Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

RTS games as test-bed for real-time AI research

Abstract

This article motivates AI research in the area of real–time strategy (RTS) games and de-scribes the road–map and the current status of the ORTS project whose goals are to imple-ment an RTS game programming environment and to build AI systems that eventually can outperform human experts in this popular and challenging domain.

References (22)

  1. M.S. Atkin. AFS and HAC: Domain-general agent simulation and control. In AAAI Workshop on Software Tools for Developing Agents, 1998.
  2. M.S. Atkin and P.R. Cohen. Physical planning and dynamics. In Working notes of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Distributed Continual Planning. 1998.
  3. M. Buro. From simple features to sophisticated evaluation functions. In LNCS volume 1558 -Proceedings of the First International Conference on Computers and Games, pages 126-145. Springer-Verlag, 1998.
  4. M. Buro. ORTS: A hack-free RTS game environment. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Computers and Games, pages 156-161, 2002. Software: http://www.cs.ualberta.ca/˜mburo/orts/orts.html.
  5. C. Dawson. Formations. In Steve Rabin, editor, AI Game Programming Wisdom, pages 260-271, 2002.
  6. M.E. des Jardins, E.H. Durfee, C.L. Ortiz, and M.J. Wolverton. A survey of research in distributed, continual planning. AI Magazine, 20(4):13-22, 1999.
  7. R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, and D.G. Stork. Pattern Classification. John Wiley and Sons, 2001. 2nd edition.
  8. K.D. Forbus, J.V. Mahoney, and K. Dill. How qualitative spatial reasoning can improve strategy game AIs. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(4):25-30, July 2002.
  9. J. Gratch and R. Hill. Continuous planning and collaboration for command and control in joint synthetic battlespaces. In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, 1998.
  10. C. Guestrin, D. Koller, C. Gearhart, and N. Kanodia. Generalizing plans to new environments in relational MDPs. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, 2003. Software available at http://dags.stanford.edu/Freecraft/.
  11. J.C. Herz and M.R. Macedonia. Computer games and the military: Two views. Defense Horizons, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, National Defense University, 11, April 2002.
  12. A. Ilachinski. Land warfare and complexity. CRM 96-68, Center for Naval Analysis Research, 1996.
  13. A. Ilachinski. Irreducible semi-autonomous adaptive combat: An artificial-life approach to land warfare. Memorandum 97-61.10, Center for Naval Analysis Research, 1997.
  14. J. Laird. Using a computer game to develop advanced AI. Computer, 34(7):70-75, July 2001.
  15. J. Laird, A. Newell, and P.S. Rosenbloom. SOAR: An architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 33(3):1-64, 1987.
  16. D. Pottinger. Terrain analysis in real-time strategy games. In Proceedings of Computer Game Developer Conference. 2000.
  17. D. Reece, M. Kraus, and P. Dumanoir. Tactical movement planning for individual combatants. In Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation. 2000.
  18. P. Stone. Layered Learning in Multi-Agent Systems. Computer Science Department, Carnegie Mellon University, 1998. Ph.D. Thesis CMU-CS-98-187.
  19. P. Stone. Multiagent competitions and research: Lessons from RoboCup and TAC. In RoboCup International Symposium, Fukuoka, 2002.
  20. P. Tozour. Strategic assessment techniques. In M. DeLoura, editor, Game Programming Gems 2, pages 298-306, 2001.
  21. W. van der Sterren. Terrain reasoning for 3D action games. In M. DeLoura, editor, Game Programming Gems 2, pages 307-323, 2001.
  22. S. von der Lippe, R.W. Franceschini, and M. Kalphat. A robotic army: The future is CGF. In Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, Florida, USA, 1999.