Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Topological inflation with graceful exit

2016, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2016/04/052

Abstract

We investigate a class of models of topological inflation in which a super-Hubble-sized global monopole seeds inflation. These models are attractive since inflation starts from rather generic initial conditions, but their not so attractive feature is that, unless symmetry is again restored, inflation never ends. In this work we show that, in presence of another nonminimally coupled scalar field, that is both quadratically and quartically coupled to the Ricci scalar, inflation naturally ends, representing an elegant solution to the graceful exit problem of topological inflation. While the monopole core grows during inflation, the growth stops after inflation, such that the monopole eventually enters the Hubble radius, and shrinks to its Minkowski space size, rendering it immaterial for the subsequent Universe's dynamics. Furthermore, we find that our model can produce cosmological perturbations that source CMB temperature fluctuations and seed large scale structure statistically consistent (within one standard deviation) with all available data. In particular, for small and (in our convention) negative nonminimal couplings, the scalar spectral index can be as large as ns ≃ 0.955, which is about one standard deviation lower than the central value quoted by the most recent Planck Collaboration.

References (38)

  1. A. H. Guth, "The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solu- tion to the Horizon Flatness Problems," Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 347.
  2. A. A. Starobinsky, "A New Type of Isotropic Cosmologi- cal Models Without Singularity," Phys. Lett. B 91 (1980) 99.
  3. P. A. R. Ade et al. [Planck Collaboration], "Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation," arXiv:1502.02114 [astro-ph.CO].
  4. A. A. Starobinsky, "Spectrum of relict gravitational radi- ation and the early state of the universe," JETP Lett. 30 (1979) 682 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 30 (1979) 719].
  5. V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov, "Quantum Fluc- tuation and Nonsingular Universe. (In Russian)," JETP Lett. 33 (1981) 532 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33 (1981) 549].
  6. A. D. Linde, "A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogene- ity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems," Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982) 389.
  7. S. W. Hawking and I. G. Moss, "Supercooled Phase Tran- sitions in the Very Early Universe," Phys. Lett. B 110 (1982) 35. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90946-7
  8. A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, "Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking," Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1220.
  9. A. D. Linde, "Chaotic Inflation," Phys. Lett. B 129 (1983) 177.
  10. D. Baumann, "TASI Lectures on Inflation," arXiv:0907.5424 [hep-th].
  11. D. H. Lyth and A. Riotto, "Particle physics models of in- flation and the cosmological density perturbation," Phys. Rept. 314 (1999) 1 [hep-ph/9807278].
  12. J. Polchinski, "The Cosmological Constant and the String Landscape," hep-th/0603249.
  13. N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, "Classical Gravita- tional Back-Reaction," Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 185014 [arXiv:1405.6281 [gr-qc]].
  14. N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, "Quantum grav- ity slows inflation," Nucl. Phys. B 474 (1996) 235 [hep-ph/9602315].
  15. D. Glavan, A. Marunović and T. Prokopec, "Inflation from cosmological constant and nonminimally coupled scalar," Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 044008, [arXiv:gr- qc/1504.07782].
  16. D. Glavan and T. Prokopec, "Nonminimal coupling and the cosmological constant problem," arXiv:1504.00842 [gr-qc].
  17. T. W. B. Kibble, "Topology of Cosmic Domains and Strings," J. Phys. A 9 (1976) 1387.
  18. T. Prokopec, "Symmetry breaking and the Goldstone theorem in de Sitter space," JCAP 1212 (2012) 023, [arxiv:gr-qc/1110.3187].
  19. G. Lazzari and T. Prokopec, "Symmetry breaking in de Sitter: a stochastic effective theory approach," [arxiv:hep-th/1304.0404].
  20. A. Marunović and T. Prokopec, "Global monopoles can change Universe's topology," arXiv:1411.7402 [gr-qc].
  21. A. Marunović and M. Murković, "A novel black hole mimicker: a boson star and a global monopole nonmini- mally coupled to gravity," Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 045010 [arXiv:1308.6489 [gr-qc]].
  22. A. Vilenkin, "Topological inflation," Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 3137 [hep-th/9402085].
  23. N. Sakai, H. A. Shinkai, T. Tachizawa and K. i. Maeda, "Dynamics of topological defects and inflation," Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 655 [Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 2981] [gr-qc/9506068].
  24. A. D. Linde, "Monopoles as big as a universe," Phys. Lett. B 327 (1994) 208 [astro-ph/9402031].
  25. Inyong Cho and Alexander Vilenkin, "Spacetime struc- ture of an inflating global monopole", Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997), [gr-qc/9708005].
  26. L. Boubekeur and D. H. Lyth, "Hilltop inflation," JCAP 0507 (2005) 010 [hep-ph/0502047].
  27. M. Joyce and T. Prokopec, "Turning around the sphaleron bound: Electroweak baryogenesis in an al- ternative postinflationary cosmology," Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6022 [hep-ph/9709320].
  28. N. Palanque-Delabrouille et al., "Cosmology with Lyman-alpha forest power spectrum," arXiv:1506.05976 [astro-ph.CO].
  29. A. Vilenkin, "Quantum Creation of Universes," Phys. Rev. D 30 (1984) 509.
  30. J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, "Wave Function of the Universe," Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2960.
  31. T. Prokopec, "Formation of topological and nontopolog- ical defects in the early universe," Phys. Lett. B 262 (1991) 215.
  32. D. A. Easson and R. Gregory, "Circumventing the eta problem," Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 083518 [arXiv:0902.1798 [hep-th]].
  33. A. Berera, "Warm inflation solution to the eta problem," PoS AHEP 2003 (2003) 069 [hep-ph/0401139].
  34. Fabrizio Di Marco and Alessio Notari, "'Grace- ful' Old Inflation", Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006), [arxiv:astro-ph/0511396].
  35. Tirthabir Biswas and Alessio Notari, "Can Inflation Solve the Hierarchy Problem", Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006), [arxiv:hep-ph/0511207].
  36. In this model the cosmological constant is driven to zero by the (quantum) backreaction of gravitons that are pro- duced during inflation. However, the validity of the model has not been rigorously established. Currently, the best calculation is from the distant 1996 [14], where the au- thors have performed a two-loop perturbative calculation of the stress-energy tensor and removed the divergences by using a momentum cutoff regularization that breaks the symmetries of the underlying space, and its results are hence not reliable.
  37. When this work was nearing completion, a new article appeared [28] in which the most recent Lyα data have been analyzed. The new measurements have further con- strained ns and α, such that the new most favorite val- ues are ns = 0.963 ± 0.045 and α = -0.0104 ± 0.0031 (1σ error bars). Our model lies about 2 standard devi- ations from these values (mostly because it predicts a too small ns and also prefers a rather small |α|. Most of other single field inflationary models also lie at least two standard deviations from the new sweet spot of ns and α. Because in our model ηE is rather large, the result- ing |α| is also rather large, but still not large enough to agree better than two sigmas with the results of Ref. [28]. If these results get confirmed by independent measure- ments, they will severely constrain many (single field) inflationary models.
  38. Fragmentation is the process by which one large monopole breaks up into smaller pieces due to the in- stability to growth of small scale perturbations. To ac- curately model this process one would have to include spatial gradients and perfore a full three dimensional nu- merical evolution, which is beyond the scope of this pa- per.