Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Applications and Future Directions
References
All Topics
Biology
Virology

Luteovirus: insights into pathogenecity

Profile image of M TahirM TahirProfile image of Muhammad AliMuhammad Ali
https://doi.org/10.1007/S00705-014-2172-6
visibility

…

description

10 pages

link

1 file

Abstract
sparkles

AI

Luteoviruses, belonging to the family Luteoviridae, are significant pathogens affecting various cereal crops globally. This review focuses on the molecular aspects of luteovirus pathogenesis, particularly the barley yellow dwarf viruses (BYDVs), which induce symptoms like dwarfing and chlorosis in host plants. The paper discusses the unique characteristics of luteoviruses, their transmission by aphid vectors, and challenges in studying their infectivity and transmission mechanisms. Potential strategies to enhance the understanding and management of these viruses are highlighted, emphasizing the importance of further research in this area.

Related papers

Leading Molecular Aspects of Plant Viruses
Diwaker Tripathi

Journal of Bacteriology & Mycology: Open Access, 2017

View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of the 5'‐end nucleotide sequences of luteoviruses from oilseed rape and sugar beet
Frank Rabenstein

Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection, 1998

View PDFchevron_right
Characterization of a potato leafroll luteovirus subgenomic RNA: differential expression by internal translation initiation and UAG suppression
F. Salamini

Journal of General Virology, 1990

View PDFchevron_right
Nucleotide sequence analysis and genomic organization of the NY-RPV isolate of barley yellow dwarf virus
Brian Larkins

Journal of General Virology, 1991

cDNA clones representing the ssRNA genome of the NY-RPV isolate of barley yellow dwarf luteovirus (BYDV) were sequenced and 5600 nucleotides of the genome were determined. The deduced genome organization has limited similarity to that of another BYDV isolate, Vic-PAV, but is identical to that of beet western yellows (BWYV) and potato leafroll (PLRV) luteoviruses. NY-RPV has six major positive-sense open reading frames (ORFs) and, by comparison with RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and nucleic acid helicase consensus sequence motifs, it is postulated that NY-RPV ORF2 and ORF3 encode the viral replicase, which is expressed by a translational frameshift mechanism. The region of the NY-RPV genome containing the 22K coat protein ORF, the apparently associated internal apparent VPg ORF and the ORF immediately 3'-proximal (ORF6) to the coat protein ORF are organized as reported for other luteoviruses. Evidence is presented showing that ORF6 is expressed by readthrough of the coat protein gene termination codon, and that this protein is associated with the intact virus as a 65K protein. Although NY-RPV infects graminaceous rather than dicotyledonous plants, the taxonomic relationships between BYDV isolates and other luteoviruses deduced from the genome organization and sequence data strongly suggest that NY-RPV is distinct from the PAV-like isolates of BYDV and is more closely related to BWYV and PLRV.

View PDFchevron_right
Barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV RNA does not have a VPg
Masoud Shams-bakhsh

1997

View PDFchevron_right
Fundamental Aspects of Plant Viruses−An Overview on Focus Issue Articles
Hélène Sanfaçon

Phytopathology™, 2020

Given the importance of and rapid research progress in plant virology in recent years, this Focus Issue broadly emphasizes advances in fundamental aspects of virus infection cycles and epidemiology. This Focus Issue comprises three review articles and 18 research articles. The research articles cover broad research areas on the identification of novel viruses, the development of detection methods, reverse genetics systems and functional genomics for plant viruses, vector and seed transmission studies, viral population studies, virus–virus interactions and their effect on vector transmission, and management strategies of viral diseases. The three review articles discuss recent developments in application of prokaryotic clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated genes (CRISPR/Cas) technology for plant virus resistance, mixed viral infections and their role in disease synergism and cross-protection, and viral transmission by whiteflies. The following br...

