Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

A Framework for Document-driven Evolution of Ontology

2006, Business Information Systems, …

Abstract

We present a framework for updating ontology as new documents arrive. The framework consists of three main layers: extraction, internal storage and refinement. In the extraction layer axioms are extracted from the text by analyzing named entities, contexts and relations. We introduce the notion of temporal axioms, i.e. the axioms that are valid in a certain time interval. This information is then usedt o reasona bout ontology evolution when those axioms are added to an ontology. We also present cases for evolution and corresponding changing a xioms. In refinement layer, final ontology for a given point in time is built.

References (13)

  1. References
  2. Doddington, G ., et al., Automatic Content Extraction ( ACE) program -t ask definitions and performance measures, in Proceedings of LREC 2004: Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation. 2004.
  3. Hobbs, J.R. and F. P an, An Ontology of Time for the Semantic Web. ACM Transactions onAsian Language Information Processing, 2004. 3(1): p. 66-85.
  4. Amardeilh, F ., P. Laublet, and J .-L. Minel, Document annotation a nd ontology population from linguistic extractions, in Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Knowledge capture. 2005, ACM Press: Banff, Alberta, Canada. p.161- 168.
  5. Magnini, B., et al., From Text to Knowledge for the Semantic Web: the ONTOTEXT Project, in S emantic Web A pplications and P erspectives, P . Bouquet and G. Tummarello, Editors. 2005, CEUR Workshop Proceedings: Trento.
  6. Cimiano, P. and J. Völker, Text2Onto. A Framework for Ontology Learning and Data-driven Change Discovery, in Proceeding of NLDB'05. 2005.
  7. Maedche, A., Ontology learning for the semantic Web. The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science ; SECS 665. 2002, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. xxiii, 244 p.
  8. Ferro, L., et al., TIDES. 2005 Standard for the Annotation of Temporal Expressions. 2005, MITRE Corporation.
  9. Mani, I., J. Pustejovsky, and R. Gaizauskas, eds. The Language of Time. 2005, Oxford University Press.
  10. Grishman, R. and B. Sundheim, Message Understanding Conference-6: a brief history in Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics -Volume 1 1996 Association for Computational Linguistics: Copenhagen, Denmark p. 466-471
  11. Allen, J.F. and G. Ferguson, Actions and Events in Interval Temporal Logic. Journal of Logic and Computation, 1994.
  12. Haase, P., et al., A Framework for Handling Inconsistency in Changing Ontologies, in 4th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2005, Y. Gil, et al., Editors. 2005, Springer, LNCS: Galway.
  13. Parsia, B., E. Sirin, and A. Kalyanpur, Debugging OWL ontologies, in Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web. 2005, ACM Press: Chiba, Japan. p. 633-640.