On Semi-permanence & History: New Museum Digital Archive
2013, Metropolitan Archivist
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Abstract
AI
AI
The paper discusses the evolution of the New Museum's digital archive, emphasizing its role in preserving contemporary art and enabling ongoing dialogue about artistic innovation. It highlights the importance of nontraditional archival practices in shaping narratives and fostering current practices in the arts. The archive aims to support both historical understanding and future initiatives in the museum and archiving sectors.
FAQs
AI
What are the implications of digital archives on museum practices?add
The study highlights that digital archives enhance accessibility and reinterpret traditional museum narratives, fostering innovative engagement methods. This shift not only informs current practices but also shapes future museum initiatives.
How does traditional archival description impact new digital methodologies?add
The research indicates that traditional archival description acts as a critical foundation for developing new, participatory archival practices. These practices enable broader interpretations and foster an ongoing narrative around museum histories.
What role do foundations play in supporting digital initiatives in museums?add
Notably, the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation and other contributors have provided significant financial support for the re-imagined online initiatives. This funding facilitates the development of modern archival practices that challenge conventional museum processes.
When did the shift towards incorporating digital archives begin in museums?add
The movement towards integrating digital archives into museums gained momentum in the early 2010s, as evidenced by foundational support from organizations like Bloomberg Philanthropies in this era. The New Museum's initiatives reflect this broader trend toward digitization.
Why are narratives important in the context of museum digital archives?add
The paper emphasizes that narratives created through digital archives enrich the understanding and interpretation of museum collections. This narrative approach allows for a more inclusive representation of diverse artistic and historical contexts.





Related papers
Archives and Records, 2018
PhD thesis / University of Amsterdam / Faculty of Humanities (FGw) / Amsterdam School for Heritage and Memory Studies (AHM) Contemporary art challenges the traditional idea of a musealium as well as institutional procedures related to collection care and preservation. Conventionally, visual artworks have been perceived as fixed, unique, material entities created and finished at a particular time, and museum approaches to collecting and preserving them were established accordingly. Nevertheless, contemporary art often resists this definition and undermines dogmas of material authenticity and artist’s intent, as well as the conviction that an object’s integrity resides in its physical features. Taking as its focus the triangle of relationships between an artist, a museum and a contemporary artwork as collectible, this study investigates how contemporary artworks by Mirosław Bałka, Danh Vo and Barbara Kruger are collected, documented and conserved in today’s institutions. It looks at how (and whether) new methods developed in the field of contemporary art conservation, such as the artist’s interview, are adopted by museums, and attempts to identify factors undermining their effectiveness. By looking at contemporary art as a new paradigm of artistic practice and building on notions such as musealisation, art project as art form and art object as document, this study works towards a theoretical model that address the incompatibility between a traditional museum approach to collecting and preserving and the features of contemporary art. By employing and extending concepts introduced by conservation theorist Hanna Hölling and the notion of ‘anarchives’ by media theorist Siegfried Zielinski, this study adopts the model of the ‘artwork-as-(an)archive’. Starting from the premise that our future understanding of contemporary artworks can only be constructed through traces of documentation, this model grants documents a status equal to that of art objects and obliges institutions to care for them on a similar basis. Besides its capacity to facilitate conservation, the artwork-as-(an)archive model is here considered as a space for collaboration between artists and museums, a space to be collectively shaped, filled and nourished that fosters transparency and inclusiveness.
The Oriental Institute 2013-2014 Annual Report. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. Pp. 213-241. (2014)
Feminist Media Histories, 2016
The digital humanities have changed the ways we talk about and approach media archives. Those of us with cultural and social capital in the West work from homes, offices, and workspaces that are often countries (if not continents) away from the archives that house the materials we examine. As long as we have access to the internet and the use of a computer or mobile screen, we can generally see digitized materials freely and at any time. Our own books, articles, lectures, and notes are also online; they are no longer spatially separate or temporally successive to the primary sources they explore. Consequently questions about online access to media history, digital research infrastructure, and cultural and political pedagogy have come to the fore. A host of related questions has acquired a new urgency: What is lost and gained in the shift from physical to digital archiving? What and how do archives preserve, and how do they curate public access? How do we search for digital material? Which tools are used to modify and limit our search options, and what does this tell us about digital networks and our relationships to them? Who or what is featured and findable in the databases we use today? Contributors to this Special Issue include: Deb Verhoeven: As Luck Would Have It: Serendipity and Solace in Digital Research Infrastructure Sarah Atkinson: Digitally Preserving Potter: The Dailiness and Feminization of Labor within Digital Filmmaking and Archiving Liz Clarke: “No Accident of Good Fortune”: Autobiographies and Personal Memoirs as Historical Documents in Screenwriting History Hana Washitani: Gentō: Still-Image Projection as Alternative Cultural Heritage
Performing Archives / Archives of Performance, 2013
2005
The International Archive of Women in Architecture grew by 67.5 cubic feet (cf), with the creation of seven new collections and additions to 15 existing collections. Largely due to supplemental library funding for architecture graduate student assistants and a grant from the Beverly Willis Architectural Foundation, 15 collections (35 cf) were processed and have detailed finding aids. The IAWA now has 290 collections (~1200 cf).