View PDFchevron_right
The remarkable variety of plant RNA virus genomes
Gabriel Macaya

Journal of General Virology, 1995

View PDFchevron_right
The influence of virus-induced changes in plants on aphid vectors: Insights from luteovirus pathosystems
Sanford Eigenbrode

Virus Research, 2011

Plant virus infection can alter the suitability of host plants for their aphid vectors. Most reports indicate that virus-infected plants are superior hosts for vectors compared to virus-free plants with respect to vector growth rates, fecundity and longevity. Some aphid vectors respond preferentially to virus-infected plants compared to virus-free ones, while others avoid infected plants that are inferior hosts. Thus, it appears vectors can exploit changes in host plant quality associated with viral infection. Enhanced vector performance and preference for virus-infected plants might also be advantageous for viruses by promoting their spread and possibly enhancing their fitness. Our research has focused on two of the most important luteoviruses that infect wheat (Barley yellow dwarf virus), or potato (Potato leafroll virus), and their respective aphid vectors, the bird-cherry oat aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi, and the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae. The work has demonstrated that virus infection of host plants enhances the life history of vectors. Additionally, it has shown that virus infection alters the concentration and relative composition of volatile organic compounds in host plants, that apterae of each vector species settle preferentially on virus-infected plants, and that such responses are mediated by volatile organic compounds. The findings also indicate that plants respond heterogeneously to viral infection and as a result different plant parts change in attractiveness to vectors during infection and vector responses to virus-infected plants are dynamic. Such dynamic responses could enhance or reduce the probability of virus acquisition by individual aphids searching among plants. Finally, our work indicates that compared to non-viruliferous aphids, viruliferous ones are less or not responsive to virus-induced host plant volatiles. Changes in vector responsiveness to plants after vectors acquire virus could impact virus epidemiology by influencing virus spread. The potential implications of these findings for virus ecology and epidemiology are discussed.

View PDFchevron_right
Comparison of the coat protein, movement protein and RNA polymerase gene sequences of Australian, Chinese, and American isolates of barley yellow dwarf virus transmitted by Rhopalosiphum padi
P. Larkin

Archives of Virology, 1998

View PDFchevron_right
Molecular characterization of a virus from the family Luteoviridae associated with cotton blue disease
M. Vaslin

Archives of Virology, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

References (69)

