Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
References
All Topics
Philosophy
Ethics

Ethical pluralism and global information ethics

Profile image of Charles EssCharles Ess

2006, Ethics and Information Technology

https://doi.org/10.1007/S10676-006-9113-3
visibility

…

description

12 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

A global information ethics that seeks to avoid imperialistic homogenization must conjoin shared norms while simultaneously preserving the irreducible differences between cultures and peoples. I argue that a global information ethics may fulfill these requirements by taking up an ethical pluralism -specifically AristotleÕs pros hen [''towards one''] or ''focal'' equivocals. These ethical pluralisms figure centrally in both classical and contemporary Western ethics: they further offer important connections with the major Eastern ethical tradition of Confucian thought. Both traditions understand ethical judgment to lead to and thus require ethical pluralism -i.e., an acceptance of more than one judgment regarding the interpretation and application of a shared ethical norm. Both traditions invoke notions of resonance and harmony to articulate pluralistic structures of connection alongside irreducible differences. Specific examples within Western computer and information ethics demonstrate these pluralisms in fact working in praxis. After reviewing further resonances and radical differences between Western and Eastern views, I then argue that emerging conceptions of privacy and data privacy protection laws in China, Hong Kong, Japan, and Thailand in fact constitute a robust, pros hen pluralism with Western conceptions. In both theory and in praxis, then, this pluralism thus fulfills the requirement for a global information ethics that holds shared norms alongside the irreducible differences between cultures and peoples.

Related papers

Interpretative Pros Hen Pluralism: from Computer-Mediated Colonization to a Pluralistic Intercultural Digital Ethics
Charles Ess

Philosophy & Technology, 2020

Intercultural Digital Ethics (IDE) faces the central challenge of how to develop a global IDE that can endorse and defend some set of (quasi-) universal ethical norms, principles, frameworks, etc. alongside sustaining local, culturally variable identities, traditions, practices, norms, and so on. I explicate interpretive pros hen (focal or “towards one”) ethical pluralism (EP(ph)) emerging in the late 1990s and into the twenty-first century in response to this general problem and its correlates, including conflicts generated by “computer-mediated colonization” that imposed homogenous values, communication styles, and so on upon “target” peoples and cultures via ICTs as embedding these values in their very design. I contrast different kinds of ethical pluralisms as structural apparatus for understanding what differences may mean and allow for, as these emerged in the 1990s forwards with EP(ph). As interwoven with phronēsis, a form of reflective judgment and virtue, EP(ph) more radica...

View PDFchevron_right
Brave New Worlds? The Once and Future Information Ethics
Charles Ess

2010

I highlight several aspects of current and future developments of the internet, in order to draw from these in turn specific consequences of particular significance for the ongoing development and expansion of information ethics. These consequences include changing conceptions of self and privacy in both Western and Eastern countries, and correlative shifts from the communication technologies of literacy and print to a "secondary orality." These consequences in turn imply that current and future information ethics should focus on developing a global but pluralistic virtue ethicsone that may offset the anti-democratic dangers of such secondary orality. (95 words)

View PDFchevron_right
Ethics at the age of information
Jose Maria Diaz Nafria

Insofar the interactions developed between social, technical and natural agents have been now significantly modified by the new information and communication technologies (ICT), we can speak of a new social dynamic arisen therefrom. Moreover, the central role that information takes in social life has lead us to talk about the dawn of the information age. If we take this seriously, a consequent ethical thinking should start unravelling the tangled skein through rephrasing what information really is and how it can be understood throughout reality. Otherwise, how could we think our proper behaviour embedded in the complex realm of informational interactions of all kind? In any case, is it feasible puzzling out most appropriate behaviours from the outset –as a sort of optimized code? Or rather, are there fundamental constraints setting the optimum completely out of reach and our whole (cultural) history just the path of the exploration? The globalisation process, developed in strong connection to the deployment of information technologies in very unequal benefit to different groups of the global human system, settles a situation in which the management of the global system complexity is significantly apart from democratic handling, despite the broad usage of democratic facades. Indeed participatory process –concerning relevant decision-making issues– are hard to be found behind these facades. Addressing the issue of inequality at the global scale is in our view a fundamental question of today's information ethics for which an approach based on electronic-Subsidiarity is proposed.