Art Libraries Journal, 2006
Founded in 1954, the Smithsonian’s Archives of American Art collects, preserves and makes available primary sources documenting the history of the visual arts in the United States. More than 16 million items strong, its collections comprise the world’s largest single source for letters, diaries, financial records, unpublished writings, sketchbooks, scrapbooks and photographs created by artists, critics, collectors, art dealers and art societies – the raw material for scholarship in American art.
2014
asks the question of how our increasingly digital civilisation will persist beyond our lifetimes. The authors focus on the preservation of new media art as a case study in new media's broader challenge to social memory. Rinehart and Ippolito are well-known names in the field of media art preservation; both have respectively worked in the field as curators, teachers and initiators of various documentation models. Recollection has been in the making for quite some time and can be seen as a collection of their previous writings supplemented by futurological perspectives and practical guidelines as 'a recipe for cultural permanence' (p. 29). In this sense the book resembles a manifesto or a polemic essay. This is not to say that it lacks argumentation, but that it provides a single narrative. Better said, a dual narrative, because not only do the two authors alternate the chapters they also at times insert comments in each other's texts. Although this is not an uncommon practice and could be said to vaguely mimic today's digital culture of commenting, in this case it works well as the comments exemplify a multiplicity of perspectives that is also in the nature of the works that they discuss. However, at times the comments function more as alternative notes to upcoming sections and they loose their strength as complementary and critical observations.
TheNewMuseum
NEWS/CALENDAR
FALL AND WINTER 1984
On Semi-permanence & History: New Museum Digital Archive
by Tara Hart
Digital Archivist, New Museum
“The New Museum of Contemporary Art was founded on the premise that works of art are not only objects for visual delectation and assessment, but are repositories for ideas that reverberate in the larger context of our culture.” - Brian Wallis, New Museum Curator, 1984
New Museum of Contemporary Art. New Museum News / Calendar (Fall and Winter 1984). New Museum, NY: 1984. Printed material. Cover image. Silvia Kolbowski, Model Pleasure V, 1983. Artwork © Silvia Kolbowski. Courtesy the artist and New Museum, New York.
When New Museum was founded in 1977, there was a limited commercial market for emerging and avant-garde works, and the New York contemporary art scene revolved around alternative spaces such as Artists Space, White Columns, and P.S. 1. Founding Director Marcia Tucker envisioned an institution positioned between a traditional museum and an alternative space focusing
New Museum staff members: Marcia Tucker, A.C. Bryson, Allan Schwartzman, Susan Logan, and Michiko Miyamoto, ca. 1977. Courtesy of the New Museum, New York.
on the work of living artists. Against the standards of tradition, permanence, and connoisseurship generally associated with museum collections, the New Museum’s stated mission was “to provide a forum for contemporary art, especially work that has received little or no public exposure or critical attention, or that might otherwise be inaccessible to a broad-based audience; to share new issues that are constantly raised in current artistic inquiry; and to challenge the context of historical precedent and museum practice.” This early mission aimed to support recent art made by less established artists through exhibitions, events, interpretation, and documentation. One of the most radical innovations was the museum’s approach
to collecting: in 1978, the New Museum initiated a “Semi-Permanent” collection policy that allowed the Museum to critically examine and deaccession works from its collection after ten years to make room for new additions, though the idea was never fully implemented.
