Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
References

Private-sector responses to climate change in the Global South

Profile image of Simone PulverSimone PulverProfile image of Tabitha M . BenneyTabitha M . Benney

2013, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change

https://doi.org/10.1002/WCC.240
visibility

…

description

18 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

What is the private sector response to climate change in the Global South? And what has motivated action? The Carbon Disclosure Project and Clean Development Mechanism registries offer some systematic data in response to the first question. Despite limitations to both data sources, they show that private sector action on climate change clusters in China, India, Brazil and other large industrializing countries. Four drivers-physical, regulatory, market, and reputational-offer answers to the second question. In the more developed countries of the Global South, corporate action is driven primarily by the prospect of domestic climate regulation-some large developing countries have pledged greenhouse gas emissions reductions by 2020-and by the market opportunities created by the Clean Development Mechanism. In the less developed countries, barriers related to weak regulatory environments, low levels of industrialization and growth, restricted access to capital, and limited technical capacity intersect to limit private-sector action on climate change. Looking to the future, the lack of depth and breadth in the push for corporate action on climate change in the Global South suggests reasons for concern.

Related papers

Assessing the probability of private sector involvement in climate adaptation in developing countries
Maaike van Aalst

2013

The large investments required to adapt to climate change in developing countries ask for the involvement of the private sector. For the private sector to participate in infrastructural projects, there needs to be clarity about, amongst others, how and when returns on investments are made and who carries the risks. This may vary by types of infrastructural measure and country’s institutional setting. The project Water2Invest under the European Climate-KIC (Knowledge Innovation Communities) programme develops an internet-based tool to support these types of decisions by showing both the effectiveness of supply-increasing or demand-reducing measures under various scenarios and by providing insight in financing possibilities in different institutional settings. To support the latter, this paper introduces a qualitative model of factors influencing the probability of private finance for climate adaptation, as a first step in understanding financial feasibility of infrastructural measure...

View PDFchevron_right
Concerns about climate change mitigation projects: summary of findings from case studies in Brazil, India, Mexico and South Africa
Willy Makundi, Mireya Imaz, C. Gay

Environmental Science & Policy, 1999

The concept of joint implementation as a way to implement climate change mitigation projects in another country has been controversial ever since its inception. Developing countries have raised numerous issues at the project-speci®c technical level and broader concerns having to do with equity and burden sharing. This paper summarizes the ®ndings of studies for Brazil, India, Mexico and South Africa, four countries that have large greenhouse gas emissions and are heavily engaged in the debate on climate change projects under the Kyoto Protocol. The studies examine potential or current projects/programs to determine whether eight technical concerns about joint implementation can be adequately addressed. They conclude that about half the concerns were minor or well managed by project developers, but concerns about additionality of funds, host country institutions and guarantees of performance (including the issues of baselines and possible leakage) need much more eort to be adequately addressed. All the papers agree on the need to develop institutional arrangements for approving and monitoring such projects in each of the countries represented. The case studies illustrate that these projects have the potential to bring new technology, investment, employment and ancillary socioeconomic and environmental bene®ts to developing countries. These bene®ts are consistent with the goal of sustainable development in the four study countries. At a policy level, the studies' authors note that in their view, the Annex I countries should consider limits on the use of jointly implemented projects as a way to get credits against their own emissions at home, and stress the importance of industrialized countries developing new technologies that will bene®t all countries. The authors also observe that if all countries accepted caps on their emissions (with a longer time period allowed for developing countries to do so) project-based GHG mitigation would be signi®cantly facilitated by the improved private investment climate. #

View PDFchevron_right
Bridging the gap: Addressing international barriers to climate action projects in the developing world.
Samir Saran

Bridging the gap: Addressing international barriers to climate action projects in the developing world., 2017

This report is part of the Observer Research Foundation’s “Financing Green Transitions” series which aims to find potential linkages between private capital, in all its forms, and climate action projects. The series will primarily examine domestic and international barriers to private capital entry for mitigation oriented climate projects, while also examining potential avenues for private capital flow entry towards adaptation and resilience projects.

