Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Microsoft Word - pubs-2004-07-anticip.doc

2020

Abstract

Federated simulations address the need for interoperability, as well as the improvement of reuse and composability of existing simulation models. The focal goal in a federated simulation is to facilitate composable simulations by standardizing interfaces to enable at least the technical interoperability among disparate simulations. Yet, existing federated simulation infrastructures neither facilitate sound reasoning about substantive interoperability nor are dynamically extensible. Emergent web services technologies hold out the potential to significantly improve the development of interoperable, extensible, and dynamically composable federations. As such, the recent XMSF initiative urges the use of a set of Web-based technologies that can be applied within an extensible framework for next generation of modeling and simulation applications to interoperate. We discuss how the realization of multimodel and multisimulation formalisms in terms of semantic web and agent technologies may ...

References (13)

  1. Bankes S. 1993. Exploratory Modeling for Policy Analy- sis. Operations Research, 4(3), 1993.
  2. Berners-Lee T., J. Hendler, and O. Lassila 2001. The Se- mantic Web. Scientific American, May 2001.
  3. Brutzman D., K. J. Morse, M. Pullen, and M. Zyda 2002. Extensible Modeling and Simulation Framework (XMSF): Challenges for Web-Based Modeling and Simulation, Technical Report. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA
  4. Dahmann J., Calvin J.O., R. Weatherly 1999. A reusable architecture for simulations. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 42, No.9, 79-84, September 1999. Yilmaz and Ören
  5. Davis K. P. and A. R. Anderson 2003. Improving the Composability of Department of Defense Models and Simulations, RAND Technical report.
  6. Fujimoto R., D. Lunceford, E. Page, A. Uhrmacher 2002. Technical Report of the Dagstuhl-Seminar Grand Challenges for Modeling and Simulation.
  7. Guizzo E. 2003. Software and the City. IEEE Spectrum, http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/WEBONLY/wonews/de c03/1203urb.html
  8. Mikalsen T. and I. Rouvellou (2002). "Transactional atti- tudes: Reliable composition of autonomous Web ser- vices," IBM Watson Research Center, http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2002-04-03-a.html. [ac- cessed February 2004].
  9. Murphy P. J., Ayorkor Mills-Tettey, Linda F. Wilson, Greg Johnston, Bin Xie. Demonstrating the ABELS System Using Real-World Scenarios", In Proceedings of the SAINT 2003.
  10. OWL Services Coalition 2004. OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. http://www.daml.org/services/owl- s/1.0/owl-s.html [accessed April 04, 2004].
  11. Ören T.I. (2001 -Invited contribution). "Towards a Mod- elling Formalism for Conflict Management," In: Dis- crete Event Modeling and Simulation: A Tapestry of Systems and AI-based Theories and Methodologies, H.S. Sarjoughian and F.E. Cellier (eds.), Springer- Verlag, New York, pp. 93-106.
  12. Peteet J, John P. Murphy, and Linda F. Wilson 2003. Matchmaking in the ABELS System for Linking Dis- tributed Simulations. In Proceedings of the 15TH European Simulation Symposium.
  13. Singhal S. and M. Zyda (1999). Networked Virtual Envi- ronment: Design and Implementation, Boston, MA. Addison-Wesley White L. E and J. M. Pullen (2003). "Adapting Legacy Computational Software for XMSF," Simulation In- teroperability Workshop (SIW), Fall 2003, Orlando Florida.