Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Introduction
Analysis
Related Works
Conclusion and Perspectives
References
All Topics
Philosophy
Metaphysics

DYNAMO-MAS: a Multi-Agent System for Ontology Evolution from Text

Profile image of Valerie CampsValerie Camps

2013, Journal on Data Semantics

https://doi.org/10.1007/S13740-013-0025-1
visibility

…

description

17 pages

link

1 file

Abstract

Manual ontology development and evolution are complex and time-consuming tasks, even when textual documents are used as knowledge sources in addition to human expertise or existing ontologies. Processing natural language in text produces huge amounts of linguistic data that need to be filtered out and structured. To support both of these tasks, we have developed DYNAMO-MAS, an interactive tool based on an adaptive multi-agent system (adaptive MAS or AMAS) that builds and evolves ontologies from text. DYNAMO-MAS is a partner system to build ontologies; the ontologist interacts with the system to validate or modify its outputs. This paper presents the architecture of DYNAMO-MAS, its operating principles and its evaluation on three case studies.

Related papers

Agent-based approach for building ontology from text
Sofiane Maza

An ontology is an explicit specification of a conceptualization, the term is often linked with the Semantic Web, ontologies are used like representations of knowledge, to annotate web resources and also to communication between systems. This make them very important, but unfortunately their construction is expensive, and because they are representations of knowledge, we thought of using the enormous amount of information available under textual format to automate the process of ontology building, and since we deal with texts, the NLP (Natural Language Processing) is considered as the base for the ontology construction from text. In this paper our goal is to propose an agent-based approach to build ontology from text, and implement a multi-agent system guided by this approach, which start from a set of textual resources to give us an ontology in OWL (Ontology Web Language), using the Formal Concept Analysis FCA and Relational Concept Analysis RCA to move from the syntactic level to t...

View PDFchevron_right
A Multi-Agent System for Dynamic Ontologies
Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles

Journal of Logic and Computation, 2009

In the article, we present Dynamo (an acronym of DYNAMic Ontologies), a tool based on an adaptive multi-agent system to construct and maintain an ontology from a domain specific set of texts. The originality of our proposal is that the adaptative multi-agent system is used both to represent the ontology itself and to produce the ontology. This enables us to propose a system building and maintaining dynamically an ontology according to interactions with the user (also called the ontologist). We present our system and the mechanisms used to build and maintain the ontology from the texts and for the interactions with the ontologist. We also give results of the evaluation of our system.

View PDFchevron_right
An intelligent system for semi-automatic evolution of ontologies
maryam ramezani

2010 5th IEEE International Conference Intelligent Systems, 2010

Ontologies are an important part of the Semantic Web as well as of many intelligent systems. However, the traditional expert-driven development of ontologies is time-consuming and often results in incomplete and inappropriate ontologies. In addition, since ontology evolution is not controlled by end users, it may take too long for a conceptual change in the domain to be reflected in the ontology. In this paper, we present a recommendation algorithm in a Web 2.0 platform that supports end users to collaboratively evolve ontologies by suggesting semantic relations between new and existing concepts. We use the Wikipedia category hierarchy to evaluate our algorithm and our experimental results show that the proposed algorithm produces high quality recommendations.

View PDFchevron_right
An Agent-Based Approach to Dynamic Ontology Construction
Keiichi Nakata

1 Abstract—The building of exhaustive ontologies leads to well known problems such as terminology, scope, encoding and context, which can only be resolved in a process of intense communication of the potential users. We propose an environment that enables users to define rules, parameters, constraints for an agent-based system which sustains (self-) organization of small sets of concepts extracted from a specific set of user provided documents and their relations. The system allows users to build or train agents, which carry small ontologies together with specific sample documents, and a generic set of rules, which enables the agents to negotiate their local ontological relations with each other.

View PDFchevron_right
Automated ontology evolution in a multi-agent system
Behrouz Far

Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Scalable information systems - InfoScale '06, 2006

This research addresses the formation of new concepts and their corresponding ontology in a multiagent system where individual autonomous agents try to learn new concepts by consulting several other agents. In this research individual agents create and learn their distinct conceptualization and rather than a commitment to a common ontology they use their own ontologies. In this paper multi-agent supervised learning of concepts among individual agents with diverse conceptualization and different ontologies is introduced and demonstrated through an intuitive example in which supervisors are other agents rather than a human.