View PDFchevron_right
Information Ethics I: Origins and Evolutions
Jared Bielby

The following paper will trace the recently established field of Information Ethics through it’s various evolutions, from it’s origins in Librarianship to it’s role as a global player in areas as diverse as technology, media, global humanitarianism, and the philosophy of information. The praxis of the field will be outlined for the uninitiated reader, followed by an intimate history of the founding players and their continued contribution to this ever-evolving field. The current evolutions of Information Ethics will then be explored in the context of their application to the viral global phenomena of Intercultural Information Ethics (IIE), and finally, the paper will conclude with projections towards future evolutions in Information Ethics, as well as an exploration of potential definitions for the field.

View PDFchevron_right
Intercultural Information Ethics
Soraj Hongladarom

International Review of …, 2010

View PDFchevron_right
Togetherness and Respect: Ethical Concerns of Privacy In Global Web Societies
Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic

AI & Society, 2006

Today's computer network technologies are sociologically founded on hunter-gatherer principles; common users may be possible subjects of surveillance and sophisticated Internet-based attacks are almost impossible to prevent. At the same time, information and communication technology, ICT offers the technical possibility of embedded privacy protection. Making technology legitimate by design is a part of the intentional design for democracy. This means incorporating options for socially acceptable behaviour in technical systems, and making the basic principles of privacy protection, rights and responsibilities, transparent to the user. The current global e-polis already has, by means of different technologies, de facto built-in policies that define the level of user-privacy protection. That which remains is to make their ethical implications explicit and understandable to citizens of the global village through interdisciplinary disclosive ethical methods, and to make them correspond to the high ethical norms that support trust, the essential precondition of any socialization. The good news is that research along these lines is already in progress. Hopefully, this will result in a future standard approach to the privacy of network communications.

View PDFchevron_right
Foundations of Information Ethics
Luciano Floridi

The handbook of information and computer ethics, 2008

View PDFchevron_right
Cybernetic Pluralism in an Emerging Global Information and Computing
Charles Ess

International review of information ethics, 2007

I trace the development of an emerging global Information and Computing Ethics (ICE), arguing that ethical pluralism-as found in both Western and Asian traditions-is crucial to such an ICE. In particular, ethical pluralism-as affiliated with notions of judgment (phronesis in Aristotle and the cybernetes in Plato), resonance, and harmony-holds together shared ethical norms (as required for a shared global ethic) alongside the irreducible differences that define individual and cultural identities. I demonstrate how such pluralism is already at work in both contemporary theory and praxis, including in development projects in diverse cultures. I conclude with a number of resonances between this global pluralism and African thought and traditions that thus suggest that such a pluralism may also succeed in the African context, as diverse African cultures and countries seek to benefit from ICTs while maintaining their cultural identities.

View PDFchevron_right
Privacy. An Intercultural Perspective
Rafael Capurro, Prof. Dr.

Ethics and Information Technology, 2005

This paper deals with intercultural aspects of privacy, particularly with regard to differences between Japanese and Western conceptions. It starts with a reconstruction of the genealogy of Western subjectivity and human dignity as the basic assumptions underlying Western views on privacy. An analysis of the Western concept of informational privacy is presented. The Japanese topic of ''denial of self'' (Musi) as well as the concepts of Seken, Shakai and Ikai (as analyzed by the authors of the companion piece on privacy in Japan) give rise to intercultural comparisons. The paper addresses the question of privacy in cyberspace and mass media. Finally the question of freedom of speech is related to the Japanese concepts of Ohyake and Watakusi.