View PDFchevron_right
The ambiguous role of corporations in climate change mitigation: an explorative appraisal of corporations in China, Malaysia and the US
Johan Nordensvard

2011

Climate change is one of the greatest challenges the world is facing today. Mitigating the emissions that lead to climate change is therefore crucial. The objective of this paper is to analyse the role of corporations and the state for climate change mitigation and the transition towards a low carbon economy. We present an explorative study using three case studies from China, the United States and Malaysia to highlight the role of corporations in three different contexts. The roles of corporations and states are inherently complex; it is far from easy to make the distinction between legal and voluntary obligations. Often politics and business are entangled, overlapping or contradictory. We suggest that to achieve climate change mitigation at the global level, the complementarities of corporations and states need to be further explored. Globally, new forms of public-private partnerships with designated tasks for each stakeholder group are needed for climate change mitigation.

View PDFchevron_right
Green economy: Private sectors’ response to climate change
Shahryar Sorooshian

Environmental Quality Management

The focus of this paper is to present a discussion of the role of the private sector in response to the need for climate change adaptations. The study, which was conducted through a literature review, investigates the concept of the green economy and climate change, as well as businesses' commitment to advance climate actions in ways that build resilience in vulnerable communities in developing countries. The paper calls on companies with national, regional, and/or global reach to adopt or develop strategies that improve resource efficiency, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and reduce the loss of biodiversity. Businesses can accelerate this transition by aligning their investments with climate change adaptation opportunities, and thus, "green" the economy. In addition, green growth could be achieved through tactical public and private investments in mitigating climate change. The paper concludes that the private sector is a key sector in addressing the challenges of vulnerable communities, and it has much to contribute to the planning, development, and implementation of climate adaptation strategies, including sector-specific expertise, technology, efficiency, financing, and entrepreneurship. Finally, some social conditions and environmental boundaries have been highlighted in this paper to attract the attention of business leaders who are trying to build initiatives and advance climate actions that will reduce socio-community risks from climate change. Also, comprehensive initiatives and strategies have been recommended to private companies seeking to address climate vulnerabilities.

View PDFchevron_right
Investigating business' contribution to climate change governance in areas of limited statehood: the case of South Africa and Kenya
Farai Kapfudzaruwa

2014

Climate change and the related social and economic challenges present society with problems at multiple levels. There is a diverse range of actors who are contributing to climate change governance, including those who are going to be affected by the impacts. In areas of limited statehood were states have varying degrees of deficits in their abilities to steer effective climate change mitigation and adaptation, private actors such as business organisations are expected to step in. This research set to investigate how and why companies in South Africa and Kenya contribute to climate change governance. South Africa and Kenya are i Acronyms and Abbreviations CDM Clean Development Mechanism CDP Carbon Disclosure Project CSR Corporate Social Responsibility iii

View PDFchevron_right
Towards a private–public synergy in financing climate change mitigation projects
Wilfred Ntama

Energy policy, 2001

Funding for greenhouse gas mitigation projects in developing countries is crucial for addressing the global climate change problem. By examining current climate change-related financial mechanisms and their limitations, this paper indicates that their roles are limited in affecting developing countries' future emissions, and argues for the necessity of stronger private sector engagement in financing mitigation projects. In this regard, the clean development mechanism (CDM), one of the flexibility mechanisms incorporated into the Kyoto Protocol, could offer great potential in helping mobilize foreign direct investment towards climate mitigation, by providing commercial incentives for the private sector to invest in mitigation projects and internalizing externalities associated with mitigation projects. However, due to additional risks and barriers involved in CDM projects, we believe that appropriate public-private linkage would be necessary in order to bring the CDM into full play. To this end, we suggest that public funds could be used to complement private investment via the CDM, thus enhancing market functions of such an investment. Moreover, in so doing, we think that it would be necessary to examine a host of factors, such as risk sharing, private sector investment behaviour, types of technologies to be transferred, and co-ordination with the commonly practiced trade and investment rules. r

View PDFchevron_right
The International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts and Responses Kyoto's Governance Footprint in the Global South An Overview of Climate Finances and REDD+ in Asia, Latin America, and Africa
Alicia Guzman León

