Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Is Planning ‘Secular’? Rethinking Religion, Secularism, and Planning

2018, Planning Theory and Practice

https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1540722

Abstract

Responding to the call for a deeper understanding of the religious phenomenon in planning – advanced, among others, by Leonie Sandercock and June Thomas in this journal – this paper argues that understanding religion in planning entails understanding religion’s constitutive other: secularism. This position draws on the burgeoning field of secular studies as well as examples of entanglement of religion, secularism, and planning in the United States and France. It problematizes a long-held assumption that good planning is based upon the notion of ‘religious indifference,’ for the assumption is conceptually anachronistic and practically untenable. This paper offers a set of methodological considerations as to how planners can radically rethink this assumption while effectively attending to the religious subjectivities of their constituencies and actively working through the structures of the modern state. The paper concludes by exploring the implications of this analysis for planning practice against the backdrop of recent improvements fostered by the American Planning Association as well as the relevance of this analysis across international contexts.

References (141)

  1. Agrama, H. A. (2010). Secularism, Sovereignty, Indeterminacy: Is Egypt a Secular or a Religious State? Comparative Studies in Society and History, 52(3), 495-523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417510000289
  2. Agrama, H. A. (2012). Questioning secularism: Islam, sovereignty, and the rule of law in modern Egypt. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  3. APA. (2009). A RLUIPA Primer: The APA Essential Information Packet. Chicago, Ill.: American Planning Association.
  4. Asad, T. (1986). The idea of an anthropology of Islam. Washington, DC: Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, Georgetown University.
  5. Asad, T. (1993). Genealogies of religion: discipline and reasons of power in Christianity and Islam. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  6. Asad, T. (1997). Europe Against Islam: Islam in Europe. The Muslim World, 87(2), 183-195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1997.tb03293.x
  7. Asad, T. (1999). Religion, Nation-State, Secularism. In P. van der Veer & H. Lehmann (Eds.), Nation and religion: Perspectives on Europe and Asia (pp. 178-196). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  8. Asad, T. (2003). Formations of the secular: Christianity, Islam, modernity. Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.
  9. Asad, T. (2004). Where are the margins of the state? In V. Das & D. Poole (Eds.), Anthropology in the Margins of the State (pp. 279-288). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  10. Asad, T. (2006). Trying to Understand French Secularism. In H. de Vries & L. E. Sullivan (Eds.), Political theologies: public religions in a post-secular world (1st ed., pp. 494- 526). New York: Fordham University Press.
  11. Asad, T. (2012). Thinking about religion, belief, and politics. In R. A. Orsi (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to religious studies (pp. 36-57). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Bardawil, F. (2016). The solitary analyst of doxas: an interview with Talal Asad. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 1, 152-173. https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201x-3482183
  13. Page 41 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice
  14. Beaumont, J., & Baker, C. R. (2011). Postsecular cities: space, theory and practice. New York: Continuum.
  15. Berger, P. (1967). The sacred canopy; elements of a sociological theory of religion. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
  16. Bowen, J. R. (2004). Muslims and Citizens: France's headscarf controversy. Boston Review. Retrieved from http://bostonreview.net/archives/BR29.1/bowen.html
  17. Brown, W. (2006). Regulating aversion: tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  18. Brown, W. (2013). Introduction. In T. Asad, J. Butler, W. Brown, & S. Mahmood (Eds.), Is Critique Secular?: Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech (pp. 7-19). New York: Fordham University Press.
  19. Calhoun, C. J. (2011). Afterwards: Religion's Many Powers. In J. Butler, J. Habermas, & C. Taylor (Eds.), Power of Religion in the Public Sphere (pp. 118-134). New York: Columbia University Press.
  20. Campbell, H. (2001). Planners and Politicians: The Pivotal Planning Relationship? Planning Theory & Practice, 2(1), 83-85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350122677
  21. Campbell, H. (2012). Planning to Change the World: Between Knowledge and Action Lies Synthesis. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 135-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X11436347
  22. Cannell, F. (2010). The Anthropology of Secularism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 85-100. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105039
  23. Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  24. Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial Truths. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 1-26). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  25. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography: a School of American Research advanced seminar. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  26. Comaroff, J. L. (2009). Reflections on the Rise of Legal Theology: Law and Religion in the Twenty-First Century. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, 53(1), 193-216. https://doi.org/10.3167/sa.2009.530112
  27. Connolly, W. E. (1999). Why I am not a secularist. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  28. Cox, H. G. (1965). The secular city: secularization and urbanization in theological perspective. New York: Macmillan.
