Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Human Nature and Human Science

2017, Herder: Philosophy and Anthropology

https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198779650.001.0001

Abstract

From within the philosophy of history and history of science alike, attention has been paid to Herder’s naturalist commitment and especially to the way in which his interest in medicine, anatomy, and biology facilitates philosophically significant notions of force, organism, and life. As such, Herder’s contribution is taken to be part of a wider eighteenth-century effort to move beyond Newtonian mechanism and the scientific models to which it gives rise. In this scholarship, Herder’s hermeneutic philosophy—as it grows out of his engagement with poetry, drama, and both literary translation and literary documentation projects —has received less attention. Taking as its point of departure Herder’s early work, this chapter proposes that, in his work on literature, Herder formulates an anthropologically sensitive approach to the human sciences that has still not received the attention it deserves.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What explains Herder's view on the origin of language versus divine origins?add

Herder argues that a hypothesis about language's human origin is epistemically more responsible than a divine origin, emphasizing historical evolution over perfection in his 1772 writings.

How does Herder's methodology interact with other eighteenth-century philosophical approaches?add

Herder's methodology diverges from Newtonian mechanics, advocating for a naturalistic understanding of human nature by emphasizing cultural contexts and language's intrinsic link to humanity.

What are the implications of Herder's language theories for understanding individuality?add

Herder's theories suggest that individuality is shaped by a cultural framework, as he posits that expression is mediated by the historical context in which it arises.

When did Herder illustrate the concept of 'Bildung' in relation to human expression?add

Herder elaborates on 'Bildung' extensively in his 1770s essays, connecting cultural development with self-understanding and the evolution of individual expression.

Why does Herder reject purely aesthetic or universal approaches to understanding individuality?add

Herder critiques both approaches, arguing that they overlook the organic relationship between the individual and the cultural context, which hinders true understanding of human expression.

References (33)