Kyoto’s Governance Footprint in the Global South: An Overview of Climate Finances and REDD+ in Asia, Latin America, and Africa

Abstract: When assessing the more pressing challenges of the Paris Agreement, four aspects become relevant. First, the lack of reliable sources and resources of climate finances–related information. Second, only developed countries’ contributions are being accounted and disseminated. The omission of the resources invested by the developing world to combat climate change skews theoretical analysis, limits accuracy in policy, and has the potential to alienate the Global South against adopting climate policies. Third, loans represent a majority share of the climate finances and are swelling the debt of developing countries, especially in Latin America. Finally, Kyoto’s leaves as legacy a governance model predominantly hierarchical both at general climate finances as well as in REDD+ in the three regions. The goal of this article is to draw a baseline on the quantity and quality of climate finances and specifically those of REDD+, a mechanism targeted at developing countries. There were three distinct stages to this review: (1) the assessment of 13,000 projects implemented in Asia, Africa, and Latin America between 2008 and 2015; (2) the assessment of 312 REDD+ initiatives implemented in the three regions in this period; and (3) the analysis of the governance model propelled by these transactions. Policy implications of the results presented in this article conclude this analysis.

View PDFchevron_right
Limits to Private Climate Change Mitigation
Deniz Igan

IMF Working Papers, 2021

As climate change looms larger, many look to sustainable investing that incorporates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns as part of the way forward. To assess scope for ESG-conscious investing to achieve climate change goals, we explore the link between emissions growth and ESG scores using firm-level data for the largest emitters around the world. Discouragingly, our analysis uncovers at best a weak relationship: firms with better ESG scores do display somewhat slower emissions growth but this link is substantially attenuated and no longer statistically significant if we limit attention to within-country or within-firm variation. Our findings suggest limited scope for sustainable investing strategies conditioned solely on ESG indicators to meaningfully help mitigate climate change and, more broadly, underscore the need to continue to build consensus towards effective economy-wide policies to address climate change.

View PDFchevron_right
The Governance of Climate Change in Developing Countries
Charles Roger

2012

Recent attempts to create a concrete framework for mitigation have fallen short. This failure has been explored in a number of studies. These have mostly focused on the pursuit of a global deal through international negotiations, or on the domestic mitigation policies of Annex 1 states. However, large developing countries, such as China and Brazil, are now widely considered to be the vanguard of climate change policymaking , taking actions that are comparable to anything being done by Annex 1 states.

View PDFchevron_right

References (92)

