Mind Over Machine: Navigating AI's Ethical Tightrope in Medicine
2025, Editorial
https://doi.org/10.52206/JSMC.2025.15.3.1276Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming the healthcare landscape, enabling clinicians to diagnose diseases more efficiently, treat patients more precisely, and expedite medical research particularly in imaging, surgery, and pharmacological development. AI can analyze massive genomic and imaging datasets within seconds. By 2022, approximately 18.7% of U.S. hospitals had integrated AI to improve workflow efficiency [1], and projections estimate that by 2025, 66% of physicians will incorporate AI into their clinical practice [2]. However, as AI becomes more embedded in-patient care, the urgency for robust ethical frameworks grows. Data privacy, transparency, and accountability are central to this discourse. Despite AI's potential, significant concerns remain. Around 38.6% of AI systems exhibit factual bias [3], which can distort clinical decisions. Additionally, 32% of healthcare data breaches have compromised sensitive information [4], and rural communities continue to face barriers to AI access [5]. To address these challenges, we must prioritize bias mitigation, enforce HIPAA-based data protections, and champion digital inclusion policies. Crucially, we must also protect empathy and patient-centered care values that remain fundamental to ethical medicine [6]. AI-powered Clinical Decision Support Systems (AI-CDSS) undeniably enhance efficiency and accuracy. However, they lack the human attributes of empathy, ethical discernment, and contextual understanding [7]. For instance, a palliative care physician once sensed a terminal patient's silent fear of being a burden an emotional nuance no algorithm could detect providing the reassurance she needed to face her final days with dignity [8]. As a practicing consultant surgeon, I've witnessed firsthand how anatomical judgment and patient context shape decisions elements no algorithm can fully replicate. This affirms the notion that AI should serve as a support tool, not a substitute for human clinicians. Explainable AI (XAI), comprehensive training, and enforceable ethical guidelines are essential to maintaining this balance. The real dilemma is not whether to adopt AI, but how with compassion, transparency, and accountability. Real-world applications underscore AI's remarkable capabilities. At the Mayo Clinic, AI has improved early disease detection and streamlined radiology workflows, achieving diagnostic accuracies of 94.2% for rib fractures [9], 93.46% for intracranial hemorrhages [10], and 91% in brain MRI evaluations [11]. At Memorial Sloan Kettering, AI reduces false positives in prostate cancer diagnoses by 50%, and achieves a 97.2% success rate in personalized treatment planning [12].
References (19)
- Bin Abdul Baten R. How are US hospitals adopting artificial intelligence? Early evidence from 2022. Health Aff Sch. 2024; 2(10):qxae123. https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxae123
- Eastwood B. Bonus Features. 66% of physicians currently use AI in their practice, 69% of data abstractors concerned about quality of AI- generated data, plus 23 more stories. Healthcare IT Today. February 2025. Accessed on: May 31, 2025.
- Gruet M. 'That's Just Common Sense'. USC researchers find bias in up to 38.6% of 'facts' used by AI. USC Viterbi School of Engineering. May 2022. Accessed on: May 31, 2025.
- Alder S. Healthcare Data Breach Statistics. The HIPAA Journal. May 2025. Accessed on June 01, 2025. Available from URL: https://www.hipaajournal.com/healthcare-data- breach-statistics/
- Tahmasebi F. The digital divide: A qualitative study of technology access in rural communities. AI Tech Behav Soc Sci. 2023; 1(2):33-9. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.2.6 J Saidu Med Coll 2025, Vol 15 (3)
- Hong N. Navigating the promise and peril of AI in a transforming world: AI's promise and peril on society, healthcare, and sustainability. Health New Media Res. 2024; 8(2):62. https://doi.org/10.22720/hnmr.2024.00185
- Elgin CY, Elgin C. Ethical implications of AI-driven clinical decision support systems on healthcare resource allocation: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives. BMC Med. Ethics. 2024;25(1):148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01151-8
- Srivastava R. As my patient was dying, this is how we failed her. The Guardian. July 2023. Accessed on: June 01, 2025. Available from URL: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023 /jul/02/cancer-palliative-care-nhs-empathy
- Sun L, Fan Shi S, Sun M, Ma Y, Zhang K, et al. AI- assisted radiologists vs. standard double reading for rib fracture detection on CT images: A real-world clinical study. PloS one. 2025;20(1):e0316732. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316732
- Matsoukas S, Scaggiante J, Schuldt BR, Smith CJ, Chennareddy S, Kalagara R, et al. Accuracy of artificial intelligence for the detection of intracranial hemorrhage and chronic cerebral microbleeds: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Radiol Med. 2022 Oct;127(10):1106-1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-022-01530-4
- Rauschecker AM, Rudie JD, Xie L, Wang J, Duong MT, Botzolakis EJ, et al. Artificial intelligence system approaching neuroradiologist-level differential diagnosis accuracy at brain MRI. Radiology. 2020; 295(3):626-37. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020190283
- Hassane M. Artificial intelligence-driven precision medicine in cancer treatment. Science. 2024;1:100041.; Ariffa S. Predictive Angiogenesis- Cancer-Artificial Intelligence (PA-C-AI): Advancing Precision Medicine through Machine Learning for Personalized Treatment. Journal of Angiotherapy. 2024 ;8(11):1-2. https://doi.org/10.70389/PJS.100041
- Talaat FM, Elnaggar AR, Shaban WM, Shehata M, Elhosseini M. CardioRiskNet: A hybrid AI-based model for explainable risk prediction and prognosis in cardiovascular disease. Bioengineering. 2024;11(8):822. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering11080822
- Sufian MA, Hamzi W, Zaman S, Alsadder L, Hamzi B, Varadarajan J, et al. Enhancing clinical validation for early cardiovascular disease prediction through simulation, AI and web technology. Diagnostics. 2024 ;14(12):1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14121308
- Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019 Oct 25;366(6464):447-453. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax2342
- Hanna M, Pantanowitz L, Jackson B, Palmer O, Visweswaran S, Pantanowitz J, et al. Ethical and Bias considerations in artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning. Mod Pathol. 2024 :100686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686
- Murphy A, Bowen K, Naqa IM, Yoga B, Green BL. Bridging health disparities in the data-driven world of artificial intelligence: a narrative review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024; 2:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02057-2
- Pew Research Center. 60% of Americans would be uncomfortable with provider relying on AI in their own health care. February 2023. Accessed on: April 25, 2025. Available from URL: https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/02/22/ 60-of-americans-would-be-uncomfortable-with- provider-relying-on-ai-in-their-own-health-care/
- Busch F, Hoffmann L, Xu L, Zhang L, Hu B, García- Juárez I, et al. Multinational attitudes towards AI in healthcare and diagnostics among hospital patients. medRxiv. 2024; 2:2024-09. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.01.24312016