View PDFchevron_right
Introduction special issue Privacy, ethics and information technology
Bart van der Sloot
View PDFchevron_right

References (53)

  1. C. Ess and the AoIR ethics working group. Ethical decision- making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee. Available online: www.aoir.org/reports/ ethics.pdf. The Cathedral or the Bazaar? The AoIR Document on Internet Research Ethics as an Exercise in Open Source Ethics. In M. Consolvo, editor, Internet Research Annual Volume 1: Selected Papers from the Association of Internet Researchers Conferences 2000-2002, pp. 95-103. Peter Lang, New York, 2003.
  2. J. Walther. Research Ethics in Internet-Enabled Research: Human Subjects Issues and Methodological Myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3). Available online: <http:// www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_walther.html.
  3. D. Elgesem. What is Special About the Ethical Issues in Online Research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3): 195- 203. Available online: <http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ ethics_elgesem.html. 26 A similar pluralism can be seen between U.S. and Norwe- gian requirements for protecting confidentiality and anonymity of research subjects. Both focus on these basic requirements of Human Subjects protections in research -but the U.S. requires such protections only for the individual subject, while Norwegian research ethics requires such protections for both the individual and his/her close web of relations (NESH (National Committee for Research Ethics in the Social sciences and the Humanities). Guidelines for Research Ethics in the Social Sciences, Law and the Humanities. <http://www.etikkom.no/NESH/guidelines.htm>, 2001, para. 40). Additional pluralistic structures can be seen in the RESPECT projectÕs ethical guidelines for socio-economic research Footnote 26 continued across the European Union (see <www.respectproject.org>). As well, Paul Reidenberg discerns such a pluralism between E.U. and U.S. approaches to data privacy protection, as these approaches reflect diverse ways of implementing shared ''First Principles'' of Data Protection (J.R. Reidenberg. Resolving Conflicting Interna- tional Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52: 1315-1376, 1331f, 2000).
  4. B.C. Stahl. Responsible Management of Information Systems. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, Pennsylvania, 2004. 28 See especially: Stahl (2004, 153-215).
  5. C. Ess. What is Information Ethics? <http://www.drury. edu/ess/CAP04/cap04infoethics.html>, 2005b. 30 IÕm very grateful indeed to Terry Bynum for confirming this account of his work: personal email to the author, 27 September, 2005.
  6. C. Ess. Beyond Contemptus Mundi and Cartesian Dualism: Western Resurrection of the Bodysubject and (re)new(ed) Coher- encies with Eastern Approaches to Life/Death. In G. Wohlfart, H.-G. Moeller, editors, Philosophie des Todes: Death philosophy East and West, pp. 15-36. Chora Verlag, Munich; C. Ess. Moral Imper- atives for Life in an Intercultural Global Village. In R. Cavalier, editor, The Internet and Our Moral Lives, pp. 161-193. State Uni- versity of New York Press, Albany, New York, 2004b; C. Ess. Can the Local Reshape the Global? Ethical Imperatives for Humane Intercultural Communication Online. In J. Fru¨hbauer, R. Capurro and T. Hausmanninger, editors, Localizing the Internet. Ethical Aspects in An Intercultural Perspective (Volume 4, ICIE Series), 2005a. 32 Ames and Rosemont (1998, 29).
  7. Ames and Rosemont (1998, 48).
  8. Ames and Rosemont (1998, 30), My thanks to Profs. Zhang Ning and Nakada Makoto for their help with the Chinese characters at work here.
  9. W.-M. Tu. Humanity as embodied love: Exploring filial piety as a global ethical perspective. In M. Zlomislic and D. Goicoechea, editors, Jen Agape Tao with Tu Wei-Ming, pp. 28-37, p. 35. Institute of Global Cultural Studies, Binghampton, NY, 1999.
  10. See M. Nakada and T. Takanori. Japanese Conceptions of Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1: March): 27-36, 2005; R. Capurro. Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1: March): 37-47, 2005; C. Ess. ''Lost in Translation''?: Intercultural Dialogues on Privacy and Information Ethics (Introduction to special issue on Privacy and Data Privacy Protection in Asia). Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1: March): 1-6, 2005c. 37 These modern Western conceptions are indeed modern -i.e., historically connected not simply with Lockean and Kantian ideals and the Enlightenment, but further with industrialization, as increasing wealth makes individual physical space -and thus individual privacy -possible (cf. L. Floridi. Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy. In C. Ess and M. Thorseth, editors, Global Information Ethics: Cross-cultural Approaches to Emancipation, Privacy and Regulation, special issue of Ethics and Information Technology, forthcoming). In this light, the emergence of positive, Western-like notions of individual privacy in China, Japan, Thailand, and Korea over the past three decades parallels the history of individual privacy in the West. In particular, increasing material wealth and the creation of personal space now allows young people in these countries to increasingly insist on personal and individual privacy, in ways that are alien (not to mention baffling and frustrating) to their parents and their parentsÕ generation (e.g., Lin, Pei-Chun and Caroline Henkes. Privacy Re- search: Privacy Sense in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Unpub- lished MS: Universita¨t Trier, 2004; Lu¨yao-huai. Footnote 37 continued Privacy and Data Privacy Issues in Contemporary China. Ethics and Information Technology, 7 (1: March): 7-15). Moreover, Soraj Hongladarom observes that these contrasts between Western and especially Buddhist views run alongside important similarities. Buddhism certainly has important understandings of the individ- ual, first of all, as the entity responsible for his/her Enlightenment - and Western thought, as exemplified in Aristotle, has communi- tarian elements as well (S. Hongladarom, Analysis and Justification of Privacy from a Buddhist Perspective. In S. Hongladarom and C. Ess, editors, Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspec- tives. Idea Publishing, Hershey, PA, forthcoming). HongladaromÕs analysis of these coherencies thus provides a further example -but from an explicitly Buddhist perspective -of resonance or harmony between East and West.
  11. D. Johnson. Computer Ethics, 3rd. ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2001.
  12. K. Kitiyadisai. Privacy Rights and Protection: Foreign Values in Modern Thai Context. Ethics and Information Technol- ogy, 7(1: March): 17-26, 2005.
  13. P. Ramasoota. Privacy: A Philosophical Sketch and a Search for a Thai Perception. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, 4(2: September): 89-107, 97f, 100f 2001. 41 Nakada and Tamura (2005). 42 Lu¨(2005).
  14. J. Bizer. Grundrechte im Netz: Von der freien Meinungsa¨ußerung bis zum Recht auf Eigentum. In C. Schulzki- Haddouti (Hrsg.), Bu¨rgerrechte im Netz, pp. 21-29. Bonn: Bundeszentrale fu¨r politische Bildung. Available online: <http:// www.bpb.de/publikationen/UZX6DW,0,B%fcrgerrechte_im_Netz. html>, 2003).
  15. R. Tang. Approaches to Privacy -The Hong Kong Experi- ence. <http://www.pco.org.hk/english/infocentre/speech_20020222. html>, 2002. References R. Ames and H. Rosemont, The Analects of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. Ballantine Books, New York, 1998.
  16. T. Aquinas, Summa Theologiae. Vol. 1: The Existence of God: Part One: Questions 1-13. Image Books, Garden City, NY, 1969.
  17. Aristotle, Metaphysics I-IX (Vol XVII, Aristotle in Twenty- Three Volumes). H. Tredennick, trans. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1968.
  18. Aristotle, Posterior Analytics, Topica. H. Tredennick & E. S. Forster, trans. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1960.
  19. J. Bizer. Grundrechte im Netz: Von der freien Meinungsa¨ußerung bis zum Recht auf Eigentum. In C. Schulzki-Haddouti (Hrsg.), Bu¨rgerrechte im Netz, pp. 21-29. Bundeszentrale fu¨r politische Bildung, Bonn. Available online: <http://www.bpb.de/publikationen/ UZX6DW,,0,B%fcrgerrechte_im_Netz.html>, 2003.
  20. J. Boss, Analyzing Moral Issues. 3 ed. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2005.
  21. D. Burrell, Analogy and Philosophical Language. Yale University Press, New Haven, 1973.
  22. R. Capurro. Privacy: An Intercultural Perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1: March): 37-47, 2005.
  23. J. Chan. Confucian Attitudes Towards Ethical Pluralism. In R. Madsen and T.B. Strong, editors, The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 129-153. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003.
  24. Y. Chen. Privacy in China. Unpublished MasterÕs thesis. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2005.
  25. G. Collste. Is Religious Pluralism Possible? In G. Collste, editors, Possibilities of Religious Pluralism, pp. 48-61. Linko¨ping University Electronic Press, Linko¨ping, 2005.
  26. Y. Chen (2005). Privacy in China. Unpublished MasterÕs thesis. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, 2005; cf. Lu( 2005). 46
  27. See Kitiyadisai (2005).
  28. R.T. De George. Business Ethics. 5th edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1999.
  29. D.F. Eickelman. Islam and Ethical Pluralism. In R. Madsen and T.B. Strong, editors, The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 161-180. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2003.
  30. R. Elberfeld. Resonanz als Grundmotiv ostasiatischer Ethik [Resonance as a Fundamental Motif of East Asian Ethics]. in R. Elberfeld and G. Wohlfart, editors, Komparative Ethik: Das gute Leben zwischen den Kulturen [Comparative Ethics: The Good Life between Cultures], pp. 131-141. Edition Chora, Cologne, 2002.