  1. van Drunen MA, Lasage R, Dorland C, eds. Climate Change in Developing Countries. Oxfordshire, Cambridge: CAB International; 2006.
  2. Ravindranath NH, Sathaye J. Climate Change and Developing Countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing; 2002.
  3. Mintzer IM, Leonard JA, eds. Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press and Stockholm Environment Institute; 1994.
  4. Oberthuer S, Ott H. The Kyoto Protocol: International Climate Policy in the 21st Century. Berlin: Springer; 1999.
  5. EIA. International Energy Outlook. Washington, DC: Energy Information Agency, US Department of Energy; 2010.
  6. Rosa E, Dietz T. Human drivers of national greenhouse- gas emissions. Nature Clim Change 2012, 2:581-586.
  7. Levy D. Business and international environmental treaties: ozone depletion and climate change. Calif Manage Rev 1997, 39:54-71.
  8. CMA. Highlights of Indian Cement Industry, 2009 (cited November 11, 2009).
  9. Kolk A, Pinkse J. Business responses to climate change: identifying emergent strategies. Calif Manage Rev 2005, 47:6-20.
  10. Forsyth T. Promoting the ''developement dividend'' of climate technology transfer: can cross-sector partnerships help. World Dev 2007, 35:1684-1698.
  11. Wara M, Victor DG. A realistic policy on international carbon offsets. In: Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Working Paper #74. Stanford: Stanford University; 2008.
  12. Purohit P, Michaelowa A. Potential of wind power project under the clean development mechanism in India. Carbon Balance Manage 2007, 2:1-15.
  13. Knox-Hayes J. The developing carbon financial service industry: expertise, adaptation and complementarity in London and New York. J Econ Geog 2010, 9:749-777.
  14. Pulver S. Corporate responses. In: Dryzek J, Norgaard R, Shlosberg D, eds. Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
  15. Cogan DG. Corporate Governance and Climate Change: Making the Connection. Boston, MA: Ceres, Inc.; 2006.
  16. Jeswani HK, Wehrmeyer W, Mulugetta Y. How warm is the corporate response to climate change? Evidence from Pakistan and the UK. Bus Strat Environ 2008, 18:46-60.
  17. Wara M. Measuring the clean development mecha- nism's performance and potential. UCLA Law Rev 2008, 55:1759-1791.
  18. Bond P. Carbon capital's trial, the Kyoto protocol's demise, and opening for climate justice. Capital Nature Social 2011, 22:3-17.
  19. Dunn S. Down to business on climate change. Greener Manage Int 2002, 39(Autumn):27-41.
  20. PWC, CDP Global 500 Report 2011: Accelerating Low Carbon Growth. Carbon Disclosure Project, London, 2011.
  21. UNEP Risø Centre. CDM/JI Pipeline Analysis and Database, 2012 (cited October 3, 2012). Available at: http://cdmpipeline.org/.
  22. Belle N, Bramwell B. Climate change and small island tourism: policy maker and industry perspectives in Barbados. J Travel Res 2005, 44:32-42.
  23. Hoffman AJ. Climate change strategy: the business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. Calif Manage Rev 2005, 47:21-46.
  24. Pulver S. Introduction: developing-country firms as agents of environmental sustainability? Stud Comp Int Dev 2007, 42(3/4):191-207.
  25. KPMG. Climate Changes Your Business: KPMG's Review of the Business Risks and Economic Impacts at Sector Level. Netherlands: KPMG International; 2008.
  26. Enkvist P-A, Vanthournout H. How Companies Think About Climate Change. Geneva: McKinsey & Company; 2007.
  27. Pulver S. Making sense of corporate environmentalism: an environmental contestation approach to analyzing the causes and consequences of the climate change policy split in the oil industry. Organ Environ 2007, 20:44-83.
  28. Jones CA, Levy DL. North American business strategies towards climate change. Eur Manage J 2007, 25:428-440.
  29. Boiral O. Global warming: should companies adopt a proactive strategy. Long Range Plann 2006, 39: 315-330.
  30. Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Linden PJVD, Hanson CE, eds. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adapation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
  31. Wolf J. Climate change adaptation as a social process. Adv Global Change Res 2011, 42:21-32.
  32. Mendelsohn R, Dinar A, Williams L. The distributional impact of climate change on rich and poor countries. Environ Dev Econ 2006, 11:159-178.