View PDFchevron_right
A Framework for Document-driven Evolution of Ontology
Krzysztof Wecel

Business Information Systems, …, 2006

We present a framework for updating ontology as new documents arrive. The framework consists of three main layers: extraction, internal storage and refinement. In the extraction layer axioms are extracted from the text by analyzing named entities, contexts and relations. We introduce the notion of temporal axioms, i.e. the axioms that are valid in a certain time interval. This information is then usedt o reasona bout ontology evolution when those axioms are added to an ontology. We also present cases for evolution and corresponding changing a xioms. In refinement layer, final ontology for a given point in time is built.

View PDFchevron_right
Dynamic Evaluation of Ontologies
kheira lakel

Procedia Computer Science, 2015

The automatic construction of ontologies from texts is a topic of continued and open research, their construction requires both a study of human knowledge, methodologies and tools to retrieve the text content. As the content of these resources is dynamic, they can be thought of as finished products and refined, which remain stable when completed. The field of ontology construction needs to go towards more dynamic, more view of ontologies is to increase intelligence in many applications such as information retrieval, semantic indexing and semantic annotation. Ontologies are software modules whose development is based on the same principles as those applied in software engineering. There are several approaches for evaluating ontologies, some are based on learning methods from the corpus, using the networks head-Expansion or other semantic networks for identify concepts and relationships. But the automation of ontology construction, actually, is a scientific lock for many applications. In this paper, we propose an approach that combines these tools to improve the process of automatic co-construction of ontologies from a corporus. DEO (Dynamic Evaluation of Ontologies) is a system dedicated to ontology construction from texts using a cooperative learning based on a multi agents structure.It uses the mechanism of extraction of relations Dynamo and more it uses the terminology WordNet1.2 to identify concepts, relationships and a storage module to save the changes of the ontologist in order to be reused.

View PDFchevron_right
Tools for Ontology Building from Texts: Analysis and Improvement of the Results of Text2Onto
IOSR Journals

Building ontologies from texts is a difficult and time-consuming process. Several tools have been developed to facilitate this process. However, these tools are not mature enough to automate all tasks to build a good ontology without human intervention. Among these tools, Text2Onto is a one for learning ontology from textual data. This case study aims at understanding the architecture and working principle of Text2Onto, analyzing the errors that Text2Onto can produce and finding a solution to reduce human intervention as well as to improve the result of Text2Onto.Three texts of different length were used in the experiment. Quality of Text2Onto results was assessed by comparing the entities extracted by Text2Onto with the ones extracted manually. Some causes of errors produced by Text2Onto were identified too. As an attempt to improve the result of Text2Onto, change discovery feature of Text2Onto was used. Meta-model of the given text was fed to Text2Onto to obtain a POM on top of which an ontology was built for the existing text. The meta-model ontology was aimed to identify all the core concepts and relations as done in the manual ontology and the ultimate objective was to improve the hierarchy of the of the ontology. The use of meta model should help to better classify the concepts unde r various core concepts.

View PDFchevron_right
CODA: Computer-aided ontology development architecture
A. Stellato

IBM Journal of Research and Development, 2014

In this paper we introduce CODA (Computer-aided Ontology Development Architecture), an Architecture and a Framework for semiautomatic development of ontologies through analysis of heterogeneous information sources. We have been motivated in its design by observing that several fields of research provided interesting contributions towards the objective of augmenting/enriching ontology content, but that they lack a common perspective and a systematic approach. While in the context of Natural Language Processing specific architectures and frameworks have been defined, time is not yet completely mature for systems able to reuse the extracted information for ontology enrichment purposes: several examples do exist, though they do not comply with any leading model or architecture. Objective of CODA is to acknowledge and improve existing frameworks to cover the above gaps, by providing: a conceptual systematization of data extracted from unstructured information to enrich ontology content, an architecture defining the components which take part in such a scenario, and a framework supporting all of the above through standard implementations. This paper provides a first overview of the whole picture, and introduces UIMAST, an extension for the Knowledge Management and Acquisition Platform Semantic Turkey, that implements CODA principles by allowing reuse of components developed inside UIMA framework to drive semi-automatic Acquisition of Knowledge from Web Content.

