de Borst R, Needleman A (2008) The simulation of dynamic crack propagation using the cohesive segments method. J Mech Phys Solids 56:70-92
  66. Repetto EA, Radovitzky R, Ortiz M (2000) Finite element simulation of dynamic fracture and fragmentation of glass rods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 183(1-2):3-14
  67. Rice JR (1968) Mathematical analysis in the mechanics of fracture. In: H Liebowitz, (ed) Fracture: an advanced treatise, vol 2. Academic, New York, pp 191-311
  68. Rice JR (1967) A path-independent integral and approximate analysis of strain concentrations by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35:379-386
  69. Rose JH, Ferrante J, Smith JR (1981) Universal binding energy curves for metals and bimetallic interfaces. Phys Rev Lett 47(9):675-678
  70. Rose JH, Smith JR, Ferrante J (1983) Universal features of bonding in metals. Phys Rev B 28(4):1835-1845
  71. Ruiz G, Ortiz M, Pandolfi A (2000) Three-dimensional finite element simulation of the dynamic brazilian tests on concrete cylinders. Int J Numer Methods Eng 48:963-994
  72. Ruiz G, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M (2001) Three-dimensional cohesive modeling of dynamic mixed-mode fracture. Int J Numer Methods Eng 52(1-2):97-120
  73. Sam C-H, Papoulia KD, Vavasis SA (2005) Obtaining initially rigid cohesive finite element models that are temporally convergent. Eng Fract Mech 72:2247-2267
  74. Scheider I, Brocks W (2003) Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model. Eng Fract Mech 70:1943-1961
  75. Seagraves A, Jérusalem A, Radovitzky R, Noels L (in preparation) A hybrid DG/cohesive method for modeling dynamic fracture brittle solids
  76. Siegmund T, Brocks W (1999) Prediction of the work of separation and implications to modeling. Int J Fract 99:97-116
  77. Siegmund T, Brocks W (2000) A numerical study on the correlation between the work of separation and the dissipation rate in ductile fracture. Eng Fract Mech 67:139-154
  78. Siegmund T, Needleman A (1997) A numerical study of dynamic crack growth in elastic- viscoplastic solids. Int J Solids Struct 34(7):769-787
  79. Ten Eyck A, Lew A (2006) Discontinuous galerkin methods for nonlinear elasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 00:1-6
  80. Tijssens MGA, Sluys LJ, van der Giessen E (2001) Simulation of fracture of cementitious com- posites with explicit modeling of microstructural features. Eng Fract Mech 68:1245-1263
  81. Tvergaard V (1990) Effect of fibre debonding in a whisker-reinforced metal. Mater Sci Eng A125:203-213
  82. Tvergaard V (2001) Crack growth prediction by cohesive zone model for ductile fracture. J Mech Phys Solids 49:2191-2207
  83. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1992) The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids. J Mech Phys Solids 40(6):1377-1397
  84. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1993) The influence of plasticity on mixed mode interface toughness. J Mech Phys Solids 41(6):1119-1135
  85. Tvergaard V, Hutchinson JW (1996) Effect of strain dependent cohesive model on predictions of interface crack growth. J Phys IV 6:C6-165-C6-172
  86. Tvergaard V, Needleman A (1993) An analysis of the brittle-ductile transition in dynamic crack growth. Int J Fract 59:53-67
  87. Xu X-P, Needleman A (1993) Void nucleation by inclusion debonding in a crystal matrix. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 1:111-132
  88. Xu X-P, Needleman A (1995) Numerical simulations of dynamic interfacial crack growth allowing for crack growth away from the bond line. Int J Fract 74:253-275
  89. Xu XP, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulation of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42(9):1397-1434
  90. Xu XP, Needleman A (1996) Numerical simulations of dynamic crack growth along an interface. Int J Fract 74:289-324
  91. Xu XP, Needleman A, Abraham FF (1997) Effect of inhomogeneities on dynamic crack growth in an elastic solid. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 5:489-516
  92. Yang Z, Xu XF (2008) A heterogeneous cohesive model for quasi-brittle materials considering spatially varying random fracture properties. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:4027-4039
  93. Yu C, Ortiz M, Rosakis AJ (2003) 3d Modeling of impact failure in sandwich structures. In Blackman BRK, Pavan A, Williams JG, (ed) Fract polymers, compos adhesives II Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 527-537
  94. Yu C, Pandolfi A, Ortiz M, Coker D, Rosakis AJ (2002) Three-dimensional modeling of intersonic shear-crack growth in asymmetrically loaded unidirectional composite plates. Int J Solids Struct 39:6135-6157
  95. Yu RC, Ruiz G, Pandolfi A (2004) Numerical investigation on the dynamic behavior of advanced ceramics. Eng Fract Mech 71:897-911
  96. Zavattieri PD, Espinosa HD (2001) Grain level analysis of crack initiation and propagation in brittle materials. Acta Mater 49:4291-4311
  97. Zavattieri PD, Hector LG, Bower AF (2008) Cohesive zone simulations of crack growth along a rough interface between two elastic-plastic solids. Eng Fract Mech 75:4309-4332
  98. Zhang Z, Paulino GH (2005) Cohesive zone modeling of dynamic failure in homogeneous and functionally graded materials. Int J Plasticity 21:1195-1254
  99. Zhang Z, G.H. Paulino, Celes W (2007) Extrinsic cohesive modeling of dynamic fracture and microbranching instability in brittle materials. Int J Numer Methods Eng 72:893-923
  100. Zhou F, Molinari JF (2004) Dynamic crack propagation with cohesive elements: a methodology to address mesh dependency. Int J Numer Methods Eng 59:1-24
  101. Zhou F, Molinari JF (2004) Stochastic fracture of ceramics under dynamic tensile loading. Int J Solids Struct 41:6573-6596
  102. Zhou F, Molinari JF, Li Y (2004) Three-dimensional numerical simulations of dynamic fracture in silicon carbide reinforced aluminum. Eng Fract Mech 71:1357-1378
  103. Zhou F, Molinari JF, Ramesh KT (2005) A cohesive model based fragmentation analysis: effects of strain rate and initial defects distribution. Int J Solids Struct 42:5181-5207