  33. Sirohi S, Michaelowa A. Implementing CDM for the Indian dairy sector: prospects and issues. Climate Policy 2008, 8:62-74.
  34. Eakin H, Luers AL. Assessing the vulnerability of social- environmental systems. Ann Rev Environ Resour 2006, 31:365-394.
  35. Oppermann M, Chon K-S. Tourism in Developing Countries. London and Boston, MA: International Thomson Business Press; 1997.
  36. Nurse L, Sem G. Small island states. In: IPCC, ed. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
  37. UNWTO. Climate Change and Tourism: Responding to Global Challenges. Madrid: World Tourism Orga- nization and United Nations Environment Program; 2008.
  38. Oxfam. The New Adaptation Marketplace: Climate Change and Opportunities for Green Growth. Boston: Oxfam America; 2009.
  39. Forstater M, Huq S, Zadeck S. The Business ofAdap- tation. Accountability and International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED): London; 2009.
  40. Kapfudzaruwa F. Corporate response to climate change in areas of limited statehood: an outline of the organizational configurations in Kenya and South Africa. International Studies Association Annual Conference, San Diego, 2012.
  41. Singh N. Bureau of energy efficiency's energy efficiency scheme hits hurdles. The Times of India, New Delhi, 2012.
  42. Hultman NE, Pulver S, Pacca S, Saran S, Powell L, Romeiro V, Benney T. Carbon markets and low-carbon investment in emerging economies: a synthesis of parallel workshops. Energy Policy 2011, 39:6698-7000.
  43. Ecofys and Climate Analytics. Climate Action Tracker Mexico. Potsdam, Germany, 2012.
  44. Dagar SS. Too hot to handle: the government and industry aren't doing enough to tackle climate change. Business Today, 2007, 17-19.
  45. Pulver S. Corporate responses to climate change in India. In: Dubash N, ed. Handbook of Climate Change and India: Development, Politics, and Governance. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2011.
  46. Black R. Inside Mexico's climate revolution. BBC News-Science and Environment, 2012.
  47. Hultman NE, Pulver S, Guimaraes L, Deshmukh R, Kane J. Carbon market risks and rewards: firm perceptions of CDM investment decisions in Brazil and India. Energy Policy 2012, 40:90-102.
  48. Dechezlepretre A, Glachant M, Meniere Y. The clean development mechanism and the international diffusion of technologies: an empritical study. Energy Policy 2008, 36:1273-1283.
  49. Elzinga D. Advantage Energy: Emerging Economies, Developing Countries, and the Private-Public Sector Interface. International Energy Agency Energy Tech- nology Policy Division: Paris; 2011.
  50. World Bank. New Businesses Registered (num- ber), 2009 (cited March 1, 2013). Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator.
  51. No author. Acronyms BRIC out all over. The Economist, 2008.
  52. Ellis J, Winkler H, Corfee-Morlot J, Gagnon-Lebrun F. CDM: Taking stock and looking forward. Energy Policy 2007, 35:15-28.
  53. Lewis J. Green Innovation in China: China's Wind Power Industry and the Global Transition to a Low-Carbon Economy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 2012.
  54. Kuriyama A. List of Grid Emissions Factor, 2013 (cited March 3, 2013) Available at: http://enviroscope.iges.or. jp/modules/envirolib/view.php?docid=2136.
  55. Bozmoski A, Hultman NE. Investment Decison-Making under the Clean Development Mechanism: South Africa's Ammonium Nitrate and Steel Sectors. No date, 33.
  56. Barnes DF, Toman MA. Energy, equity, and economic development. In: Lopez R, Toman MA, eds. Economic Development and Environmental Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006, 245-272.
  57. IPCC. Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer: Summary for Policymakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
  58. Porter M, Kramer M. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 2006, 17.
  59. Ceres. The 21st Century Corporation: A Ceres Roadmap to Sustainability. Boston, MA: Ceres; 2010.
  60. Incite Sustainability, CDP South Africa 100: South African business-shifting the focus to performance. Carbon Disclosure Project, London, 2012.
  61. Brechin SR, Bhandari M. Perceptions of Climate Change Worldwide. WIREs Clim Change 2011, 2:871-885.
  62. Shanahan M. Time to adapt: media coverage of climate change in non-industrialized countries. In: Boyce T, Lewis J, eds. Climate Change and the Media. New York, NY: Peter Lang; 2009.
