Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

An Interchange Format for Optical Music Recognition Applications

2010

Abstract

Page appearance and layout for music notation is a critical component of the overall musical information contained in a document. To capture and transfer this information, we outline an interchange format for OMR applications, the OMR Interchange Package (OIP) format, which is designed to allow layout information and page images to be preserved and transferred along with semantic musical content. We identify a number of uses for this format that can enhance digital representations of music, and introduce a novel idea for distributed optical music recognition system based on this format.

References (24)

  1. REFERENCES
  2. Blostein, D., and L. Haken. 1991. Justification of printed music. Communications of the ACM 34 (3): 88-99.
  3. Warmington, F. 1999. A survey of scribal hands in the manuscripts. In The treasury of Petrus Alamire: Music and art in Flemish court manuscripts 1500- 1535, ed. H. Kellman, 41-52. Amsterdam: Ludion Ghent.
  4. Luth, N. 2002. Automatic identification of music no- tations. In Proceedings of the International Confer- ence on Web Delivering of Music (WEDELMUSIC), 203-10.
  5. Hall, P. 1997. A view of Berg's Lulu through the autograph sources. Berkeley: University of Califor- nia Press.
  6. Schubert Autographs. http://www.schubert- online.at/activpage/index_en.htm [Accessed 23 March 2010].
  7. Digital Image Archive of Medieval Music. http://www.diamm.ac.uk [Accessed 23 March 2010].
  8. The Computerized Mensural Music Editing Project. http://www.cmme.org [Accessed 23 March 2010].
  9. Breuel, T. M., and U. Kaiserslautern. 2007. The hOCR microformat for OCR workflow and results. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR), 1063- 7.
  10. Celartem/Lizartech DjVu format reference. http://djvu.org/docs/DjVu3Spec.djvu [Accessed 23 March 2010].
  11. The BagIt File Packaging Format. https:// svn.tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kunze-bagit-04 [Accessed 23 March 2010].
  12. Tabata, K., T. Okada, M. Nagamori, T. Sakaguchi, and S. Sugimoto. 2005. A collaboration model be- tween archival systems to enhance the reliability of preservation by an enclose-and-deposit method. In Proceedings of the International Web Archiving Workshop.
  13. Castan, G. 2009. NIFF. http://www.music- notation.info/en/formats/NIFF.html. [Accessed 29 May 2010].
  14. Jones, G. OMR engine output file format. http://www.visiv.co.uk/tech-mro.htm [Accessed 29 May 2010].
  15. Kurth, F., D. Damm, C. Fremerey, M. Müller, and M. Clausen. 2008. A framework for managing mul- timodal digitized music collections. In Research and advanced technology for digital libraries, 334-45. Berlin: Springer.
  16. Good, M. 2009. Using MusicXML 2.0 for music edi- torial applications. In Digitale Edition zwischen Ex- periment und Standardisierung, ed. P. Stadler and J. Veit, 157-74. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
  17. Barton, L. 2002. The NEUMES project: Digital tran- scription of medieval chant manuscripts. In Proceed- ings of the Web Delivering of Music (WEDELMUSIC), 211-8.
  18. Roland, P. 2009. MEI as an editorial music standard. In Digitale Edition zwischen Experiment und Stan- dardisierung, ed. P. Stadler and J. Veit, 175-94. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
  19. Riley, J., and I. Fujinaga. 2003. Recommended best practices for digital image capture of musical scores. OCLC Systems and Services 19 (2): 62-9.
  20. Glossary of terms used by the NEUMES project. http://www.scribeserver.com/NEUMES/help/glossar y.htm [Accessed 23 March 2010].
  21. Barton, L., J. Caldwell, and P. Jeavons. 2005. E- library of medieval chant manuscript transcriptions. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL), 320-39.
  22. Fujinaga, I. 1997. Adaptive optical music recogni- tion. PhD diss., McGill University.
  23. Pugin, L., J. Burgoyne, and I. Fujinaga. 2007. Reduc- ing costs for digitising early music with dynamic ad- aptation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Digital Libraries (ECDL), 471-4.
  24. Hankinson, A. 2010. PyBagIt 1.0 documentation. http://www.musiclibs.net/pybagit [Accessed 29 May 2010].