Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

NON- PROTOTYPICAL REDUPLICATION

Abstract

The paper discusses in detail echo formations and expressives found in South Asian languages. Their structural features and their associated semantics across a wide range of languages indicate that these two are significant South Asian areal phenomena (Emeneau 1956, 1969). The complex semantic structure of these constructions as well as a wide semantic and conceptual space they occupy – make them complex categories which had been ignored both by western and Asian linguists because they are a-prototypical grammatical feature not fitting the traditional grammar writing. Considering the effects of globalization, it is observed that while echo formations are stable structures which are indicators of social cohesion and bonding and thus find their inroads into ever-evolving languages, expressives are endangered structures and are dying very fast. Keywords: semantically elaborate grammatical category, endangered structures, replacer syllable, reduplicator

References (24)

  1. Abbi, Anvita. 1987. Semantic correlates of the Indian linguistic area: A study in reduplicative structures. In Elena L. Bashir, Madhav K. Deshpande & Peter E. Hook (eds.), Select papers from SALA-7: South Asian Languages Analysis Roundtable Conference held in Ann Arbor, Michigan, May 17-19, 1985, 1-12. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
  2. Abbi, Anvita. 1990. Reduplication in Tibeto-Burman languages of South Asia. South East Asian Studies 28(2). 171-181.
  3. Abbi, Anvita. 1992. Reduplication in South Asian languages: An areal, typological and historical study. New Delhi: Allied Publishers.
  4. Abbi, Anvita. 1994. Semantic universals in Indian languages. Simla: All India Institute of Advanced Study.
  5. Abbi, Anvita & Ahum Victor. 1997. Expressive morphology and manner adverbs in Khasi, Tangkhul Naga and Kuki-Chin languages. In Anvita Abbi (ed.), Languages of tribal and indigenous people of India: The ethnic space, 415-431. New Delhi: Moti Lal Benarsi Das.
  6. Bhaskararao, Peri. 1977. Reduplication and onomatopoeia in Telugu. Poona: Deccan College. Childs, Tucker G. 1989. Where do ideophones come from? Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19. 57-78.
  7. Childs, Tucker G. 2001. Research on ideophones, whither hence? The need for a social theory of ideophones. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones. Typological studies in language, 63-73. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  8. Diffloth, Gérard. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. Chicago Linguistics Society 8. 440-447
  9. Diffloth, Gérard. 1976. Expressives in Semai. In Philip N. Jenner, Lawrence C. Thompson & Stanley Starosta (eds.), Austroasiatic studies. Part 1, 249-264. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
  10. Doke, Clement M. 1935. Bantu linguistic terminology. London: Longmans, Green and Co.
  11. Durand, Maurice. 1961. Les impressifs en Vietnamien. Etude preliminaire. Bulletin de la Société des Études Indochinoises 36(1). 7-50.
  12. Emeneau, Murray B. 1956. India as a linguistic area. Language 32. 1-17.
  13. Emeneau, Murray B. 1969. Onomatopoeics in the Indian linguistic area. Language 45. 274-299.
  14. Emeneau, Murray B. 1978. Some notes on Dravidian intensives. In George Cardona & Norman H. Zide (eds.), Festschrift for Henry Hoenigswald: On the occasion of his 70th birthday, 109-113. Tübingen: Gunter Narr. [Repr. In Emeneau 1994: 323-327].
  15. Kuteva, Tania. 2009. Grammatical categories and linguistic theory: Elaborateness in grammar. In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Bond, Monik Charette, David Nathan & Peter Sells (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 2, 13-28. London: SOAS.
  16. Kuteva, Tania. 2010. Grammaticalization and the evolution of grammar: On one particular kind of grammatical categories. In Young-Se Kang, Jong-Yuri Yoon, Jongseon Hong, Jiun-Shiung Wu, Seongha Rhee, Kyoung-Ae Kim, Dong-Ho Choi, Kee-Ho Kim & Hye-Kyung Kang (eds.), Lectures on universal grammar and individual languages (SICOL-2010), 144-156. Seoul, Korea: Hankookmunhwasa.
  17. Mohan, Shailendra. 1999. Morpho-semantic study of echo words in Hindi. Case of speech act phenomenon. M.Phil. Dissertation. Jawaharlal Nehru University. New Delhi. Unpublished.
  18. Newman, Paul. 1968. Ideophones from a syntactic point of view. Journal of West African Languages 5. 107-118.
  19. Schaefer, Ronald. 2001. Ideophonic adverbs and manner gaps in Emai. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones. Typological studies in language, 339-354. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  20. Sharma, Bishakha Das. 2014. A descriptive grammar of Tai-Khamti. Ph.D. Dissertation, JNU, New Delhi.
  21. Tassa, Okombe-Lukumbu. 2001. La formation des radicaux déidéophoniques et des idéophones déverbatifs en tɛtɛla (dialecte ewango). In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones. Typological studies in language, 375-384. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  22. Victor, Ahum. 1992. A grammatical study of expressives and echo formation in Tangkhul Naga. M.Phil. dissertation. Jawaharlal Nehru University. New Delhi. Unpublished.
  23. Voeltz, F. K. Erhard & Christa Kilian-Hatz. 2001 (eds.). Ideophones. Typological studies in language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  24. Watson, Richard L. 2001. A comparison of some Southeast Asian ideophones with some African ideophones. In F. K. Erhard Voeltz & Christa Kilian-Hatz (eds.), Ideophones. Typological studies in language, 385-405. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.