  1. Bibliography references: Cassirer, Ernst (1961). Freiheit und Form. Studien zur deutschen Geistesgeschichte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
  2. Clark, Robert T. (1955). Herder: His Life and Thought. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  3. DeSouza, Nigel (2012). "Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century: Herder's Critical Reflections on the Principles of Nature and Grace." The British Journal for the History of Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 4, 773-95.
  4. Dilthey, Wilhelm (1914). Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 14. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
  5. Dilthey, Wilhelm (1996). "Schleiermacher's Hermeneutical System in Relation to Earlier Protestant Hermeneutics" (1860). In Selected Works, vol. 4: Hermeneutics and the Study of History. Ed. Rudolf A. Makkreel and Frithjof Rodi. Trans. Theodore Nordenhaug. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 33- 229. Forster, Michael N. (2010). After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Frank, Manfred (1985). Das individuelle Allgemeine. Textstrukturierung und Textinterpretation nach Schleiermacher. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
  7. Frazer, Michael L. (2010). The Enlightenment of Sympathy: Justice and the Moral Sentiments in the Eighteenth Century and Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Gadamer, Hans-Georg (1987). Gesammelte Werke, vol. 4: Neuere Philosophie. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
  9. Gjesdal, Kristin (2014). "Hermeneutics, Individuality, and Tradition: Schleiermacher's Idea of Bildung in the Landscape of Hegelian Thought." In The Relevance of Romanticism: Essays on German Romantic Philosophy. Ed. Dalia Nassar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 92-109.
  10. Haym, Rudolf (1954). Herder. 2 vols. Berlin: Aufbau-Verlag. (p.183) Heidegger, Martin (1999). Vom Wesen der Sprache. Die Metaphysik der Sprache und die Wesung des Wortes. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann. PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: Temple University; date: 22 November 2020
  11. Heidegger, Martin (2004). On the Essence of Language: The Metaphysics of Language and the Essencing of the World. Trans. Wanda Torres Gregory and Yvonne Unna. Buffalo, NY: SUNY Press.
  12. Heinz, Marion (1994). Sensualistischer Idealismus. Untersuchungen zur Erkenntnistheorie und Metaphysik des jungen Herder (1763-1778). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
  13. Herder, Johann Gottfried (1800). Outlines of a Philosophy of the History of Man. Trans. T. Churchill. London: Bergman Publishers. [This text is referred to as Ideas for the Philosophy of History of Humankind and abbreviated PHM]
  14. Herder, Johann Gottfried (2002). Philosophical Writings. Ed. and trans. Michael N. Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Abbreviated PW]
  15. Hume, David (2007). A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  16. Irmscher, Hans Dietrich (1973). "Grundzüge der Hermeneutik Herders." Schaumburger Studien, vol. 33, Bückeburg, 17-57.
  17. Irmscher, Hans Dietrich (1987). "Zur Ästhetik des jungen Herder." In Johann Gottfried Herder, 1744-1803. Ed. Gerhard Sauder. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 43-76.
  18. Kant, Immanuel (2011). Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime and Other Writings. Ed. Patrick Frierson and Paul Guyer. Trans. David Walford et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Kant, Immanuel (1900-). Kants gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the Royal Prussian Academy of Sciences. Berlin: Georg Reimer [Walter de Gruyter]. [Abbreviated AK]
  20. Kelletat, Andreas F. (1984). Herder und die Weltliteratur. Zur Geschichte des Übersetzens im 18. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. Leventhal, Robert S. (1994). The Disciplines of Interpretation: Lessing, Herder, Schlegel and Hermeneutics in Germany, 1750-1800. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  21. Meinecke, Friedrich (1936). Die Entstehung des Historismus. 2 vols. Munich and Berlin: Verlag von R. Oldenbourg.
  22. Meinecke, Friedrich (1972). Historism: The Rise of a New Historical Outlook. Trans. J. E. Anderson. London: Routledge.
  23. Redekop, Benjamin W. (2000). Enlightenment and Community: Lessing, Abbt, Herder, and the Quest for a German Public. Montreal and Kingston: McGill- Queen's University Press.
  24. PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: Temple University; date: 22 November 2020
  25. Reill, Peter H. (1996). "Herder's Historical Practice and the Discourse of Late Enlightenment Science." In Johann Gottfried Herder: Academic Disciplines and the Pursuit of Knowledge. Ed. Wulf Koepke. Columbia, SC: Camden House, 13- 22. Reill, Peter H. (2005). Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  26. Sapir, Edward (1907). "Herder's 'Ursprung der Sprache.'" Modern Philology, vol. 5, no. 1, 109-42.
  27. Sauder, Gerhard (2009). "Herder's Poetic Works, His Translations, and His Views on Poetry." In A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder. Eds. Hans Adler and Wulf Koepke. Rochester, NY: Camden House, 305-30. (p.184) Schick, Edgar B. (1971). Metaphorical Organism in Herder's Early Work: A Study of the Relation of Herder's Literary Idiom to his World-View. The Hague: Mouton.
  28. Schleiermacher, Friedrich (1993). Hermeneutik und Kritik. Ed. Manfred Frank. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
  29. Schleiermacher, Friedrich (1998). Hermeneutics and Criticism. Ed. and trans. Andrew Bowie. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shaftesbury (1999). Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. Ed. Lawrence E. Klein. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Taylor, Charles (1975). Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  31. Zammito, John H. (2002). Kant, Herder, and the Birth of Anthropology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Notes: ( 1 ) See for example the contributions by Zammito, Buchenau, and Waldow in the present volume. See also Schick, 1971 and Reill, 2005. ( 2 ) Heidegger and Gadamer praise Herder's work, yet none of them engages his hermeneutics in much detail. See Gadamer, 1987, 318-36 and Heidegger, 2004; 1999. For a different approach, see Dilthey, 1996, 89; 1914, 649.
  32. Only later does poetry, and with it language more generally speaking, become objective (SEW 44; FHA 1, 89). Such a development, though, is not entirely negative. For, according to Herder, a more abstract language is also more perfect (SEW 106; FHA 1, 183).
  33. PRINTED FROM OXFORD SCHOLARSHIP ONLINE (oxford.universitypressscholarship.com). (c) Copyright Oxford University Press, 2020. All Rights Reserved. An individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a monograph in OSO for personal use. Subscriber: Temple University; date: 22 November 2020 Access brought to you by: ( 43 ) Furthermore, Herder notes, presumably with a reference to classicist criticism, that if Aristotle had been read in this way (i.e., with reference to his historical context) his work would not have been so harmful (PW 173; FHA 2, 580).