  29. Cox, H. G. (2014). The Sacred in the Secular City: an interview with Harvey Cox. Faith & Form, 47(3). Retrieved from http://faithandform.com/feature/sacred-secular-city- conversation-harvey-cox/
  30. Davidoff, P. (1965). Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 331-338. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366508978187
  31. de Vries, H. (2006). Introduction: Before, Around, and Beyond the Theologico-Political. In H. de Vries & L. E. Sullivan (Eds.), Political theologies: public religions in a post- secular world (pp. 1-88). New York: Fordham University Press.
  32. Durkheim, É. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life: a study in religious sociology. New York: Macmillan.
  33. Eliot, T. S. (1943). Planning and Religion. Theology, 46(275), 102-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040571X4304627502
  34. Employment Division v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 § (1990).
  35. Fainstein, S., & Campbell, S. (2012). Introduction: The structure and debates of planning theory. In S. Fainstein & S. Campbell (Eds.), Readings in planning theory (3rd ed., pp. 1-20). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  36. Fawaz, M. (2009). Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 8(4), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209341327
  37. Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: democracy in practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  38. Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter: why social inquiry fails and how it can count again. Oxford, UK: Cambridge University Press. Page 43 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice
  39. Flyvbjerg (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management (pp. 155-193). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  40. Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  41. Forester, J. (2015). What kind of research might help us become better planners? Planning Theory & Practice, 16(2), 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1028711
  42. Friedmann, J. (1987). Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  43. Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment: the politics of alternative development. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
  44. Friedmann, J. (1993). Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 482-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975902
  45. Gale, R. (2008). Locating Religion in Urban Planning: Beyond 'Race' and Ethnicity? Planning Practice & Research, 23(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450802076415
  46. Gale, R., & Naylor, S. (2002). Religion, planning and the city: The spatial politics of ethnic minority expression in British cities and towns. Ethnicities, (3), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968020020030601
  47. Geertz, C. (1973). Deep Play: Notes on a Balinese Cockfight. In The interpretation of cultures: selected essays (pp. 412-453). New York: Basic Books.
  48. Giaimo, M. S., & Lucero, L. A. (2009). RLUIPA reader: religious land uses, zoning, and the courts. Chicago, Ill.: American Bar Association.
  49. Gilroy, P. (1987). "There ain't no black in the Union Jack": the cultural politics of race and nation. London: Hutchinson.
  50. Gorski, P. S. (2012). The post-secular in question: religion in contemporary society. New York: New York University Press.
  51. Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: Norton.
  52. Green, E. (2017, November 5). The quiet religious-freedom fight that is remaking america. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/rluipa/543504/ Page 44 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2015/04/23/this-swingers-sex- club-has-rebranded-itself-as-a-church-is-that-all-it-takes/
  53. Habermas, J. (2002). Religion and rationality: essays on reason, God, and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  54. Habermas, J. (2006). Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 14(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x
  55. Habermas, J. (2008). Notes on post-secular society. New Perspectives Quarterly, 25(4), 17- 29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.01017.x
  56. Hall, D. (1997). Lived religion in America: toward a history of practice. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  57. Hall, H. (2015, April 30). Weighing who gets to decide whether Nashville Swingers Club will become a church. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/04/30/nashville-swingers-club- church_n_7184168.html
  58. Hall, P. (2002). Cities of tomorrow: an intellectual history of urban planning and design in the twentieth century. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
  59. Hamilton, M. A. (2004). RLUIPA is unfair, unwise, and unconstitutional. Planning & Environmental Law, 56(4), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2004.10394249
  60. Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
  61. Hays, R. A. (2002). Habitat for humanity: building social capital through faith based service. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(3), 247-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.00126
  62. Healey, P. (2012). The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices. Planning Theory, 11(2), 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211419333
  63. Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., 551 U.S. 587 § (2007).
  64. Hillier, J. (2002). Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning. Florence: Routledge. Page 45 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice
  65. Hillier, J., & Healy, P. (2008). Introduction. In Foundations of the planning enterprise: Critical essays in planning theory (Vol. 1, pp. ix-xxvii). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  66. Hirschkind, C. (2011). Is There a Secular Bod? Cultural Anthropology, 26(4), 633-647. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01116.x
  67. Hirschman, A. O. (1967). Development projects observed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  68. Hollywood, A. (2010). Spiritual but not religious: the vital interplay between submission and freedom. Harvard Divinity Bulletin, 38(1&2). Retrieved from http://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/articles/winterspring2010/spiritual-not-religious
  69. Hurd, E. S. (2008). The politics of secularism in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  70. Kingsley, A., & Smith, T. (2008). The zoning of religious institutions in the wake of RLUIPA. Zoning Practice, 5(9, September). Retrieved from https://www.planning.org/publications/publicationdocument/9027708/
  71. Klosterman, R. E. (1985). Arguments for and against planning. Town Planning Review, 56(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.56.1.e8286q3082111km4