View PDFchevron_right
Computer-aided Ontology Development: an integrated environment
Andrea Turbati

2010

In this paper we introduce CODA (Computer-aided Ontology Development Architecture), an Architecture and a Framework for semiautomatic development of ontologies through analysis of heterogeneous information sources. We have been motivated in its design by observing that several fields of research provided interesting contributions towards the objective of augmenting/enriching ontology content, but that they lack a common perspective and a systematic approach. While in the context of Natural Language Processing specific architectures and frameworks have been defined, time is not yet completely mature for systems able to reuse the extracted information for ontology enrichment purposes: several examples do exist, though they do not comply with any leading model or architecture. Objective of CODA is to acknowledge and improve existing frameworks to cover the above gaps, by providing: a conceptual systematization of data extracted from unstructured information to enrich ontology content, an architecture defining the components which take part in such a scenario, and a framework supporting all of the above through standard implementations. This paper provides a first overview of the whole picture, and introduces UIMAST, an extension for the Knowledge Management and Acquisition Platform Semantic Turkey, that implements CODA principles by allowing reuse of components developed inside UIMA framework to drive semi-automatic Acquisition of Knowledge from Web Content.

View PDFchevron_right

References (45)

  1. Aubin S, Hamon T (2006) Improving term extraction with termi- nological resources. In: Salakosk T, Ginter F, Pyysalo S, Pahikkala T (eds) Advances in natural language processing 5th international conference on NLP. Springer, Turku, pp 380-387
  2. Aussenac-Gilles N, Condamines A, Sèdes F (eds) (2006) Ressources termino-ontologiques. Revue I3 (Information- interaction-intelligence). Cépaduès-edn
  3. Aussenac-Gilles N, Despres S, Szulman S (2003) The TERMI- NAE method and platform for ontology engineering from texts. In: Buitelaar P, Cimiano P (eds) Bridging the gap between text and knowledge-selected contributions to ontology learning and population from text. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 199-223
  4. Aussenac-Gilles N, Séguéla P (2000) Les relations sémantiques : du linguistique au formel. Cahiers de Grammaire. "Sémantique et Corpus". Textes réunis par A. Condamines 25:175-198
  5. Barrière C, Akakpo A (2006) Terminoweb: a software environment for term study in rich contexts. In: Proceedings of international con- ference on terminology, standardization and technology transfer. Encyclopedia of China Publishing House, Beijing, pp 103-113
  6. Basili R, Velardi P, Pazienza MT (1996) Integrating general- purpose and corpus-based verb classification. Comput Linguistics 22(4): 559-568
  7. Bourigault D (2007) Un analyseur syntaxique opérationnel : Syn- tex. PhD Thesis, Univ. de Toulouse Le Mirail, France. Habilitation à diriger des recherches
  8. Buitelaar P, Cimiano P, Magnini B (2005) Ontology learning from text: methods evaluation and applications. Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications series, IOS Press, Amsterdam
  9. Camps V(1998) Vers une théorie de l'auto-organisation dans les systèmes multi-agents basée sur la coopération : application à la recherche d'information dans un système d'information répartie. Thèse de doctorat, Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
  10. Cimiano P (2006) Ontology learning and population from text: algorithms evaluation and applications. Springer, Berlin
