Syntactic Testsuites and Textual Entailment Recognition
2010, Language Resources and Evaluation
Abstract
We focus on textual entailments mediated by syntax and propose a new methodology to evaluate textual entailment recognition systems on such data. The main idea is to generate a syntactically annotated corpus of pairs of (non-)entailments and to use error mining to identify the most likely sources of errors. To illustrate the approach, we apply this methodology to the Afazio
References (7)
- References P. Bedaride and C. Gardent. 2009a. Normalising semantics : a framework and an experiment. In IWCS 2009 (In- ternational Conference on Computational Semantics), Tilburg, The Netherlands.
- P. Bedaride and C. Gardent. 2009b. Noun/verb entailment. In 4th Language and Technology Conference, Poznan, Poland.
- J.R. Curran, S. Clark, and J. Bos. 2007. Linguistically mo- tivated large-scale nlp with c&c and boxer. In Proceed- ings of the ACL 2007 Demo and Poster Sessions, pages 33-36, Prague, Czech Republic.
- C. Gardent and E. Kow. 2005. Generating and selecting grammatical paraphrases. ENLG, Aug.
- W. Lewis Johnson, P. Rizzo, W. Bosma, S. Kole, and M. Ghijsen. 2004. Generating socially appropriate tu- torial dialog. In Workshop on Affective dialog systems.
- D. Klein and C. D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In ACL '03: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 423-430, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- B. Sagot and E. de La Clergerie. 2006. Error mining in parsing results. In Proceedings of ACL-CoLing 06, pages 329-336, Sydney, Australie.