Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

The Use of Video Data in Reading Research

2020, Handbook of Reading Research, Volume V

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676302-24

Abstract

This paper discusses the uses of video data in research on reading as well as future directions for research in the area. In the paper, we view video as a medium for collecting, transmitting, and storing research data, just like photography, audio recording, live observation with field notes, artifact collection, in-person interviewing, questionnaires, and administrative records are media through which data are collected, transmitted, and stored. The purpose of this paper is to point the reader to some existing resources on the collection of video data and to discuss some trends in the use of video data in research on teaching and learning in the area of reading. Our central argument is that video recording technologies are evolving rapidly, providing particular affordances-and challenges-for the use of video data in qualitative and quantitative research on reading. We argue that some of these affordances might also help address the "gaps" in reading research identified in this Handbook, gaps that now exist with respect to what has been studied in reading research, gaps in the translation of research findings from the reading research to reading practice communities, and gaps in how results from reading research are implemented in schools and classrooms. As we discuss below, new affordances in video data collection, management, and data analysis have the potential to address these gaps by allowing for research on new topics in the field, by allowing for different ways to communicate research results to different communities of practice, and by providing different ways to guide practitioners as they implement findings from reading research in classrooms. Several publications have described the growing (and varied) uses of video data in research on teaching and learning broadly. A review by Erickson (2011) discussed the emergence and early use of video data in qualitative and ethnographic research. Stigler and colleagues discussed the use of "video surveys" in comparative cross-national research on teaching . An edited volume by Kane, Kerr, and Pianta (2014) included several chapters on methodological issues arising in video-based studies of teaching effectiveness and their bearing on the practical evaluation of teachers. Goldman and colleagues' (2014) booklength monograph described the uses of video data in learning sciences research, and an edited volume by Janik and Seidel (2014) described the use of video data in European research on classroom teaching and learning. Overall, this published work points to some special affordances of video in comparison to other modes of data collection for research on teaching and learning generally and, by inference, for reading research. Like direct observation, video data can be used to record the rich detail of real-time events. Of course, the features of events actually captured by video data depends on how, and how often, video tools are deployed, but holding those important features of research constant, video records preserve the exact timing and sequencing of observed events with less editing and more contextual detail than

References (30)

  1. Amendum, S., Bratsch-Hines, M., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2018). Investigating the efficacy of a web-based early reading and professional development intervention for young English learners. Reading Research Quarterly. 53(2), 155-174. https://doi.10.1002.rrq.188.
  2. Aukerman, M. & Schuldt, L.C. (2016). "The pictures can say more things": Change across time in young children's references to images and words during text discussion. Reading Research Quarterly. 51(3), 267-287. https://doi.10.1002.rrq.138.
  3. Beach, P., & McConnel, J. (2018). Eye tracking methodology for studying teacher learning: a review of the research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 0(0), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1496415
  4. Blikstad-Balas, M. (2017). Key challenges of using video when investigating social practices in education: contextualization, magnification, and representation. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(5), 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1181162
  5. Blikstad-Balas, M., & Sørvik, G. O. (2015). Researching literacy in context: using video analysis to explore school literacies. Literacy, 49(3), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12037
  6. Burris, A. (2017). A Child's-Eye View: An Examination of Point-of-View Camera Use in Four Informal Education Settings. Visitor Studies, 20(2), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2017.1404352
  7. Casabianca, J. M., McCaffrey, D. F., Gitomer, D. H., Bell, C. A., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2013). Effect of Observation Mode on Measures of Secondary Mathematics Teaching. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(5), 757-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413486987
  8. Cho, B-Y., Woodward, L., & Li, D. (2018). Epistemic processing when adolescents read online: A verbal protocol analysis of more and less successful online readers. Reading Research Quarterly. 53(2), 197-221. https://doi/10/1002/rrq.190.
  9. Curby, T. W., Johnson, P., Mashburn, A. J., & Carlis, L. (2016). Live Versus Video Observations: Comparing the Reliability and Validity of Two Methods of Assessing Classroom Quality. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(8), 765-781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915627115
  10. Derry, S. J. (2007). Guidelines for Video Research in Education, 90.
  11. Erickson, F. (2011). Uses of video in social research: a brief history. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14(3), 179-189.
  12. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In, The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  13. Goldman, R., Pea, R., Barron, B., & Derry, S. J. (Eds.). (2014). Video research in the learning sciences. Routledge.
  14. Goldman, S., et al. (2012). Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly. 47(4), 356-381. https://doi.10.1002/rrq.027.
  15. Gregory, A., Ruzek, E., Hafen, C.A., Mikami, A. Y., Allen, J. P. & Pianta, R. C. (2017) My Teaching Partner-Secondary: A Video-Based Coaching Model, Theory Into Practice, 56(1), 38-45, DOI: 10.1080/00405841.2016.1260402
  16. Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers' value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119(3), 445-470.
  17. Irwin, S. (2013). Qualitative secondary data analysis: Ethics, epistemology and context. Progress in Development Studies, 13(4), 295-306.
  18. Ivey, G. & Johnston, P. H. (2013). Engagement with young adult literature: Outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly. 48(3), 255-275. https://doi.10.1002/rrq.46.
  19. Jacobs, J. K., Kawanaka, T., & Stigler, J. W. (1999). Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 717-724.
  20. Jamil, F. M., Sabol, T. J., Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2015). Assessing Teachers' Skills in Detecting and Identifying Effective Interactions in the Classroom: Theory and Measurement. The Elementary School Journal, 115(3), 407-432. https://doi.org/10.1086/680353
  21. Johnston, L. R. (2017). Curating Research Data Volume One: Practical Strategies for Your Digital Repository. Association of College and Research Libraries.
  22. Kane, T., Kerr, K., & Pianta, R. (2014). Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of effective teaching project. John Wiley & Sons Kersting, N. (2008). Using Video Clips of Mathematics Classroom Instruction as Item Prompts to Measure Teachers' Knowledge of Teaching Mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(5), 845-861. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407313369
  23. Levine, S. (2014). Making interpretation visible with an affect-based strategy. Reading Research Quarterly. 49(3), 283-303. https://doi:10.10021.rrq.71.
  24. Magnusson, C. G., Roe, A., Blikstad-Balas, M. (2018). To what extent and how are reading comprehension strategies part of language arts instruction? A study of lower secondary classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly. 0(0), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.231.
  25. MET Project. (2009). Learning about Teaching: Initial Findings from the Measure of Effective Teaching Project. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Seattle, WA.
  26. Moore, J. & Schleppegrell, M. (2014). Using a functional linguistic metalanguage to support academic language development in the English Language Arts. Linguistics and Education. 26(1), 92-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.002.
  27. Pea, R. D., Mills, M., Rosen, J., Dauber, K., Effelsberg, W., & Hoffert, E. (2003). The Diver Project: Interactive Digital Video Repurposing. IEEE MultiMedia, 11(1), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2004.1261108
  28. Stigler, J. W., Gallimore, R., & Hiebert, J. (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies. Educational Psychologist, 35(2), 87-100.
  29. Tomáš, J., & Seidel, T. (Eds.). (2013). The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. BoD-Books on Demand
  30. White, M. (2017). Generalizability of Scores from Classroom Observation Instruments. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138742.