  1. Ahlquist P (2006) Parallels among positive-strand RNA viruses, reverse-transcribing viruses and double-stranded RNA viruses. Nat Rev Microbiol 4:371-382
  2. Ali M, Tahir M, Hameed S, Ashraf M (2013) Coat protein based molecular characterization of Barley yellow dwarf virus isolates identified on oat plants in Pakistan. Acta Virol 57:383-385
  3. Allen E, Wang S, Miller WA (1999) Barley yellow dwarf virus RNA requires a cap-independent translation sequence because it lacks a 5 0 cap. Virology 253:139-144
  4. Andret-Link P, Fuchs M (2005) Transmission specificity of plant viruses by vectors. J Plant Pathol 87:153-165
  5. Barry JK, Miller WA (2002) A -1 ribosomal frameshift element that requires base pairing across four kilobases suggests a mechanism of regulating ribosome and replicase traffic on a viral RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:11133-11138
  6. Baulcombe D (2002) Viral suppression of systemic silencing. Trends Microbiol 10:306-308
  7. Brown J (2000) Molecular markers for the identification and global tracking of whitefly vector-Begomovirus complexes. Virus Res 71:233-260
  8. Callaway A, Giesman-Cookmeyer D, Gillock E, Sit T, Lommel S (2001) The multifunctional capsid proteins of plant RNA viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:419-460
  9. Caplan JL, Mamillapalli P, Burch-Smith TM, Czymmek K, Dinesh-Kumar S (2008) Chloroplastic protein NRIP1 mediates innate immune receptor recognition of a viral effector. Cell 132:449-462
  10. Chay CA, Gunasinge UB, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Miller WA, Gray SM (1996) Aphid transmission and systemic plant infection determinants of barley yellow dwarf luteovirus-PAV are con- tained in the coat protein readthrough domain and 17-kDa pro- tein, respectively. Virology 219:57-65
  11. Cheng Z, He X, Wu M, Zhou G, Keese P, Waterhouse P (1996) Nucleotide sequence of coat protein gene for GPV isolate of barley yellow dwarf virus and construction of expression plasmid for plant. Sci China Ser C Life Sci (English Edition) 39:534-543
  12. Coudriet D, Kishaba A, Bohn G (1981) Inheritance of resistance to muskmelon necrotic spot virus in a melon aphid-resistant breeding line of muskmelon [Cucumis melo, Aphis gossypii].
  13. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 106:789-791
  14. D'Arcy CJ, Burnett PA (1995) Barley yellow dwarf virus: 40 years of progress. APS Press, St Paul, MN 14. den Boon JA, Diaz A, Ahlquist P (2010) Cytoplasmic viral rep- lication complexes. Cell Host Microbe 8:77-85
  15. Di R, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Miller WA (1993) Translational frameshifting by barley yellow dwarf virus RNA (PAV serotype) in Escherichia coli and in eukaryotic cell-free extracts. Mol Plant Microbe Interact MPMI 6:444-452
  16. Dinesh-Kumar S, Miller WA (1993) Control of start codon choice on a plant viral RNA encoding overlapping genes. Plant Cell Online 5:679-692
  17. Dolja VV, Koonin EV (1991) Phylogeny of capsid proteins of small icosahedral RNA plant viruses. J Gen Virol 72:1481-1486
  18. Domier L (2008) Barley yellow dwarf virus. In: Mahy BWJ, Regenmortel MHV (eds) Encyclopedia of virology. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, pp 279-286
  19. Domier L (2009) Barley yellow dwarf viruses. In: Mahy BWJ, Regenmortel MHV (eds) Desk encyclopedia of plant and fungal virology. Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, pp 100-107
  20. Dreher TW, Miller WA (2006) Translational control in positive strand RNA plant viruses. Virology 344:185-197
  21. Escaler M, Aranda MA, Thomas CL, Maule AJ (2000) Pea embryonic tissues show common responses to the replication of a wide range of viruses. Virology 267:318-325
  22. Falk B, Tian T, Harrison B (1999) Transcapsidation interactions and dependent aphid transmission among luteoviruses, and luteovirus-associated RNAs. In: Smith HG, Barker H (eds) Luteoviridae. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 125-134
  23. Fan Q, Treder K, Miller WA (2012) Untranslated regions of diverse plant viral RNAs vary greatly in translation enhancement efficiency. BMC Biotechnol 12:22