  11. Cimiano P, Buitelaar P, Völker J (2010) Ontology construction. In: Indurkhya N, Damerau FJ (eds) Handbook of natural language processing, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton
  12. Cimiano P, Völker j (2005) Text2onto-a framework for ontology learning and data-driven change discovery. In: Montoyo A, Munoz R, Metais e (eds) Proceedings of the 10th international confer- ence on applications of natural language to information systems (NLDB). Springer, Heidelberg, pp 227-298
  13. Flouris G(2006) On belief change and ontology evolution. Ph.D. thesis, University of Crete, Department of Computer Science, Her- aklion, Greece
  14. Flouris G, Plexousakis D, Antoniou G (2006) A classification of ontology change. In: Poster session of the 3rd Italian semantic web workshop, semantic web applications and perspectives (SWAP- 06), CEUR Workshop proceedings, vol 201. CEUR-WS.org
  15. Gandon F (2002) Distributed artificial intelligence and knowledge management: ontologies and multi-agent systems for a corporate semantic web. Thèse de doctorat, Univ. de Nice -Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
  16. Gawrysiak P, Protaziuk G, Rybinski H, Delteil A(2008) Text onto miner: a semi automated ontology building system. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on foundations of intelligent systems, ISMIS'08, Springer, Berlin, pp 563-573
  17. Gleizes MP, Camps V, Georgé JP, Capera D(2007) Engineering systems which generate emergent functionalities. In: Engineering environment-mediated multi-agent systems-satellite conference, The European Conference on Complex Systems. Katholieke Uni- versiteit Leuven, Dresden
  18. Haase P, Sure Y, Vrande D (2004) D3.1.1 ontology management and evolution-survey, methods and prototypes. Eu-ist ip ist-2003- 506826 sekt, project deliverable, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe
  19. Harris ZS (1968) Mathematical structures of language. Wiley, New York
  20. Hearst MA (1992) Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In: 14th internaitonal conference on computational linguistics (COLING), pp 539-545
  21. Klein M (2004) Change management for distributed ontologies. Ph.D. thesis, Dutch Graduate School for information and knowl- edge systems, Germany
  22. Leen-Kiat S (2002) Multiagent distributed ontology learning. In: Cranefield S, Finin, S. Willmott (eds.) Proceedings of the Work- shop on Ontologies in Agent Systems, 1st Int. Joint Conference on AAMAS. Vol 66Bologna, Italy, pp 75-79
  23. Lemouzy S (2011) Systèmes interactifs auto-adaptatifs par sys- tèmes multi-agents auto-organisateurs : application a la person- nalisation de l'accès à l'information. UniversitT Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, ThFse de doctorat
  24. Levenshtein VI (1966) Binary codes capable of correcting deletions insertions and reversals. Soviet Phys Doklady 10:707
  25. Luong PH (2007) Gestion de l'évolution d'un web sémantique d'entreprise. Ph.D. thesis, Ecole doctorale STIC, école des mines de Paris, Paris
  26. Maedche A (2002) Ontology learning for the Semantic Web. Vol 665, Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht
  27. Malaise V (2005) Méthodologie linguistique et terminologique pour la structuration d'ontologies différentiellespartir de corpus textuels. Ph.D. thesis, Paris 7 Denis Diderot University
  28. Morin E (1999) Using lexico-syntactic patterns to extract seman- tic relations between terms from technical corpus. In: 5th interna- tional congress on terminology and knowledge engineering (TKE). TermNet, Innsbruck, pp 268-278
  29. Nédellec C, Nazarenko A, Bossy R (2009) Information extraction. In: Staab S, Studer R (eds) Ontology handbook. Springer, Berlin, pp 268-278.
