Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Syntactic Testsuites and Textual Entailment Recognition

2010, Language Resources and Evaluation

Abstract

We focus on textual entailments mediated by syntax and propose a new methodology to evaluate textual entailment recognition systems on such data. The main idea is to generate a syntactically annotated corpus of pairs of (non-)entailments and to use error mining to identify the most likely sources of errors. To illustrate the approach, we apply this methodology to the Afazio

References (7)

  1. References P. Bedaride and C. Gardent. 2009a. Normalising semantics : a framework and an experiment. In IWCS 2009 (In- ternational Conference on Computational Semantics), Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  2. P. Bedaride and C. Gardent. 2009b. Noun/verb entailment. In 4th Language and Technology Conference, Poznan, Poland.
  3. J.R. Curran, S. Clark, and J. Bos. 2007. Linguistically mo- tivated large-scale nlp with c&c and boxer. In Proceed- ings of the ACL 2007 Demo and Poster Sessions, pages 33-36, Prague, Czech Republic.
  4. C. Gardent and E. Kow. 2005. Generating and selecting grammatical paraphrases. ENLG, Aug.
  5. W. Lewis Johnson, P. Rizzo, W. Bosma, S. Kole, and M. Ghijsen. 2004. Generating socially appropriate tu- torial dialog. In Workshop on Affective dialog systems.
  6. D. Klein and C. D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In ACL '03: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 423-430, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  7. B. Sagot and E. de La Clergerie. 2006. Error mining in parsing results. In Proceedings of ACL-CoLing 06, pages 329-336, Sydney, Australie.