  24. Fauquet CM, Mayo M, Maniloff J, Desselberger U, Ball LA (2005) Virus taxonomy: VIIIth report of the International Com- mittee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Access Online via Elsevier
  25. Gildow F, Damsteegt V, Stone A, Smith O, Gray S (2000) Virus- vector cell interactions regulating transmission specificity of soybean dwarf luteoviruses. J Phytopathol 148:333-342
  26. Gildow FE (1987) Virus-membrane interactions involved in circulative transmission of luteoviruses by aphids. Current topics in vector research. Springer, Berlin, pp 93-120
  27. Gill C, Chong J (1975) Development of the infection in oat leaves inoculated with barley yellow dwarf virus. Virology 66:440-453
  28. Gill C, Chong J (1979) Cytopathological evidence for the divi- sion of barley yellow dwarf virus isolates into two subgroups. Virology 95:59-69
  29. Gray S, Gildow FE (2003) Luteovirus-aphid interactions. Annu Review Phytopathol 41:539-566
  30. Gray SM, Banerjee N (1999) Mechanisms of arthropod trans- mission of plant and animal viruses. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:128-148
  31. Guo L, Allen EM, Miller WA (2001) Base-pairing between untranslated regions facilitates translation of uncapped, non- polyadenylated viral RNA. Mol Cell 7:1103-1109
  32. Jones JD, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444:323-329
  33. Kawakami S, Watanabe Y, Beachy RN (2004) Tobacco mosaic virus infection spreads cell to cell as intact replication complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6291-6296
  34. Koev G, Mohan BR, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Torbert KA, Somers DA, Miller WA (1998) Extreme reduction of disease in oats trans- formed with the 5' half of the barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV genome. Phytopathology 88:1013-1019
  35. Koev G, Miller WA (2000) A positive-strand RNA virus with three very different subgenomic RNA promoters. J Virol 74:5988-5996
  36. Koev G, Liu S, Beckett R, Miller WA (2002) The 3 0 -terminal structure required for replication of barley yellow dwarf virus RNA contains an embedded 3 0 end. Virology 292:114-126
  37. Lee L, Palukaitis P, Gray SM (2002) Host-dependent requirement for the Potato leafroll virus 17-kDa protein in virus movement. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 15:1086-1094
  38. Liu F, Wang X, Liu Y, Xie J, Gray S, Zhou G, Gao B (2007) A Chinese isolate of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV represents a third distinct species within the PAV serotype. Arch Virol 152:1365-1373
  39. Liu Y, Zhai H, Zhao K, Wu B, Wang X (2012) Two suppressors of RNA silencing encoded by cereal-infecting members of the family luteoviridae. J Gen Virol 93:1825-1830
  40. Lucas WJ, Lee J-Y (2004) Plasmodesmata as a supracellular control network in plants. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:712-726
  41. Lucas WJ (2006) Plant viral movement proteins: agents for cell- to-cell trafficking of viral genomes. Virology 344:169-184
  42. Mayo M, D'Arcy C (1999) Family Luteoviridae: a reclassifica- tion of luteoviruses. In: Smith HG, Barker H (eds) Luteoviri- dae. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 15-22
  43. Miller WA, Rasochova ´L (1997) Barley yellow dwarf viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 35:167-190
  44. Miller W, Beckett R, Liu S (2002) Structure, function and vari- ation of the Barley yellow dwarf virus and Cereal yellow dwarf virus genomes. In: Henry M, McNab A (eds) Barley yellow dwarf disease: recent advances and future strategies. CIMMYT, Mex- ico, DF, pp 1-8
  45. Miller W, Wang Z, Treder K (2007) The amazing diversity of cap-independent translation elements in the 3 0 -untranslated regions of plant viral RNAs. Biochem Soc Trans 35:1629-1633
  46. Miller WA, Liu S, Beckett R (2002) Barley yellow dwarf virus: luteoviridae or Tombusviridae? Mol Plant Pathol 3:177-183
  47. Nass PH, Domier LL, Jakstys BP, D'Arcy CJ (1998) In situ localization of barley yellow dwarf virus-PAV 17-kDa protein and nucleic acids in oats. Phytopathology 88:1031-1039
