Abstract
Managing water resources systems usually involves conflicts. Behaviors of stakeholders, who might be willing to contribute to improvements and reach a win–win situation, sometimes result in worse conditions for all parties. Game theory can identify and interpret the behaviors of parties to water resource problems and describe how interactions of different parties who give priority to their own objectives, rather than system's objective, result in a system's evolution.
References (76)
- Adams, G., Rausser, G., Simon, L., 1996. Modelling multilateral negotiations: an application to California Water Policy. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 30 (1), 97-111.
- Ambec, S., Ehlers, L., 2008. Sharing a river among satiable agents. Games and Economic Behavior 64 (1), 35-50.
- Ansink, E., Rujis, R., 2008. Climate change and the stability of water allocation agreements'. Environmental and Resource Economics 41 (2).
- Bardhan, P., 1993. Analytics of the institutions of informal cooperation in rural development. World Development 21 (4), 633-639.
- Becker, N., Easter, K.W., 1995. Water diversions in the great lakes basin analyzed in a game theory framework. Water Resources Management 9 (3).
- Bennett, P.G., 1980. Hypergames: the development of an approach to modeling conflicts. Futures 12, 489-507.
- Bogardi, I., Szidarovsky, F., 1976. Application of game theory in water management. Applied Mathematical Modelling 1 (1), 16-20.
- Brams, S.J., 1994. Theory of Moves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- Carraro, C., Marchiori, C., Sgobbi, A., 2005. Applications of Negotiation Theory to Water Issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3641 (<http:// papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID722362_code468680.pdf?abstractid= 722362&mirid=1>).
- Chew, I.M.L., Tan, R.R., Foo, D.C.Y., Chiu, A.S.F., 2009. Game theory approach to the analysis of inter-plant water integration in an eco-industrial park. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 1611-1619.
- Dinar, A., 2004. Exploring transboundary water conflict and cooperation. Water Recourses Research 40 (5), W05S01. doi:10.1029/2003WR002598.
- Dinar, A., Howitt, R.E., 1997. Mechanisms for allocation of environmental control cost: empirical tests of acceptability and stability. Journal of Environmental Management 49, 183-203.
- Dinar, A., Ratner, A., Yaron, D., 1992. Evaluating cooperative game theory in water resources. Theory and Decision (32), 1-20.
- Dufournaud, C.M., 1982. On the mutually beneficial cooperative scheme: dynamic change in the payoff matrix of international river basin schemes. Water Resources Research 18 (4), 764-772.
- Elimam, L., Rheinheimer, D., Connell, C., Madani, K., 2008. An ancient struggle: a game theory approach to resolving the nile conflict. In: Babcock, R.W., Walton, R. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2008 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Honolulu, Hawaii. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1-10. doi:10.1061/40976(316)258.
- Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., 1993. Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, New York, USA.
- Fernandez, L., 2002. Trade's dynamic solutions to transboundary pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43, 386-411.
- Fernandez, L., 2009. Wastewater pollution abatement across an international border. Environment and Development Economics 14 (1), 67.
- Fisvold, G.B., Caswell, M.F., 2000. Transboundary water management: game- theoretic lessons for projects on the US-Mexico border. Agricultural Economics 24, 101-111.
- Fraser, N.M., Hipel, K.W., 1984. Conflict Analysis: Models and Resolutions. North- Holland, Amsterdam, New York, USA.
- Gardner, R., Moore, M.R., Walker, J.M., 1997. Governing a groundwater commons: a strategic and laboratory analysis of Western water law. Economic Inquiry 35 (2), 218-234.
- Giordano, R., Passarella, G., Uricchio, V.F., Vurro, M., 2005. Fuzzy cognitive maps for issue identification in a water resources conflict resolution system. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C 30 (6-7), 463-469.
- Grim, P., Mar, G., St. Denis, P., 1999. The Philosophical Computer: Exploratory Essays in Philosophical Computer Modeling. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Hardin, G., 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243-1248.
- Hipel, K.W., Obeidi, A., 2005. Trade versus the environment strategic settlement from a systems engineering perspective. Systems Engineering 8 (3).
- Hipel, K.W, Fang, L., Kilgour, D.M., Haight, M., 1993. Environmental conflict resolution using the graph model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 1, Le Touquet, France, October 17-20, pp. 17-20.
