Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Infants use attention but not emotions to predict others’ actions

2010, Infant Behavior & Development

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.INFBEH.2009.11.003

Abstract

Phillips, suggest that by 12 to 14 months, infants can use a person's emotional and attentional cues to predict that person's actions. However, this work was conducted using only positive emotions, which is problematic because attention and positive emotions lead to the same prediction about a person's actions, thus leaving unclear whether infants made predictions based upon attention and emotion or attention alone. To get around this problem, we used both positive and negative emotions in a looking-time paradigm to investigate whether 14-month-old infants can use emotional cues to predict a person's actions. The findings suggest that infants used attentional but not emotional cues as predictors. We argue that while 14-month-olds can use another person's emotion cues to modify their own behavior (as in social referencing situations), they do not yet use them robustly to predict the other's behavior.

References (22)

  1. Cacioppo JT, Gardner WL, Berntson GG. Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1997;1:3-25. [PubMed: 15647126]
  2. Caron AJ, Caron RF, Antell SE. Infant understanding of containment: An affordance perceived or a relationship conceived? Developmental Psychology 1998;24(5):620-627.
  3. Ekman, P.; Friesen, WV. Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1975.
  4. Gergely G, Egyed K, Király I. On pedagogy. Developmental Science 2007;10(1):139-146. [PubMed: 17181712]
  5. Hertenstein MJ, Campos JJ. The retention effects of an adult's emotional displays on infant behavior. Child Development 2004;75:595-613. [PubMed: 15056208]
  6. Hespos SJ, Baillargeon R. Reasoning about containment events in very young infants. Cognition 2001;78:207-245. [PubMed: 11124350]
  7. Hornik R, Risenhoover N, Gunnar M. The Effects of Maternal Positive, Neutral, and Negative Affective Communications on Infant Responses to New Toys. Child Development 1987;58(4):937-944.
  8. Mumme DL, Fernald A, Herrera C. Infants' Responses to Facial and Vocal Emotional Signals in a Social Referencing Paradigm. Child Development 1996;67(6):3219-3237. [PubMed: 9071778]
  9. Perner, J. Understanding the representational mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991.
  10. Phillips AT, Wellman HM, Spelke ES. Infants' ability to connect gaze and emotional expression to intentional action. Cognition 2002;85(1):53-78. [PubMed: 12086713]
  11. Repacholi BM. Infants' use of attentional cues to identify the referent of another person's emotional expression. Developmental Psychology 1998;34(5):1017-1025. [PubMed: 9779747]
  12. Repacholi BM, Gopnik A. Early reasoning about desires: Evidence from 14-and 18-month-olds. Developmental Psychology 1997;33(1):12-21. [PubMed: 9050386]
  13. Scherer KR. Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin 1986;99(2):143-165. [PubMed: 3515381]
  14. Schöner G, Thelen E. Using dynamic field theory to rethink infant habituation. Psychological Review 2006;113(2):273-299. [PubMed: 16637762]
  15. Sodian B, Thoermer C. Infants' understanding of looking, pointing, and reaching as cues to goal-directed action. Journal of Cognition and Development 2004;5(3):289-316.
  16. Stein NL, Levine LJ. The Causal Organisation of Emotional Knowledge: A Developmental Study. Cognition & Emotion 1989;3(4):343-378.
  17. Tabachnick, BG.; Fidell, LS. Computer-assisted research design and analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
  18. Vaish A, Grossmann T, Woodward A. Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social- emotional development. Psychological Bulletin 2008;134(3):383-403. [PubMed: 18444702]
  19. Vaish A, Striano T. Is visual reference necessary? Contributions of facial versus vocal cues in 12-month- olds' social referencing behavior. Developmental Science 2004;7(3):261-269. [PubMed: 15595366]
  20. Wellman, HM. Early understanding of mind: The normal case. In: Baron-Cohen, S.; Tager-Flusberg, H.; Cohen, DJ., editors. Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1993.
  21. Wellman HM, Woolley JD. From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: The early development of everyday psychology. Cognition 1990;35(3):245-275. [PubMed: 2364653]
  22. Woodward AL. Infants' developing understanding of the link between looker and object. Developmental Science 2003;6(3):297-311.