Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Loyola eCommons Process Analysis of Rorschach Interpretation

Abstract

Disertación para Doctorado en Filosofía

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. This study analyzes the Rorschach Test interpretation process rather than its validation or underlying principles.
  2. Analysts selected between 6 to 49 cards, averaging 22 cards for diagnosis, highlighting individual variability.
  3. Group patterns in analysis reveal consistent interpretive procedures among analysts, indicating shared understanding.
  4. The relationship between utility indices of scoring categories and their sequential positioning was significant, indicating diagnostic relevance.
  5. The research emphasizes introspective data collection to enhance understanding of analysts' reasoning during interpretation.

References (32)

  1. Beck, S. J. Error, symbol, and method in the Rorschach test. J. abnorm . . soc. Psychol., 1942, 37, 83-103.
  2. Bell, J. E. The case of Gregor:interpretation of test data. i!. proj. Tech. , 194~ 1~ 433-468.
  3. Benjamin, J. D. & Ebaugh, F. G.The diagnostic validity of the Rorschach test. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1938, 94, 1163-1178.
  4. Block J' I Levine, L. S., & McNemar, Q. Testing for the existence of psychometric patterns.:!: abnorm. soc. P'sychol., 1951, 46, 356 -3;;9.
  5. Bloom, B. S. & Broder, Lois J. Problem-solving processes of college students. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1950.
  6. Chambers, Guinevere S. & Hamlin, R. M. The validity of judgments based on ~lind t Rorschach records. J. consult. Psychol., 1957, 21, 105-109.
  7. Cronbach, L. J. Pattern tabulation: a statistical method of analy:';:~ of limited patterns of scoring with particular reference to the Rorschach test. Educ. psychol. Measmt., 1949, 9, 149-171.
  8. Cronbach, L. J. .Statistica1 methods applied to the Rorschach scores: a review. Psycho!. Bull. ~ 1949, 46, 393-429.
  9. Elizur, A. Content analysis of the Rorschach with regard to anxiety and hostility. 1. proj. Tech., 1949, 13, 247-284.
  10. Ferguson, G. A. Approaches to the experimental study of the Rorschach test. Canad. J. Psychol., 1951, 5, 157-166.
  11. Heidbreder, Edna F. Problem-solving in children and adults. Pedag:::>g. Sem. ~ ~ genet. Psychol., 1928, 35, 522 -545.
  12. Hertz, Marguerite R. Validity of Rorschach methodology. Amer. J. Orthopsycl~., 1941, il, 512-520.
  13. Kendall, M. G. Rank correlation methods. New York: Hafner Publ. Co., . 1955.
  14. Klopfer, B. Instruction in the Rorschach method. J. consult Psychol., 1943, 7,112-119.
  15. I 15. Klopfer~ B., Ainsworth, M. D., Klopfer, W. G" & Holt, R. R. Developments in the Rorschach technique: "~!.()1 ... I. New York: World Bo:::>l~ Co., 1954.
  16. MacFarlane, J. W. Problems of validation inherent in projective methods. Amer. ~ Orthopsychiat., 1942, 12, 405-411.
  17. Maier, N. R. F. Reasoning in-children, J. compo Psychol., 1936" 21, 357-366.
  18. Palmer, J. O. A dual approach to Rorschach validation.: a methodological study. Psychol. Monogr., 1951. 65. No. 325.
  19. Piaget, J. Judgment and reasoning in the child. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Co., 1928.
  20. Rimoldi, H. J. A. A new technique for appraising diagnostic ability. Loyola University, 1956. (Mimeo)
  21. Rimoldi, a J. A. A technique for the study of problem-solving. Educ. psycho!. Measmt., 1955, 15, 450-461.
  22. Rimoldi, H. J. A" Devane, J. R., & Grib, T. F. Testing skills in medical diagnosis. (Commonwealth Fund project), Loyola University, 1958. . ,1. 1 (Mimeo) ',.
  23. Rimoldi, H. .. J. A., Devane, J. R., & Haley, J. The analysis of test performance as a process. In press, 1958.
  24. Rimoldi, H. J. A. & Grib., T. F. Pattern Analysis. Loyola University, 1958. (Mimeo)
  25. Ross., W. D. The relation between Rorschach interpretations and clinic3.l diagnosis . .1..: proj. Tech . ., 1950, 14, 5-14.
  26. Stephenson, W. The study ofoehavior: ,9-technique and its methodology. Chicago: Univer, of Chicago Press, 1953.
  27. Tit~hener, E.B. Lectures on the experimental psychology of the thought processes. New York;: :Macmilla.n Co., 1909.
  28. Vernon, P. E. Matching methods as applied to the investigation of the personality. Psychol. Bull., 1936, 33, 149-177.
  29. Wertheimer, M. Productive thinking. New York: Harper & Bros., 1945.
  30. Wirt, R. D. Pattern analysis of the Rorschach. J. glin.Psychol., 1856, , i 12, 382-384. "
  31. Wittenborn, J. R. A factor analysis of Rorschach scoring categories. J. consult. Ps;ychol., 1950, 14,261-267.
  32. Zubin, J. FailUres of the Rorschach technique. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 303-315.