Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Acquiring Primary and Secondary Assumptions in BGP-MS

1994

Abstract

User modeling components should include suitable mechanisms for acquiring user models, in addition to representation and management mechanisms. The methods developed to date can be divided into two groups: Those that extract primary assumptions about the user from his/her system input; and those that extract secondary (orderivative) assumptions from primary and other secondary assumptions.

References (18)

  1. G. Brajnik and C. Tasso. A shell for developing non-monotonic user modeling systems. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 40:31-62, 1994.
  2. T. W. Finin. GUMS: A general user modeling shell. In A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster, editors, User Models in Dialog Systems, pages 411-430. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1989.
  3. D. Gabbay and H. J. Ohlbach. Quantifier elimination in second-order predicate logic. In B. Nebel, C. Rich, and W. Swartout, editors, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proc. of the Third International Conference (KR'92), pages 425-435. Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1992.
  4. J. Kay. The um toolkit for reusable, long term user models. Submitted to User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1994.
  5. A. Kobsa, D. Müller, and A. Nill. KN-AHS: An adaptive hypertext client of the user modeling system BGP-MS. In Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on User Modeling, pages 99-105, Hyannis, MA, 1994.
  6. A. Kobsa. Utilizing knowledge: The components of the SB-ONE knowledge representation workbench. In J. Sowa, editor, Principles of Semantic Networks: Exploration in the Representation of Knowledge. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA, 1991.
  7. A. Kobsa and W. Pohl. The BGP-MS user modeling shell system. To appear in User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1994.
  8. W. W. McCune. Otter 3.0 reference manual and guide. Technical Report ANL-94/6, Argonne National Laboratory, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne, IL, 1994.
  9. H.J. Ohlbach. Semantics-based translation methods for modal logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 1(5):691-746, 1991.
  10. J. Orwant. Heterogeneous learning in the Doppelgänger user modeling system. Submitted to User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 1994.
  11. W. Pohl, A. Kobsa, and O. Kutter. User model acquisition heuristics based on dialogue acts. WIS Report 6, WG Knowledge-Based Information Systems, Department of Information Science, University of Konstanz, Germany, 1994.
  12. W. Pohl. Viewübergreifendes Schließen in BGP-MS. In A. Kobsa and W. Pohl, editors, Arbeitspapiere des Workshops "Adaptivität und Benutzermodellierung in interaktiven Software- systemen". WIS Memo 7. WG Knowledge-Based Information Systems, Department of Informa- tion Science, University of Konstanz, Germany, 1993.
  13. J. R. Searle. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, 1969.
  14. S. Sitter and A. Stein. Modeling the illocutionary aspects of information-seeking dialogues. Information Processing & Management, 28(2):165-180, 1992.
  15. H. Vergara. PROTUM: A prolog based tool for user modeling. WIS Memo 10, WG Knowledge- Based Information Systems, Department of Information Science, University of Konstanz, Ger- many, 1994.
  16. T. Winograd. A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work. Human Computer Interaction, 3(1):3-30, 1988.
  17. U. Winkler. Formalismentransformationen in KN-PART. Master's thesis, WG Knowledge-Based Information Systems, Department of Information Science, University of Konstanz, Germany, 1994.
  18. J. Zimmermann. Hybride Wissensrepräsentation in BGP-MS: Integration der Wissensverarbeitung von SB-ONE und OTTER. WIS Memo, WG Knowledge-Based Information Systems, Department of Information Science, University of Konstanz, Germany, 1994.