  30. Noel V, Arcangeli JP, Gleizes MP (2010) Component-based agent architectures to build dedicated agent frameworks (regular paper). In: Trappl R (ed) international symposium "From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation" (AT2AI). Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna
  31. Ottens K (2007) Un système multi-agent adaptatif pour la con- struction d'ontologies-partir de textes. Thèse de doctorat, Univ. Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
  32. Ottens K, Hernandez N, Gleizes MP, Aussenac-Gilles N (2008) A multi-agent system for dynamic ontologies. J Logic Comput 19:1- 28
  33. Palma A, Haase P, Wang Y, d'Aquin M (2007) D1.3.1: Propagation models and strategies. Technical report, NeOn IST Project Deliv- erable
  34. Reinberger ML, Spyns P (2004) Discovering knowledge in texts for the learning of dogma-inspired ontologies. In: Proceedings of the workshop Ontology learning and population, ECAI04, Valencia, Spain, pp 19-24
  35. Reymonet A, Thomas J, Aussenac-Gilles N (2007) Modelling onto- logical and terminological resources in OWL DL. In: Buitelaar P, Choi KS, Gangemi A, Huang CR (eds) OntoLex07-from text to knowledge: the Lexicon/Ontology interface, Workshop at ISWC07 6th International Semantic Web Conference, Busan
  36. Sellami Z, Aussenac-Gilles N, Gleizes MP, Camps V (2012) DYNAMO : un outil de construction et d'évolution d'ontologies partir de textes. Technique et Science Informatiques 31/1, pp 97- 124
  37. Sellami Z, Camps V (2012) Evaluation of a multi-agent sys- tem for the evolving of domain ontologies from text (regular paper). In: International conference on practical applications of agents and multiagent systems (PAAMS), Salamanca, 28/03/12- 30/03/12, 4240, vol 155. Springer, Berlin, pp 169-179 http://www. springerlink.com
  38. Sellami Z, Gleizes MP, Aussenac-Gilles N, Rougemaille S (2009) Dynamic ontology co-construction based on adaptive multi-agent technology. In: International conference on knowledge engineering and ontology development (KEOD), INSTICC
  39. Stojanovic L (2004) Methods and tools for ontology evolution. Ph.D. thesis, Karlsruhe University, Germany
  40. Tamma V, Bench-Capon T (2002) An ontology model to facilitate knowledge-sharing in multi-agent systems. Knowl Eng Rev 17:41- 60. doi:10.1017/S0269888902000371
  41. Tissaoui A, Aussenac-Gilles N, Laublet P, Hernandez N (2010) Gestion des évolutions d'une ressource termino-ontologique et des annotations sémantiques. In: Aussenac-Gilles N, Hernandez N, Laublet P (eds) Atelier "Evolution d'ontologies" des 21èmes Journées francophones d'Ingénierie des Connaissances (IC2010). Nîmes, France
  42. Velardi P, Navigli R, Cucchiarelli A, Neri F (2005) Evaluation of ontolearn, a methodology for automatic learning of domain ontolo- gies. In: Buitelaar P, Cimiano P, Magnini B (eds) Ontology Learn- ing from text: methods. Evaluation and applications. IOS Press, Amsterdam
  43. Wang J, Les Gasser L (2002) Mutual online ontology alignment. In: Cranefield S, Finin T, Willmott S (eds) Proceedings of the Work- shop on Ontologies in agent systems, 1st international joint con- ference on AAMAS. Vol 66, Bologna, Italy, pp 103-113
  44. Zablith F, Sabou M, d'Aquin M, Motta E (2009) Ontology evolu- tion with Evolva. In: L.e.a. Aroyo (ed) Proceedings of the 6th Euro- pean semantic web conference (ESWC). Vol LNCS 5554, Springer, Berlin, pp 908-912
  45. Zablith F, Sellami Z, D'Aquin M, Aussenac-Gilles N, Hernan- dez N (2010) Vers la combinaison de deux techniques d'évolution d'ontologies à partir de ressources générales et de ressources lin- guistiques. In: Atelier "Evolution d'ontologies" des 21e Journées francophones d'Ingénierie des Connaissances (IC2010), Nîmes

