Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Evaluating cycling behaviour of Millennials in Vitoria-Gasteiz

2018, Transportation research procedia

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRPRO.2018.10.090

Abstract

One of the most exciting topics in recent literature is focused on the travel behaviour of Millennials. These 'young adults' promote a change towards the so-called soft modes, such as cycling, what could become an opportunity to facilitate the transition towards a more sustainable mobility paradigm. This study addresses the case study of Vitoria-Gasteiz (Spain). Bicycle share in Vitoria-Gasteiz in 2014 was the highest of any Spanish city, increasing from 1.4% in 2002 to 12.3% in 2014. An exploratory analysis of the city's last mobility survey (2014) allows us to analyse how cycling is perceived. The results show differences between Millennials (18-36 years old) and the rest of generational cohorts. Significant changes are not found in the context of cycling. It seems that cities cannot expect large increase in rates of bicycle use simply due to generational changes.

References (31)

  1. Ajzen, I., (1991). 'The theory of planned behavior', Orgnizational Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50, 179-211; doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020- T.
  2. Banister, D., (2008). 'The sustainable mobility paradigm', Transport Policy, 15, pp. 73-80; doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005.
  3. Barberan, A., & Monzon, A., (2016). 'How did bicycle share increase in Vitoria-Gasteiz?' Transportation Research Procedia, 18, pp. 312-319; doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.042.
  4. Blumenberg, E., Ralph, K., Smart, M., & Taylor, B. D., (2016). 'Who knows about kids these days? Analyzing the determinants of youth and adult mobility in the U.S. between 1990 and 2009', Transportation Research Part A, 93, pp. 39-54; doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.010.
  5. Case, R. B., & Schipinski, S., (2015). 'Mode Choices of Millennials: How Different? How Enduring?' Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization, Chesapeake (Virginia).
  6. Circella, G., Fulton, L., Alemi, F., Berliner, R.M., Tiedeman, K., Mokhtarian, P. L., & Handy, S., (2016). 'What Affects Millennials' Mobility? PART I: Investigating the Environmental Concerns, Lifestyles, Mobility-Related Attitudes and Adoption of Technology of Young Adults in California', National Center for Sustainable Transportation, ITS UCDAVIS (Institute of Transportation Studies). Author name / Transportation Research Procedia 00 (2018) 000-000
  7. Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2013). 'Causes of youth licensing decline: A synthesis of evidence', Transport Reviews, 33 (3), pp. 271-290; doi: 10.1080/0 1441647.2013.801929.
  8. Delbosc, A., & Nakanishi, H., (2017). 'A life course perspective on the travel of Australian millennials', Transportation Research Part A, 104, pp. 319-336; doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.03.014.
  9. Dill, J. (2017). 'Are Millennials Really the Generation That Bikes?' Transportation Research and Education Center (TREC), Portland State University.
  10. Dill, J., & Carr, T., (2003). 'Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them', Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board; doi: 10.3141/1828-14.
  11. European Commission (2007). 'Green Paper on Urban Mobility'.
  12. European Commission (2013). 'Attitudes of Europeans towards urban mobility', Special Eurobarometer 406.
  13. Garikapati, V. M., Pendyala, R. M., Morris, E. A., Mokhtarian, P. L., & McDonald, N., (2015). 'Activity patterns, time use, and travel of the millennial 1 generation: what is all the hype about?' 95th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
  14. Garikapati, V. M., Pendyala, R. M., Morris, E. A., Mokhtarian, P. L., & McDonald, N., (2016). 'Activity patterns, time use, and travel of millennials: a generation in transition?', Transport Reviews, 36 (5), pp. 558-584; doi: 10.1080/01441647.2016.1197337.
  15. Handy, S., van Wee, B., & Kroesen, M., (2014). 'Promoting Cycling for Transport: Research Needs and Challenges', Transport Reviews, 34, pp. 4-24; doi:10.1080/01441647.2013.860204.
  16. Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K., (2010). 'Commuting by bicycle: an overview on literature', Transport Reviews, 30, pp. 59-96; doi: 10.1080/01441640903187001.
  17. Hjorthol, R., (2016). 'Decreasing popularity of the car? Changes in driving licence and access to a car among young adults over a 25-year period in Norway', Journal of Transport Geography, 51, pp. 140-146; doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.12.006.
  18. Hopkins, (2016). 'Can environmental awareness explain declining preference for car-based mobility amongst generation Y? A qualitative examination of learn to drive behaviours', Transportation Research Part A, 94, pp. 149-163; doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.028.
  19. Klein, N. J., & Smart, M. J., (2017). 'Millennials and car ownership: Less money, fewer cars', Transport Policy, 53, pp. 20-29; doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.010.
  20. McDonald, N. C., (2015). 'Are Millennials Really the "Go-Nowhere" Generation?', Journal of the American Planning Association, 81 (2), pp. 90- 103; doi: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1057196.
  21. Monzón, A., Rondinella, G., & Equipo Investigador PROBICI, (2010). PROBICI. 'Guía de la Movilidad Ciclista. Métodos y técnicas para el fomento de la bicicleta en áreas urbanas'.
  22. Muñoz, B., Monzon, A. & López, E., (2016). 'Transition to a cyclable city: Latent variables affecting bicycle commuting', Transportation Research Part A, 84, pp. 4-17; doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.10.006.
  23. Newbold, K. B. & Scott, D. M., (2017); 'Driving over the life course: The auto-mobility of Canada's Millennial, Generation X, Baby Boomer and Greatest Generations', Travel Behaviour and Society, 6, pp. 57-63; doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2016.06.003.
  24. Polzin, S.E., Chu, X., & Godfrey, J., (2014). 'The impact of millennials' travel behavior on future personal vehicle travel', Energy Strategy Reviews, 5, pp. 59-65; doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2014.10.003.
  25. Ralph, K., Voulgaris, C. T., Taylor, B. D., Blumenberg, E., & Brown, A. E., (2016). 'Millennials, built form, and travel insights froma nationwide typology of U.S. neighborhoods', Journal of Transport Geography, 57, pp. 218-226; doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.10.007.
  26. Tight, M., Timms, P., Banister, D., Bowmaker, J., Copas, J., Day, A., Drinkwater, D., Givoni, M., Gühnemann, A., Lawler, M., Macmillen, J., Miles, A., Moore, N., Newton, R., Ngoduy, D., Ormerod, M., O'Sullivan, M., & Watling, D., (2011). Visions for a walking and cycling focussed urban transport system. J. Transp. Geogr. 19, 1580-1589; doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.011
  27. van Der Waard, J., Jorritsma, P., Immers, B., (2013). New drivers in mobility: what moves the Dutch in 2012? Transport Rev. 33 (3), 343-359.
  28. van Wee, B., (2015). 'Peak car: The first signs of a shift towards ICT-based activities replacing travel? A discussion paper'. Transport Policy, 42, pp. 1-3; doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.002.
  29. Vitoria-Gasteiz, C. of, 2007. Plan de Movilidad Sostenible y Espacio Público de Vitoria-Gasteiz.
  30. Vitoria-Gasteiz, C. of, 2009. Plan Director de Movilidad Ciclista.
  31. Willis, D.P., Manaugh, K., El-Geneidy, A., (2015). Cycling under influence: Summarizing the influence of perceptions, attitudes, habits and social environments on cycling for transportation. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 9, 565-579. doi:10.1080/15568318.2013.827285.