Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

New Media and U.S. Latinx identity (Ch. 3)

2020, Mobilizing the U.S. Latinx Vote: Media, Identity, and Politics

Abstract

This chapter considers how Latinxs in the United States navigate online spaces that intersect with established media and political institutions. Within these networks Latinx identity is contested, reframed, updated, and commodified. It is not the case that identity homogenization is a simple, unidirectional process where elite actors and institutions shape Latinxs into perfect consumers of U.S. politics and ideology. Instead, Latinx subjects simultaneously receive essentialized narratives about themselves and selectively perform aspects in advantageous moments. Online, hybrid media networks enable the use of culture capital for Latinxs in ways not previously possible. These moments of performance vary by class and institutional circumstances, such as middle-class Latinas preforming quince culture online or Latinas in Congress giving intersectional context to policy issues. In summary, these works point to a post-modern system of racial performance. In this system we preform our identity as Latinxs through media consumption and personalized new media. Culture then becomes a form of immaterial capital, or as I have said before – a commodity.

References (25)

  1. Aldama, F. L. (2013). Multimediated Latinos in the twenty-first century: An introduction. In F. L. Aldama (Ed.), Latinos and narrative media: Participa- tion and portrayal (pp. 1-31). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Anguiano, C. A. (2016). Hostility and Hispandering in 2016: The demographic and discursive power of Latinx voters. Women's Studies in Communication, 39(4), 366-369. doi:10.1080/07491409.2016.1228385
  3. Arias, S., & Hellmueller, L. (2016). Hispanics-and-Latinos and the U.S. media: New issues for future research. Communication Research Trends, 35(2), 4-21.
  4. Brown, A., López, G., & Lopez, M. (2016, July 20). Hispanics and mobile access to the Internet. Retrieved November 02, 2018, from http://www. pewhispanic. org/2016/07/20/3-hispanics-and-mobile-access-to-the-internet/
  5. Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  6. Chavez, C. A. (2013). Building a "new Latino" in the post-network era: Mun2 and the reconfiguration of the U.S. Latino audience. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1026-1045.
  7. Cisneros, J. (2017). Racial presidentialities: Narratives of Latinxs in the 2016 campaign. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 20(3), 511. doi:10.14321/rhet publaffa.20.3.0511
  8. Dávila, A. M. (2012). Latinos, Inc: The marketing and making of a people. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  9. Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507-526. doi:10.1177/ 1461444813487959
  10. Gershon, S. A. (2008). Communicating female and minority interests online: A study of web site issue discussion among female, Latino, and African American members of congress. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(2), 120-140. doi:10.1177/1940161208315741
  11. González-Martin, R. (2016). Digitizing cultural economies: 'Personalization' and U.S. quinceañera practice online. Cultural Analysis, 15(1), 57-77.
  12. Katz, V. (2014). Children as brokers of their immigrant families' health-care connections. Social Problems, 61(2), 194-215. doi:10.1525/sp.2014.12026
  13. Marchi, R. (2016). News translators: Latino immigrant youth, social media, and citizenship training. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 189-212. doi:10.1177/1077699016637119
  14. Mizuko, I. (2013). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  15. Mora, G. C. (2014). Making Hispanics: How activists, bureaucrats, and media constructed a new American. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer Internet users. Journal of Com- munication, 63(4), 721-744. doi:10.1111/jcom.12045
  17. Phillip, A., & O'Keefe, E. (2016, September 18). Among Democrats, deep concern about Clinton's hispanic strategy. Retrieved December 11, 2019, from https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/among-democrats-deep- concern-about-clintons-hispanic-strategy/2016/09/18/38d3b99a-7c54-11e6- bd86-b7bbd53d2b5d_story.html
  18. Rinderle, S., & Montoya, D. (2008). Hispanic/Latino identity labels: An examination of cultural values and personal experiences. Howard Journal of Communications, 19(2), 144-164. doi:10.1080/10646170801990953
  19. Rodriguez, A. (1999). Making Latino news: Race, language, class. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  20. Salinas, C., & Lozano, A. (2017). Mapping and recontextualizing the evolu- tion of the term Latinx: An environmental scanning in higher education. Journal of Latinos and Education, 1-14. doi:10.1080/15348431.2017.1390464
  21. Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without or- ganizations. New York, NY: Penguin.
  22. Smith, J. A., & Abreu, R. (2018). MOU or an IOU? Latina/os and the raciali- zation of media policy. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 1-19. doi:10.1080/014198 70.2018.1444187
  23. Stokes-Brown, A. (2018). The Latino vote in the 2016 election-Myths and realities about the "Trump effect". In J. C. Lucas, C. J. Galdieri, & T. S. Sisco (Eds.), Conventional wisdom, parties, and broken barriers in the 2016 election (pp. 61-80). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  24. Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121-136.
  25. Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discus- sion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69-91. doi:10.1080/1361332052000341006