  48. Novoa RR, Calderita G, Arranz R, Fontana J, Granzow H, Risco C (2005) Virus factories: associations of cell organelles for viral replication and morphogenesis. Biol Cell 97:147-172
  49. Paul CP, Barry JK, Dinesh-Kumar SP, Brault V, Miller WA (2001) A sequence required for -1 ribosomal frameshifting located four kilobases downstream of the frameshift site. J Mol Biol 310:987-999
  50. Peter KA, Gildow F, Palukaitis P, Gray SM (2009) The C ter- minus of the polerovirus p5 readthrough domain limits virus infection to the phloem. J Virol 83:5419-5429
  51. Plant EP, Jacobs KLM, Harger JW, Meskauskas A, Jacobs JL, Baxter JL, Petrov AN, Dinman JD (2003) The 9-A ˚solution: How mRNA pseudoknots promote efficient programmed -1 ribosomal frameshifting. RNA 9:168-174
  52. Pogany J, Fabian MR, White KA, Nagy PD (2003) A replication silencer element in a plus-strand RNA virus. EMBO J 22:5602-5611
  53. Power A, Gray S (1995) Aphid transmission of barley yellow dwarf viruses: interactions between viruses, vectors, and host plants. In: D'Arcy CJ, Burnett PA (eds) Barley yellow dwarf virus: 40 years of progress. APS Press, St Paul, MN, pp 259-289
  54. Reavy B, Mayo M (2002) Persistent transmission of luteoviruses by aphids. Adv Bot Res 36:21-46
  55. Restrepo-Hartwig MA, Ahlquist P (1996) Brome mosaic virus helicase-and polymerase-like proteins colocalize on the endo- plasmic reticulum at sites of viral RNA synthesis. J Virol 70:8908-8916
  56. Schaad MC, Jensen PE, Carrington JC (1997) Formation of plant RNA virus replication complexes on membranes: role of an endoplasmic reticulum-targeted viral protein. EMBO J 16:4049-4059
  57. Shen R, Miller WA (2004) Subgenomic RNA as a riboregulator: negative regulation of RNA replication by Barley yellow dwarf virus subgenomic RNA 2. Virology 327:196-205
  58. Tacke E, Pru ¨fer D, Schmitz J, Rohde W (1991) The potato leafroll luteovirus 17 K protein is a single-stranded nucleic acid- binding protein. J Gen Virol 72:2035
  59. Wang D, Maule AJ (1995) Inhibition of host gene expression associated with plant virus replication. Science 267:229-231
  60. Wang M-B, Cheng Z, Keese P, Graham M, Larkin P, Waterhouse P (1998) Comparison of the coat protein, movement protein and RNA polymerase gene sequences of Australian, Chinese, and American isolates of barley yellow dwarf virus transmitted by Rhopalosiphum padi. Arch Virol 143:1005-1013
  61. Wang S, Browning KS, Miller WA (1997) A viral sequence in the 3 0 -untranslated region mimics a 5 0 cap in facilitating translation of uncapped mRNA. EMBO J 16:4107-4116
  62. Wang S, Guo L, Allen E, Miller WA (1999) A potential mech- anism for selective control of cap-independent translation by a viral RNA sequence in cis and in trans. RNA 5:728-738
  63. Wang X, Chang S, Jin Z, Li L, Zhou G (2001) Nucleotide sequences of the coat protein and readthrough protein genes of the Chinese GAV isolate of barley yellow dwarf virus. Acta Virol 45:249
  64. Wang X, Zhou G (2003) Identification of a protein associated with circulative transmission of Barley yellow dwarf virus from cereal aphids, Schizaphis graminum and Sitobion avenae. Chin Sci Bull 48:2083-2087
  65. Wang X, Liu Y, Chen L, Zhao D, Wang X, Zhang Z (2013) Wheat resistome in response to barley yellow dwarf virus infection. Funct Integr Genomics 13(2):155-165
  66. Waziri H, El Gaffar MA, Allam E, El Din AG (2002) Coat protein sequence of an Egyptian BYDV-PAV isolate. In: Henry M, McNab A (eds) Barley yellow dwarf disease: recent advances and future strategies. CIMMYT, Mexico, DF, pp 97-99
  67. Xia Z, Cao R, Sun K, Zhang H (2012) The movement protein of barley yellow dwarf virus-GAV self-interacts and forms homo- dimers in vitro and in vivo. Arch Virol 157:1233-1239
  68. Yoon J-Y, Choi S-K, Palukaitis P, Gray SM (2011) Agrobacte- rium-mediated infection of whole plants by yellow dwarf viruses. Virus Res 160:428-434
  69. Zvereva AS, Pooggin MM (2012) Silencing and innate immunity in plant defense against viral and non-viral pathogens. Viruses 4:2578-2597