  31. D. Elgesem. What is Special About the Ethical Issues in Online Research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3): 195-203. Available online: <http://www.nyu.edu/ projects/nissenbaum/ethics_elgesem.html>, 2002.
  32. C. Ess. Analogy in the Critical Works: Kant's Transcenden- tal Philosophy as Analectical Thought. University Micro- films International, Ann Arbor, MI, 1983.
  33. C. Ess. The Cathedral or the Bazaar? The AoIR Document on Internet Research Ethics as an Exercise in Open Source Ethics. In M. Consolvo, editor, Internet Research Annual Volume 1: Selected Papers From the Association of Internet Researchers Conferences 2000-2002, pp. 95- 103. Peter Lang, New York, 2003.
  34. C. Ess. Beyond contemptus mundi and Cartesian Dualism: Western Resurrection of the Bodysubject and (re)new(ed) Coherencies with Eastern Approaches to Life/Death. In G. Wohlfart and H.-G. Moeller, editors, Philosophie des Todes: Death Philosophy East and West, pp. 15-36.
  35. C. Ess. Moral Imperatives for Life in an Intercultural Global Village. In R. Cavalier, editor, The Internet and Our Moral Lives, pp. 161-193. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York, 2004b.
  36. C. Ess. Can the Local Reshape the Global? Ethical Imperatives for Humane Intercultural Communication Online. In J. Fru¨hbauer, R. Capurro and T. Hausmann- inger, editors, Localizing the Internet. Ethical Aspects in an Intercultural Perspective (Volume 4, ICIE Series), 2005a. C. Ess. What is Information Ethics? <http://www. drury.edu/ess/CAP04/cap04infoethics.html>, 2005b.
  37. C. Ess. ''Lost in Translation''? Intercultural Dialogues on Privacy and Information Ethics (Introduction to special issue on Privacy and Data Privacy Protection in Asia). Ethics and Information Technology, 7(1: March): 1-6, 2005c.
  38. C. Ess. Culture and Global Networks: Hope for a Global Ethics? In Jeroen van den Hoven and John Weckert, editors, Information Technology and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.
  39. C. Ess and the AoIR ethics working group. Ethical decision- making and Internet research: Recommendations from the aoir ethics working committee. Available online: www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf.
  40. L. Floridi. Four Challenges for a Theory of Informational Privacy. In C. Ess and M. Thorseth, editors, Global Information Ethics: Cross-cultural Approaches to Eman- cipation, Privacy and Regulation, special issue of Ethics and Information Technology, forthcoming.
  41. W.A. Galston. Liberal Egalitarian Attitudes Toward Eth- ical Pluralism. In R. Madsen and T.B. Strong, editors, The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 25-41.
  42. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford, 2003. J.H. Haldane. Natural Law and Ethical Pluralism. In R. Madsen and T.B. Strong, editors,, The Many and the One: Religious and Secular Perspectives on Ethical Pluralism in the Modern World, pp. 89-114. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2003.
  43. L. Hinman, Ethics: A Pluralistic Approach to Moral Theory. Fort Worth, Harcourt, Brace, 1998.
  44. S. Hjarvard. Mediated Encounters. An Essay on the Role of Communication Media in the Creation of Trust in the 'Global MetropolisÕ. In G. Stald and T. Tufte, editors, Global Encounters: Media and Cultural Transformation, pp. 69-84. University of Luton Press, Luton, 2002.
  45. S. Hongladarom. Analysis and Justification of Privacy from a Buddhist Perspective. In S. Hongladarom and C. Ess, editors, Information Technology Ethics: Cultural Perspec- tives. Idea Publishing, Hershey, PA, forthcoming.
  46. D. Johnson, Computer Ethics. 3 ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2001.
  47. J. Rawls, Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press, New York, 1993.
  48. J.R. Reidenberg. Resolving Conflicting International Data Privacy Rules in Cyberspace. Stanford Law Review, 52: 1315-1376, 2000.
  49. B.C. Stahl, Responsible Management of Information Sys- tems. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, Pennsylvania, 2004. R. Tang. Approaches to Privacy -The Hong Kong Experience. <http://www.pco.org.hk/english/infocentre/ speech_20020222.html>, 2002.
  50. W.-M. Tu. Humanity as Embodied Love: Exploring Filial Piety as a Global Ethical Perspective. In M. Zlomislic and D. Goicoechea, editors, Jen Agape Tao with Tu Wei-Ming, pp. 28-37. Institute of Global Cultural Studies, Binghampton, NY, 1999.
  51. H. Veatch. A Critique of Benedict. In J.R. Weinberg and K.E. Yandell, editors, Theory of Knowledge. Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York, 1971.
  52. J. Walther. Research Ethics in Internet-Enabled Research: Human Subjects Issues and Methodological Myopia. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3). Available online: <http://www.nyu.edu/projects/nissenbaum/ethics_walther. html>, 2002.
  53. K.J. Warren. The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism. Environmental Ethics, 12(2: (Summer): 123-146, 1990.