- Hipel, K.W.D., Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L., Peng, X., 1997. The decision support system GMCR in environmental conflict management. Applied Mathematics and Computation 83 (2-3), 117-152.
- Howard, N., 1971. Paradoxes of Rationality: Theory of Metagames and Political Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Howard, N., 1999. Confrontation Analysis: How to Win Operations Other Than War. CCRP Publications, Pentagon, Washington, DC, USA.
- Kilgour, D.M., 1995. Book review: theory of moves. Group Decision and Negotiation 4, 283-284.
- Kilgour, D.M., Dinar, A., 2001. Flexible water sharing within an international river Basin. Environmental and Resource Economics 18 (1), 43-60.
- Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W., Fang, L., 1987. The graph model for conflicts. Automatica 23 (1), 41-55.
- Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., 1996. Negotiation support using the decision support system GMCR. Group Decision and Negotiation 5 (4-6), 371-384.
- Kucukmehmetoglu, M., Guldmen, J., 2004. International water resources allocation and conflicts: the case of the euphrates and tigris. Environment and Planning A 36 (5), 783-801.
- Lejano, R.P., Davos, C.A., 1995. Cost allocation of multiagency water resource projects: game theoretic approaches and case study. Water Resources Research 31 (5), 1387-1393.
- Li, K.W., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L., 2004. Preference uncertainty in the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A 34 (4), 507-520.
- Lippai, I., Heaney, P., 2000. Efficient and equitable impact fees for urban water systems. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 126 (2), 75-84.
- Loaiciga, H.A., 2004. Analytic game-theoretic approach to ground-water extraction. Journal of Hydrology 297, 22-33.
- Losa, Fabio B., van den Honert, Rob, Joubert, Alison, 2001. The multivariate analysis biplot as tool for conflict analysis in MCDA. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (10), 273-284.
- Lund, J.R., Palmer, R.N., 1997. Water resource system modeling for conflict resolution. Water Resources Update 3 (108), 70-82.
- Madani, K., 2009. Climate change effects on high-elevation hydropower system in California. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis. (<http://cee.engr.ucdavis.edu/ faculty/lund/students/MadaniDissertation.pdf>).
- Madani, K., Hipel, K.W., 2007. Strategic insights into the Jordan River conflict. In: Kabbes, K.C. (Ed.), Proceeding of the 2007 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Tampa, Florida. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1- 10. doi:10.1061/40927(243)213.
- Massoud, T.G., 2000. Fair division, adjusted winner procedure (AW), and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44, 333-358.
- Nash, J.F., 1950. Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the USA 36, 48-49.
- Nash, J.F., 1951. Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54 (2), 286-295.
- Obeidi, A., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., 2002. Canadian bulk water exports: analyzing the sun belt conflict using the graph model for conflict resolution. Knowledge, Technology, and Policy 14 (4), 145-163.
- Parrachino, I., Dinar, A., Patrone, F., 2006. Cooperative game theory and its application to natural, environmental, and water resource issues: 3. Application to Water Resources. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4074, WPS4072. <http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/ WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2006/11/21/000016406_20061121155643/Rendered/ PDF/wps4074.pdf>.
- Raquel, S., Ferenc, S., Emery Jr., C., Abraham, R., 2007. Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management 84, 560-571.
- Rogers, P., 1969. A game theory approach to the problems of international river basins. Water Resources Research 5 (4), 749-760.
- Rosen, M.D., Sexton, R.J., 1993. Irrigation districts and water markets: an application of cooperative decision-making theory. Land Economics 69 (1), 39-53.
- Sandler, T., 1992. After the cold war, secure the global commons. Challenge 35 (4).
- Sauer, P., Dvorak, A., Lisa, A., Fiala, P., 2003. A procedure for negotiating pollution reduction under information asymmetry. Surface water quality case. Environmental and Resource Economics 24 (2), 103-119.
- Schreider, S., Zeephongsekul, P., Fernandes, M., 2007. A game-theoretic approach to water quality management. In: Oxley, L., Kulasiri, D. (Eds.), MODSIM 2007 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, December 2007, pp. 2312-2318. ISBN: 978-0-9758400-4-7. (<http://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim07/papers/43_s47/ A%20Game%20Theoretics47_Schreider_pdf>).