  63. Billet S. Dividing climate change: global warming in the Indian mass media. Clim Change 2009, 99:1-16.
  64. Boykoff M. Flogging a Dead Norm? Newspaper coverage of anthropogenic climate change in the United States and United Kingdom, 2003-2006. Area 2007, 39:470-481.
  65. Taalab A. Rising voices against global warming. Informationszentral der Elektrizitaetswirtschaft IZE, 1998.
  66. Pulver S. Climate change politics in Mexico. In: Selin H, VanDeveer S, eds. Changing Climates in North American Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009.
  67. Guha R, Martinez-Alier J. Varieties of Environmen- talism: Essays North and South. London: Earthscan; 1997.
  68. Karliner J. The corporate planet: ecology and politics in the age of globalization. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books; 1997.
  69. Fuhr H, Lederer M. Varieties of carbon governance in newly industrializing countries. J Environ Dev 2009, 18:327-345.
  70. Schroeder M. Varieties of carbon governance: utilizing the clean development mechanism for Chinese priorities. J Environ Dev 2009, 18:371-394.
  71. Benecke G. Varieties of carbon governance: taking stock of the local carbon market in India. J Environ Dev 2009, 18:346-370.
  72. Schneider M, Hoffmann VH, Gurjar BR. Corporate responses to the CDM: the Indian pulp and paper industry. Climate Policy 2009, 9:255-272.
  73. KPMG. Carbon Disclosure Project: South Africa's Carbon Chasm. Carbon Disclosure Project, Parkview, 2010.
  74. Friberg L. Varieties of carbon governance: the clean development mechanism in Brazil-a success story challenges. J Environ Dev 2009, 18:395-424.
  75. Dechezlepretre A, Glachant M, Meniere Y. Technology transfer by CDM projects: a comparison of Brazil, China, India, and Mexico. Energy Policy 2009, 37:703-711.
  76. UNEP. Welcome to the UNEP Climate Pledges Site. 2010 (cited May 5, 2012). Available at: http://www. unep.org/climatepledges/Default.aspx?pid=1.
  77. Byigero A, Clancy J, Skutsh M. CDM in Sub-Saharan Africa and the prospects of the Nairobi framework initiative. Climate Policy 2010, 10:181-189.
  78. De Lopez T, Tin P, Iyadomi K, Santos S, McIntosh B. Clean development mechanism and least developed countries: changing the rules for greater participation. J Environ Dev 2009, 18:436-452.
  79. Collier P, Conway G, Venables T. Climate change and Africa. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 2008, 24:337-353.
  80. AOSIS. AOSIS Presses Loss and Damage in Bangkok, 2012 (cited March 4, 2013). Available at: http://aosis.org/category/matters-of-survival/.
  81. Barnett J, Campbell J. Climate Change and Small Island States: Power, Knowledge and the South Pacific. London: Earthscan; 2010.
  82. Depledge J. Striving for no: Saudi Arabia in the climate change regime. Global Environ Polit 2008, 8:9-35.
  83. Karakosta C, Doukas H, John P. EU-MENA energy technology transfer under the CDM: Israel as a frontrunner? Energy Policy 2010, 38:2455-2462.
  84. Mason M, Kumetat D. At the crossroads: energy futures for North Africa. Energy Policy 2011, 39:4407-4410.
  85. Michaelowa A, Luomi M. From Climate Antagonists to Low-Carbon Protagonists? Lysaker: Fridtjof Nansen Institute; 2012, 1-8.
  86. Lovell B. Challenged by Carbon: The Oil Industry and Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
  87. Agoumi A. Vulnerability of North African Countries to Climatic Changes. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustianble Development; 2003.
  88. Betsill M, Bulkeley H. Transnational networks and global environmental governance: the cities for climate protection program. Int Stud Quart 2004, 48:471-493.
  89. Biermann F. 'Earth systems governance' as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Glob Environ Chang 2007, 17(3-4):326-337.
  90. Michaelowa A. Creating foundations for host country participation in the CDM: experiences and challenges in CDM capacity building. In: Yamin F, ed. Climate Change and Carbon Markets: A Handbook of Emissions Reduction Mechanisms. London: Earthscan; 2005.
  91. Lovell H. Governing the carbon offset market. WIREs Clim Change 2012, 1:353-362.
  92. Grossman D. Physical Risks from Climate Change: A Guide for Companies and Investors on Disclosure and Management of Climate Impacts. Boston: Ceres with Oxfam America and Calvert Investment; 2011.