Related papers

East–West Perspectives on Privacy, Ethical Pluralism and Global Information Ethics
Charles Ess

Proceedings of the 30th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium in Kirchberg, 2007

View PDFchevron_right
“Lost in Translation”?: Intercultural Dialogues on Privacy and Information Ethics (Introduction to Special Issue on Privacy and Data Privacy Protection in Asia)
Charles Ess

Ethics and Information Technology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right
Neither relativism nor imperialism: Theories and practices for a global information ethics
Charles Ess

Ethics and Information Technology, 2006

We highlight the important lessons our contributors present in our collective project of fostering dialogues both between applied ethics and computer science and between cultures. These include: critical reflexivity; procedural (partly Habermasian) approaches to establishing such central norms as ''emancipation''; the importance of local actors in using ICTs both for global management and in development projects -especially as these contribute the trust essential for the social context of use of new technologies; and pluralistic approaches that preserve local cultural differences alongside shared norms. May Thorseth then contextualizes our work vis-a-vis broader philosophical discussions of deliberation and democracy.

View PDFchevron_right
Building Bridges: Eurocentric to Intercultural Information Ethics
Ayesha Gautam

Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, 2021

Misguided use, manipulation, misappropriation, disruption and mismanagement of Information deeply affects the infosphere as well as the social and moral fabric of a society. Information ethics is an attempt to bring the creation, organization, dissemination, and use of information within the ambit of ethical standards and moral codes. The diverse and inherently pluralistic nature of societies however puts forth an additional demand on us -to come up with an intercultural information ethics. An intercultural ethics which is other-centric, context sensitive and workable without being homogenizing, patronizing and colonizing. An endeavor in that direction has already been made by proponents of intercultural information ethics like: Charles M. Ess, Fay Sudweeks, Rafael Capurro, Pak-Hang Wong, Soraj Hongladarom et al. In our paper, we propose that the kind of ethical pluralism being sought in the domain of information ethics can be attained by having a reappraisal of the current methodological strategies, by casting a critical relook at the Eurocentric ethical model. This paper analyses the current framework of Intercultural Information Ethics. And in an endeavour to move towards an allencompassing, other-centric, workable, intercultural, harmonious and compassionate model of 'Pluralistic Information Ethics', it proposes the Indian / Asian philosophical method of 'Samvāda' to the current inventory which includes methods like: 'parrhesia/free speech' and 'interpretive phronēsis.

View PDFchevron_right
Comparative Philosophies in Intercultural Information Ethics; Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies
Jared Bielby

Confluence: Online Journal of World Philosophies

The following review explores Intercultural Information Ethics (IIE) in terms of comparative philosophy, supporting IIE as the most relevant and significant development of the field of Information Ethics (IE). The focus of the review is threefold. First, it will review the core presumption of the field of IIE, that being the demand for an inter- mission in the pursuit of a founding philosophy for IE in order to first address the philosophical biases of IE by western philosophy. Second, a history of the various philosophical streams of IIE will be outlined, including its literature and pioneering contributors. Lastly, a new synthesis of comparative philosophies in IIE will be offered, looking towards a future evolution of the field. Examining the interchange between contemporary information ethicists regarding the discipline of IIE, the review first outlines the previously established presumptions of the field of IIE that posit the need for an IE as grounded in western sensibilities. The author then addresses the implications of the foregoing presumption from several non-western viewpoints, arguing that IIE does in fact find roots in non-western philosophies as established in the concluding synthesis of western and eastern philosophical traditions.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Human Geography
  • Philosophy
  • Applied Ethics
  • Information Ethics
  • Data Privacy
  • Information Technology Ethics

    • Cited by

    Floridi's Philosophy of Information and Information Ethics: Current Perspectives, Future Directions
    Charles Ess

    The Information Society, 2009

    with an ethical pluralism in IE that will be enhanced through IE's further incorporation of discourse ethics. In this form, PI and IE emerge as still more robust frameworks for a global ICE; in this form, however, they also profoundly challenge modern Western assumptions regarding reality, the self, and our ethical obligations.

    View PDFchevron_right
    A cross-cultural investigation of situational information security awareness programs
    Profect Chen

    Information Management & Computer Security, 2008

    Purpose -The aim of this research is to make users aware of the importance surrounding the issue of security and security awareness while at the same time making educators as well as other individuals aware of the differing effects of cultural dimensions into the learning process. Design/methodology/approach -An inter-cultural study was conducted to investigate if users from the USA and Taiwan exposed to the same situational awareness learning would have different performance in those security awareness outcomes. Findings -The findings confirm that American users who received the situational learning outperformed those users who received the traditional face-to-face instruction. Taiwanese users did not perform significantly differently between these two treatments.

    View PDFchevron_right
    Ethical implications of digital infrastructures for pluralistic perspectives
    Maria Joseph Israel

    Ethics and Information Technology

    It is important to design digital infrastructure that can better accommodate multicultural and pluralistic views from its foundations. It is insufficient to look at only the responses and influences of culture on technology without considering how the technology can be adapted in anticipation of, and to support, pluralistic multicultural perspectives in its original design. This goes beyond the simple act of supporting multiple languages and interfaces, but should include the ability of digital and data infrastructure to capture and accommodate pluralistic views, supporting multiple perspectives in the representation and processing of the data itself. In this work, we look at how rethinking the representation of data can allow us to more directly tackle domains that are typically hampered due to intercultural differences, and their inevitable losses in translation, particularly losses of valuable information like context and intention. When we refer to a loss of context and intentio...

    View PDFchevron_right
    The Ubuntu Robot: Towards a Relational Conceptual Framework for Intercultural Robotics
    Mark Coeckelbergh

    Science and Engineering Ethics, 2022

    Recently there has been more attention to the cultural aspects of social robots. This paper contributes to this effort by offering a philosophical, in particular Wittgensteinian framework for conceptualizing in what sense and how robots are related to culture and by exploring what it would mean to create an “Ubuntu Robot”. In addition, the paper gestures towards a more culturally diverse and more relational approach to social robotics and emphasizes the role technology can play in addressing the challenges of modernity and in assisting cultural change: it argues that robots can help us to engage in cultural dialogue, reflect on our own culture, and change how we do things. In this way, the paper contributes to the growing literature on cross-cultural approaches to social robotics.

    View PDFchevron_right
    Human rights as a topic and guide for LIS research and practice
    Kay Mathiesen

    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved