Coupling two complementary knowledge discovery systems
1998
Abstract
Most approaches to knowledge discovery concentrate on either an attribute-value representation or a structural data representation. The discover}, systems for these two representations are typically different, and their integration is non-trivial. We investigate a simpler integration of the two systems by coupling the two approaches. Our method first executes the structural discovery s}~tem on the data, and then uses these results to augment or compress the data before being input to the attribute-value-based system. We demonstrate this strategy using the AutoClass attribute-valuebased clustering system and the Subdue structural discovery system. The results of the demonstration show that coupling the two systems allows the discovery of knowledge imperceptible to either system alone.
References (7)
- Cheeseman, P., and Stutz, J. 1996. Bayesian classification (AutoClass): Theory and results.
- Fayyad, U. M.; Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.; Smyth, P.; and Uthurusamy, R., eds., Advances in Knowledge Dincovery and Data Mining. MIT Press. chapter 6, 153-180.
- Cook, D. J., and Holder, L. B. 1994. Substruc- ture discovery using minimum description length and background knowledge. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 1:231-255.
- Cook, D. J.; Holder, L. B.; and Djoko, S. 1996. Scalable discovery of informative structural con- cepts using domain knowledge. IEEE Expert 10:59-68.
- Djoko, S.; Cook, D. J.; and Holder, L. B. 1995. Analyzing the benefits of domain knowledge in substructure discovery. In The First Interna- tional Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining.
- Fayyad, U. M.; Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.; and Smyth, P. 1996. From data mining to knowledge discov- ery: An overview. In Fayyad, U. M.; Piatetsky- Shapiro, G.; Smyth, P.; and Uthurusamy, R., eds., Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Min- ing. MIT Press. chapter 1, 1-34.
- Rissanen, J. 1989. Stochastic Complexity in Sta- tistical Inquiry. World Scientific Publishing Com- pany.