Related papers

Direct Detection of Transcapsidated Barley Yellow Dwarf Luteoviruses in Doubly Infected Plants
R. Creamer

Journal of General Virology, 1990

A novel immunohybridization assay was used to analyse the virion capsid proteins and nucleic acids of various barley yellow dwarf luteoviruses from singly and doubly infected plants. Plants singly infected with New York MAV or RPV contained only viruses indistinguishable from the parental types, but plants doubly infected with these viruses contained transcapsidated virions (MAV RNA in RPV protein capsids). The presence of transcapsidated virions was positively correlated with altered aphid transmission characteristics of MAV from the same plants. Virions with phenotypically mixed capsids (chimeric capsids containing subunits from both co-infecting viruses) were not detected in these plants using heterologous and homologous ELISAs. Transcapsidated virions were detected in mixed infections of California and New York MAV and RPV isolates and, more epidemiologically significantly, in natural doubly infected field plants. In addition, evidence for two-way transcapsidation was obtained using immunohybridization and aphid transmission studies from mixed infections of New York RPV and PAV isolates.

View PDFchevron_right
Luteovirus: insights into pathogenicity
Muhammad Tahir

Archives of Virology, 2014

View PDFchevron_right
Nucleotide Sequences of Coat Protein Genes for Three Isolates of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus and their Relationships to Other Luteovirus Coat Protein Sequences
P. Ueng

Journal of General Virology, 1990

Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) can be separated into two groups based on, among other criteria, serological relationships that are presumably governed by the viral capsid structure. Nucleotide sequences for the coding regions of coat proteins of approximately 22 K were identified for the MAV-PS 1, P-PAV (group 1) and NY-RPV (group 2) isolates of BYDV, The MAV-PS1 and P-PAV coat protein sequences shared 71% deduced amino acid similarity whereas that of the NY-RPV isolate shared no more than 51% similarity with either the MAV-PSI or the P-PAV sequence. Other comparisons showed that these and other BYDV coat protein sequences examined to date share a high degree of identity with those identified from other luteoviruses. Among luteovirus coat protein sequences in general, several highly conserved domains were identified whereas other domains differentiate MAV-PSI and PAV isolates from NY-RPV and other luteoviruses. Sequence similarities and differences among BYDV coat proteins (approx, 22K) are consistent with the serological relationships exhibited by these viruses. Amino acid sequence comparisons between BYDV isolates that share common aphid vectors indicate that it is unlikely that these coat proteins are involved in aphid specificity.

View PDFchevron_right
Aphid transmission of beet western yellows luteovirus requires the minor capsid readthrough protein
Etienne Herrbach

HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 1995

Beet western yellows luteovirus is obligately transmitted by the aphid Myzus persicae in a circulative, non-propagative fashion. Virus movement across the epithelial cells of the digestive tube into the hemocoel and from the hemocoel into the accessory salivary glands is believed to occur by receptor-mediated endocytosis and exocytosis. Virions contain two types of protein; the major 22 kDa capsid protein and the minor read-through protein, P74, which is composed of the major capsid protein fused by translational readthrough to a long C-terminal extension called the readthrough domain. Beet western yellows virus carrying various mutations in the read-through domain was tested for its ability to be transmitted to test plants by aphids fed on agro-infected plants and semi-purified or purified virus preparations. The results establish that the read-through domain carries determinants that are essential for aphid transmission. The findings also reveal that the read-through domain is important for accumulation of the virus in agro-infected plants.

View PDFchevron_right
Red clover-associated luteovirus – a newly classifiable member of the genus Luteovirus with an enamo-like P5 protein
Jana Franova

Archives of Virology, 2018

This study reports the complete genomic sequence of a novel virus isolated from red clover. According to its genomic organization, its similarity to luteoviruses, and a greater than 10% difference in all genes, this virus isolate likely represents a new luteovirus species. As seen in nectarine stem pitting-associated virus (NSPaV) and NSPaV-South Korea (SK) luteoviruses, it differs from typical luteoviruses through the absence of ORF3a and ORF4 encoding movement proteins. Furthermore, its P5 protein (responsible for aphid transmission) is more similar to the P5 of enamoviruses than that of luteoviruses. The virus isolate has been named red clover-associated luteovirus (RCaV).

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Plant Virology
  • Plant Biotechnology and Molecula...

    • Cited by

    Deciphering the Virome of Culex vishnui Subgroup Mosquitoes, the Major Vectors of Japanese Encephalitis, in Japan
    astri nur faizah

    Viruses

    Japanese encephalitis (JE) remains a public health concern in several countries, and the Culex mosquito plays a central role in its transmission cycle. Culex mosquitoes harbor a wide range of viruses, including insect-specific viruses (ISVs), and can transmit a variety of arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) that cause human and animal diseases. The current trend of studies displays enhanced efforts to characterize the mosquito virome through bulk RNA sequencing due to possible arbovirus–ISV interactions; however, the extent of viral diversity in the mosquito taxon is still poorly understood, particularly in some disease vectors. In this study, arboviral screening and RNA virome analysis of Culex tritaeniorhynchus and C. pseudovishnui, which are part of the Culex vishnui subgroup mosquitoes, were performed. Results from these two mosquito species, known as the major vectors of JE virus (JEV) in Asia, collected in three prefectures in Japan were also compared with the sympatric spec...

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved