Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Modeling the Complexities of Human Performance

2005 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2005.1571377

Abstract

The Man-machine Integrated Design and Analysis System (MIDAS) is an integrated human performance modeling software tool that symbolically represents a human's perceptual, cognitive and motor systems in an integrated fashion to produce emergent, high level behavioral predictions characteristic of actual human performance. MIDAS has been augmented in a number of significant ways to simulate even more realistic simulations of human behavior in various aerospace operational contexts. The effort undertaken in the current project culminated in an agent-based sub model (e.g. slots) that can be used by a variety of models to predict and recreate short-and long-term effects of stressors (fatigue, stress, time pressure, inadequate situation awareness, etc.) on performance in aerospace accidents/incidents causation. A computational simulation demonstrated performance influences brought to task performance by fatigue (as characterized by the Yerkes-Dodson theoretical threshold model) that is incurred while undertaking activities required to complete a goal behavior, and the impact of performance-influencing factors (PIFs) on human performance output by combining this with a primitive based action error vulnerability. This paper discusses the computational development effort undertaken in creating the conceptual relationship and PIF implementation in MIDAS.

References (16)

  1. B.F. Gore, "The study of distributed cognition in free flight: A human performance modeling tool structural comparison," Proceedings of the Third Annual SAE International Conference and Exposition -Digital Human Modeling for Design and Engineering, Dearborn, Michigan, Paper # 2000-01-2181, pp. 1-6, June 2000.
  2. B.F. Gore and J.D. Smith, "Risk assessment and human performance modeling: the need for an integrated approach," in K.A. Malek (ed.) International journal of human factors of modeling and simulation, Vol. 1(1), ISSN (Online): 1742-5557 -ISSN (Paper): 1742-5549, (in press).
  3. B.F. Gore, "Human performance cognitive-behavioral modeling: A benefit for occupational safety," in B. Chase & W. Karwowski (Eds.), International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics (JOSE), Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 339-351, 2002.
  4. C.D. Wickens, "The multiple resource model of human performance: implications for display design" In Proceedings of AGARD/NATO Report, Williamsburg, VA, AGARD/NATO, 1984.
  5. J.H. McCracken and T.B Aldrich, "Analysis of selected LHX mission functions: Implications for operator workload and system automation goals," Technical note ASI 479-024-84(b), Anacapa Sciences, Inc., Fort Rucker, AL, 1984.
  6. M.M. Mallis, S. Mejdal, T.T. Nguyen 3 , and D.T.
  7. Dinges, "Summary of the key features of seven biomathematical models of human fatigue and performance," Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, Vol. 75, No. 3, Sect. 2, pp. A4-A14, March 2004.
  8. D.A. Wiegmann and S.A. Shappell, "Applying the human factors analysis and classification system (hfacs) to the analysis of commercial aviation accident data," 11 th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH, The Ohio State University, 2001.
  9. R.M. Yerkes and J.D. Dodson, "The relation of strength of stimuli to rapidity of habit-information," Journal of comparative neurology and psychology, Vol 18, pp. 459-482, 1908.
  10. C.D. Wickens and J.M. Flach, "Information processing", in E.L. Wiener & D.C. Nagel (Eds.), Human factors in aviation, pp. 111-155, Academic Press, San Diego, 1988.
  11. K.R. Boff and J.E. Lincoln, Engineering data compendium: human perception and performance, John Wiley & Sons, NY: NY, 1988.
  12. E. Hollnagel, Cognitive reliability and error analysis method, Elsevier Science, NY, 1998.
  13. S.G. Hart, "Pilot workload coping strategies", AIAA/NASA/FAA/HFS Conference on Challenges in Aviation Human Factors: The National Plan, Tyson's Corner, VA., 1991.
  14. S.R Hursh, D.P. Redmond, M.L. Johnson, D.R. Thorne, G. Belenky, T.J. Balkin, W.F. Storm, J.C. Miller, and D.R. Eddy, "Fatigue model for applied research in warfighting," Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, Vol. 75, No. 3, Sect. 2, pp. A44- A54, March 2004.
  15. A.A. Borbély, "A two process model of sleep regulation," Human neurobiology, Vol. 1, pp. 195-204, 1982.
  16. S.R. Rodgers, "Work physiology -fatigue and recovery," In G. Salvendy (ed.) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics, 2 nd Edition, pp. 269-297, 1997.