- Sheikhmohammady, M., Madani, K., 2008a. Bargaining over the Caspian Sea-the largest Lake on the earth. In: Babcock, R.W., Walton, R. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2008 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Honolulu, Hawaii. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1-9. doi:10.1061/40976(316)262.
- Sheikhmohammady, M., Madani, K., 2008b. Sharing a multi-national resource through bankruptcy procedures. In: Babcock, R.W., Walton, R. (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2008 World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, Honolulu, Hawaii. American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1-9. doi:10.1061/ 40976(316)556.
- Sheikhmohammady, M., Madani, K., 2008c. A Descriptive Model to Analyze Asymmetric Multilateral Negotiations. In: Proceeding of 2008 UCOWR/NIWR Annual Conference, International Water Resources: Challenges for the 21st Century and Water Resources Education, Durham, North Carolina. (<http:// opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=ucowrconfs_ 2008>).
- Simon, L., Goodhue, R., Rausser, G., Thoyer, S., Morardet, S., Rio, P., 2007. Structure and power in multilateral negotiations: an application to French Water Policy. Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics. Monograph Series. Paper 47. <http://repositories.cdlib.org/giannini/ms/47>.
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006. Game Theory, <http://plato.stanford. edu/entries/game-theory/>.
- Straffin, P., Heaney, J., 1981. Game theory and the tennessee valley authority. International Journal of Game Theory 10 (1), 35-43.
- Supalla, R., Klaus, B., Yeboah, O., Bruins, R., 2002. A game theory approach to deciding who will supply instream flow water. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38 (4), 959-966.
- Suzuki, M., Nakayama, M., 1976. The cost assignment of the cooperative water resource development: a game theoretical approach. Management Science 32 (10), 1081-1086.
- Szidarovszky, F., Duckstein, L., Bogardi, I., 1984. Multiobjective management of mining under water hazard by game theory. European Journal of Operational Research 15 (2), 251-258.
- Taylor, M., 1987. The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
- Thiessen, E.M., Loucks, D.P., 1992. Computer-assisted negotiation of multiobjective water resources conflicts. Water Resources Bulletin 28 (1), 163-177.
- Thiessen, E.M., Loucks, D.P., Stedinger, J.R., 1998. Computer-assisted negotiations of water resources conflicts. Group Decision and Negotiation (7), 109-129.
- Thoyer, S., Morardet, S., Rio, P., Simon, L., Goodhue, R., Rausser, G., 2001. A bargaining model to simulate negotiations between water users. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4 (2).
- Tisdell, J.G., Harrison, S.R., 1992. Estimating an optimal distribution of water entitlements. Water Resources Research 28 (12), 3111-3117.
- von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O., 1944. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
- Wang, M., Hipel, K.W., Fraser, N.M., 1988. Modeling misperceptions in games. Behavioral Science 33 (3), 207-223.
- Wang, L., Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., 2008. Basin-wide cooperative water resources allocation. European Journal of Operational Research 190 (3), 798-817.
- Wolf, A.T., 2000. Indigenous approaches to water conflict negotiations and implications for international waters. International Negotiation 2 (5), 357-373.
- Wolf, A., 2002. Conflict prevention and resolution in water systems. In: Howe, C.W. (Ed.), The Management of Water Resources series. Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
- Wu, X., Whittington, D., 2006. Incentive compatibility and conflict resolution in international river basins: a case study of the Nile Basin. Water Resources Research 42, W02417. doi:10.1029/2005WR004238.
- Yaron, D., Ratner, A., 1990. Regional cooperation in the use of irrigation water: efficiency and income distribution. Agricultural Economics 4 (1), 45-58.
- Young, H.P., Okada, N., Hashimoto, T., 1980. Cost allocation in water resource development: a case study of Sweden. RR-80-32, IIASA, Luxemburg, Austria. <http://www.iiasa.ac.at/Admin/PUB/Documents/RR-80-032.pdf>.
- Zara, S., Dinar, A., Patrone, F., 2006. Cooperative game theory and its application to natural, environmental, and water resource issues: 2. Application to Natural and Environmental Resources. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4073, WPS4072. <http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContent Server/ IW3P/IB/2006/11/21/000016406_20061121154100/Rendered/PDF/wps4073. pdf>.