Building SYMLOG profiles with an online collaborative game
2018, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHCS.2018.07.002Abstract
Collaboration is essential for individuals working in groups to achieve a common goal. The understanding of the collaborative profile of each member of a team is extremely useful to understand and predict his/her performance in future teamwork. Users can demonstrate their collaborative skills in many digital platforms. Among them, video games enable to capture the players" behavior by the direct observation of their actions, while engaging them in a pleasant activity. In this work, we propose an approach for building collaborative profiles of a group of people working together towards a common goal, using an online game as a shared environment and a well-known theory about groups" dynamics: SYMLOG. This profile can be useful to know which features each member should train to improve his/her collaborative skills and to predict the performance of the group. We validate our approach with 98 players to evaluate the similarity between the profiles generated with our approach and the profiles derived from the SYMLOG questionnaire, which is the usual tool used with this theory
References (26)
- Bales, R. F. (1983). SYMLOG: A practical approach to the study of groups. Small Groups and Social Interaction, 2, 499-523.
- Bales, R. F. (2000). Social Interaction Systems: Theory and Measurement: Book review.
- Barata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2013). Improving Participation and Learning with Gamification. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (pp. 10-17). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
- Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2013). An approach to comparing external and internal methods for analyzing group dynamic. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17(4), 281.
- Bell, S., Mahroum, S., & Yassin, N. (2017). Towards understanding problem structuring and groups with triple task methodology "e". Journal of the Operational Research Society, 68(2), 192-206.
- Berdun, F. (2014). Identification of collaborative skills with serious games. In XLIII Jornadas Argentinas de Informática e Investigación Operativa (43JAIIO)-Doctoral Consortium (IJCAI)(Buenos Aires, 2014).
- Boëthius, S.B. & Ögren M-L. (2008) Role Patterns in Group Supervision. The clinical Supervisor 19(2):45-69.
- Chen, L. L.-J. (1997). Modeling the Internet as CyberOrganism: a Living Systems Framework and Investigative Methodologies for Virtual Cooperative Interaction. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.49.1341
- Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th international academic MindTrek conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9-15). ACM.
- DeSmet, A., Van Ryckeghem, D., Compernolle, S., Baranowski, T., Thompson, D., Crombez, G., ... & Vandebosch, H. (2014). A meta- analysis of serious digital games for healthy lifestyle promotion. Preventive medicine, 69, 95-107.
- Feldman, J., Monteserin, A., & Amandi, A. (2014/2). Detecting students" perception style by using games. Computers & Education, 71, 14-22.
- Haferkamp, N., Kraemer, N. C., Linehan, C., & Schembri, M. (2011). Training disaster communication by means of serious games in virtual environments. Entertainment Computing, 2(2), 81-88.
- Hare, A. P., & Baker, H. G. (2005). Analysis of social interaction systems: SYMLOG research and applications. Univ Pr of Amer.
- Jin, C.-H. (2014). The role of users" motivations in generating social capital building and subjective well-being: The case of social network games. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 29-38.
- Knizia, R. (2004). The design and testing of the board game Lord of the Rings. In K. Salen & E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Rules of play: Game design fundamentals(pp. 22-27). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A. (2004). Literature review in games and learning. Retrieved from https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal- 00190453/
- Kosterman, S., & Gierasimczuk, N. (2015). Collective Learning in Games Through Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Social Influence Analysis -Volume 1398 (pp. 35-41). Aachen, Germany, Germany: CEUR-WS.org.
- Linehan, C., Lawson, S., & Doughty, M. (2009). Tabletop Prototyping of Serious Games for"Soft Skills' Training. In Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications, 2009. VS-GAMES"09. Conference in (pp. 182-185). IEEE.
- Losada, M., & Markovitch, S. (1990). GroupAnalyzer: a system for dynamic analysis of group interaction. In Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. iv, pp. 101-110 vol.4).
- Maisonneuve, J. (1998). La dinámica de los grupos. 11va. Edn. Nueva Visión, Argentina.
- McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of personality and social psychology, 52(1), 81.
- Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M., Not, E., Leonardi, C., Falcon, V., & Lepri, B. (2008). Multimodal support to group dynamics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 12(3), 181-195.
- Piezon, S. L., & Donaldson, R. L. (2005). Online groups and social loafing: Understanding student-group interactions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4), 1.
- Popescu, M., Romero, M., & Usart, M. (2012). Using serious games in adult education serious business for serious people-the MetaVals game case study. In ICVL 2012-7th International Conference on Virtual Learning (pp. 125-134).
- Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of human-computer studies, 74, 14- 31. Zagal, J. P., Rick, J., & Hsi, I. (2006). Collaborative games: Lessons learned from board games. Simulation & Gaming, 37(1), 24-40.
- Zichermann, G. (2011). The purpose of gamification. A look at gamification"s applications and limitations. Radar, April, 26.