Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Software Project Risk Analysis using Intelligent Project metrics

Abstract

Software project administration most likely is a domain that has seen the most noteworthy rate of undertaking failures on the planet. This is not the situation with other projects of different domains because of better administration of their inalienable qualities and shortcomings. Software projects have innate instabilities and risks involved at every stage. Social Software projects endure significantly more prerequisite changes and require more thoughtfulness regarding risk administration. Risk administration is important to expand the possibility of accomplishment of any future task by investigating its instabilities. It will meet every one of the solutions for project advancement success by keeping in perspective all the future issues that may happen amid the undertaking procedure. It incorporates the recognizable proof of risks and their evaluation in the task course and tries to make changes to make the project more valuable by cutting down on the losses incurred due to the potential risks. Risk administration objectives are to capitalize on project undertaking risks that are distinguished before beginning of the task and amid the execution. This paper also aims to provide an insight to this process alongside an intelligent framework for systematic and more efficient risk elimination and handling in the software industry.

References (12)

  1. Beranek, P. M.; Broder, J.; Romano, N.; Reinig, B.; (2005). Management of virtual project teams: Guidelines for team leaders. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, s 247-259.
  2. B. Reyck, Y. Grushka-Cockayne, M. Lockett, S. Calderini, M. Moura, A. Sloper, The impact of project portfolio management on information technology projects, International Journal of Project Management 23 (7) (2005) 524-537.
  3. Miler J., Górski J., Implementing risk management in software projects, Proc. of 3rd National Software Engineering Conference, Poland, 2001
  4. Higuera R. P., Haimes Y. Y., Software Risk Management, SEI report CMU/SEI--96-TR-012, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh PA, June 1996.
  5. J. Cumming, IT portfolio management: balancing risks and rewards of projects yields significant returns, Network World 19 (13), 2002, pp. 48.
  6. Laura Girdžiūtė. 2012. Risks in Agriculture and Opportunities of their Integrated Evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 62, 783-790.
  7. Selby RW, Software Engineering: Barry W. Boehm's Lifetime Contributions to Software Development, Management, and Research, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
  8. F. Reyes,N. Cerpa, A. Candia-Véjar,M. Bardeen, The optimization of success probability for software projects using genetic algorithms, Journal of Systems and Software 84 (5)(2011) 775-785.
  9. W. Han, S. Huang, An empirical analysis of risk components and performance on software projects, Journal of Systems and Software 80 (1) (2007) 42-50.
  10. John Organ, Larry Stapleton. 2013. Information Systems Risk Paradigms: Towards a New Theory on Systems Risk. IFAC Proceedings Volumes 46:8, 116-121
  11. E. Wang, P. Ju, J. Jiang, G. Klein, The effects of change control and management review on software flexibility and project performance, Information Management 45 (7) (2008) 438-443.
  12. K.R. MacCrimmon, D.A. Wehrung, The risk in-basket,Journal of Business 57 (3), 1984, pp. 367-38