  72. Kruse, K. M. (2015). One nation under God: how corporate America invented Christian America. New York: Basic Books.
  73. Lieto, L., & Beauregard, R. A. (2016). Planning for a material world. New York: Routledge.
  74. Lind, J. R. (2017, May 12). Nashville Sex Club masquerading as church under fire again. Retrieved September 7, 2017, from https://patch.com/tennessee/east- nashville/nashville-sex-club-masquerading-church-under-fire-again
  75. Lucero, L. (2004). Where Does APA Stand on RLUIPA? Planning & Environmental Law, 56(4), 14-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2004.10394250
  76. Luckmann, T. (1967). The invisible religion; the problem of religion in modern society. New York: Macmillan.
  77. Mahmood, S. (2006). Secularism, hermeneutics, and empire: the politics of Islamic reformation. Public Culture, 18(2), 323-347. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2006- 006
  78. Mahmood, S. (2009). Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide? Critical Inquiry, 35(4), 836-862. https://doi.org/10.1086/599592 Page 46 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice
  79. Mahmood, S. (2013). Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide? In T. Asad, W. Brown, J. Butler, & S. Mahmood (Eds.), Is critique secular?: Blasphemy, injury, and free speech (pp. 64-100). New York: Fordham University Press.
  80. Mahmood, S. (2015). Religious Difference in a Secular Age: A Minority Report. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  81. Mannheim, K. (1950). Freedom, power, and democratic planning. New York: Oxford University Press.
  82. Marcus, G. E. (1986). Contemporary problems of ethnography in the modern world system. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: the poetics and politics of ethnography (pp. 165-193). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  83. Marcuse, P. (1976). Professional ethics and beyond: values in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 42(3), 264-274. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944367608977729
  84. Marzouki, N. (2017). Islam, an American religion. New York: Columbia University Press.
  85. Masuzawa, T. (2011). The university and the advent of the academic secular: the state's management of public instruction. In W. F. Sullivan, R. A. Yelle, & M. Taussig- Rubbo (Eds.), After secular law (pp. 119-139). Stanford, CA.: Stanford University Press.
  86. McClymont, K. (2015). Postsecular planning? The idea of municipal spirituality. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(4), 535-554. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1083116
  87. McConnell, M. W. (1997). Institutions and interpretation: a critique of City of Boerne v. Flores. Harvard Law Review, 111(1), 153-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342131
  88. Mele, C. (2000). The materiality of urban discourse rational planning in the restructuring of the early twentieth-century ghetto. Urban Affairs Review, 35(5), 628-648. https://doi.org/10.1177/10780870022184570
  89. Miller, E. (2016, February 10). Two Boca residents sue city over controversial synagogue planned near downtown. Sun Sentinel. Retrieved from http://www.sun- sentinel.com/local/palm-beach/boca-raton/fl-boca-chabad-lawsuit-20160210- story.html
  90. Miraftab, F. (2009). Insurgent planning: situating radical planning in the global South. Planning Theory, 8(1), 32-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095208099297
  91. Page 47 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice
  92. Mumford, L. (1940). Faith for living. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
  93. Nash, D. (1999). Blasphemy in modern Britain, 1789 to the present. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
  94. Orsi, R. A. (2010). The Madonna of 115th Street: faith and community in Italian Harlem, 1880-1950. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
  95. Ostrow, A. P. (2008). Judicial review of local land use decisions: Lessons from RLUIPA. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 31(2), 717-760. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41307797
  96. Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and process in modern societies. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press.
  97. Picarello, A. R. (2004). RLUIPA Is Constitutional. Planning & Environmental Law; Chicago, 56(4), 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15480755.2004.10394248
  98. Polanyi, M. (1946). Science, faith and society. London: Oxford University Press.
  99. Polanyi, M. (1958). The logic of liberty: Reflections and rejoinders. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago.
  100. Rauschenbusch, W. (1907). Christianity and the social crisis in the 21st Century: The classic that woke up the church. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan.
  101. Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S. Code § §2000bb-2000bb-4 (1994).
  102. Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S. Code § 2000cc (2000).
  103. Roy, A. (2009). Strangely familiar: Planning and the worlds of insurgence and informality. Planning Theory, 8(1), 7-11. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1177/1473095208099294
  104. Royle, E. (1974). Victorian infidels: the origins of the British secularist movement, 1791- 1866. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  105. Sandel, M. J. (1998). Religious liberty: Freedom of choice or freedom of conscience. In R. Bhargava (Ed.), Secularism and its critics (pp. 73-93). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  106. Sandercock, L. (1998). Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. Chichester, NY: John Wiley.
  107. Sandercock, L. (2006). Spirituality and the Urban Professions: The Paradox at the Heart of Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 7(1), 65-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350500497471
  108. Sanyal, B. (2005a). Comparative planning cultures. New York: Routledge. Page 48 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice B. Sanyal (Ed.), Comparative planning cultures (pp. 3-25). New York: Routledge.
  109. Sanyal, B. (2014). Celebrating the Idea of Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 15(1), 100- 103. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.886801
  110. Sanyal, B. (2016). Revisiting comparative planning cultures: is culture a reactionary rhetoric? Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4), 658-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1230363
  111. Sanyal, B. (2018). A planners' planner: John Friedmann's quest for a general theory of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 84(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1427616
  112. Sanyal, B., Vale, L. J., & Rosan, C. D. (Eds.). (2012). Planning ideas that matter: livability, territoriality, governance, and reflective practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  113. Scherer, M. (2011). Landmarks in the Critical Study of Secularism. Cultural Anthropology, 26(4), 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2011.01115.x
  114. Schmalzbauer, J., & Mahoney, K. (2012). Religion and knowledge in the post-secular academy. In P. S. Gorski, D. K. Kim, J. Torpey, & J. VanAntwerpen (Eds.), The Post- Secular in Question (pp. 215-248). New York: New York University Press.
  115. Scott, D. (2004). Conscripts of modernity: the tragedy of colonial enlightenment. Durham, NC.: Duke University Press.
  116. Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
  117. Scott, J. W. (2007). The politics of the veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  118. Seelye, K. Q. (2013, November 3). End of casino partnership leaves fate of East Boston racetrack in doubt. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/04/us/end-of-casino-partnership-leaves-fate-of-east- boston-racetrack-in-doubt.html
  119. Simon, H. (1957). Administrative behavior; a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  120. Spain, D. (2001). Redemptive places, charitable choice, and welfare reform. Journal of the American Planning Association, 67(3), 249-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360108976234
  121. Page 49 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice
  122. Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Sociology of Religion, 60(3), 249-273. https://doi.org/10.2307/3711936
  123. Sullivan, W. F. (2002). Neutralizing Religion; Or, What Is the Opposite of "Faith-Based"? History of Religions, 41(4), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1086/463692
  124. Sullivan, W. F. (2005). The impossibility of religious freedom. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  125. Sullivan, W. F. (2010a). Religion naturalized: The new establishment. In C. Bender & P. E. Klassen (Eds.), After pluralism: reimagining religious engagement (pp. 82-97). New York: Columbia University Press.
  126. Sullivan, W. F. (2010b). Varieties of legal secularism. In L. E. Cady & E. S. Hurd (Eds.), Comparative secularisms in a global age (pp. 107-120). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  127. Sullivan, W. F. (2014). The impossibility of religious freedom. Retrieved August 30, 2017, from https://tif.ssrc.org/2014/07/08/impossibility-of-religious-freedom/
  128. Sullivan, W. F. (2017, November 6). No. Religion is not the common denominator... Retrieved April 1, 2018, from https://tif.ssrc.org/2017/11/06/no-religion-is-not-the- common-denominator/
  129. Taylor, C. (1994). Multiculturalism: examining the politics of recognition. (A. Gutmann, Ed.). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
  130. Taylor, C. (1998). Modes of secularism. In R. Bhargave (Ed.), Secularism and its Critics (pp. 31-53). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  131. Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  132. Taylor, C. (2010). The meaning of secularism. The Hedgehog Review, 12(3), 23-34.
  133. Thomas, J. M. (1999). Planning progress: lessons from Shoghi Effendi. Ottawa, Canada: Baháʾí Studies Publications.
  134. Thomas, J. M. (2006). Integrating the Spiritual and the Practical. Planning Theory & Practice, 7(1), 93-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350500497471
  135. Upton, R. (2015). What's missing? Planning Theory & Practice, 16(4), 451-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1094196 Page 50 of 51 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/rptp Email: journalmanagerptp@gmail.com Planning Theory and Practice U.S. Department of Justice. (2016). Update on the Justice Department's Enforcement of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act: 2010 -2016.
  136. VanAntwerpen, J., Mendieta, E., & Calhoun, C. (Eds.). (2013). Habermas and religion. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  137. Warner v. City of Boca Raton, 64 F. Supp. 2d 1272 (S.D. Fla. 1999) § (2001).
  138. Weber, M. (1930). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner.
  139. Weinstein, A. C. (2008). How to avoid a "Holy War": Dealing with potential RLUIPA claims. Planning & Environmental Law; Chicago, 60(3), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/15480750802202876
  140. Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1958). Philosophical investigations: the English text of the third edition. New York: Prentice Hall.
  141. Wood, J. (2016, June 27). On Brexit, the 2016 Euro Championship, and Trump. Retrieved August 23, 2016, from http://www.newyorker.com/culture/cultural-comment/on- brexit-the-2016-euro-championship-and-trump