Over the years, the Museum’s approach to history has progressed to consider how the New Museum’s own institutional past might inform its current program. Seventeen years after the Semi-Permanent Collection was introduced, the exhibition’s organizers re-evaluated the Museum’s initial collection policy in the exhibition “Temporarily Possessed: The Semi-Permanent Collection” (1995). In the exhibition catalogue, former New Museum curator Alice Yang asked, “How does one maintain the forward trajectory towards innovation without rendering an absolute rupture between the old and the new and losing sight of the histories that contextualize recent developments?” We might ask today: How do we represent and activate the Museum’s history in light of its present for particular histories to be remobilized, or brought to critical scrutiny? In 1999, Director Lisa Phillips implemented an expanded vision for the Museum, which included collaborative partnerships and new digital initiatives. As part of this vision, plans for a digital archive began in 2002 with the announcement that the Museum would construct a new building. Preparation
for the move required a close examination of the Museum’s offsite and inaccessible holdings. As the Museum began to evaluate its relationship with its past, the Digital Archive was conceived as an experiment with public access to historical materials that were previously unavailable.
The common characterization of digital archives as “immaterial” frames them in opposition to the analog. Rather than polarizing the digital and analog, the New Museum conceives of the Digital Archive as an expansion of the reach of traditional cultural objects by increasing their accessibility, reproduction, and use. The Digital Archive is innovative in that it expands upon the interest in new forms of distribution posed by conceptual and process art during the 1960s and 1970s. While the structure of the Digital Archive frames meaning and provides context by creating new forms, it is nonetheless anchored within the material realities of documents, boxes, and folders. Significant documentation of the organization remains unprocessed and inaccessible to outside researchers - the collection is comprised of more than 300 linear feet of primary and secondary source materials, including papers from Marcia Tucker, curator and AIDS activist William Olander, and a wealth of exhibition files, press clippings, and research materials. Analog materials are ordered and described using traditional series, box, and folder structure in the form of finding aids. Moving forward, the aim will be to create a Digital Archive experience that truly combines
Ethyl Eichelberger, “The Decade Show: Performance Series,” 1990. Performance view. Photograph by Dona Ann McAdams. Courtesy the artist and New Museum, New York.
“old-school” archival methodologies of traditional archival description with the “new-school” digital culture.
The current incarnation of the Digital Archive acts as an important milestone with the potential to develop into a progressive archival program. We are particularly concerned with providing evidence of ephemeral events and time-based practices that resist traditional modes of documentation. The archive includes a wealth of traces from performance-based or mediated art events, such as “The Decade Show: Performance Series.” As we process and make available additional materials, we work to present the original content and context of the activities of the New Museum through finding aids, metadata, relationships, and links. We have also invited others to interpret and contribute ideas related to the archive. This interpretation is found in essay form on the Digital Archives “Features” page. By bringing in new ideas, we hope to create a narrative of the museum that is heterogeneous and relevant to the art and politics of today. As the New Museum continues to foster and develop programs focusing on contemporary art, we hope the archives will continue to inform current practices as well as future initiatives and that we will continue to think critically about the value of technological innovation in archives, while expanding upon our understanding of archival history and structures.
The New Museum gratefully acknowledges the generous support of Andrew W. Mellon Foundation, Bloomberg Philanthropies, Booth Ferris Foundation, Henry Luce Foundation, and the Institute of Museum and Library Services for making its re-imagined online initiatives possible.
B OARD OF DIRECTORS
Rachel Chatalbash President
Pamela Cruz
Vice President
Mitchell Brodsky
Treasurer
Melissa Bowling
Secretary
Karen Murphy
Director, Education Committee
Ryan Anthony Donaldson
Director, Communications
Committee
Anne Petrimoulx
Director, Membership Committee
Janet Bunde
Director, Outreach & Advocacy Committees
Nick Pavlik
Director, Programming Committee
Editor-in-Chief
Ryan Anthony Donaldson
Managing Editors
Rachel L. Conrad
Madeline Rogers
Mary Ann Quinn
Features Editor
Rachel Greer
Interview Editor
Ellen Mehling
Book Review Editor
Lindsey Wyckoff
ART News Editor
Will Andersen
Layout Design
Shirin Khaki
WELCOME
The following individuals have joined the Archivists Round Table of Metropolitan New York since June 2012
New Members | John Tomasicchio | Bleakley McDowell | Abril Siqueiros |
---|---|---|---|
Clifford Allen | Chris Ventura | Emily Nabasny | Robert Smith |
Erin Allsop | Miwa Yokoyama | Deborah Nitka | Theo Roth |
Lauren Barnes | New Student | Robin Preiss | Queens College |
Michala Biondi | Members | Rachel Ann Schimke | Shira Bistricer |
Mary Brown | Long Island | Erin Shaw | Caroline Curtin |
Anna Ciepiela | University, Palmer | Erica Titkemeyer | Bridget Jivanelli |
Ioannides | School of Library | Pamela Vizner Oyarce | Leeroy Kang |
Matthew Coody | and Information | Pratt Institute, | Deborah Marks |
Cara Dellatte | Science | School of Information | Minda Matz |
Honora Drohan | Meagan Doodian | and Library Sciences | Hallie McNeill |
Deborah Falik | Michael Leverett | Erin Barsan | Meg Milewski |
Caitlin Goodman | Dorn | Sophia Dahab | Evelyn Shunaman |
Yevgeniya Gribov | Tina Edell | Nik Dragovic | |
Kate Jadwin | Daniel Frett | Eleizabeth Kaufer | Other |
John Joseph | Marina Rosenfield | Megan Koontz | Lauren Alpher |
Miriam Kahn | Marie Stark | Leanora Lange | Sarah Bost |
Brigette C. Kamsler | New York University | Richard Lee | Caitlin Christian- |
Michael Kemezis | Rachel Corbman | Heather Lember | Lamb |
Natalie Milbrodt | Alyssa DesRochers | Carolyn Li-Madeo | Wanett Clyde |
Virginia Millington | Bonnie Gordon | Barbarajean Majewski | CJ Donson |
Nancy Palley | Nicole Greenhouse | Aria Marco | Annamarie Klose |
Gregory Raml | Rebecca Hernandez- | Rossy Mendez | Martie McNabb |
Haley Richardson | Gerber | Christina Neckles | Christina Orozco |
Stephanie Satalino | Salome Jeronimo | Ngozi Okoro | Ethan Patch |
Natalia Sawchuk | Stephanie Krom | Hallie Olson | Emily Reynolds |
Christopher Smith | Alexsandra Mitchell | Abby Rubin | Twila Rios |
Marc Steinberg | Taylor McBride | Anna Rybakov | Jim Rush |
Susie Tofte | Walter Schlect |
We extend a special thank you to the following members for their support as
Friends of ART: Sustaining Members: Sponsors of ART:
Timothy Conley
J. E. Molly Seegers
Gina Pollara
Stephanie Gellis
The mission of Metropolitan Archivist is to serve members of the Archivists Round Table of Metropolitan New York (ART) by:
- Informing them of ART activities through reports of monthly meetings and committee activities
- Relating important announcements about individual members and member repositories
- Reporting important news related to the New York metropolitan area archival profession
- Providing a forum to discuss archival issues
Metropolitan Archivist (ISSN 1546-3125) is issued semi-annually to the members of ART. Comments, questions, or submissions for features should be directed to the editor at outreach@nycarchivists.org. Deadlines for submissions are April 30 and November 15. Similar inquiries and submissions for reviews should be directed to outreach@nycarchivists.org.
Preferred length of submissions is 800−1000 words for feature articles and 400−500 words for reviews.
Metropolitan Archivist and ART assume no responsibility for statements made by contributors.
TABLE of CONTENTS
Letter from the President / Editor’s Note … 4
On Semi-permanence & History: New Museum Digital Archive by Tara Hart … 5
Picture Perfect: Surveying Photographs of the Manuscripts and Archives Division, Special Collections, New York Public Library by Valerie Wingfield … 8
Archive Notebook: “Writing to the Scrap” as Qualitative Crowdsourcing by Jane Greenway Carr and Cecily Swanson … 10
“Human Skin Color” and the Challenges of Using LCSH to Describe Oral Histories by Margaret Fraser … 12
iPads in the Reading Room: Broadening the Reference Horizon by Melanie Meyers … 14
Saving a Memory: Verrazano Narrows Bridge Construction by Laura DeMuro, Alexandra Janvery & Ann Christiansen … 15
INTERVIEW WITH THE ARCHIVIST: An Interview with Rebecca Goldman by Nick Pavlik … 16
BOOK REVIEWS: Rare Book Librarianship: An Introduction and Guide review by Matthew Flaherty / How to Manage Processing in Archives and Special Collections review by Michael D. Montalbano … 18
CITING COLLECTIONS submitted by Jim Moske … 19
EXHIBITIONS REVIEW: Straight to Hell: 20 Years of Dyke Action Machine … 20
ART News … 21
Programming Committee Report by Pamela Cruz … 32
Education Committee Report by Karen Murphy … 33
Treasurer’s Report … 34
Front and Back Cover: Images depicting the demolition of the Third Avenue “El” train tracks at the intersection of East 42nd Street and Third Avenue. Photographs taken in summer 1955, photographer unidentified. The photographs vividly convey the changing nature of transportation in New York, a theme of this year’s New York Archives Week K-12 Archives Education Institute. Courtesy The Durst Organization Archives.