Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Trends in automatic three-dimensional mesh generation

1988, Computers & Structures

https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(88)90248-9

Abstract

Some recent efforts on the development of methods to ensun the robustness of automatic thracdimensional mesh generation techniques arc discuss& The topic arcas considered arc mesh entity classification, finite octrcc cell triangulation, and coarse mesh generation by element removal.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What are the key advantages of using octree structures for mesh generation?add

The study reveals that octree structures provide linear growth rates and regular discretization, enhancing computational efficiency for complex geometries. For instance, they simplify adaptive analysis by enabling local control over mesh generation.

How does mesh classification impact the accuracy of finite element meshes?add

The paper demonstrates that accurate mesh classification ensures topology compatibility, which prevents topological holes in finite element meshes. It finds that inferior classification can lead to invalid mesh representations, particularly in complex geometries.

What challenges arise when applying Delaunay triangulation for 3D mesh generation?add

The research notes difficulties in achieving topological compatibility due to reliance solely on point data, leading to potential 'holes' in mesh topology. Furthermore, these challenges are exacerbated by insufficient point distributions, as shown in practical case studies.

What are the methodologies explored for integrating geometric and finite element modeling?add

The methods discussed include leveraging topological data structures to interlink geometric models and finite element mesh data. The paper also outlines geometric operators necessary for dynamic interactions between modeling systems and mesh generation.

How does the element removal procedure enhance mesh generation in complex objects?add

This procedure allows for generating large coarse meshes by strategically removing vertices, edges, and faces, providing controlled geometric modeling interactions. The study exemplifies its effectiveness in creating valid tetrahedral elements while maintaining shape integrity.

References (20)

  1. M. S. Shephard, Approaches to the automatic generation and control of finite element meshes. Appl. Mech. Rev. 41, 169-185 (1988).
  2. M. S. Shephard and P. M. Fiinigao. Toward automatic model generation. In State-of-the-Art Surveys on Computational hfeckanics (Edited by A. K. Noor), Ch. 13. ASME (to appear).
  3. W. I. Schroeder and M. S. Shephard, Geometry-based fully automatic mesh geocratioo and the Delaunay triangulation. ht. J. Namer. Meth. Engng (to appear).
  4. K. J. Weiler, Topological structures for geometric modeling. Ph.D. thesis, TR-86032, CICG, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY (1986).
  5. J. C. Cavendish, D. A. Field and W. H. Frey, An approach to automatic three-dimensional mesh gener- ation. ht. J. Numer. Meth. &ngng 21, 329-347 (1985).
  6. D. A. Field, Implementing Watson's algorithm in three dimensions. In Proc. Second Annual ACM Symposium on Computational Geometry, pp. 246-259. ACM, Yorktown Heights, NY (1986).
  7. P. L. Baehmann, S. L. Wittchen, M. S. Shephard, K. R. Grice and M. A. Yerry, Robust geometrically based automatic two-dimensional mesh generation. -Int. J. Numer. Meth. Enzntt 24. 1043-1078 11987).
  8. A. Kela, R. Per&&o -and H. B. 'valdker, Toward automatic finite element analysis. Comput. Mech. Engng. 5, 57-71 (1986).
  9. M. S. Shephard, P. L. Baehmaon and K. R. Grice, The versatility of automatic mesh generators based on tree structures and advanced geometric constructs. Communs appl. Numer. Meth. (to appear).
  10. M. A. Yerry and M. S. Shephard, Automatic three- dimensional mesh generation for threedimensional solids. Comput. Struct. 20, 31-39 (1985).
  11. M. S. Shephard, K. R. Gricc, C. E. Soechtig and C. M. Graicheo, Automatic, topologically correct, three- dimensional mesh generation by the finite octree technique. Center for Interactive Computer Graphics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy, NY (1987).
  12. C. L. Lawson, Properties of n-dimensional triaogula- tions. Comput.-aided Geometric Des. 3, 231-246 (1986).
  13. R. Sibsoo. Locallv eauiannular triangulations. Comout.
  14. Jnl21, 243-245 (i97i).
  15. T. C. Woo and T. Thomasa, An algorithm for generating solid elements in objects with holes. Comput. Struct. 1% 333-342 (1984).
  16. B. Wordenweber, Finite element mesh generation. Comput.-aided Des. 16, 285-291 (1984).
  17. I. Babuska and E. Rank, An expert-system-like feedback approach in the hp-version of the finite element method. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 3, 127-147 (1987).
  18. B. A. S&o, Mesh design for the pversion of the finite element method. Comput. Meth. appl. Mech. Engng 55, 181-197 (1986).
  19. A. A. G. Requicha and H. B. Voelcker, Solid modeling: a historical summary and contemporary assessment. IEEE Comput. Graphics Applications 2, 9-24 (1982).
  20. K. J. Weiler. Edge based data structures for solid