Related papers

Climate change cooperation within the Global South: Finance, policy and institutions
Stephen Minas
View PDFchevron_right
The role of private investment in increasing climate friendly technologies in developing countries
Leah Stokes

2000

View PDFchevron_right
Market barriers for voluntary climate change mitigation in the South African private sector
Derick Jongh

South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 2014

A key challenge in the twenty-first century is to enable economic growth and increase both environmentalquality and social inclusiveness, while mitigating and adapting to the impacts of climate change. The need for a transition to more sustainable consumption and production patterns is undeniable and sustainable economic growth must be placed at the heart of future development for all citizens. The South African private sector is under enormous pressure to remain globally competitive while balancing the interests of society, the environment and its shareholders. It has been suggested that there are discrepancies between what companies say and what they actually do, as they are challenged to move from policy to action. This paper evaluates the extent to which the private sector in South Africa adheres to voluntary climate change mitigation mechanisms and identifies potential market barriers impeding the large-scale uptake of such mechanisms. The research findings suggest that the pri...

View PDFchevron_right
Institutionalizing climate change mitigation in the Global South: Current trends and future research
Anna Fünfgeld

Earth System Governance, 2023

Following the Paris Agreement, states and non-state actors have pledged countless commitments to mitigate climate change. Yet, translating these words into tangible action and institutionalizing mitigation efforts remains a key challenge in post-Paris climate governance. This is particularly prevalent in the Global South, where carbon emissions are expected to grow most significantly over the next decades. Besides, efforts to tackle the climate crisis compete with other human development priorities. With this review, we explore the prospects and challenges of institutionalizing climate change mitigation in the Global South. We (1) map the field in terms of concepts, methods, regions, sectors, and topics; (2) suggest a differentiation between reform-oriented, transformative, and failed attempts to institutionalize climate change mitigation, and (3) propose a future research agenda. We conclude that a stronger emphasis on institutionalization as a political, societal, and discursive challenge is crucial for implementing, sustaining, and enhancing climate change mitigation in the Global South.

View PDFchevron_right
Private Governance in Developing Countries: Drivers of Voluntary Carbon Offset Programs
Yixian Sun

Global Environmental Politics

In the Paris Agreement era of climate governance, private market-based initiatives are expected to play a catalytic role in achieving global commitments. However, the literature has been largely silent on the political causes of the variable and often limited uptake of such initiatives in the Global South. This article uses original project-level data to investigate the participation in voluntary carbon offset (VCO) programs across developing countries. We argue that, paradoxically, access to formal international institutions and linkages with domestic priorities are key factors for participation in voluntary carbon markets, reducing asymmetries in information, capacity, and interest in developing contexts. Our statistical analysis finds that institutions such as the Clean Development Mechanism and targeted foreign aid, as well as domestic concerns such as climate vulnerability and advancing renewable energy, shape in important ways the variable engagement in VCO projects. Our analy...

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Climate Change

    • Cited by

    Private Governance in Developing Countries: Drivers of Voluntary Carbon Offset Programs
    Yixian Sun

    Global Environmental Politics

    In the Paris Agreement era of climate governance, private market-based initiatives are expected to play a catalytic role in achieving global commitments. However, the literature has been largely silent on the political causes of the variable and often limited uptake of such initiatives in the Global South. This article uses original project-level data to investigate the participation in voluntary carbon offset (VCO) programs across developing countries. We argue that, paradoxically, access to formal international institutions and linkages with domestic priorities are key factors for participation in voluntary carbon markets, reducing asymmetries in information, capacity, and interest in developing contexts. Our statistical analysis finds that institutions such as the Clean Development Mechanism and targeted foreign aid, as well as domestic concerns such as climate vulnerability and advancing renewable energy, shape in important ways the variable engagement in VCO projects. Our analy...

    View PDFchevron_right
    Are we expecting too much from the private sector in flood adaptation? Scenario-based field experiments with small- and medium-sized firms in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
    Javier Revilla Diez

    Climatic Change, 2020

    Adaptive governance approaches emphasize the crucial role of the private sector in enabling climate change adaptation. Yet, the participation of local firms is still lacking, and little is known about the conditions potentially influencing firms’ adaptation decisions and mechanisms that might encourage private sector engagement. We address this gap with an empirical analysis of the willingness of manufacturing small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to participate financially in collective flood adaptation in Ho Chi Minh City (HCMC), a hotspot of future climate change risk. Using scenario-based field experiments, we shed light on internal and external conditions that influence potential investments in collective initiatives and explain what role SMEs can play in flood adaptation. We find that direct impacts of floods, perceived self-responsibility, and strong local ties motivate firms to participate in collective adaptation, whereas government support, sufficient financial resour...

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved