Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Title
Abstract
Overview of the Study
Introduction and Background
Method
Analysis and Discussion
Methodology
Summary of Findings
Introduction
Conclusion
References
All Topics
Engineering
Other Engineering

Aoir Ethics Panel 2: Platform Challenges

Profile image of Connie M SehatConnie M Sehat

2021, AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research

Abstract

This panel is one of two sessions organized by the AoIR Ethics Working Committee. It collects five papers exploring a broad (but in many ways common) set of ethical dilemmas faced by researchers engaged with specific platforms such as Reddit, Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, and private messaging platforms. These include: a study of people's online conversations about health matters on Reddit in support of a proposed situated ethics framework for researchers working with publicly available data; an exploration into sourcing practices among Reddit researchers to determine if their sources could be unmasked and located in Reddit archives; a broader systematic review of over 700 research studies that used Reddit data to assess the kinds of analysis and methods researchers are engaging in as well as any ethical considerations that emerge when researching Reddit; a critical examination of the use of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk for academic research; and an investigation into current practices ...

Related papers

CFP: Internet Research Ethics in the Platform Society: Theoretical Reflections, Research Experiences, and Open Questions
Comunicazioni Sociali. Journal of Media, Performing Arts and Cultural Studies, Elisabetta Locatelli

Comunicazioni Sociali. Journal of Media, Performing Arts and Cultural Studies, 2023

Since the late 1990s, Internet Research Ethics (IRE) has emerged as a burgeoning field, fueled by an evergrowing variety of ethical challenges and concerns (Zimmer and Buchanan, 2016). To name but a few, questions include how to minimize risks for researchers and research subjects, and issues surrounding informed consent and intersecting interests between corporations and academic approaches: both emphasize the importance of the integrity of researcher but also add challenges to Ethics Committees, who aim to confirm what research can or cannot be conducted (franzke et al., 2020). In recent years, the societal and technological landscape has changed and expanded still again: platforms such as social media and apps aggregate a significant number of users, generating new social, cultural, and media practices to study. Research into these realms is stimulating and challenging but further implies methodological and ethical issues surrounding both qualitative and quantitative approaches. Both ethnographies and big data approaches in particular have different but compelling ethical issues to consider (Zimmer, Kinder-Kurlanda, 2017; Zook et al, 2017). Actually, there is the need to study and comprehend users' behaviors and their socio-cultural implications but users need to be more aware of what may happen to the data they posted and also about the research they are involved into. Moreover, the complex nature of AI technology and platform logics has evoked thunderous academic debates surrounding buzzwords such as fake news, and the importance of taking up misinformation, hate speech and ethical reflection in social media research is more compelling than ever before. In addition to these changes, the role and importance of internet research ethics has grown for over a decade and the approach of having it incorporated by design into the research projects is increasingly more common (Ibiricu, Van Der Made, 2020). For example, when participating in public grants and fundings such as Horizon Europe, the evaluation of the ethics of research is an aspect required from the very beginning also for social sciences and humanities. This entails a specific attention to privacy and developing a new attitude and best practices also for these disciplines, with consequences for how research projects are developed and carried out, including ethics assessments from its very beginning through its dissemination. Among the new challenges there is also the need of making research data open, requiring a further level of reflection. Considering this landscape, the present issue of Comunicazioni Sociali. Journal of Media, Performing Arts and Cultural Studies focuses on the new challenges of the ethics of social media and internet research through eliciting papers addressing theoretical reflections and research projects across the world especially related to social sciences, media studies, performing arts, and cultural studies. This topic is consistent with the tradition of the journal and its attention to the research on media and its context.

View PDFchevron_right
Ethical Concerns in Internet Research
Annette Markham

Across the globe, societies are experiencing significant flux and transformation in the way digital information and networked technologies are woven into and influence everyday life, workplace practices, social norms, and institutional structures. Likewise, all academic disciplines are challenged to make sense of these transformations in light of ethical research practice. Actively confronting these challenges means not only being aware of them, but thoughtfully considering how we might better address these challenges. This entry discusses various ethical challenges in applied research involving digital media or internet-related contexts.

View PDFchevron_right
Ethical approval: none sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data
Lynn de Rijk

Research Ethics

Although ethical guidelines for doing Internet research are available, most prominently those of the Association of Internet Researchers ( www.aoir.org ), ethical decision-making for research on publicly available, naturally-occurring data remains a major challenge. As researchers might also turn to others to inform their decisions, this article reviews recent research papers on publicly available, online data. Research involving forums such as Facebook pages, Twitter, YouTube, news comments, blogs, etc. is examined to see how authors report ethical considerations and how they quote these data. We included 132 articles published in discourse analysis-oriented journals between January 2017 and February 2020. Roughly one third of the articles (85 out of 132) did not discuss ethical issues, mostly claiming the data were publicly available. Quotations nevertheless tended to be anonymized, although retrievability of posts was generally not taken into account. In those articles in which e...

View PDFchevron_right
Report on workshop: Ethical issues in social media research: current thinking
Gabby Samuel
View PDFchevron_right
Blurring the Boundries: Internet Research Ethics
Danielle Lawson

As use of the Internet has grown, so to has the amount of research concerning various aspects of computer-mediated communication (CMC). In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of research projects dealing with Internet-based, synchronous chat programs. Although timely, this increased research interest in synchronous chat media is problematic due to potential ethical dilemmas regarding data gathering and research publication. This paper examines the ethical problems related to subject identity, privacy and "chat copyright" in synchronous online research. Additionally, it addresses possible strategies for minimizing ethical conflict, while maintaining research integrity.

View PDFchevron_right
Ethical Aspects of Research in a Web Chat Community." Paper prepared for the Ethics Work Group, Association of Internet Researchers
Malin Sveningsson

2001

All material in this paper (with a few minor changes + language check) will be published in my dissertation: Sveningsson, Malin. (2001). Creating a Sense of Community. Experiences from a Swedish Web Chat. Linköping: Linköping Studies in Art and Science.

View PDFchevron_right
Using Social Media in Research: New Ethics for a New Meme?
Eric Swirsky

The American Journal of Bioethics, 2014

The case vignettes presented here highlight ethical issues surrounding the use of social media in clinical research. To date, investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) have had little in the way of specific guidance in this area. Written over 30 years ago, the Code of Federal Regulations for conducting human subjects research do not address social media (45 CFR 46). The U.S. Office for Human Research Protection, in its guidelines issued to address "significant challenges" presented by Internet research, recognized that "[e]thical conduct of Internet research…brings questions of scientific design into high relief…" (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2013).

View PDFchevron_right
Ethics and online social network research–developing best practices
Luke Hutton

Facebook and other social network sites (SNSs) are used by hundreds of millions of people daily. 1 With such a large number of social interactions being made and recorded digitally, it is not surprising that researchers from many fields in the humanities and both physical and social sciences have exploited this rich source of data, with one recent survey listing 410 social science papers studying the Facebook SNS alone (W ilson et al. 2012). This includes HCI researchers, who have studied, for instance, mobile SNSs to understand location- ...

View PDFchevron_right
The Conceptual and Practical Ethical Dilemmas of Using Health Discussion Board Posts as Research Data
Osman Ahmed

Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2013

Background: Increasing numbers of people living with a long-term health condition are putting personal health information online, including on discussion boards. Many discussion boards contain material of potential use to researchers; however, it is unclear how this information can and should be used by researchers. To date there has been no evaluation of the views of those individuals sharing health information online regarding the use of their shared information for research purposes.

View PDFchevron_right
Research Ethics in the Age of Digital Platforms
antonio carlos santos junior

Science and Engineering Ethics

Scientific research is growingly increasingly reliant on "microwork" or "crowdsourcing" provided by digital platforms to collect new data. Digital platforms connect clients and workers, charging a fee for an algorithmically managed workflow based on Terms of Service agreements. Although these platforms offer a way to make a living or complement other sources of income, microworkers lack fundamental labor rights and basic safe working conditions, especially in the Global South. We ask how researchers and research institutions address the ethical issues involved in considering microworkers as "human participants." We argue that current scientific research fails to treat microworkers in the same way as in-person human participants, producing de facto a double morality: one applied to people with rights acknowledged by states and international bodies (e.g., the Helsinki Declaration), the other to guest workers of digital autocracies who have almost no right...

View PDFchevron_right

References (61)

  1. Collin, P., Swist, T., Taddeo, C., & Spears, B. (2020). Working with complexity: Between control and care in digital research ethics. Complexities of Researching with Young People, 115-129.
  2. Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
  3. Roberts, L. D. (2015). Ethical Issues in Conducting Qualitative Research in Online Communities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(3), 314-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2015.1008909
  4. Steinmetz, K. F. (2012). Message Received: Virtual Ethnography in Online Message Boards. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(1), 26-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100103
  5. Stommel, W., & Rijk, L. de. (2021). Ethical approval: None sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data. Research Ethics, 174701612098876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120988767
  6. Taylor, J., & Pagliari, C. (2018). Mining social media data: How are research sponsors and researchers addressing the ethical challenges? Research Ethics, 14(2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117738559
  7. Webb, H., Jirotka, M., Stahl, B. C., Housley, W., Edwards, A., Williams, M., Procter, R., Rana, O., & Burnap, P. (2017). The Ethical Challenges of Publishing Twitter Data for Research Dissemination. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference - WebSci '17, 339-348. https://doi.org/10.1145/3091478.3091489
  8. References Barbaro, M., & Zeller, T., Jr. (2006, August 9). A face is exposed for AOL searcher no. 4417749. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/09/technology/09aol.html
  9. Bruckman, A. (2002). Studying the amateur artist: a perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.432.1591&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  10. Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2015). Obfuscation: A user's guide for privacy and protest. MIT Press.
  11. Finn, J., & Lavitt, M. (1994). Computer-based self-help groups for sexual abuse survivors. Social Work With Groups, 17(1-2), 21-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J009v17n01_03
  12. Franzke, A. S., Bechmann, A., Zimmer, M., Ess, C., & AoIR, and. (2020). Internet research: Ethical guidelines 3.0. AoIR. https://aoir.org/reports/ethics3.pdf Haimson, O. L., Andalibi, N., & Pater, J. (2016, December 20). Ethical use of visual social media content in research publications. AHRECS. https://ahrecs.com/ethical-use- visual-social-media-content-research-publications/
  13. King, S. A. (1996). Researching internet communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results. The Information Society, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/713856145
  14. Markham, A. (2012). Fabrication as ethical practice: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous Internet contexts. Information, Communication & Society, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2011.641993
  15. Ohm, P. (2010). Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of Anonymization. UCLA Law Review, 58(2). https://www.uclalawreview.org/broken- promises-of-privacy-responding-to-the-surprising-failure-of-anonymization-2/
  16. Shklovski, I., & Vertesi, J. (2013, April 27). 'UnGoogling' publications: The ethics and problems of anonymization. Proceedings of CHI 2013. https://pure.itu.dk/portal/files/80190129/p2169_shklovski.pdf
  17. Singer, N. (2015, February 14). Love in the time of Twitter. The New York Times. https://web.archive.org/web/20190412053116/https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/02/13 /love-in-the-times-of-twitter/
  18. Zimmer, M. (2010). 'But the data is already public': On the ethics of research in Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676- 010-9227-5
  19. Farrell, T., Fernandez, M., Novotny, J., & Alani, H. (2019). Exploring misogyny across the manosphere in Reddit. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science, 87-96.
  20. Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). "Participant" Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1).
  21. Marotti, A. (2018). Reddit to open Chicago office as part of advertising push. Chicagotribune.Com. https://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-biz-reddit-chicago- office-20180418-story .html
  22. Marwick, A. E. (2017). Scandal or sex crime? Gendered privacy and the celebrity nude photo leaks. Ethics and Information Technology, 19(3), 177-191.
  23. Mills, R. A. (2018). Pop-up political advocacy communities on Reddit.com: SandersForPresident and The Donald. AI & SOCIETY, 33(1), 39-54
  24. Reddit.com. (2020). Reddit's 2020 Year in Review. Reddit.Com Official Blog. https://redditblog.com/2020/12/08/reddits-2020-year-in-review/
  25. Roose, K. (2021, January 28). The GameStop Reckoning Was a Long Time Coming. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/28/technology/gamestop- stock.html
  26. Starbird, K., Maddock, J., Orand, M., Achterman, P., & Mason, R. M. (2014). Rumors, false flags, and digital vigilantes: Misinformation on Twitter after the 2013 Boston marathon bombing. iConference 2014 Proceedings.
  27. Tufekci, Z. (2014). Big Questions for Social Media Big Data: Representativeness, Validity and Other Methodological Pitfalls. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1).
  28. Zimmer, M., & Proferes, N. J. (2014). A topology of Twitter research: Disciplines, methods, and ethics. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 66(3), 250-261
  29. Alkhatib, A., Bernstein, M. S., & Levi, M. (2017). Examining Crowd Work and Gig Work Through The Historical Lens of Piecework. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4599-4616. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025974
  30. Aloisi, A. (2015). Commoditized Workers The Rising of On-Demand Work, A Case Study Research on a Set of Online Platforms and Apps. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2637485
  31. Antin, J., & Shaw, A. (2012). Social Desirability Bias and Self-Reports of Motivation: A Study of Amazon Mechanical Turk in the US and India. 10.
  32. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Howcroft, D. (2014). Amazon Mechanical Turk and the commodification of labour. 12.
  33. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3-5.
  34. Durward, D., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2016). Is There PAPA in Crowd Work?: A Literature Review on Ethical Dimensions in Crowdsourcing. 2016 Intl IEEE Conferences on Ubiquitous Intelligence & Computing, Advanced and Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing and Communications, Cloud and Big Data Computing, Internet of People, and Smart World Congress (UIC/ATC/ScalCom/CBDCom/IoP/SmartWorld), 823-832. https://doi.org/10.1109/UIC-ATC-ScalCom-CBDCom-IoP-SmartWorld.2016.0131
  35. Hitlin, P. (2016). Research in the Crowdsourcing Age, a Case Study (p. 37). Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/07/11/research-in-the- crowdsourcing-age-a-case-study/
  36. Irani, L. C., & Silberman, M. S. (2013). Turkopticon: Interrupting worker invisibility in amazon mechanical turk. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems -CHI '13, 611. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2470742
  37. Jensen-Doss, A., Patel, Z. S., Casline, E., Mora, V. A., & Timpano, K. R. (2021). Using Mechanical Turk to Study Parents and Children: An Examination of Data Quality and Representati. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1815205
  38. Kees, J., Berry, C., Burton, S., & Sheehan, K. (2017). An Analysis of Data Quality: Professional Panels, Student Subject Pools, and Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 141-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304
  39. Lee, K., Webb, S., & Ge, H. (2014). The Dark Side of Micro-Task Marketplaces: Characterizing Fiverr and Automatically Detecting Crowdturfing. ArXiv:1406.0574 [Physics]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.0574
  40. Silberman, M. S., Tomlinson, B., LaPlante, R., Ross, J., Irani, L., & Zaldivar, A. (2018). Responsible research with crowds: Pay crowdworkers at least minimum wage. Communications of the ACM, 61(3), 39-41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3180492
  41. Xia, H., Wang, Y., Huang, Y., & Shah, A. (2017). "Our Privacy Needs to be Protected at All Costs": Crowd Workers' Privacy Experiences on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134748
  42. Select References
  43. Barbosa, Sérgio, and Stefania Milan. "Do Not Harm in Private Chat Apps: Ethical Issues for Research on and with WhatsApp." Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture 14, no. 1 (August 14, 2019): 49-65. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.313.
  44. Bengani, Priyanjana. "India Had Its First 'WhatsApp Election.' We Have a Million Messages from It." Columbia Journalism Review, October 16, 2019. https://www.cjr.org/tow_center/india-whatsapp-analysis-election-security.php.
  45. Brown, Barry, Alexandra Weilenmann, Donald McMillan, and Airi Lampinen. "Five Provocations for Ethical HCI Research." In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 852-63. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858313.
  46. Dotto, Carlotta, Rory Smith, and Claire Wardle. "Closed Groups, Messaging Apps, and Online Ads." First Draft, November 2019. https://firstdraftnews.org/wp- content/uploads/2019/11/Messaging_Apps_Digital_AW-1.pdf?x80491.
  47. European Commission and Directorate General for Research. Ethics for Researchers: Facilitating Research Excellence in FP7. Luxembourg: Publications Office, 2013. "Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects." Federal Register (United States), Rules and Regulations, 82, no. 12 (January 19, 2017): 7149-.
  48. Fiesler, Casey, and Nicholas Proferes. "'Participant' Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics." Social Media + Society 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2018): 2056305118763366. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366.
  49. Frankel, Mark. "The Promises and Pitfalls of Reporting within Chat Apps and Other Semi-Open Platforms: A Journalist's Guide." Nieman Lab, July 10, 2018. https://www.niemanlab.org/2018/07/a-journalists-guide-to-the-promises-and-pitfalls-of- reporting-within-open-and-closed-and-semi-open-platforms/.
  50. Garimella, Kiran, and Gareth Tyson. "WhatsApp, Doc? A First Look at WhatsApp Public Group Data." In Proceedings of the Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Stanford, CA: The AAAI Press, 2018. https://aaai.org/Library/ICWSM/icwsm18contents.php.
  51. Gibson, Kerry. "Bridging the Digital Divide: Reflections on Using WhatsApp Instant Messenger Interviews in Youth Research." Qualitative Research in Psychology, April 17, 2020, 1- 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1751902.
  52. Gruzd, Anatoliy, Jenna Jacobsen, and Elisabeth Dubois. "Challenges and Opportunities of Doing Research with Social Media Data." Social Media Data Stewardship (blog). Accessed December 3, 2020. https://socialmediadata.org/2016/04/16/challenges-and- opportunities-of-doing-research-with-social-media-data/.
  53. Kaufmann, Katja, and Corinna Peil. "The Mobile Instant Messaging Interview (MIMI): Using WhatsApp to Enhance Self-Reporting and Explore Media Usage in Situ." Mobile Media & Communication 8, no. 2 (May 1, 2020): 229-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157919852392.
  54. Mac, Ryan, and Pranav Dixit. "The Tip Line WhatsApp Launched to Combat Fake News Isn't Actually Going to Combat Fake News." BuzzFeed News, April 3, 2019. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/whatsapp-fake-news-tip-line-indian- election-not-helpline.
  55. Mont'Alverne, Camila, and Isabele Mitozo. "Muito Além da Mamadeira Erótica: As notícias compartilhadas nas redes de apoio a presidenciáveis em grupos de WhatsApp, nas eleições brasileiras de 2018." In Compolítica8 25 (2019). http://ctpol.unb.br/compolitica2019/GT4/gt4_Montalverne_Mitozo.pdf.
  56. Moreno, Andrés, Philip Garrison, and Karthik Bhat. "WhatsApp for Monitoring and Response during Critical Events: Aggie in the Ghana 2016 Election." In Proceedings of the 14th ISCRAM Conference, 11. Albi, France, 2017.
  57. Mpofu, Shepherd, and Shanade Bianca Barnabas. "Citizen Journalism and Moral Panics: A Consideration of Ethics in the 2015 South African Xenophobic Attacks." African Journalism Studies 37, no. 4 (November 2016): 115-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2016.1256053.
  58. Narayanan, Vidya, Bence Kollanyi, Ruchi Hajela, Ankita Barthwal, Nahema Marchal, and Philip N. Howard. "News and Information over Facebook and WhatsApp during the Indian Election Campaign." Computational Propaganda Project Data Memo. Oxford Internet Institute, May 13, 2019. https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/india-election-memo/ (now at https://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/posts/news-and-information-over-facebook-and- whatsapp-during-the-indian-election-campaign/).
  59. Rennó, Raquel. "WhatsApp: The Widespread Use of WhatsApp in Political Campaigning in the Global South (Updated Version)." Our Data Our Selves (Tactical Tech) (blog), November 13, 2018. https://ourdataourselves.tacticaltech.org/posts/whatsapp/.
  60. Sandvig v. Barr, No. 16-1368 (D.D.C. March 27, 2020).
  61. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects ('Common Rule') (2018). https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and- policy/regulations/common-rule/index.html.

Related papers

Ethical Issues in Social Media Research
Gabby Samuel

Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2020

View PDFchevron_right
Ethics in Digital Research, in SAGE Handbook for Qualitative Data Collection, edited by Uwe Flick, 2018
Katrin Tiidenberg
View PDFchevron_right
Ethical Issues in Social Media Research for Public Health
Mandy Lee

American journal of public health, 2018

Social media (SM) offer huge potential for public health research, serving as a vehicle for surveillance, delivery of health interventions, recruitment to trials, collection of data, and dissemination. However, the networked nature of the data means they are riddled with ethical challenges, and no clear consensus has emerged as to the ethical handling of such data. This article outlines the key ethical concerns for public health researchers using SM and discusses how these concerns might best be addressed. Key issues discussed include privacy; anonymity and confidentiality; authenticity; the rapidly changing SM environment; informed consent; recruitment, voluntary participation, and sampling; minimizing harm; and data security and management. Despite the obvious need, producing a set of prescriptive guidelines for researchers using SM is difficult because the field is evolving quickly. What is clear, however, is that the ethical issues connected to SM-related public health research ...

View PDFchevron_right
Ethical Dilemmas in Research on Internet Communities
Sarah Flicker

Qualitative Health Research, 2004

O nline discussion boards have shown great promise for enhancing health service delivery (practitioner-patient communication), consumer health information, and mutual support (patient-patient communication) . As a result, there has been a proliferation of articles in which researchers have used Internet data to understand health behavior and new models of health services has been written about the ethical considerations of developing online health resources for the dual purpose of research and service delivery.

View PDFchevron_right
We Aren't All Going to Be on the Same Page about Ethics": Ethical Practices and Challenges in Research on Digital and Social Media
Sheridan Sayles

2016

Defining ethical practices for research using data from digital and social media communities is an ongoing challenge. This paper reports on interviews with digital and social media researchers to investigate the challenges they experienced when collecting, managing, and analyzing online data. Analysis of the interviews reveals a diverse set of ethical challenges that push at the boundaries of existing research ethics guidance. The interview data also describes existing practices for navigating ethical quandaries, and documents resources that help researchers meet ethical challenges. The analysis of the data points to opportunities for review boards and ethics researchers as well as new debates to undertake as a community.

View PDFchevron_right

Related topics

  • Engineering Ethics
    • 580 California St., Suite 400
    San Francisco, CA, 94104
    © 2025 Academia. All rights reserved