Related papers

An Adaptative Multi-Agent System to Co-construct an Ontology from Texts with an Ontologist
Valerie Camps

Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014

Ontologies are one of the most used representations to model the domain knowledge. An ontology consists of a set of concepts connected by semantic relations. The construction and evolution of an ontology are complex and timeconsuming tasks. This paper presents DYNAMO-MAS, an Adaptive Multi-Agent System (AMAS) that automates these tasks by co-constructing an ontology from texts with an ontologist. Terms and concepts of a given domain are agentified and they act, according to the AMAS approach, by solving the non cooperative situations they locally perceive at runtime. These agents cooperate to determine their position in the AMAS (that is the ontology) thanks to (i) lexical relations between terms, (ii) some adaptive mechanisms enabling addition, removing or moving of new terms, of concepts and of relations in the ontology as well as (iii) feedbacks from the ontologist about the propositions given by the AMAS. This paper focuses on the instantiation of the AMAS approach to this difficult problem. It presents the architecture of DYNAMO-MAS, and details the cooperative behaviors of the two types of agents we defined for ontology evolution. Finally evaluations made on three different ontologies are given in order to show the genericity of our solution.

View PDFchevron_right
DYNAMO, un outil de construction et d’évolution d’ontologies à partir de textes
Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles

Techniques et sciences informatiques, 2012

Ontologies have become an important means for structuring knowledge and defining semantic information retrieval systems. Ontology engineering requires a significant effort, and recent researches show that human language technologies are useful means to acquire or update ontologies from text. In this paper we present DYNAMO, a tool based on a Multi-Agent System, which aims at assisting ontologists during the ontology building and evolution processes. This work is carried out in the context of the DYNAMO project. The main novelty of the agent system is to take advantage of text extracted terms and lexical relations together with some quantitative features of the corpus to guide the agents when self-organizing. We exhibit the first experiment of ontology building that shows promising results, and helps us to identify key issues to be solved to the DYNAMO system behavior and the resulting ontology.

View PDFchevron_right
Ontology Co-construction with an Adaptive Multi-Agent System: Principles and Case-Study
Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles

Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2011

Manual ontology engineering and maintenance is a difficult task that requires significant effort from the ontologist to identify and structure domain knowledge. Automatic ontology learning makes this task easier, especially through the use of text and natural language processing tools. In this paper, we present DYNAMO, a tool based on an Adaptive Multi-Agent System (AMAS), which aims at helping ontologists during ontology building and evolution (co-construction process). DYNAMO is based on terms and lexical relations that have been extracted from text. DYNAMO provides an AMAS based module to support ontology co-construction. The ontologist interacts with the tool by modifying the ontology. Then the AMAS adapts to these changes and proposes new evolutions to improve the ontology. A first experiment of ontology building shows promising results, and helps us to identify key issues in the agent behaviour that should be solved so that the DYNAMO performs better.

View PDFchevron_right
Dynamic Ontology Co-construction based on Adaptive Multi-Agent Technology
Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles

Ontologies have become an important means for structuring knowledge and defining semantic information retrieval systems. Ontology engineering requires a significant effort, and recent researches show that human language technologies are useful means to acquire or update ontologies from text. In this paper we present DYNAMO, a tool based on a Multi-Agent System, which aims at assisting ontologists during the ontology building and evolution processes. This work is carried out in the context of the DYNAMO project. The main novelty of the agent system is to take advantage of text extracted terms and lexical relations together with some quantitative features of the corpus to guide the agents when self-organizing. We exhibit the first experiment of ontology building that shows promising results, and helps us to identify key issues to be solved to the DYNAMO system behavior and the resulting ontology.

View PDFchevron_right
Dynamic Ontology Co-Evolution from Texts: Principles and Case Study
Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles

As claimed in the Semantic Web project, a huge amount of physically distributed interacting software agents could find the semantic of available resources and answer more relevantly to users' requests if the content of these resources would be represented with formal semantic concepts defined in ontologies. Because Web information sources are highly dynamic and conceptually heterogeneous, one of the most challenging problems in the Semantic Web research is the proper and frequent ontology updating in keeping with knowledge changes. To tackle this problem, we have developed a selforganizing multi-agent system -Dynamo-able to create an ontology draft from automatic text processing. Because it is well-known that only a part of a domain description is explicitly described in texts, Dynamo enables an ontology coconstruction with a domain expert in a fully interactive way. In this paper, we present the principles of this approach and related experiments.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Computer Science
  • Ontology
  • Multi Agent System
  • Ontology Evolution
  • Intelligence Artificielle

    • Cited by

    Knowledge Representation: A Comparative Study
    mariam gawich

    Internet of Things—Applications and Future, 2020

    The intelligent computer system relies on the existence of knowledge. Knowledge refers to a set of facts and rules that describe the domain of interest. The encoded knowledge enables the computer system to interpret and analyze the received information. It also enables the computer system to infer new knowledge from the current facts. The encoded knowledge can include a set of rules that can be captured from the human experts to solve a complex problem such as the disease diagnosis. By this way, the intelligent computer system stimulates the human reasoning that is used to solve problems in an automated way. The process of the symbolization of knowledge in a formal manner in order to be understood by the intelligent systems called knowledge representation. The objective of this paper is the investigation of the major knowledge representation techniques. Furthermore, the paper presents a framework proposal for a comparative study to clarify the difference between the knowledge representation techniques.

    View PDFchevron_right
    580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved